{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,22]],"date-time":"2026-04-22T23:19:15Z","timestamp":1776899955355,"version":"3.51.2"},"reference-count":22,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"5","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,1,4]],"date-time":"2023-01-04T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1672790400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,1,4]],"date-time":"2023-01-04T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1672790400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Int Urogynecol J"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,5]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-022-05427-8","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2023,1,4]],"date-time":"2023-01-04T08:04:01Z","timestamp":1672819441000},"page":"993-1000","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":8,"title":["Comparative study of absorbable suture and permanent suture in sacrocolpopexy: a meta-analysis and systematic review"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"34","author":[{"given":"Shuang","family":"Chen","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Yuhao","family":"Liu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Liao","family":"Peng","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Yuanzhuo","family":"Chen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Hong","family":"Shen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-9436-036X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Deyi","family":"Luo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,1,4]]},"reference":[{"issue":"3","key":"5427_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"230.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.03.046","volume":"205","author":"JM Wu","year":"2011","unstructured":"Wu JM, Kawasaki A, Hundley AF, Dieter AA, Myers ER, Sung VW. Predicting the number of women who will undergo incontinence and prolapse surgery, 2010 to 2050. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;205(3):230.e1\u20135.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"5427_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Maher C, Feiner B, Baessler K, Schmid C. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;(4):CD004014.","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD004014.pub5"},{"issue":"3","key":"5427_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"409","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2021.11.002","volume":"29","author":"A Padoa","year":"2022","unstructured":"Padoa A, Shiber Y, Fligelman T, Tomashev R, Tsviban A, Smorgick N. Advanced cystocele is a risk factor for surgical failure after robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2022;29(3):409\u201315.","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"5427_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"355","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1957.tb02652.x","volume":"64","author":"HG Arthure","year":"1957","unstructured":"Arthure HG, Savage D. Uterine prolapse and prolapse of the vaginal vault treated by sacral hysteropexy. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Emp. 1957;64(3):355\u201360.","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Br Emp"},{"issue":"6","key":"5427_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1201","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31818ce394","volume":"112","author":"EJ Geller","year":"2008","unstructured":"Geller EJ, Siddiqui NY, Wu JM, Visco AG. Short-term outcomes of robotic sacrocolpopexy compared with abdominal sacrocolpopexy. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;112(6):1201\u20136.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"19","key":"5427_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2016","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2013.4919","volume":"309","author":"I Nygaard","year":"2013","unstructured":"Nygaard I, Brubaker L, Zyczynski HM, Cundiff G, Richter H, Gantz M, et al. Long-term outcomes following abdominal sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse. JAMA. 2013;309(19):2016\u201324.","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"issue":"1","key":"5427_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"44","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000570","volume":"125","author":"NY Siddiqui","year":"2015","unstructured":"Siddiqui NY, Grimes CL, Casiano ER, Abed HT, Jeppson PC, Olivera CK, et al. Mesh sacrocolpopexy compared with native tissue vaginal repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;125(1):44\u201355.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"5427_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"199","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-007-0422-9","volume":"19","author":"SP Marinkovic","year":"2008","unstructured":"Marinkovic SP. Will hysterectomy at the time of sacrocolpopexy increase the rate of polypropylene mesh erosion? Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008;19(2):199\u2013203.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct"},{"issue":"2","key":"5427_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"347","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.13997","volume":"100","author":"V Tagliaferri","year":"2021","unstructured":"Tagliaferri V, Ruggieri S, Taccaliti C, Gentile C, Didonna T, D\u2019Asta M, et al. Comparison of absorbable and permanent sutures for laparoscopic sacrocervicopexy: A randomized controlled trial. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2021;100(2):347\u201352.","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"10","key":"5427_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2035","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-020-04471-6","volume":"31","author":"CE Bretschneider","year":"2020","unstructured":"Bretschneider CE, Kenton K, Geller EJ, Wu JM, Matthews CA. Pain after permanent versus delayed absorbable monofilament suture for vaginal graft attachment during minimally invasive total hysterectomy and sacrocolpopexy. Int Urogynecol J. 2020;31(10):2035\u201341.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"2","key":"5427_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"355","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000003884","volume":"136","author":"CA Matthews","year":"2020","unstructured":"Matthews CA, Geller EJ, Henley BR, Kenton K, Myers EM, Dieter AA, et al. Permanent compared with absorbable suture for vaginal mesh fixation during total hysterectomy and sacrocolpopexy: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2020;136(2):355\u201364.