{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,13]],"date-time":"2026-05-13T07:34:21Z","timestamp":1778657661401,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":20,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"11","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,7,20]],"date-time":"2023-07-20T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1689811200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,7,20]],"date-time":"2023-07-20T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1689811200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100006304","name":"Aalborg University Hospital","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100006304","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"crossref"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Int Urogynecol J"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,11]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Introduction and hypothesis<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>The most common complications to midurethral sling (MUS) operations for stress urinary incontinence are postoperative urinary retention (POUR), vaginal MUS exposure, and urgency. They are well described but consensus regarding their management is missing. An evaluation of the treatment of POUR, exposure and urgency after the MUS procedure in our department was implemented. Incontinence status after treatment of complications was evaluated.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>A review of the medical records of women undergoing MUS procedures from 1 January 2017 to 31 December 2021 (<jats:italic>n<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u2009329).<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>A total of 279 women (85%) had no complications. Fifty women had one or more complications. Twenty-three women (7%) experienced POUR. Final treatment in 9 women was clean intermittent self-catheterization (CISC). All remained continent. Nine women had the MUS mobilized. This was successful in 8 women who remained continent. Six women had their MUS incised (one after unsuccessful mobilization). Four became incontinent again and 2 remained continent. Eight women had vaginal MUS exposure. Seven attempted recovering of the MUS. This was successful in 3 patients. The remaining had a partial MUS removal. Only 33% remained continent after removal. Ten patients developed de novo urge, but only 2 needed medication.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>Mobilization of the MUS must be considered the optimal treatment for POUR when CISC fails. It is the most effective intervention with the best effect on POUR and the lowest risk of incontinence. Concerning vaginal exposure, a trial of recovering should be attempted as the risk of incontinence when undergoing a partial removal of the MUS is considerable.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-023-05600-7","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2023,7,20]],"date-time":"2023-07-20T14:12:46Z","timestamp":1689862366000},"page":"2767-2774","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":5,"title":["Impact on urinary incontinence after management of complications related to a retropubic midurethral sling"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"34","author":[{"given":"Caroline","family":"Juhl","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Mette Holberg","family":"Thimm","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Karin","family":"Glavind","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,7,20]]},"reference":[{"issue":"1","key":"5600_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"5","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-009-0976-9","volume":"21","author":"BT Haylen","year":"2010","unstructured":"Haylen BT, de Ridder D, Freeman RM, et al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)\/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21(1):5\u201326.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"7","key":"5600_CR2","first-page":"CD006375","volume":"7","author":"AA Ford","year":"2017","unstructured":"Ford AA, Rogerson L, Cody JD, Aluko P, Ogah JA. Mid-urethral sling operations for stress urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;7(7):CD006375.","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"9","key":"5600_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1377","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-017-3279-6","volume":"28","author":"CW Swenson","year":"2017","unstructured":"Swenson CW, Kolenic GE, Trowbridge ER, et al. Obesity and stress urinary incontinence in women: compromised continence mechanism or excess bladder pressure during cough? Int Urogynecol J. 2017;28(9):1377\u201385.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"28","key":"5600_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e11443","DOI":"10.1097\/MD.0000000000011443","volume":"97","author":"HH Zhou","year":"2018","unstructured":"Zhou HH, Shu B, Liu TZ, Wang XH, Yang ZH, Guo YL. Association between parity and the risk for urinary incontinence in women: a meta-analysis of case-control and cohort studies. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018;97(28):e11443.","journal-title":"Medicine (Baltimore)"},{"issue":"4","key":"5600_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"831","DOI":"10.1097\/gme.0b013e3181967b5d","volume":"16","author":"L Zhu","year":"2009","unstructured":"Zhu L, Lang J, Liu C, Han S, Huang J, Li X. The epidemiological study of women with urinary incontinence and risk factors for stress urinary incontinence in China. Menopause. 2009;16(4):831\u20136.","journal-title":"Menopause"},{"key":"5600_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Schimpf MO, Rahn DD, Wheeler TL, et al. Sling surgery for stress urinary incontinence in women: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;211(1):71.e1\u201327.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.030"},{"issue":"2","key":"5600_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"407","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-021-06299-x","volume":"305","author":"J Jahn","year":"2022","unstructured":"Jahn J, Reisenauer C, Schoenfisch B, Amend B, Brucker SY, Andress J. A retrospective analysis of perioperative complications associated with retropubic tension-free vaginal tape in 960 women. