{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,30]],"date-time":"2026-07-30T16:13:25Z","timestamp":1785428005234,"version":"3.56.0"},"reference-count":31,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,4,28]],"date-time":"2022-04-28T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1651104000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,4,28]],"date-time":"2022-04-28T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1651104000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Int Urogynecol J"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Introduction and hypothesis<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a frequent occurring health issue, especially concerning elderly women. The objective of this study is to examine the long-term outcomes of laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy (LSH) and vaginal sacrospinous hysteropexy (SSHP) for treatment of uterine prolapse.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>A retrospective study of patients who underwent a LSH or SSHP. Validated questionnaires and an outpatient examination visit were used to investigate the effects of both surgical treatments. The primary outcome was the composite outcome of success for the apical compartment, defined as no recurrence of uterine prolapse (POP-Q measurement C \u2264 0), no subjective recurrence of POP, and\/or not requiring therapy for recurrent prolapse. Secondary outcomes were peri- and postoperative data, anatomical failure, prolapse beyond hymen, subjective outcomes, and disease-specific quality of life.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>We included 105 patients, 53 in the LSH group and 52 in the SSHP group. The overall response rate of the questionnaires was 83% (<jats:italic>n<\/jats:italic> = 87) after a mean follow-up time of 4.5 years (54.2 months; 95% CI 44.8\u201364.2 months) in the LSH group and 2.5 years (30.1 months; 95% CI 29.3\u201331.5 months) in the SSHP group. There were no clinically relevant differences between the study groups in composite outcome of success (<jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic> = 0.073), anatomical failure of the apical compartment (<jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic> = 0.711), vaginal bulge symptoms for which patients consulted professionals (<jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic> = 0.126), and patient satisfaction (<jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic> = 0.741). The operative time was longer in the LSH group (117 min; interquartile range (IQR) 110\u2013123) compared to the SSHP group (67 minutes; IQR 60\u201373) (<jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic> &lt; 0.001). The duration of hospital stay was also longer in the LSH group (4 days) than in the SSHP group (3 days) (<jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic> = 0.006).<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>LSH and SSHP seem to be equally effective after long-term follow-up in treating uterine prolapse in terms of objective and subjective recurrence.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-022-05185-7","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,4,28]],"date-time":"2022-04-28T14:03:50Z","timestamp":1651154630000},"page":"211-223","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":9,"title":["Laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy versus vaginal sacrospinous hysteropexy as treatment for uterine descent: comparison of long-term outcomes"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"34","author":[{"given":"Anique M.J.","family":"van Oudheusden","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Anne-Lotte W.M.","family":"Coolen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Hilde","family":"Hoskam","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Joggem","family":"Veen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Marlies Y.","family":"Bongers","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,4,28]]},"reference":[{"issue":"9","key":"5185_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1037","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-009-0902-1","volume":"20","author":"MC Slieker-ten Hove","year":"2009","unstructured":"Slieker-ten Hove MC, Pool-Goudzwaard AL, Eijkemans MJ, Steegers-Theunissen RP, Burger CW, Vierhout ME. The prevalence of pelvic organ prolapse symptoms and signs and their relation with bladder and bowel disorders in a general female population. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2009;20(9):1037\u201345. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-009-0902-1.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct"},{"key":"5185_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"CD012376","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD012376","volume":"10","author":"C Maher","year":"2016","unstructured":"Maher C, Feiner B, Baessler K, Christmann-Schmid C, Haya N, Brown J. Surgery for women with apical vaginal prolapse. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;10:CD012376. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/14651858.CD012376.","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"4","key":"5185_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"501","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(97)00058-6","volume":"89","author":"AL Olsen","year":"1997","unstructured":"Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, Colling JC, Clark AL. Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;89(4):501\u20136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0029-7844(97)00058-6.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"5185_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"h3717","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.h3717","volume":"351","author":"RJ Detollenaere","year":"2015","unstructured":"Detollenaere RJ, den Boon J, Stekelenburg J, IntHout J, Vierhout ME, Kluivers KB, van Eijndhoven HW. Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial. BMJ. 2015;351:h3717. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmj.h3717.","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"6","key":"5185_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1201","DOI":"10.1097\/aog.0000000000000286","volume":"123","author":"JM Wu","year":"2014","unstructured":"Wu JM, Matthews CA, Conover MM, Pate V, Jonsson Funk M. Lifetime risk of stress urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123(6):1201\u20136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/aog.0000000000000286.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"5185_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1096","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181f73729","volume":"116","author":"FJ Smith","year":"2010","unstructured":"Smith FJ, Holman CD, Moorin RE, Tsokos N. Lifetime risk of undergoing surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116(5):1096\u2013100. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181f73729.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"42","key":"5185_CR7","first-page":"A3623","volume":"155","author":"RJ Detollenaere","year":"2011","unstructured":"Detollenaere RJ, den Boon J, Vierhout ME, van Eijndhoven HW. Uterus preserving surgery versus vaginal hysterectomy in treatment of uterine descent: a systematic review. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2011;155(42):A3623.","journal-title":"Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd"},{"issue":"1","key":"5185_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"79","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-005-1346-x","volume":"17","author":"A Diwan","year":"2006","unstructured":"Diwan A, Rardin CR, Strohsnitter WC, Weld A, Rosenblatt P, Kohli N. Laparoscopic uterosacral ligament uterine suspension compared with vaginal hysterectomy with vaginal vault suspension for uterovaginal prolapse. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2006;17(1):79\u201383. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-005-1346-x.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct"},{"issue":"8","key":"5185_CR9","first-page":"679","volume":"44","author":"M Marchionni","year":"1999","unstructured":"Marchionni M, Bracco GL, Checcucci V, Carabaneanu A, Coccia EM, Mecacci F, Scarselli G. True incidence of vaginal vault prolapse. Thirteen years of experience. J Reprod Med. 1999;44(8):679\u201384.","journal-title":"J Reprod Med"},{"issue":"4","key":"5185_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"841","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-020-04591-z","volume":"32","author":"CKM Vermeulen","year":"2021","unstructured":"Vermeulen CKM, Veen J, Adang C, van Leijsen SAL, Coolen ALWM, Bongers MY. Pelvic organ prolapse after laparoscopic hysterectomy compared with vaginal hysterectomy: the POP-UP study. Int Urogynecol J. 2021;32(4):841\u201350. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-020-04591-z.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"5185_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"l5149","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.l5149","volume":"366","author":"SFM Schulten","year":"2019","unstructured":"Schulten SFM, Detollenaere RJ, Stekelenburg J, IntHout J, Kluivers KB, van Eijndhoven HWF. Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: observational follow-up of a multicentre randomised trial. BMJ. 2019;366:l5149. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmj.l5149.","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"6","key":"5185_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"381","DOI":"10.1007\/s001920170017","volume":"12","author":"CF Maher","year":"2001","unstructured":"Maher CF, Cary MP, Slack MC, Murray CJ, Milligan M, Schluter P. Uterine preservation or hysterectomy at sacrospinous colpopexy for uterovaginal prolapse? Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2001;12(6):381\u20134; discussion 384-385. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s001920170017.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct"},{"issue":"11","key":"5185_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1271","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-007-0336-6","volume":"18","author":"V Dietz","year":"2007","unstructured":"Dietz V, de Jong J, Huisman M, Schraffordt Koops S, Heintz P, van der Vaart H. The effectiveness of the sacrospinous hysteropexy for the primary treatment of uterovaginal prolapse. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2007;18(11):1271\u20136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-007-0336-6.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct"},{"issue":"2","key":"5185_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"209","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-009-1014-7","volume":"21","author":"V Dietz","year":"2010","unstructured":"Dietz V, van der Vaart CH, van der Graaf Y, Heintz P, Schraffordt Koops SE. One-year follow-up after sacrospinous hysteropexy and vaginal hysterectomy for uterine descent: a randomized study. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21(2):209\u201316. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-009-1014-7.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"10","key":"5185_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1284","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.16242","volume":"127","author":"MN van IJsselmuiden","year":"2020","unstructured":"van IJsselmuiden MN, van Oudheusden AMJ, Veen J, van de Pol G, Vollebregt A, Radder CM, Housmans S, van Kuijk SMJ, Deprest J, Bongers MY, van Eijndhoven HWF. Hysteropexy in the treatment of uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy versus sacrospinous hysteropexy-a multicentre randomised controlled trial (LAVA trial). BJOG. 2020;127(10):1284\u201393. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/1471-0528.16242.","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"12","key":"5185_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1495","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijsu.2014.07.013","volume":"12","author":"E von Elm","year":"2014","unstructured":"von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, G\u00f8tzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Int J Surg. 2014;12(12):1495\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ijsu.2014.07.013.","journal-title":"Int J Surg"},{"issue":"5","key":"5185_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"527","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-012-1726-y","volume":"23","author":"P Toozs-Hobson","year":"2012","unstructured":"Toozs-Hobson P, Freeman R, Barber M, Maher C, Haylen B, Athanasiou S, Swift S, Whitmore K, Ghoniem G, de Ridder D. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)\/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for reporting outcomes of surgical procedures for pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2012;23(5):527\u201335. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-012-1726-y.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"2","key":"5185_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"165","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-015-2932-1","volume":"27","author":"BT Haylen","year":"2016","unstructured":"Haylen BT, Maher CF, Barber MD, Camargo S, Dandolu V, Digesu A, Goldman HB, Huser M, Milani AL, Moran PA, Schaer GN, Withagen MI. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)\/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27(2):165\u201394. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-015-2932-1.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"1","key":"5185_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"10","DOI":"10.1016\/s0002-9378(96)70243-0","volume":"175","author":"RC Bump","year":"1996","unstructured":"Bump RC, Mattiasson A, B\u00f8 K, Brubaker LP, DeLancey JO, Klarskov P, Shull BL, Smith AR. The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;175(1):10\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/s0002-9378(96)70243-0.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"5185_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"600","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181b2b1ae","volume":"114","author":"MD Barber","year":"2009","unstructured":"Barber MD, Brubaker L, Nygaard I, Wheeler TL 2nd, Schaffer J, Chen Z, Spino C, Pelvic Floor Disorders N. Defining success after surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114(3):600\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181b2b1ae.