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"5427_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"40","DOI":"10.7812\/TPP\/14-022","volume":"18","author":"J Tan-Kim","year":"2014","unstructured":"Tan-Kim J, Menefee SA, Lippmann Q, Lukacz ES, Luber KM, Nager CW. A pilot study comparing anatomic failure after sacrocolpopexy with absorbable or permanent sutures for vaginal mesh attachment. Permanente J. 2014;18(4):40\u20134.","journal-title":"Permanente J"},{"issue":"6","key":"5427_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"944","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2018.0029","volume":"35","author":"CR Powell","year":"2021","unstructured":"Powell CR, Tachibana I, Eckrich B, Rothenberg J, Hathaway J. Securing mesh with delayed absorbable suture does not increase risk of prolapse recurrence after robotic sacral colpopexy. J Endourol. 2021;35(6):944\u20139.","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"issue":"2","key":"5427_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"411","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-021-04853-4","volume":"33","author":"C Reisenauer","year":"2022","unstructured":"Reisenauer C, Andress J, Schoenfisch B, Huebner M, Brucker SY, Lippkowski A, et al. Absorbable versus non-absorbable sutures for vaginal mesh attachment during sacrocolpopexy: a randomized controlled trial. Int Urogynecol J. 2022;33(2):411\u20139.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"3","key":"5427_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"412","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2013.11.002","volume":"21","author":"MA Borahay","year":"2014","unstructured":"Borahay MA, Oge T, Walsh TM, Patel PR, Rodriguez AM, Kilic GS. Outcomes of robotic sacrocolpopexy using barbed delayed absorbable sutures. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014;21(3):412\u20136.","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"5427_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1473","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2002.129160","volume":"187","author":"PJ Culligan","year":"2002","unstructured":"Culligan PJ, Murphy M, Blackwell L, Hammons G, Graham C, Heit MH. Long-term success of abdominal sacral colpopexy using synthetic mesh. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;187(6):1473\u201380; discussion 81\u20132.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"5427_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"600.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.02.049","volume":"198","author":"MR Toglia","year":"2008","unstructured":"Toglia MR, Fagan MJ. Suture erosion rates and long-term surgical outcomes in patients undergoing sacrospinous ligament suspension with braided polyester suture. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;198(5):600.e1\u20134.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"5427_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"360.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.11.016","volume":"204","author":"CF Maher","year":"2011","unstructured":"Maher CF, Feiner B, DeCuyper EM, Nichlos CJ, Hickey KV, O\u2019Rourke P. Laparoscopic sacral colpopexy versus total vaginal mesh for vaginal vault prolapse: a randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;204(4):360.e1\u20137.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"5427_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"137","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-010-1249-3","volume":"22","author":"SB Tate","year":"2011","unstructured":"Tate SB, Blackwell L, Lorenz DJ, Steptoe MM, Culligan PJ. Randomized trial of fascia lata and polypropylene mesh for abdominal sacrocolpopexy: 5-year follow-up. Int Urogynecol J. 2011;22(2):137\u201343.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"8","key":"5427_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1131","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-015-2666-0","volume":"26","author":"C Rondini","year":"2015","unstructured":"Rondini C, Braun H, Alvarez J, Urz\u00faa MJ, Villegas R, Wenzel C, et al. High uterosacral vault suspension vs sacrocolpopexy for treating apical defects: a randomized controlled trial with twelve months follow-up. Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26(8):1131\u20138.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"10","key":"5427_CR21","first-page":"687","volume":"28","author":"N Noor","year":"2022","unstructured":"Noor N, Bastawros D, Florian-Rodriguez ME, Hobson D, Eto C, Lozo S, et al. Comparing minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy with vaginal uterosacral ligament suspension: a multicenter retrospective cohort study through the Fellows\u2019 Pelvic Research Network. Urogynecology (Hagerstown). 2022;28(10):687\u201394.","journal-title":"Urogynecology (Hagerstown)"},{"issue":"9","key":"5427_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1603","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2021.01.021","volume":"28","author":"EJ Geller","year":"2021","unstructured":"Geller EJ, Bretschneider CE, Wu JM, Kenton K, Matthews CA. Sexual function after minimally invasive total hysterectomy and sacrocolpopexy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021;28(9):1603\u20139.","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"}],"container-title":["International Urogynecology Journal"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00192-022-05427-8.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00192-022-05427-8\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00192-022-05427-8.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,5,8]],"date-time":"2023-05-08T05:03:34Z","timestamp":1683522214000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00192-022-05427-8"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023,1,4]]},"references-count":22,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,5]]}},"alternative-id":["5427"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-022-05427-8","relation":{},"ISSN":["0937-3462","1433-3023"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0937-3462","type":"print"},{"value":"1433-3023","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2023,1,4]]},"assertion":[{"value":"10 August 2022","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"2 November 2022","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"4 January 2023","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"None.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflicts of interest"}}]}}