{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,11,4]],"date-time":"2026-11-04T01:32:29Z","timestamp":1793755949084,"version":"4.6.1"},"reference-count":18,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,4,11]],"date-time":"2022-04-11T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1649635200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,4,11]],"date-time":"2022-04-11T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1649635200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Int Urogynecol J"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,2]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Introduction and hypothesis<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>Conventional defecography and MRI defecography can be requested as an additional test for diagnosing and differentiating the type of posterior compartment prolapse and\/or obstructive defecation disorders. The objective of this study was to determine the added value of conventional defecography, conventional defecography and MRI defecography for clinical decision-making on treatment for patients with posterior compartment prolapse.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>Four gynecologists were asked to fill in their treatment plan per patient for 32 cases for three different steps. Step 1 consisted of information on the anamnesis and physical examination (POP-Q). Step 2 consisted of Step 1, including conventional defecography (group A) or MRI defecography (group B). In Step 3, all gynecologists received the information on Step 1 including both conventional defecography and MRI defecography. Data analysis solely focused on the assessment of changes in the gynecological treatment plan of the posterior compartment.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>After Step 2 a change in treatment plan occurred in 37% and 48% of the women in groups A and B, respectively. Accordingly, after Step 3 (including all imaging data), a change in treatment plan occurred in 19% and 52% of the women in groups A and B, respectively. A change within the surgery group (when a different type of surgery was selected) was seen for a total of 11 cases in group A and 20 in group B in all steps combined.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>Both conventional defecography and MRI defecography had an large effect on the treatment plan for patients with posterior compartment prolapse. The dedicated added value of the imaging modality individually cannot be concluded yet.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-022-05181-x","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,4,11]],"date-time":"2022-04-11T14:02:51Z","timestamp":1649685771000},"page":"507-515","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":8,"title":["The added value of conventional defecography and MRI defecography in clinical decision making on treatment for posterior compartment prolapse"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"34","author":[{"given":"Dionne M.","family":"Nijland","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Linde T.","family":"van Genugten","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Karin S.","family":"Dekker","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Gert Jan","family":"Wagenmakers","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Sicco J.","family":"Braak","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Angelique L.","family":"Veenstra van Nieuwenhoven","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Annemarie","family":"van der Steen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Anique T. M.","family":"Grob","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,4,11]]},"reference":[{"key":"5181_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Forstner R, Lienemann A. MRI of the pelvic floor. Med Radiol. 2019:407\u201327. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/174_2017_53.","DOI":"10.1007\/174_2017_53"},{"key":"5181_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1417","DOI":"10.1148\/rg.345140137","volume":"34","author":"LG del Salto","year":"2014","unstructured":"del Salto LG, de Criado JM, del Hoyo LFA, Velasco LG, Rivas PF, Paradela MM, et al. Mr imaging-based assessment of the female pelvic floor. Radiographics. 2014;34:1417\u201339. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1148\/rg.345140137.","journal-title":"Radiographics"},{"key":"5181_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Swamy N, Bajaj G, Olliphant SS, Henry JA, Jambhekar K, Pandey T, et al. Pelvic floor imaging with MR defecography: correlation with gynecologic pelvic organ prolapse quantification. Abdom Radiol. 2020. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00261-020-02476-9.","DOI":"10.1007\/s00261-020-02476-9"},{"key":"5181_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Salvador JC, Coutinho MP, Ven\u00e2ncio JM, Viamonte B. Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of the female pelvic floor\u2014a pictorial review. Insights Imaging. 2019;10. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s13244-019-0687-9.","DOI":"10.1186\/s13244-019-0687-9"},{"key":"5181_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Abdelzaher DG, Abdelatif M, Thabet WM, Elshafei AM, Shady MM. Role of static and dynamic MRI in evaluation of pelvic posterior compartment pathologies: prospective case series. Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med 2020;51. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s43055-020-00165-7.","DOI":"10.1186\/s43055-020-00165-7"},{"key":"5181_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"47","DOI":"10.1007\/s11604-019-00903-6","volume":"38","author":"F Iacobellis","year":"2020","unstructured":"Iacobellis F, Reginelli A, Berritto D, Gagliardi G, Laporta A, Brillantino A, et al. Pelvic floor dysfunctions: how to image patients? Jpn J Radiol. 2020;38:47\u201363. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11604-019-00903-6.","journal-title":"Jpn J Radiol"},{"key":"5181_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Flusberg M, Sahni VA, Erturk SM, Mortele KJ. Dynamic MR defecography: Assessment of the usefulness of the defecation phase. Am J Roentgenol. 