{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,11,3]],"date-time":"2026-11-03T14:01:28Z","timestamp":1793714488143,"version":"4.6.1"},"reference-count":45,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,12,3]],"date-time":"2022-12-03T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1670025600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,12,3]],"date-time":"2022-12-03T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1670025600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Int Urogynecol J"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,4]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-022-05408-x","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,12,3]],"date-time":"2022-12-03T09:03:28Z","timestamp":1670058208000},"page":"825-841","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":27,"title":["A systematic review of the surgical management of apical pelvic organ prolapse"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"34","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-9960-6528","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Cherie Yik Wah","family":"Chan","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Royston Antony","family":"Fernandes","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Henry Han-I","family":"Yao","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Helen E.","family":"O\u2019Connell","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Vincent","family":"Tse","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Johan","family":"Gani","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,12,3]]},"reference":[{"issue":"11","key":"5408_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1783","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-013-2169-9","volume":"24","author":"MD Barber","year":"2013","unstructured":"Barber MD, Maher C. Epidemiology and outcome assessment of pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24(11):1783\u201390. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-013-2169-9.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"5","key":"5408_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"33","DOI":"10.1007\/s11934-015-0498-6","volume":"16","author":"AN Alas","year":"2015","unstructured":"Alas AN, Anger JT. Management of apical pelvic organ prolapse. Curr Urol Rep. 2015;16(5):33. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11934-015-0498-6.","journal-title":"Curr Urol Rep"},{"issue":"6","key":"5408_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1201","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000286","volume":"123","author":"JM Wu","year":"2014","unstructured":"Wu JM, Matthews CA, Conover MM, Pate V, Jonsson FM. Lifetime risk of stress urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123(6):1201\u20136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000286.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"5408_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Committee on Practice Bulletins-Gynecology, American Urogynecologic Society. Practice Bulletin No. 185: pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 2017;130(5):e234\u201350. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/AOG.0000000000002399.","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000002399"},{"issue":"3","key":"5408_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"489","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000136100.10818.d8","volume":"104","author":"I Nygaard","year":"2004","unstructured":"Nygaard I, Bradley C, Brandt D, Women\u2019s Health Initiative. Pelvic organ prolapse in older women: prevalence and risk factors. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104(3):489\u201397. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/01.AOG.0000136100.10818.d8.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"5408_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"37","DOI":"10.1016\/s0090-4295(02)02243-4","volume":"61","author":"P Abrams","year":"2003","unstructured":"Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, Griffiths D, Rosier P, Ulmsten U, et al. The standardisation of terminology in lower urinary tract function: report from the standardisation sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Urology. 2003;61(1):37\u201349. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/s0090-4295(02)02243-4.","journal-title":"Urology"},{"issue":"11","key":"5408_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1873","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-013-2178-8","volume":"24","author":"C Cheon","year":"2013","unstructured":"Cheon C, Maher C. Economics of pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24(11):1873\u20136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-013-2178-8.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"6","key":"5408_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"678.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.07.049","volume":"199","author":"RU Margulies","year":"2008","unstructured":"Margulies RU, Lewicky-Gaupp C, Fenner DE, McGuire EJ, Clemens JQ, Delancey JO. Complications requiring reoperation following vaginal mesh kit procedures for prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199(6):678.e1\u20134. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.07.049.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"10","key":"5408_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1023","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2014.1719","volume":"311","author":"MD Barber","year":"2014","unstructured":"Barber MD, Brubaker L, Burgio KL, Richter HE, Nygaard I, Weidner AC, et al. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development pelvic floor disorders Network. Comparison of 2 transvaginal surgical approaches and perioperative behavioral therapy for apical vaginal prolapse: the OPTIMAL randomized trial. JAMA. 2014;311(10):1023\u201334. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jama.2014.1719.","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"issue":"3","key":"5408_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"321","DOI":"10.3126\/jnhrc.v16i3.21431","volume":"16","author":"G Dangal","year":"2018","unstructured":"Dangal G, Poudel R, Shrestha R, Karki A, Pradhan HK, Bhattachan K, et al. Outcome of sacrospinous ligament fixation of the vault during repair of pelvic organ prolapse. J Nepal Health Res Counc. 2018;16(3):321\u20134. