{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,21]],"date-time":"2026-09-21T21:00:14Z","timestamp":1790024414285,"version":"4.0.1"},"reference-count":24,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"9","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,4,20]],"date-time":"2022-04-20T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1650412800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,4,20]],"date-time":"2022-04-20T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1650412800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Int Urogynecol J"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,9]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-022-05182-w","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,4,20]],"date-time":"2022-04-20T16:02:58Z","timestamp":1650470578000},"page":"2475-2483","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":7,"title":["Outcomes following sacrocolpopexy using ultralight and lightweight mesh"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"33","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-5129-158X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Mugdha","family":"Kulkarni","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Daniel L.","family":"Rolnik","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"James","family":"Alexander","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Francesca","family":"McGannon","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Yizhen Amy","family":"Liu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Anna","family":"Rosamilia","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,4,20]]},"reference":[{"issue":"2","key":"5182_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"230","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2004.08.014","volume":"47","author":"F Rozet","year":"2005","unstructured":"Rozet F, Mandron E, Arroyo C, Andrews H, Cathelineau X, Mombet A, Cathala N, Vallancien G. Laparoscopic sacral colpopexy approach for genito-urinary prolapse: experience with 363 cases. Eur Urol. 2005;47(2):230\u20136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.eururo.2004.08.014.","journal-title":"Eur Urol"},{"issue":"4","key":"5182_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"545","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-018-3702-7","volume":"30","author":"E Bataller","year":"2019","unstructured":"Bataller E, Ros C, Angles S, Gallego M, Espuna-Pons M, Carmona F. Anatomical outcomes 1 year after pelvic organ prolapse surgery in patients with and without a uterus at a high risk of recurrence: a randomised controlled trial comparing laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy\/cervicopexy and anterior vaginal mesh. Int Urogynecol J. 2019;30(4):545\u201355. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-018-3702-7.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"5182_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"CD012376","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD012376","volume":"10","author":"C Maher","year":"2016","unstructured":"Maher C, Feiner B, Baessler K, Christmann-Schmid C, Haya N, Brown J. Surgery for women with apical vaginal prolapse. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;10:CD012376. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/14651858.CD012376.","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"8","key":"5182_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2335","DOI":"10.1002\/nau.23764","volume":"37","author":"RM Moroni","year":"2018","unstructured":"Moroni RM, Juliato CRT, Cosson M, Giraudet G, Brito LGO. Does sacrocolpopexy present heterogeneity in its surgical technique? A systematic review. Neurourol Urodyn. 2018;37(8):2335\u201345. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/nau.23764.","journal-title":"Neurourol Urodyn"},{"issue":"2","key":"5182_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"233","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.12085","volume":"120","author":"R Liang","year":"2013","unstructured":"Liang R, Abramowitch S, Knight K, Palcsey S, Nolfi A, Feola A, Stein S, Moalli PA. Vaginal degeneration following implantation of synthetic mesh with increased stiffness. BJOG. 2013;120(2):233\u201343. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/1471-0528.12085.","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"4","key":"5182_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"559","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-012-1901-1","volume":"24","author":"A Feola","year":"2013","unstructured":"Feola A, Barone W, Moalli P, Abramowitch S. Characterizing the ex vivo textile and structural properties of synthetic prolapse mesh products. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24(4):559\u201364. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-012-1901-1.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"5","key":"5182_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"413","DOI":"10.1097\/GCO.0000000000000313","volume":"28","author":"R Liang","year":"2016","unstructured":"Liang R, Knight K, Abramowitch S, Moalli PA. Exploring the basic science of prolapse meshes. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2016;28(5):413\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/GCO.0000000000000313.","journal-title":"Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"5182_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Askew AL, Visco AG, Weidner AC, Truong T, Siddiqui NY, Bradley MS. Does Mesh Weight Affect Time to Failure After Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy? Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2018. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/SPV.0000000000000632.","DOI":"10.1097\/SPV.0000000000000632"},{"key":"5182_CR9","unstructured":"Administration USFD (2021) Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP): Surgical Mesh Considerations and Recommendations. https:\/\/www.fda.gov\/medical-devices\/urogynecologic-surgical-mesh-implants\/pelvic-organ-prolapse-pop-surgical-mesh-considerations-and-recommendations. Accessed 3\/12\/2021"},{"issue":"1","key":"5182_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"10","DOI":"10.1016\/s0002-9378(96)70243-0","volume":"175","author":"RC Bump","year":"1996","unstructured":"Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bo K, Brubaker LP, DeLancey JO, Klarskov P, Shull BL, Smith AR. The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;175(1):10\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/s0002-9378(96)70243-0.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"5182_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"523","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-009-1069-5","volume":"21","author":"S Srikrishna","year":"2010","unstructured":"Srikrishna S, Robinson D, Cardozo L. Validation of the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) for urogenital prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21(5):523\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-009-1069-5.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"2","key":"5182_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"149","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-008-0742-4","volume":"20","author":"K Baessler","year":"2009","unstructured":"Baessler K, O\u2019Neill SM, Maher CF, Battistutta D. Australian pelvic floor questionnaire: a validated interviewer-administered pelvic floor questionnaire for routine clinic and research. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2009;20(2):149\u201358. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-008-0742-4.