{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,17]],"date-time":"2026-08-17T15:15:30Z","timestamp":1786979730972,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":21,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"9","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,4,29]],"date-time":"2023-04-29T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1682726400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,4,29]],"date-time":"2023-04-29T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1682726400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Int Urogynecol J"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,9]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Introduction and hypothesis<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The objective was to compare the location and motion of pessaries between women with pelvic organ prolapse (POP) with a successful (fitting) and unsuccessful (non-fitting) pessary treatment on dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI).<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>A cross-sectional exploratory study of 15 women who underwent a mid-sagittal dMRI of the pelvic floor at rest, during contraction and during Valsalva with three different types of pessaries. The coordinates of the pessaries cross section, inferior pubic point (IPP) and sacrococcygeal junction (SCJ) were obtained and the location (position, orientation) and the motion (translation and rotation) were calculated. Differences between the groups and between the pessaries within the groups were compared.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Nine women with a fitting pessary and 6 women with a non-fitting pessary were selected. In the non-fitting group, the pessaries were positioned more caudally and rotated more in clockwise direction and descended more, but not significantly, during Valsalva compared with the fitting group. The Falk pessary was positioned more anteriorly in the fitting group and more cranially in the non-fitting group compared with the ring and ring with support pessary.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>A non-fitting pessary was positioned more caudally at rest; on Valsalva, it rotated more clockwise and moved more caudally, suggesting that the dynamic characteristics of the pessary might play an important role in its effectiveness. Findings of this study serve as a basis for the development of new pessary designs.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-023-05555-9","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2023,4,29]],"date-time":"2023-04-29T04:02:18Z","timestamp":1682740938000},"page":"2293-2300","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":6,"title":["Location and motion of vaginal pessaries in situ in women with successful and unsuccessful pessary treatment for pelvic organ prolapse"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"34","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-9063-4618","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Lars L.","family":"Boogaard","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Charlotte P. R.","family":"Triepels","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Luc M.","family":"Verhamme","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Sander M. J.","family":"van Kuijk","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Judith J. A. E.","family":"Donners","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Kirsten B.","family":"Kluivers","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Thomas J. J.","family":"Maal","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Mirjam","family":"Weemhoff","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Kim J. B.","family":"Notten","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,4,29]]},"reference":[{"key":"5555_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"332","DOI":"10.1097\/SPV.0000000000000190","volume":"21","author":"C Ghetti","year":"2015","unstructured":"Ghetti C, Skoczylas LC, Oliphant SS, et al. The emotional burden of pelvic organ prolapse in women seeking treatment: a qualitative study HHS public access. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2015;21:332\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/SPV.0000000000000190.","journal-title":"Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg"},{"key":"5555_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1455","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2006.01.060","volume":"194","author":"JE Jelovsek","year":"2006","unstructured":"Jelovsek JE, Barber MD. Women seeking treatment for advanced pelvic organ prolapse have decreased body image and quality of life. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;194:1455\u201361. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2006.01.060.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"5555_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1317","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-007-0321-0","volume":"18","author":"I Diez-Itza","year":"2007","unstructured":"Diez-Itza I, Aizpitarte I, Becerro A. Risk factors for the recurrence of pelvic organ prolapse after vaginal surgery: a review at 5 years after surgery. Int Urogynecol J. 2007;18:1317\u201324. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-007-0321-0.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"5555_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"125","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2010.12.039","volume":"156","author":"R Oliver","year":"2011","unstructured":"Oliver R, Thakar R, Sultan AH. The history and usage of the vaginal pessary: a review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011;156:125\u201330. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2010.12.039.","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"5555_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"664","DOI":"10.1016\/S1701-2163(15)30888-4","volume":"35","author":"M Robert","year":"2013","unstructured":"Robert M, Schulz JA, Harvey MA, et al. Technical update on pessary use. J Obstet Gynaecol Canada. 2013;35:664\u201374. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S1701-2163(15)30888-4.","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Canada"},{"key":"5555_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1157","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-009-0930-x","volume":"20","author":"DS Kapoor","year":"2009","unstructured":"Kapoor DS, Thakar R, Sultan AH, Oliver R. Conservative versus surgical management of prolapse: what dictates patient choice? Int Urogynecol J. 2009;20:1157\u201361. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-009-0930-x.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"5555_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"541","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2009.08.010","volume":"36","author":"SD Atnip","year":"2009","unstructured":"Atnip SD. Pessary use and management for pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2009;36:541\u201363. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ogc.2009.08.010.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am"},{"key":"5555_CR8","first-page":"S115","volume":"98","author":"L Orawan","year":"2015","unstructured":"Orawan L, Wanichsetakul P. Factors affecting successfulness of vaginal pessary use for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. J Med Assoc Thail. 