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2022;305(2):407\u201313.","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"issue":"4","key":"5600_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"269","DOI":"10.1007\/s001200170035","volume":"40","author":"U Ulmsten","year":"2001","unstructured":"Ulmsten U. The basic understanding and clinical results of tension-free vaginal tape for stress urinary incontinence. Urologe A. 2001;40(4):269\u201373.","journal-title":"Urologe A"},{"key":"5600_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"252","DOI":"10.1007\/s11884-017-0427-2","volume":"12","author":"L Rickey","year":"2017","unstructured":"Rickey L, Russo A. Evaluation and management of voiding dysfunction following surgery for mesh excision. Curr Bladder Dysfunct Rep. 2017;12:252\u20139.","journal-title":"Curr Bladder Dysfunct Rep"},{"issue":"10","key":"5600_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1515","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-017-3302-y","volume":"28","author":"EA Brennand","year":"2017","unstructured":"Brennand EA, Tang S, Birch C, Robert M, Kim-Fine S. Early voiding dysfunction after midurethral sling surgery: comparison of two management approaches. Int Urogynecol J. 2017;28(10):1515\u201326.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"3","key":"5600_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"675","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-022-05095-8","volume":"34","author":"M Pinsard","year":"2022","unstructured":"Pinsard M, Fauconnier A, D\u2019Halluin F, et al. Comparison of early loosening vs delayed section of mid-urethral slings for postoperative voiding dysfunction. Int Urogynecol J. 2022;34(3):675\u201381.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"4","key":"5600_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1091","DOI":"10.1002\/nau.23046","volume":"36","author":"LR Moksnes","year":"2017","unstructured":"Moksnes LR, Svenningsen R, Schi\u00f8tz HA, Moe K, Staff AC, Kulseng-Hanssen S. Sling mobilization in the management of urinary retention after mid-urethral sling surgery. Neurourol Urodyn. 2017;36(4):1091\u20136.","journal-title":"Neurourol Urodyn"},{"key":"5600_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"146","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.03.039","volume":"177","author":"MK Kokanali","year":"2014","unstructured":"Kokanali MK, Do\u011fanay M, Aksakal O, Cavkaytar S, Top\u00e7u HO, \u00d6zer \u0130. Risk factors for mesh erosion after vaginal sling procedures for urinary incontinence. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014;177:146\u201350.","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"4","key":"5600_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"482","DOI":"10.1080\/00016340600604989","volume":"85","author":"N Kuuva","year":"2006","unstructured":"Kuuva N, Nilsson CG. Long-term results of the tension-free vaginal tape operation in an unselected group of 129 stress incontinent women. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2006;85(4):482\u20137.","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"1","key":"5600_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"72","DOI":"10.1034\/j.1600-0412.2002.810113.x","volume":"81","author":"N Kuuva","year":"2002","unstructured":"Kuuva N, Nilsson CG. A nationwide analysis of complications associated with the tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) procedure. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2002;81(1):72\u20137.","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"1","key":"5600_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"159","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-020-04402-5","volume":"32","author":"NB S\u00f8gaard","year":"2021","unstructured":"S\u00f8gaard NB, Glavind K. Complications and re-operations after tension-free vaginal tape operation in women with stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J. 2021;32(1):159\u201366.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"11","key":"5600_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1657","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-015-2756-z","volume":"26","author":"K Glavind","year":"2015","unstructured":"Glavind K, Shim S. Incidence and treatment of postoperative voiding dysfunction after the tension-free vaginal tape procedure. Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26(11):1657\u201360.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"8","key":"5600_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1071","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.13830","volume":"99","author":"B Hold\u00f8","year":"2020","unstructured":"Hold\u00f8 B, M\u00f8llersen K, Verelst M, Milsom I, Svenningsen R, Skjeldestad FE. Surgeon\u2019s experience and clinical outcome after retropubic tension-free vaginal tape\u2014a case series. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020;99(8):1071\u20137.","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"11","key":"5600_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1353","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-010-1210-5","volume":"21","author":"I Kristensen","year":"2010","unstructured":"Kristensen I, Eldoma M, Williamson T, Wood S, Mainprize T, Ross S. Complications of the tension-free vaginal tape procedure for stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21(11):1353\u20137.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"3","key":"5600_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e103","DOI":"10.1097\/SPV.0000000000001165","volume":"28","author":"D Vargas Maldonado","year":"2022","unstructured":"Vargas Maldonado D, Wymer KM, Gebhart JB, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of early sling loosening versus delayed sling lysis in the management of voiding dysfunction after midurethral sling placement. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2022;28(3):e103\u20137.","journal-title":"Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg"}],"container-title":["International Urogynecology Journal"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00192-023-05600-7.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00192-023-05600-7\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00192-023-05600-7.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,11,27]],"date-time":"2023-11-27T09:04:42Z","timestamp":1701075882000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00192-023-05600-7"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023,7,20]]},"references-count":20,"journal-issue":{"issue":"11","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,11]]}},"alternative-id":["5600"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-023-05600-7","relation":{},"ISSN":["0937-3462","1433-3023"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0937-3462","type":"print"},{"value":"1433-3023","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2023,7,20]]},"assertion":[{"value":"12 March 2023","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"7 June 2023","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"20 July 2023","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"None.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflicts of interest"}}]}}