2011;196. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2214\/AJR.10.4445.","DOI":"10.2214\/AJR.10.4445"},{"key":"5181_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"327","DOI":"10.1016\/j.diii.2016.03.018","volume":"98","author":"E Poncelet","year":"2017","unstructured":"Poncelet E, Rock A, Quinton JF, Cosson M, Ramdane N, Nicolas L, et al. Dynamic MR defecography of the posterior compartment: Comparison with conventional X-ray defecography. Diagn Interv Imaging. 2017;98:327\u201332. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.diii.2016.03.018.","journal-title":"Diagn Interv Imaging"},{"key":"5181_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"711","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-009-0846-5","volume":"20","author":"AG Groenendijk","year":"2009","unstructured":"Groenendijk AG, Birnie E, de Blok S, Adriaanse AH, Ankum WM, Roovers JPW, et al. Clinical-decision taking in primary pelvic organ prolapse; the effects of diagnostic tests on treatment selection in comparison with a consensus meeting. Int Urogynecol J. 2009;20:711\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-009-0846-5.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"5181_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1607","DOI":"10.2214\/ajr.171.6.9843296","volume":"171","author":"GDJ FieldingJR","year":"1998","unstructured":"FieldingJR GDJ, Versi E, Mulkern RV, Lee ML, Jolesz FA. MR imaging of pelvic floor continence mechanism in the supine and sitting positions. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998;171:1607\u201310.","journal-title":"AJR Am J Roentgenol"},{"key":"5181_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"775","DOI":"10.2214\/ajr.169.3.9275895","volume":"169","author":"HS HealyJC","year":"1997","unstructured":"HealyJC HS, Reznek RH, et al. Dynamic MR imaging compared with evacuation proctography when evaluating anorectal configuration and pelvic floor movement. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997;169:775\u20139.","journal-title":"AJR Am J Roentgenol"},{"issue":"3","key":"5181_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"462","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejrad.2006.11.020","volume":"61","author":"FJ MorteleKJ","year":"2007","unstructured":"MorteleKJ FJ. Dynamic MR defecography of the posterior compartment: indications, technique and MRI features. Eur J Radiol. 2007;61(3):462\u201372.","journal-title":"Eur J Radiol"},{"key":"5181_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"23","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.10092367","volume":"258","author":"DDT Maglinte","year":"2011","unstructured":"Maglinte DDT, Bartram CI, Hale DA, Park J, Kohli MD, Robb BW, et al. Functional imaging of the pelvic floor. Radiology. 2011;258:23\u201339. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1148\/radiol.10092367.","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"5181_CR14","unstructured":"Nederlandse Vereniging voor Obstetrie en Gynaecologie. Richtlijn NVOG \u2013 Prolaps. 2014."},{"key":"5181_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"852","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31824c0806","volume":"119","author":"PJ Culligan","year":"2012","unstructured":"Culligan PJ. Nonsurgical management of pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;119:852\u201360. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31824c0806.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"5181_CR16","first-page":"485","volume":"53","author":"R Bordman","year":"2007","unstructured":"Bordman R, Telner D, Jackson B, Little D. Step-by-step approach to managing pelvic organ prolapse: Information for physicians. Can Fam Physician. 2007;53:485\u20137.","journal-title":"Can Fam Physician"},{"key":"5181_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"119","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-017-3395-3","volume":"29","author":"E L\u00f8wenstein","year":"2018","unstructured":"L\u00f8wenstein E, M\u00f8ller LA, Laigaard J, Gimbel H. Reoperation for pelvic organ prolapse: a Danish cohort study with 15\u201320 years\u2019 follow-up. Int Urogynecol J. 2018;29:119\u201324. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-017-3395-3.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"5181_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Hetzer FH, Andreisek G, Tsagari C, Sahrbacher U, Weishapt D. MR defecography in patient with fecal incontinence: Imaging findings and their effect on surgical management. Radiology. 2006;240(2). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1148\/radiol.2401050648.","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2401050648"}],"container-title":["International Urogynecology Journal"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00192-022-05181-x.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00192-022-05181-x\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00192-022-05181-x.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,1,23]],"date-time":"2023-01-23T13:02:45Z","timestamp":1674478965000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00192-022-05181-x"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,4,11]]},"references-count":18,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,2]]}},"alternative-id":["5181"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-022-05181-x","relation":{},"ISSN":["0937-3462","1433-3023"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0937-3462","type":"print"},{"value":"1433-3023","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,4,11]]},"assertion":[{"value":"29 November 2021","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"4 March 2022","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"11 April 2022","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"None.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflicts of interest"}}]}}