{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2023,11,28]],"date-time":"2023-11-28T00:39:40Z","timestamp":1701131980755},"reference-count":26,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"11","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,7,1]],"date-time":"2023-07-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1688169600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,7,1]],"date-time":"2023-07-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1688169600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Int Urogynecol J"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,11]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Introduction and hypothesis<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>Vaginal sacrospinous fixation (VSF) without mesh and sacrocolpopexy (SCP) with mesh are the most frequently performed surgical procedures for apical prolapse in the Netherlands. There is no long-term evidence suggesting the optimal technique, however. The aim was to identify which factors play a role in the choice between these surgical treatment options.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>A qualitative study using semi-structured interviews amongst Dutch gynecologists was carried out. An inductive content analysis was performed with Atlas.ti.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>Ten interviews were analyzed. All gynecologists performed vaginal surgeries for apical prolapse, six gynecologists perform SCP themselves. Six gynecologists would perform VSF for a primary vaginal vault prolapse (VVP); three gynecologists preferred a SCP. All participants prefer a SCP for recurrent VVP. All participants have stated that multiple comorbidities could be a reason for choosing VSF, as this procedure is considered less invasive. Most participants choose a VSF in the case of older age (6 out of 10) or higher body mass index (7 out of 10). All treat primary uterine prolapse with vaginal, uterine-preserving surgery.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>Recurrent apical prolapse is the most important factor in advising patients which treatment they should undergo for VVP or uterine descent. Also, the patient\u2019s health status and the patient\u2019s own preference are important factors. Gynecologists who do not perform the SCP in their own clinic are more likely to perform a VSF and find more reasons not to advise a SCP. All participants prefer a vaginal surgery for a primary uterine prolapse.\n<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-023-05587-1","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2023,7,1]],"date-time":"2023-07-01T13:01:31Z","timestamp":1688216491000},"page":"2705-2712","update-policy":"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Gynecologists\u2019 perspectives on surgical treatment for apical prolapse: a qualitative study"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"34","author":[{"given":"Anique M. J.","family":"van Oudheusden","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Mirjam","family":"Weemhoff","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Leah F.","family":"Menge","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Brigitte A. B.","family":"Essers","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,7,1]]},"reference":[{"issue":"9","key":"5587_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1037","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-009-0902-1","volume":"20","author":"MC Slieker-ten Hove","year":"2009","unstructured":"Slieker-ten Hove MC, Pool-Goudzwaard AL, Eijkemans MJ, Steegers-Theunissen RP, Burger CW, Vierhout ME. The prevalence of pelvic organ prolapse symptoms and signs and their relation with bladder and bowel disorders in a general female population. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2009;20(9):1037\u201345. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-009-0902-1.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct"},{"issue":"6","key":"5587_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1201","DOI":"10.1097\/aog.0000000000000286","volume":"123","author":"JM Wu","year":"2014","unstructured":"Wu JM, Matthews CA, Conover MM, Pate V, Jonsson Funk M. Lifetime risk of stress urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123(6):1201\u20136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/aog.0000000000000286.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"5587_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"l5149","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.l5149","volume":"366","author":"SFM Schulten","year":"2019","unstructured":"Schulten SFM, Detollenaere RJ, Stekelenburg J, IntHout J, Kluivers KB, van Eijndhoven HWF. Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: observational follow-up of a multicentre randomised trial. BMJ. 2019;366:l5149. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmj.l5149.","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"10","key":"5587_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1284","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.16242","volume":"127","author":"MN Van IJsselmuiden","year":"2020","unstructured":"Van IJsselmuiden MN, van Oudheusden AMJ, Veen J, et al. Hysteropexy in the treatment of uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy versus sacrospinous hysteropexy\u2014a multicentre randomised controlled trial (LAVA trial). BJOG. 2020;127(10):1284\u201393. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/1471-0528.16242.","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"5","key":"5587_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"781","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-012-1934-5","volume":"24","author":"RJ Detollenaere","year":"2013","unstructured":"Detollenaere RJ, den Boon J, Kluivers KB, Vierhout ME, van Eijndhoven HW. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse and uterine descent in the Netherlands. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24(5):781\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-012-1934-5.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"6","key":"5587_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"365","DOI":"10.1097\/SPV.0000000000000426","volume":"23","author":"AM Madsen","year":"2017","unstructured":"Madsen AM, Raker C, Sung VW. Trends in hysteropexy and apical support for uterovaginal prolapse in the United States from 2002 to 2012. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2017;23(6):365\u201371. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/SPV.0000000000000426.","journal-title":"Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg"},{"key":"5587_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"79","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.11.016","volume":"220","author":"MN Van IJsselmuiden","year":"2018","unstructured":"Van IJsselmuiden MN, Detollenaere RJ, Gerritse MBE, Kluivers KB, Bongers MY, van Eijndhoven HWF. Dutch women\u2019s attitudes towards hysterectomy and uterus preservation in surgical treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018;220:79\u201383. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.11.016.","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"6","key":"5587_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1299","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2001.119081","volume":"185","author":"AM Weber","year":"2001","unstructured":"Weber AM, Walters MD, Piedmonte MR, Ballard LA. Anterior colporrhaphy: a randomized trial of three surgical techniques. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;185(6):1299\u2013306. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1067\/mob.2001.119081.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"5587_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"841","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-020-04591-z","volume":"32","author":"CKM Vermeulen","year":"2021","unstructured":"Vermeulen CKM, Veen J, Adang C, van Leijsen SAL, Coolen ALWM, Bongers MY. Pelvic organ prolapse after laparoscopic hysterectomy compared with vaginal hysterectomy: the POP-UP study. Int Urogynecol J. 2021;32(4):841\u201350. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-020-04591-z.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"4","key":"5587_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"581","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-018-3832-y","volume":"30","author":"CKM Vermeulen","year":"2019","unstructured":"Vermeulen CKM, Coolen ALWM, Spaans WA, Roovers JPWR, Bongers MY. Treatment of vaginal vault prolapse in The Netherlands: a clinical practice survey. Int Urogynecol J. 2019;30(4):581\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-018-3832-y.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"13","key":"5587_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.3310\/hta24130","volume":"24","author":"C Hemming","year":"2020","unstructured":"Hemming C, Constable L, Goulao B, et al. Surgical interventions for uterine prolapse and for vault prolapse: the two VUE RCTs. Health Technol Assess. 2020;24(13):1\u2013220. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3310\/hta24130.","journal-title":"Health Technol Assess"},{"issue":"1","key":"5587_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"52","DOI":"10.1186\/s12905-017-0402-2","volume":"17","author":"ALWM Coolen","year":"2017","unstructured":"Coolen ALWM, van IJsselmuiden MN, van Oudheusden AMJ, et al. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy versus vaginal sacrospinous fixation for vaginal vault prolapse, a randomized controlled trial: SALTO-2 trial, study protocol. BMC Womens Health. 2017;17(1):52. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12905-017-0402-2.","journal-title":"BMC Womens Health"},{"key":"5587_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.17525","author":"AMJ Van Oudheusden","year":"2023","unstructured":"van Oudheusden AMJ, van IJsselmuiden MN, Menge LF, Coolen ALWM, Veen J, van Eijndhoven HWF, Dietz V, Kluivers KB, Spaans WA, Vollebregt A, van de Pol G, Radder CM, van der Ploeg JM, van Kuijk SMJ, Bongers MY (2023) Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy versus vaginal sacrospinous fixation for vaginal vault prolapse: a randomised controlled trial and prospective cohort (SALTO-2 trial). BJOG. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/1471-0528.17525","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"5587_CR14","unstructured":"Central Committee on Research Involving Human Subjects (CCMO). Your research: is it subject to the WMO or not? https:\/\/english.ccmo.nl\/investigators\/legal-framework-for-medical-scientific-research\/your-research-is-it-subject-to-the-wmo-or-not. Accessed 17 May 2022."},{"issue":"6","key":"5587_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"349","DOI":"10.1093\/intqhc\/mzm042","volume":"19","author":"A Tong","year":"2007","unstructured":"Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349\u201357. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/intqhc\/mzm042.","journal-title":"Int J Qual Health Care"},{"key":"5587_CR16","unstructured":"NVOG. Leidraad Gebruik van implantaten bij genitale prolaps- en urine-incontinentiechirurgie Nederlandse Vereniging voor Obstetrie & Gynaecologie. Accessed 30 December 2020. https:\/\/www.nvog.nl\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/2012\/Gebruik-van-implantaten-bij-genitale-prolaps-en-urine-incontinentiechirurgie-2030-2012-2020.pdf"},{"issue":"5","key":"5587_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"542","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.14341","volume":"101","author":"M Brunes","year":"2022","unstructured":"Brunes M, Ek M, Drca A, S\u00f6derberg M, Bergman I, Warnqvist A, Johannesson U. Vaginal vault prolapse and recurrent surgery: a nationwide observational cohort study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2022;101(5):542\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/aogs.14341.","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"11","key":"5587_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1559","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-015-2695-8","volume":"26","author":"TF Vergeldt","year":"2015","unstructured":"Vergeldt TF, Weemhoff M, IntHout J, Kluivers KB. Risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse and its recurrence: a systematic review. Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26(11):1559\u201373. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-015-2695-8.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"2","key":"5587_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"192","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2022.04.046","volume":"227","author":"SFM Schulten","year":"2022","unstructured":"Schulten SFM, Claas-Quax MJ, Weemhoff M, et al. Risk factors for primary pelvic organ prolapse and prolapse recurrence: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022;227(2):192\u2013208. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2022.04.046.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"5587_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"CD012376","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD012376","volume":"10","author":"C Maher","year":"2016","unstructured":"Maher C, Feiner B, Baessler K, Christmann-Schmid C, Haya N, Brown J. Surgery for women with apical vaginal prolapse. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;10:CD012376. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/14651858.CD012376.","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"1","key":"5587_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-021-04823-w","volume":"33","author":"W Zhang","year":"2022","unstructured":"Zhang W, Cheon WC, Zhang L, Wang X, Wei Y, Lyu C. Comparison of the effectiveness of sacrospinous ligament fixation and sacrocolpopexy: a meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J. 2022;33(1):3\u201313. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-021-04823-w.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"4","key":"5587_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"871","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-020-04374-6","volume":"32","author":"G Nightingale","year":"2021","unstructured":"Nightingale G, Phillips C. Long-term safety and efficacy of laparoscopically placed mesh for apical prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2021;32(4):871\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-020-04374-6.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"1","key":"5587_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"11","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.01.039","volume":"217","author":"A Giri","year":"2017","unstructured":"Giri A, Hartmann KE, Hellwege JN, Velez Edwards DR, Edwards TL. Obesity and pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;217(1):11\u201326.e3. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.01.039.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"5587_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"391","DOI":"10.1093\/bja\/aet104","volume":"111","author":"A Harsten","year":"2013","unstructured":"Harsten A, Kehlet H, Toksvig-Larsen S. Recovery after total intravenous general anaesthesia or spinal anaesthesia for total knee arthroplasty: a randomized trial. Br J Anaesth. 2013;111(3):391\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/bja\/aet104.","journal-title":"Br J Anaesth"},{"issue":"8","key":"5587_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1171","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-015-2670-4","volume":"26","author":"B Purwar","year":"2015","unstructured":"Purwar B, Ismail KM, Turner N, et al. General or spinal anaesthetic for vaginal surgery in pelvic floor disorders (GOSSIP): a feasibility randomised controlled trial. Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26(8):1171\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-015-2670-4.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"22","key":"5587_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2025","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa2113514","volume":"385","author":"MD Neuman","year":"2021","unstructured":"Neuman MD, Feng R, Carson JL, et al. Spinal anesthesia or general anesthesia for hip surgery in older adults. N Engl J Med. 2021;385(22):2025\u201335. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1056\/NEJMoa2113514.","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"}],"container-title":["International Urogynecology Journal"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00192-023-05587-1.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00192-023-05587-1\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00192-023-05587-1.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,11,27]],"date-time":"2023-11-27T09:04:03Z","timestamp":1701075843000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00192-023-05587-1"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023,7,1]]},"references-count":26,"journal-issue":{"issue":"11","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,11]]}},"alternative-id":["5587"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-023-05587-1","relation":{},"ISSN":["0937-3462","1433-3023"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0937-3462","type":"print"},{"value":"1433-3023","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2023,7,1]]},"assertion":[{"value":"31 March 2023","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"21 May 2023","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"1 July 2023","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"None.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflicts of interest"}}]}}