{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,19]],"date-time":"2026-06-19T03:04:03Z","timestamp":1781838243707,"version":"3.54.5"},"reference-count":30,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"5","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,12,20]],"date-time":"2022-12-20T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1671494400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,12,20]],"date-time":"2022-12-20T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1671494400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Int Urogynecol J"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,5]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-022-05426-9","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,12,20]],"date-time":"2022-12-20T09:07:32Z","timestamp":1671527252000},"page":"981-992","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":4,"title":["The impact of surgeon operative volume on risk of reoperation within 5 years of mid-urethral sling: a systematic review"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"34","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-0670-3164","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Sophie","family":"Cartier","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Gina-Marie","family":"Cerantola","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Alexander A.","family":"Leung","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Erin","family":"Brennand","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,12,20]]},"reference":[{"issue":"2","key":"5426_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"78","DOI":"10.1038\/nrurol.2012.243","volume":"10","author":"A Cox","year":"2013","unstructured":"Cox A, Herschorn S, Lee L. Surgical management of female SUI: is there a gold standard? Nat Rev Urol. 2013;10(2):78\u201389.","journal-title":"Nat Rev Urol"},{"issue":"1","key":"5426_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"4","DOI":"10.1002\/nau.20798","volume":"29","author":"BT Haylen","year":"2010","unstructured":"Haylen BT, de Ridder D, Freeman RM, Swift SE, Berghmans B, Lee J, et al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)\/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Neurourol Urodyn. 2010;29(1):4\u201320.","journal-title":"Neurourol Urodyn"},{"issue":"3","key":"5426_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"217","DOI":"10.1080\/13697137.2018.1543263","volume":"22","author":"I Milsom","year":"2019","unstructured":"Milsom I, Gyhagen M. The prevalence of urinary incontinence. Climacteric. 2019;22(3):217\u201322.","journal-title":"Climacteric"},{"issue":"2","key":"5426_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"166 e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.03.016","volume":"225","author":"M Abufaraj","year":"2021","unstructured":"Abufaraj M, Xu T, Cao C, Siyam A, Isleem U, Massad A, et al. Prevalence and trends in urinary incontinence among women in the United States, 2005\u20132018. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021;225(2):166 e1\u2013e12.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"5426_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"25","DOI":"10.1007\/s40520-020-01712-y","volume":"33","author":"D Pizzol","year":"2021","unstructured":"Pizzol D, Demurtas J, Celotto S, Maggi S, Smith L, Angiolelli G, et al. Urinary incontinence and quality of life: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2021;33(1):25\u201335.","journal-title":"Aging Clin Exp Res"},{"issue":"9","key":"5426_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1389","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2018.12.020","volume":"41","author":"CA Committee","year":"2019","unstructured":"Committee CA, No O. 387-Mid-urethral slings for stress urinary incontinence. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2019;41(9):1389\u201391.","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Can"},{"issue":"1","key":"5426_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"4","DOI":"10.1111\/bju.15260","volume":"127","author":"S Morton","year":"2021","unstructured":"Morton S, Wilczek Y, Harding C. Complications of synthetic mesh inserted for stress urinary incontinence. BJU Int. 2021;127(1):4\u201311.","journal-title":"BJU Int"},{"issue":"3","key":"5426_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"573","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-020-04612-x","volume":"32","author":"E MacCraith","year":"2020","unstructured":"MacCraith E, Cunnane EM, Joyce M, Forde JC, O\u2019Brien FJ, Davis NF. Comparison of synthetic mesh erosion and chronic pain rates after surgery for pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review. Int Urogynecol J. 2020;32(3):573\u201380.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"6","key":"5426_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2381","DOI":"10.1080\/01443615.2022.2056827","volume":"42","author":"P Kim","year":"2022","unstructured":"Kim P, Cantrell AB, Wallach SJ, Rothschild J, Durbin-Johnson B, Kurzrock EA. Reoperation rates for stress urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse in women after undergoing mid-urethral sling with or without concomitant colporrhaphy in academic centers within the United States. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2022;42(6):2381\u20136.","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"5426_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"257","DOI":"10.1001\/jamasurg.2016.4200","volume":"152","author":"B Chughtai","year":"2017","unstructured":"Chughtai B, Barber MD, Mao J, Forde JC, Normand ST, Sedrakyan A. Association between the amount of vaginal mesh used with mesh erosions and repeated surgery after repairing pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence. JAMA Surg. 2017;152(3):257\u201363.","journal-title":"JAMA Surg"},{"issue":"5","key":"5426_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1047","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000003526","volume":"134","author":"AA Berger","year":"2019","unstructured":"Berger AA, Tan-Kim J, Menefee SA. Long-term risk of reoperation after synthetic mesh midurethral sling surgery for stress urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol (New York 1953). 2019;134(5):1047\u201355.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol (New York 1953)"},{"issue":"16","key":"5426_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1659","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2018.14997","volume":"320","author":"I Gurol-Urganci","year":"2018","unstructured":"Gurol-Urganci I, Geary RS, Mamza JB, Duckett J, El-Hamamsy D, Dolan L, et al. Long-term rate of mesh sling removal following midurethral mesh sling insertion among women with stress urinary incontinence. JAMA. 2018;320(16):1659\u201369.","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"issue":"4","key":"5426_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"727","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-019-04223-1","volume":"31","author":"S Tulokas","year":"2020","unstructured":"Tulokas S, Rahkola-Soisalo P, Gissler M, Mikkola TS, Mentula MJ. Long-term re-procedure rate after mid-urethral slings for stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J. 2020;31(4):727\u201335.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"2","key":"5426_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"252","DOI":"10.1097\/GRF.0000000000000518","volume":"63","author":"JD Wright","year":"2020","unstructured":"Wright JD. The volume-outcome paradigm for gynecologic surgery: clinical and policy implication. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2020;63(2):252\u201365.","journal-title":"Clin Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"Suppl 1","key":"5426_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"425","DOI":"10.1186\/s12913-017-2340-y","volume":"17","author":"JK Elrod","year":"2017","unstructured":"Elrod JK, Fortenberry JJL. Centers of excellence in healthcare institutions: what they are and how to assemble them. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17(Suppl 1):425.","journal-title":"BMC Health Serv Res"},{"issue":"1","key":"5426_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.5317\/wjog.v3.i1.1","volume":"3","author":"NS Moawad","year":"2014","unstructured":"Moawad NS, Canning A. Centers of excellence in minimally invasive gynecology: raising the bar for quality in women's health. World J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;3(1):1\u20136.","journal-title":"World J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"5426_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"21","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.02.048","volume":"215","author":"A Mowat","year":"2016","unstructured":"Mowat A, Maher C, Ballard E. Surgical outcomes for low-volume vs high-volume surgeons in gynecology surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;215(1):21\u201333.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"12","key":"5426_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1167","DOI":"10.1001\/jamasurg.2015.2590","volume":"150","author":"B Welk","year":"2015","unstructured":"Welk B, Al-Hothi H, Winick-Ng J. Removal or revision of vaginal mesh used for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence. JAMA Surg. 2015;150(12):1167\u201375.","journal-title":"JAMA Surg"},{"issue":"6","key":"5426_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1099","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000003275","volume":"133","author":"EA Brennand","year":"2019","unstructured":"Brennand EA, Quan H. Evaluation of the effect of surgeon's operative volume and specialty on likelihood of revision after mesh midurethral sling placement. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;133(6):1099\u2013108.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"5426_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"855","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2018.01.001","volume":"25","author":"DL Howard","year":"2018","unstructured":"Howard DL, McGlynn A, Greer JA. Military surgeon volume and stress incontinence surgery complications: a retrospective cohort study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018;25(5):855\u201360.","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"key":"5426_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Developed by the Joint Writing Group of the American Urogynecologic Society and the International Urogynecological Association. Joint position statement on the management of mesh-related complications for the FPMRS specialist. Int Urogynecol J. 2020;31(4):679\u201394.","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-020-04248-x"},{"issue":"3","key":"5426_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"285","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.01.007","volume":"43","author":"GW Cundiff","year":"2021","unstructured":"Cundiff GW. Le Coll\u00e8ge des m\u00e9decins du Qu\u00e9bec devrait-il d\u00e9terminer l'utilisation ad\u00e9quate des bandelettes sous-ur\u00e9trales au Canada? Une analyse du rapport d'enqu\u00eate. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2021;43(3):285\u20137.","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Can"},{"key":"5426_CR23","unstructured":"Wells GA, Shea B, O'Connel D, et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. Available from: http:\/\/www.ohrica\/programs\/clinical_epidemiology\/oxford. Accessed Sept\u00a02021."},{"key":"5426_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Egger MS, George D, Altman DG. Principles of and procedures for systematic reviews. Systematic reviews in health care. London: BMJ Publishing Group. 2001.","DOI":"10.1002\/9780470693926"},{"issue":"1","key":"5426_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"73.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2012.10.006","volume":"208","author":"M Jonsson Funk","year":"2013","unstructured":"Jonsson Funk M, Siddiqui NY, Pate V, Amundsen CL, Wu JM. Sling revision\/removal for mesh erosion and urinary retention: long-term risk and predictors. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;208(1):73.e1\u20137.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"5426_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1457","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2006.11.034","volume":"177","author":"JT Anger","year":"2007","unstructured":"Anger JT, Rodr\u00edguez LV, Wang Q, Pashos CL, Litwin MS. The role of provider volume on outcomes after sling surgery for stress urinary incontinence. J Urol. 2007;177(4):1457\u201362.","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"issue":"8","key":"5426_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2099","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-021-04714-0","volume":"33","author":"H Baxter","year":"2021","unstructured":"Baxter H, Carter E, Marris K, Nugent R, Weaver E. Effect of surgeon volume on long-term quality of life outcomes following tension-free vaginal tape surgery. Int Urogynecol J. 2021;33(8):2099\u2013106.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"5","key":"5426_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"523.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.09.006","volume":"221","author":"AA Berger","year":"2019","unstructured":"Berger AA, Tan-Kim J, Menefee SA. Surgeon volume and reoperation risk after midurethral sling surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019;221(5):523.e1\u20138.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"5426_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"475","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urpr.2015.10.004","volume":"3","author":"B Welk","year":"2016","unstructured":"Welk B, Winick-Ng J. Repeat Surgical intervention for stress urinary incontinence after a failed mid urethral sling. Urol Pract. 2016;3(6):475\u201380.","journal-title":"Urol Pract"},{"issue":"22","key":"5426_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2117","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMsa035205","volume":"349","author":"JD Birkmeyer","year":"2003","unstructured":"Birkmeyer JD, Stukel TA, Siewers AE, Goodney PP, Wennberg DE, Lucas FL. Surgeon volume and operative mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2003;349(22):2117\u201327.","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"}],"container-title":["International Urogynecology Journal"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00192-022-05426-9.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00192-022-05426-9\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00192-022-05426-9.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,5,8]],"date-time":"2023-05-08T05:03:16Z","timestamp":1683522196000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00192-022-05426-9"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,12,20]]},"references-count":30,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,5]]}},"alternative-id":["5426"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-022-05426-9","relation":{},"ISSN":["0937-3462","1433-3023"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0937-3462","type":"print"},{"value":"1433-3023","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,12,20]]},"assertion":[{"value":"18 July 2022","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"30 November 2022","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"20 December 2022","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"None.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflicts of interest"}}]}}