2015;98:S115\u201320.","journal-title":"J Med Assoc Thail"},{"key":"5555_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"89","DOI":"10.1016\/J.AJOG.2004.12.012","volume":"193","author":"MF Mutone","year":"2005","unstructured":"Mutone MF, Terry C, Hale DS, Benson JT. Factors which influence the short-term success of pessary management of pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193:89\u201394. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/J.AJOG.2004.12.012.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"5555_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"78","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmwh.2005.09.003","volume":"51","author":"JM Maito","year":"2006","unstructured":"Maito JM, Quam ZA, Craig E, et al. Predictors of successful pessary fitting and continued use in a nurse-midwifery pessary clinic. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2006;51:78\u201384. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jmwh.2005.09.003.","journal-title":"J Midwifery Womens Health"},{"key":"5555_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1434","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.15260","volume":"125","author":"M Mao","year":"2018","unstructured":"Mao M, Ai F, Zhang Y, et al. Predictors for unsuccessful pessary fitting in women with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse: a prospective study. BJOG. 2018;125:1434\u201340. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/1471-0528.15260.","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"5555_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"637","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-011-1390-7","volume":"22","author":"BHC Lamers","year":"2011","unstructured":"Lamers BHC, Broekman BMW, Milani AL. Pessary treatment for pelvic organ prolapse and health-related quality of life: a review. Int Urogynecol J. 2011;22:637\u201344. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-011-1390-7.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"5555_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"820","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.16950","volume":"129","author":"LR van der Vaart","year":"2022","unstructured":"van der Vaart LR, Vollebregt A, Milani AL, et al. Pessary or surgery for a symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse: the PEOPLE study, a multicentre prospective cohort study. BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2022;129:820\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/1471-0528.16950.","journal-title":"BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"5555_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"931","DOI":"10.1097\/00006250-200006000-00029","volume":"95","author":"GW Cundiff","year":"2000","unstructured":"Cundiff GW, Weidner AC, Visco AG, et al. A survey of pessary use by members of the American Urogynecologic Society. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;95:931\u20135. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/00006250-200006000-00029.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"5555_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.3909\/riog0110","volume":"3","author":"KA Jones","year":"2010","unstructured":"Jones KA, Harmanli O. Pessary use in pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2010;3:3\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3909\/riog0110.","journal-title":"Rev Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"5555_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"369","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-021-04888-7","volume":"33","author":"CX Hong","year":"2022","unstructured":"Hong CX, Meer E, Cioban M, et al. Position and orientation of vaginal pessaries in situ on magnetic resonance imaging. Int Urogynecol J. 2022;33:369\u201376. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-021-04888-7.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"5555_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"10","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(96)70243-0","volume":"175","author":"RC Bump","year":"1996","unstructured":"Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bo K, et al. The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;175:10\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0002-9378(96)70243-0.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"5555_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1323","DOI":"10.1016\/J.MRI.2012.05.001","volume":"30","author":"A Fedorov","year":"2012","unstructured":"Fedorov A, Beichel R, Kalpathy-Cramer J, et al. 3D slicer as an image computing platform for the quantitative imaging network. Magn Reson Imaging. 2012;30:1323\u201341. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/J.MRI.2012.05.001.","journal-title":"Magn Reson Imaging"},{"key":"5555_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1421","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-013-2100-4","volume":"24","author":"C Betschart","year":"2013","unstructured":"Betschart C, Chen L, Ashton-Miller JA, DeLancey JOL. On pelvic reference lines and the MR evaluation of genital prolapse: a proposal for standardization using the pelvic inclination correction system. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24:1421\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-013-2100-4.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"5555_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1263","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-014-2395-9.Comparison","volume":"25","author":"C Betschart","year":"2014","unstructured":"Betschart C, Kim J, Miller JM, et al. Comparison of muscle fiber directions between different levator ani muscle subdivisions: in vivo MRI measurements in women. Int Urogynecol J. 2014;25:1263\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-014-2395-9.Comparison.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"5555_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"569","DOI":"10.1016\/J.ULTRASMEDBIO.2020.11.016","volume":"47","author":"S Das","year":"2021","unstructured":"Das S, Hansen HHG, Hendriks GAGM, et al. 3D ultrasound strain imaging of puborectalis muscle. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2021;47:569\u201381. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/J.ULTRASMEDBIO.2020.11.016.","journal-title":"Ultrasound Med Biol"}],"container-title":["International Urogynecology Journal"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00192-023-05555-9.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00192-023-05555-9\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00192-023-05555-9.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,18]],"date-time":"2023-09-18T10:04:40Z","timestamp":1695031480000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00192-023-05555-9"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023,4,29]]},"references-count":21,"journal-issue":{"issue":"9","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,9]]}},"alternative-id":["5555"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-023-05555-9","relation":{},"ISSN":["0937-3462","1433-3023"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0937-3462","type":"print"},{"value":"1433-3023","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2023,4,29]]},"assertion":[{"value":"18 January 2023","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"3 April 2023","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"29 April 2023","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"None.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflicts of interest"}}]}}