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"5185_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"523","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-009-1069-5","volume":"21","author":"S Srikrishna","year":"2010","unstructured":"Srikrishna S, Robinson D, Cardozo L. Validation of the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) for urogenital prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21(5):523\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-009-1069-5.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"2","key":"5185_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"97","DOI":"10.1002\/nau.10038","volume":"22","author":"CH van der Vaart","year":"2003","unstructured":"van der Vaart CH, de Leeuw JR, Roovers JP, Heintz AP. Measuring health-related quality of life in women with urogenital dysfunction: the urogenital distress inventory and incontinence impact questionnaire revisited. Neurourol Urodyn. 2003;22(2):97\u2013104. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/nau.10038.","journal-title":"Neurourol Urodyn"},{"issue":"11","key":"5185_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1547","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2005.00734.x","volume":"112","author":"JP Roovers","year":"2005","unstructured":"Roovers JP, van der Bom JG, van der Vaart CH, Heintz AP. Prediction of findings at defecography in patients with genital prolapse. BJOG. 2005;112(11):1547\u201353. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2005.00734.x.","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"3","key":"5185_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"164","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-003-1063-2","volume":"14","author":"RG Rogers","year":"2003","unstructured":"Rogers RG, Coates KW, Kammerer-Doak D, Khalsa S, Qualls C. A short form of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse\/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12). Int Urogynecol J. 2003;14(3):164\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-003-1063-2.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"9","key":"5185_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1293","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-015-2692-y","volume":"26","author":"LA t Hoen","year":"2015","unstructured":"t Hoen LA, Utomo E, Steensma AB, Blok BF, Korfage IJ. The Pelvic Organ Prolapse\/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12): validation of the Dutch version. Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26(9):1293\u2013303. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-015-2692-y.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"10","key":"5185_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1469","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-017-3296-5","volume":"28","author":"ALWM Coolen","year":"2017","unstructured":"Coolen ALWM, van Oudheusden AMJ, Mol BWJ, van Eijndhoven HWF, Roovers JPWR, Bongers MY. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy compared with open abdominal sacrocolpopexy for vault prolapse repair: a randomised controlled trial. Int Urogynecol J. 2017;28(10):1469\u201379. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-017-3296-5.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"3","key":"5185_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"615","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2009.08.007","volume":"36","author":"M Murphy","year":"2009","unstructured":"Murphy M. Use of mesh and materials in pelvic floor surgery. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2009;36(3):615\u201335. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ogc.2009.08.007.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am"},{"issue":"19","key":"5185_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2016","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2013.4919","volume":"309","author":"I Nygaard","year":"2013","unstructured":"Nygaard I, Brubaker L, Zyczynski HM, Cundiff G, Richter H, Gantz M, Fine P, Menefee S, Ridgeway B, Visco A, Warren LK, Zhang M, Meikle S. Long-term outcomes following abdominal sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse. JAMA. 2013;309(19):2016\u201324. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jama.2013.4919.","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"issue":"1","key":"5185_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"62","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2009.02396.x","volume":"117","author":"N Price","year":"2010","unstructured":"Price N, Slack A, Jackson SR. Laparoscopic hysteropexy: the initial results of a uterine suspension procedure for uterovaginal prolapse. BJOG. 2010;117(1):62\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2009.02396.x.","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"11","key":"5185_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1687","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-015-2761-2","volume":"26","author":"P Rahmanou","year":"2015","unstructured":"Rahmanou P, Price N, Jackson SR. Laparoscopic hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy for the treatment of uterovaginal prolapse: a prospective randomized pilot study. Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26(11):1687\u201394. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-015-2761-2.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"1","key":"5185_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"131","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-013-2209-5","volume":"25","author":"P Rahmanou","year":"2014","unstructured":"Rahmanou P, White B, Price N, Jackson S. Laparoscopic hysteropexy: 1- to 4-year follow-up of women postoperatively. Int Urogynecol J. 2014;25(1):131\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-013-2209-5.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"}],"container-title":["International Urogynecology Journal"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00192-022-05185-7.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00192-022-05185-7\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00192-022-05185-7.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,1,11]],"date-time":"2023-01-11T13:03:35Z","timestamp":1673442215000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00192-022-05185-7"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,4,28]]},"references-count":31,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,1]]}},"alternative-id":["5185"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-022-05185-7","relation":{},"ISSN":["0937-3462","1433-3023"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0937-3462","type":"print"},{"value":"1433-3023","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,4,28]]},"assertion":[{"value":"20 December 2021","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"15 March 2022","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"28 April 2022","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"None.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflicts of interest"}}]}}