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct"},{"issue":"2","key":"5182_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"187","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0b013e3181b13ca2","volume":"250","author":"PA Clavien","year":"2009","unstructured":"Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, de Santibanes E, Pekolj J, Slankamenac K, Bassi C, Graf R, Vonlanthen R, Padbury R, Cameron JL, Makuuchi M. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg. 2009;250(2):187\u201396. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/SLA.0b013e3181b13ca2.","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"issue":"1","key":"5182_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2","DOI":"10.1002\/nau.21036","volume":"30","author":"BT Haylen","year":"2011","unstructured":"Haylen BT, Freeman RM, Swift SE, Cosson M, Davila GW, Deprest J, Dwyer PL, Fatton B, Kocjancic E, Lee J, Maher C, Petri E, Rizk DE, Sand PK, Schaer GN, Webb R, International Urogynecological A, International Continence S, Joint IICSWGoCT. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)\/International Continence Society (ICS) joint terminology and classification of the complications related directly to the insertion of prostheses (meshes, implants, tapes) and grafts in female pelvic floor surgery. Neurourol Urodyn. 2011;30(1):2\u201312. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/nau.21036.","journal-title":"Neurourol Urodyn"},{"key":"5182_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Giugale LE, Hansbarger MM, Askew AL, Visco AG, Shepherd JP, Bradley MS. Assessing pelvic organ prolapse recurrence after minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy: does mesh weight matter? Int Urogynecol J. 2021. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-021-04681-6.","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-021-04681-6"},{"issue":"2","key":"5182_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"205","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-010-1265-3","volume":"22","author":"J Tan-Kim","year":"2011","unstructured":"Tan-Kim J, Menefee SA, Luber KM, Nager CW, Lukacz ES. Prevalence and risk factors for mesh erosion after laparoscopic-assisted sacrocolpopexy. Int Urogynecol J. 2011;22(2):205\u201312. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-010-1265-3.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"4","key":"5182_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"362 e361","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.10.009","volume":"224","author":"JE Jelovsek","year":"2021","unstructured":"Jelovsek JE, Gantz MG, Lukacz E, Sridhar A, Zyczynski H, Harvie HS, Dunivan G, Schaffer J, Sung V, Varner RE, Mazloomdoost D, Barber MD, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child H, Human Development Pelvic Floor Disorders N. Success and failure are dynamic, recurrent event states after surgical treatment for pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021;224(4):362 e361\u201311. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.10.009.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"5182_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"501","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(97)00058-6","volume":"89","author":"AL Olsen","year":"1997","unstructured":"Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, Colling JC, Clark AL. Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;89(4):501\u20136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0029-7844(97)00058-6.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"5182_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"115","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-018-3724-1","volume":"30","author":"K Baessler","year":"2019","unstructured":"Baessler K, Mowat A, Maher CF. The minimal important difference of the Australian Pelvic Floor Questionnaire. Int Urogynecol J. 2019;30(1):115\u201322. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-018-3724-1.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"2","key":"5182_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"323","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000003380","volume":"134","author":"S Pacquee","year":"2019","unstructured":"Pacquee S, Nawapun K, Claerhout F, Werbrouck E, Veldman J, D'Hoore A, Wyndaele J, Verguts J, De Ridder D, Deprest J. Long-Term Assessment of a Prospective Cohort of Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;134(2):323\u201332. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/AOG.0000000000003380.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"19","key":"5182_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2016","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2013.4919","volume":"309","author":"I Nygaard","year":"2013","unstructured":"Nygaard I, Brubaker L, Zyczynski HM, Cundiff G, Richter H, Gantz M, Fine P, Menefee S, Ridgeway B, Visco A, Warren LK, Zhang M, Meikle S. Long-term outcomes following abdominal sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse. JAMA. 2013;309(19):2016\u201324. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jama.2013.4919.","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"issue":"1","key":"5182_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"5","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000006","volume":"123","author":"JT Anger","year":"2014","unstructured":"Anger JT, Mueller ER, Tarnay C, Smith B, Stroupe K, Rosenman A, Brubaker L, Bresee C, Kenton K. Robotic compared with laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123(1):5\u201312. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000006.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"5182_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1061","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000004393","volume":"137","author":"M Larouche","year":"2021","unstructured":"Larouche M, Belzile E, Geoffrion R. Surgical Management of Symptomatic Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2021;137(6):1061\u201373. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/AOG.0000000000004393.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"5182_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1565","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-020-04657-y","volume":"32","author":"CA Ferrando","year":"2021","unstructured":"Ferrando CA, Paraiso MFR. A prospective randomized trial comparing Restorelle(R) Y mesh and flat mesh for laparoscopic and robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: 24-month outcomes. Int Urogynecol J. 2021;32(6):1565\u201370. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-020-04657-y.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"}],"container-title":["International Urogynecology Journal"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00192-022-05182-w.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00192-022-05182-w\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00192-022-05182-w.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,9]],"date-time":"2025-04-09T11:49:02Z","timestamp":1744199342000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00192-022-05182-w"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,4,20]]},"references-count":24,"journal-issue":{"issue":"9","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,9]]}},"alternative-id":["5182"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-022-05182-w","relation":{},"ISSN":["0937-3462","1433-3023"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0937-3462","type":"print"},{"value":"1433-3023","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,4,20]]},"assertion":[{"value":"15 September 2021","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"4 March 2022","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"20 April 2022","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"None.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflicts of interest"}}]}}