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3126\/jnhrc.v16i3.21431.","journal-title":"J Nepal Health Res Counc"},{"issue":"4","key":"5408_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"805","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000139514.90897.07","volume":"104","author":"IE Nygaard","year":"2004","unstructured":"Nygaard IE, McCreery R, Brubaker L, Connolly A, Cundiff G, Weber AM, et al. Abdominal sacrocolpopexy: a comprehensive review. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104(4):805\u201323. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/01.AOG.0000139514.90897.07.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2 Pt 1","key":"5408_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"367","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e318195888d","volume":"113","author":"GB Diwadkar","year":"2009","unstructured":"Diwadkar GB, Barber MD, Feiner B, Maher C, Jelovsek JE. Complication and reoperation rates after apical vaginal prolapse surgical repair: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;113(2 Pt 1):367\u201373. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/AOG.0b013e318195888d.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"5408_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"103","DOI":"10.1097\/SPV.0b013e31827d8667","volume":"19","author":"AC Frick","year":"2013","unstructured":"Frick AC, Barber MD, Paraiso MF, Ridgeway B, Jelovsek JE, Walters MD. Attitudes toward hysterectomy in women undergoing evaluation for uterovaginal prolapse. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2013;19(2):103\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/SPV.0b013e31827d8667.","journal-title":"Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg"},{"issue":"5","key":"5408_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"470.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.08.003","volume":"209","author":"NB Korbly","year":"2013","unstructured":"Korbly NB, Kassis NC, Good MM, Richardson ML, Book NM, Yip S, et al. Patient preferences for uterine preservation and hysterectomy in women with pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;209(5):470.e1\u20136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.08.003.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"5408_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"h3717","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.h3717","volume":"351","author":"RJ Detollenaere","year":"2015","unstructured":"Detollenaere RJ, den Boon J, Stekelenburg J, IntHout J, Vierhout ME, Kluivers KB, et al. Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial. BMJ. 2015;351:h3717. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmj.h3717.","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"11","key":"5408_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1803","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-013-2171-2","volume":"24","author":"R Gutman","year":"2013","unstructured":"Gutman R, Maher C. Uterine-preserving POP surgery. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24(11):1803\u201313. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-013-2171-2.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"5408_CR17","unstructured":"U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Urogynecologic surgical mesh: update on the safety and effectiveness of transvaginal placement for pelvic organ prolapse. https:\/\/www.fda.gov\/downloads\/medicaldevices\/safety\/alertsandnotices\/ucm262760.pdf."},{"key":"5408_CR18","unstructured":"The Therapeutic Goods Administration, Australian Government. Urogynaecological (transvaginal) surgical mesh hub. 2017. https:\/\/www.tga.gov.au\/hubs\/transvaginal-mesh."},{"key":"5408_CR19","unstructured":"National Heart Lung and blood institute, National Institutes of Health. Study Quality Assessment Tools 2020. https:\/\/www.nhlbi.nih.gov\/health-topics\/study-quality-assessment-tools."},{"issue":"3","key":"5408_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"532","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2011.11.025","volume":"79","author":"EJ Geller","year":"2012","unstructured":"Geller EJ, Parnell BA, Dunivan GC. Robotic vs abdominal sacrocolpopexy: 44-month pelvic floor outcomes. Urology. 2012;79(3):532\u20136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.urology.2011.11.025.","journal-title":"Urology"},{"issue":"5","key":"5408_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"435.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2012.01.035","volume":"206","author":"NY Siddiqui","year":"2012","unstructured":"Siddiqui NY, Geller EJ, Visco AG. Symptomatic and anatomic 1-year outcomes after robotic and abdominal sacrocolpopexy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;206(5):435.e1\u20135. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2012.01.035.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"5408_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"159","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2015.12.089","volume":"196","author":"E Costantini","year":"2016","unstructured":"Costantini E, Mearini L, Lazzeri M, Bini V, Nunzi E, di Biase M, et al. Laparoscopic versus abdominal sacrocolpopexy: a randomized controlled trial. J Urol. 2016;196(1):159\u201365. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.juro.2015.12.089.","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"issue":"1","key":"5408_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"47","DOI":"10.1016\/S1701-2163(16)35133-7","volume":"34","author":"CD McDermott","year":"2012","unstructured":"McDermott CD, Park J, Terry CL, Woodman PJ, Hale DS. Surgical outcomes of abdominal versus laparoscopic sacral colpopexy related to body mass index. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2012;34(1):47\u201356. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S1701-2163(16)35133-7.","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Can"},{"issue":"1","key":"5408_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"33","DOI":"10.1097\/SPV.0000000000000036","volume":"20","author":"PA Nosti","year":"2014","unstructured":"Nosti PA, Umoh AU, Kane S, White DE, Harvie HS, Lowenstein L, et al. Outcomes of abdominal and minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy: a retrospective cohort study. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2014;20(1):33\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/SPV.0000000000000036.","journal-title":"Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg"},{"key":"5408_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Campagna G, Vacca L, Panico G, Rumolo V, Caramazza D, Lombisani A, et al. Laparoscopic sacral hysteropexy versus laparoscopic sacral colopopexy plus supracervical hysterectomy in patients with pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2022;33(2):359\u201368. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-021-04865-0. Advance online publication.","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-021-04865-0"},{"issue":"10","key":"5408_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2069","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-020-04260-1","volume":"31","author":"E Illiano","year":"2020","unstructured":"Illiano E, Giannitsas K, Costantini E. Comparison between laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with hysterectomy and hysteropexy in advanced urogenital prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2020;31(10):2069\u201374. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-020-04260-1.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"4","key":"5408_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"101977","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2020.101977","volume":"50","author":"NT Okcu","year":"2021","unstructured":"Okcu NT, G\u00fcrb\u00fcz T, Uysal G. Comparison of patients undergoing vaginal hysterectomy with sacrospinous ligament fixation, laparoscopic hysterectomy with sacrocolpopexy and abdominal hysterectomy with sacrocolpopexy in terms of postoperative quality of life and sexual function. J Gynecol Obstet Human Reprod. 2021;50(4):101977. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jogoh.2020.101977.","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Human Reprod"},{"issue":"10","key":"5408_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"612","DOI":"10.1097\/SPV.0000000000000647","volume":"26","author":"DA Bastawros","year":"2020","unstructured":"Bastawros DA, Tarr ME, Templin MA, Stepp KJ, Taylor GB, Myers EM. Anterior wall success at 1 year after vaginal uterosacral ligament suspension and sacral colpopexy. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2020;26(10):612\u20136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/SPV.0000000000000647.","journal-title":"Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg"},{"issue":"2","key":"5408_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"93","DOI":"10.1097\/SPV.0000000000000704","volume":"25","author":"BC Smith","year":"2019","unstructured":"Smith BC, Crisp CC, Kleeman SD, Yook E, Pauls RN. Uterosacral ligament suspension versus robotic sacrocolpopexy for treatment of apical pelvic organ prolapse. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2019;25(2):93\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/SPV.0000000000000704.","journal-title":"Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg"},{"issue":"12","key":"5408_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"763","DOI":"10.1097\/SPV.0000000000000710","volume":"26","author":"E Davidson","year":"2020","unstructured":"Davidson E, Casas-Puig V, Paraiso M, Ridgeway B, Ferrando CA. Pelvic organ prolapse recurrence and patient-centered outcomes following minimally invasive abdominal uterosacral ligament and mesh-augmented sacrohysteropexy. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2020;26(12):763\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/SPV.0000000000000710.","journal-title":"Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg"},{"issue":"10","key":"5408_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1284","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.16242","volume":"127","author":"MN van Ijsselmuiden","year":"2020","unstructured":"van Ijsselmuiden MN, van Oudheusden A, Veen J, van de Pol G, Vollebregt A, Radder CM, et al. Hysteropexy in the treatment of uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy versus sacrospinous hysteropexy\u2014a multicentre randomised controlled trial (LAVA trial). BJOG. 2020;127(10):1284\u201393. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/1471-0528.16242.","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"2","key":"5408_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"153.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.03.012","volume":"225","author":"CW Nager","year":"2021","unstructured":"Nager CW, Visco AG, Richter HE, Rardin CR, Komesu Y, Harvie HS, et al. National institute of child health and human DEvelopment Pelvic floor disorders network. Effect of sacrospinous hysteropexy with graft vs vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension on treatment failure in women with uterovaginal prolapse: 5-year results of a randomized clinical trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021;225(2):153.e1\u2013153.e31. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.03.012.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"11","key":"5408_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1054","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2019.12812","volume":"322","author":"CW Nager","year":"2019","unstructured":"Nager CW, Visco AG, Richter HE, Rardin CR, Rogers RG, Harvie HS, et al. NICHD Pelvic Floor Disorders Network. Effect of vaginal mesh hysteropexy vs vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension on treatment failure in women with uterovaginal prolapse: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2019;322(11):1054\u201365. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jama.2019.12812.","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"issue":"9","key":"5408_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1867","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-019-04206-2","volume":"31","author":"R Milani","year":"2020","unstructured":"Milani R, Manodoro S, Cola A, Bellante N, Palmieri S, Frigerio M. Transvaginal uterosacral ligament hysteropexy versus hysterectomy plus uterosacral ligament suspension: a matched cohort study. Int Urogynecol J. 2020;31(9):1867\u201372. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-019-04206-2.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"5408_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Schulten S, Detollenaere RJ, Stekelenburg J, IntHout J, Kluivers KB, van Eijndhoven H. Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: observational follow-up of a multicentre randomised trial. BMJ. 2019;366:l5149. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmj.l5149","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.l5149"},{"issue":"4","key":"5408_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"101905","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2020.101905","volume":"50","author":"EP Topdagi Yilmaz","year":"2021","unstructured":"Topdagi Yilmaz EP, Yapca OE, Topdagi YE, Atakan Al R, Kumtepe Y. Comparison of two natural tissue repair-based surgical techniques; sacrospinous fixation and uterosacral ligament suspension for pelvic organ prolapse treatment. J Gynecol Obstet Human Reprod. 2021;50(4):101905. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jogoh.2020.101905.","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Human Reprod"},{"issue":"2","key":"5408_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"164","DOI":"10.1002\/ijgo.12097","volume":"137","author":"Y Chen","year":"2017","unstructured":"Chen Y, Hua K. Medium-term outcomes of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy or sacrohysteropexy versus vaginal sacrospinous ligament fixation for middle compartment prolapse. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2017;137(2):164\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/ijgo.12097.","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"issue":"10","key":"5408_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"687","DOI":"10.1097\/SPV.0000000000001226","volume":"28","author":"N Noor","year":"2022","unstructured":"Noor N, Bastawros D, Florian-Rodriguez ME, Hobson D, Eto C, Lozo S, et al. Comparing minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy with vaginal uterosacral ligament suspension: a multicenter retrospective cohort study through the Fellows' Pelvic Research Network. Urogynecology (Hagerstown). 2022;28(10):687\u201394. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/SPV.0000000000001226.","journal-title":"Urogynecology (Hagerstown)"},{"key":"5408_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1957","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-021-04932-6","volume":"33","author":"ML Izett-Kay","year":"2022","unstructured":"Izett-Kay ML, Rahmanou P, Cartwright RJ, Price N, Jackson SR. Laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy and apical suspension: 7-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. Int Urogynecol J. 2022;33:1957\u201365. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-021-04932-6.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"1","key":"5408_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"117","DOI":"10.1111\/ajo.12835","volume":"59","author":"BJ Miller","year":"2019","unstructured":"Miller BJ, Seman EI, O'Shea RT, Hakendorf PH, Nguyen T. Recent trends in the management of pelvic organ prolapse in Australia and New Zealand. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2019;59(1):117\u201322. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/ajo.12835.","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"5408_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1201","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31818ce394","volume":"112","author":"EJ Geller","year":"2008","unstructured":"Geller EJ, Siddiqui NY, Wu JM, Visco AG. Short-term outcomes of robotic sacrocolpopexy compared with abdominal sacrocolpopexy. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;112(6):1201\u20136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31818ce394.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"5408_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"221","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2005.03.017","volume":"12","author":"JW Ross","year":"2005","unstructured":"Ross JW, Preston M. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for severe vaginal vault prolapse: five-year outcome. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2005;12(3):221\u20136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jmig.2005.03.017.","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"5408_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"672.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2007.08.065","volume":"197","author":"CK Wieslander","year":"2007","unstructured":"Wieslander CK, Roshanravan SM, Wai CY, Schaffer JI, Corton MM. Uterosacral ligament suspension sutures: anatomic relationships in unembalmed female cadavers. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;197(6):672.e1\u20136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2007.08.065.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"5408_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Larouche M, Belzile E, Geoffrion R. Surgical management of symptomatic apical pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\u00a0Obstet Gynecol. 2021;137(6):1061\u201373. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/AOG.0000000000004393.","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000004393"},{"issue":"10","key":"5408_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"CD012376","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD012376","volume":"10","author":"C Maher","year":"2017","unstructured":"Maher C, Feiner B, Baessler K, Christmann-Schmid C, Haya N, Brown J. Surgery for women with apical vaginal prolapse. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;10(10):CD012376. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/14651858.CD012376.","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"}],"container-title":["International Urogynecology Journal"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00192-022-05408-x.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00192-022-05408-x\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00192-022-05408-x.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,3,24]],"date-time":"2023-03-24T11:05:30Z","timestamp":1679655930000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00192-022-05408-x"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,12,3]]},"references-count":45,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,4]]}},"alternative-id":["5408"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-022-05408-x","relation":{},"ISSN":["0937-3462","1433-3023"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0937-3462","type":"print"},{"value":"1433-3023","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,12,3]]},"assertion":[{"value":"23 September 2022","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"6 November 2022","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"3 December 2022","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflicts of interest"}}]}}