{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,4]],"date-time":"2026-09-04T00:51:06Z","timestamp":1788483066855,"version":"build-2803163510"},"reference-count":18,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"5","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,2,2]],"date-time":"2023-02-02T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1675296000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,2,2]],"date-time":"2023-02-02T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1675296000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Int Urogynecol J"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,5]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-022-05445-6","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2023,2,2]],"date-time":"2023-02-02T07:03:34Z","timestamp":1675321414000},"page":"1121-1126","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":6,"title":["Financial analysis of minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy compared with native tissue vaginal repair with concomitant hysterectomy"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"34","author":[{"given":"Amr S.","family":"El Haraki","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jonathan P.","family":"Shepherd","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Candace","family":"Parker-Autry","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Catherine A.","family":"Matthews","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,2,2]]},"reference":[{"issue":"1","key":"5445_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"141","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000057","volume":"123","author":"JM Wu","year":"2014","unstructured":"Wu JM, Vaughan CP, Goode PS, Redden DT, Burgio KL, Richter HE, et al. Prevalence and trends of symptomatic pelvic floor disorders in U.S. women. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123(1):141\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000057.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"5445_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1201","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000286","volume":"123","author":"JM Wu","year":"2014","unstructured":"Wu JM, Matthews CA, Conover MM, Pate V, Jonsson FM. Lifetime risk of stress urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123(6):1201\u20136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000286.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"5445_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1096","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181f73729","volume":"116","author":"FJ Smith","year":"2010","unstructured":"Smith FJ, Holman CD, Moorin RE, Tsokos N. Lifetime risk of undergoing surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116(5):1096\u2013100.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"5445_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"501","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(97)00058-6","volume":"89","author":"AL Olsen","year":"1997","unstructured":"Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, Colling JC, Clark AL. Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;89(4):501\u20136.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"8","key":"5445_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1101","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-018-3666-7","volume":"29","author":"RG Rogers","year":"2018","unstructured":"Rogers RG, Nolen TL, Weidner AC, Richter HE, Jelovsek JE, Shepherd JP, et al. NICHD Pelvic Floor Disorders Network. Open sacrocolpopexy and vaginal apical repair: retrospective comparison of success and serious complications. Int Urogynecol J. 2018;29(8):1101\u201310. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-018-3666-7.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"10","key":"5445_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"CD012376","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD012376","volume":"10","author":"C Maher","year":"2016","unstructured":"Maher C, Feiner B, Baessler K, Christmann-Schmid C, Haya N, Brown J. Surgery for women with apical vaginal prolapse. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;10(10):CD012376. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/14651858.CD012376.","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"5","key":"5445_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"495.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.06.009","volume":"219","author":"CM Carter-Brooks","year":"2018","unstructured":"Carter-Brooks CM, Du AL, Ruppert KM, Romanova AL, Zyczynski HM. Implementation of a urogynecology-specific enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;219(5):495.e1\u2013495.e10. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.06.009.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"5445_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"335","DOI":"10.1097\/SPV.0b013e318270ade3","volume":"18","author":"L Hoyte","year":"2012","unstructured":"Hoyte L, Rabbanifard R, Mezzich J, Bassaly R, Downes K. Cost analysis of open versus robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2012;18(6):335\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/SPV.0b013e318270ade3.","journal-title":"Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg"},{"issue":"2","key":"5445_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"117","DOI":"10.1016\/j.acuro.2016.08.001","volume":"41","author":"D Carracedo","year":"2017","unstructured":"Carracedo D, L\u00f3pez-Fando L, S\u00e1nchez MD, Jim\u00e9nez M\u00c1, G\u00f3mez JM, Laso I, et al. Cost analysis of surgical treatment for pelvic organ prolapse by laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy or transvaginal mesh. Actas Urol Esp. 2017;41(2):117\u201322. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.acuro.2016.08.001.","journal-title":"Actas Urol Esp"},{"issue":"2","key":"5445_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"305","DOI":"10.1007\/s11701-019-00982-7","volume":"14","author":"B Kaaki","year":"2020","unstructured":"Kaaki B, Lewis E, Takallapally S, Cleveland B. Direct cost of hysterectomy: comparison of robotic versus other routes. J Robot Surg. 2020;14(2):305\u201310. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11701-019-00982-7.","journal-title":"J Robot Surg"},{"issue":"4","key":"5445_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1567","DOI":"10.1111\/jog.14683","volume":"47","author":"M Myoga","year":"2021","unstructured":"Myoga M, Sho T, Aoki H, Ishizuka T, Nakajima D, Yoshimura K. Cost analysis of four types of surgeries for pelvic organ prolapse in a Japanese population. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2021;47(4):1567\u201371. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/jog.14683.","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Res"},{"issue":"4","key":"5445_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"918","DOI":"10.1007\/s11605-019-04499-0","volume":"24","author":"L Noba","year":"2020","unstructured":"Noba L, Rodgers S, Chandler C, Balfour A, Hariharan D, Yip VS. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) reduces hospital costs and improve clinical outcomes in liver surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Gastrointest Surg. 2020;24(4):918\u201332. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11605-019-04499-0.","journal-title":"J Gastrointest Surg"},{"issue":"5","key":"5445_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"952","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2020.10.030","volume":"47","author":"G Bogani","year":"2021","unstructured":"Bogani G, Sarpietro G, Ferrandina G, Gallotta V, DI Donato V, Ditto A, et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in gynecology oncology. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021;47(5):952\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejso.2020.10.030.","journal-title":"Eur J Surg Oncol"},{"key":"5445_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"86","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2016.05.072","volume":"97","author":"MJ Ehlert","year":"2016","unstructured":"Ehlert MJ, Gupta P, Park J, Sirls LT. Detailed cost analysis of robotic sacrocolpopexy compared to transvaginal mesh repair. Urology. 2016;97:86\u201391. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.urology.2016.05.072.","journal-title":"Urology"},{"issue":"3","key":"5445_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"284","DOI":"10.1001\/jamasurg.2016.4674","volume":"152","author":"CC Zygourakis","year":"2017","unstructured":"Zygourakis CC, Valencia V, Moriates C, Boscardin CK, Catschegn S, Rajkomar A, et al. Association between surgeon scorecard use and operating room costs. JAMA Surg. 2017;152(3):284\u201391. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jamasurg.2016.4674.","journal-title":"JAMA Surg"},{"issue":"5","key":"5445_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e142","DOI":"10.1097\/SPV.0000000000001133","volume":"28","author":"SE Andiman","year":"2022","unstructured":"Andiman SE, Bui AH, Ascher-Walsh C, Wright JD, Xu X. Surgical complications and hospital costs in robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy with concurrent sacrocolpopexy: analysis of the nationwide readmissions database. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2022;28(5):e142-8. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/SPV.0000000000001133.","journal-title":"Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg"},{"key":"5445_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"115","DOI":"10.1007\/s10397-016-0930-z","volume":"13","author":"G Callewaert","year":"2016","unstructured":"Callewaert G, Bosteels J, Housmans S, Verguts J, Van Cleynenbreugel B, Van der Aa F, et al. Laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review. Gynecol Surg. 2016;13:115\u201323. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10397-016-0930-z.","journal-title":"Gynecol Surg"},{"issue":"1","key":"5445_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"44","DOI":"10.1097\/SPV.0b013e3181fa44cf","volume":"17","author":"J Tan-Kim","year":"2011","unstructured":"Tan-Kim J, Menefee SA, Luber KM, Nager CW, Lukacz ES. Robotic-assisted and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: comparing operative times, costs and outcomes. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2011;17(1):44\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/SPV.0b013e3181fa44cf.","journal-title":"Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg"}],"container-title":["International Urogynecology Journal"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00192-022-05445-6.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00192-022-05445-6\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00192-022-05445-6.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,9]],"date-time":"2025-04-09T14:49:12Z","timestamp":1744210152000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00192-022-05445-6"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023,2,2]]},"references-count":18,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,5]]}},"alternative-id":["5445"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-022-05445-6","relation":{},"ISSN":["0937-3462","1433-3023"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0937-3462","type":"print"},{"value":"1433-3023","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2023,2,2]]},"assertion":[{"value":"29 October 2022","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"10 December 2022","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"2 February 2023","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"Catherine Matthews has grant support to her institution from Boston Scientific Corporation and Coloplast; Catherine Matthews is a consultant to Boston Scientific Corporation and has received honoraria from Neomedic. Parker Autry has received honoraria from Neomedic. No other authors have any conflicts to disclose.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflicts of interest"}}]}}