{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,26]],"date-time":"2026-10-26T22:33:30Z","timestamp":1793054010016,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":129,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"11","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,22]],"date-time":"2023-09-22T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1695340800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,22]],"date-time":"2023-09-22T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1695340800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100001779","name":"Monash University","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100001779","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"crossref"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Int Urogynecol J"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,11]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Introduction and hypothesis<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>This manuscript from Chapter 2 of the International Urogynecology Consultation (IUC) on Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP) reviews the literature involving the clinical evaluation of a patient with POP and associated bladder and bowel dysfunction.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>An international group of 11 clinicians performed a search of the literature using pre-specified search MESH terms in PubMed and Embase databases (January 2000 to August 2020). Publications were eliminated if not relevant to the clinical evaluation of patients or did not include clear definitions of POP. The titles and abstracts were reviewed using the Covidence database to determine whether they met the inclusion criteria. The manuscripts were reviewed for suitability using the Specialist Unit for Review Evidence checklists. The data from full-text manuscripts were extracted and then reviewed.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>The search strategy found 11,242 abstracts, of which 220 articles were used to inform this narrative review. The main themes of this manuscript were the clinical examination, and the evaluation of comorbid conditions including the urinary tract (LUTS), gastrointestinal tract (GIT), pain, and sexual function. The physical examination of patients with pelvic organ prolapse (POP) should include a reproducible method of describing and quantifying the degree of POP and only the Pelvic Organ Quantification (POP-Q) system or the Simplified Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (S-POP) system have enough reproducibility to be recommended. POP examination should be done with an empty bladder and patients can be supine but should be upright if the prolapse cannot be reproduced. No other parameters of the examination aid in describing and quantifying POP. Post-void residual urine volume &gt;100 ml is commonly used to assess for voiding difficulty. Prolapse reduction can be used to predict the possibility of postoperative persistence of voiding difficulty. There is no benefit of urodynamic testing for assessment of detrusor overactivity as it does not change the management. In women with POP and stress urinary incontinence (SUI), the cough stress test should be performed with a bladder volume of at least 200 ml and with the prolapse reduced either with a speculum or by a pessary. The urodynamic assessment only changes management when SUI and voiding dysfunction co-exist. Demonstration of preoperative occult SUI has a positive predictive value for de novo SUI of 40% but most useful is its absence, which has a negative predictive value of 91%. The routine addition of radiographic or physiological testing of the GIT currently has no additional value for a physical examination. In subjects with GIT symptoms further radiological but not physiological testing appears to aid in diagnosing enteroceles, sigmoidoceles, and intussusception, but there are no data on how this affects outcomes. There were no articles in the search on the evaluation of the co-morbid conditions of pain or sexual dysfunction in women with POP.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>The clinical pelvic examination remains the central tool for evaluation of POP and a system such as the POP-Q or S-POP should be used to describe and quantify. The value of investigation for urinary tract dysfunction was discussed and findings presented. The routine addition of GI radiographic or physiological testing is currently not recommended. There are no data on the role of the routine assessment of pain or sexual function, and this area needs more study. Imaging studies alone cannot replace clinical examination for the assessment of POP.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-023-05629-8","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,22]],"date-time":"2023-09-22T10:04:03Z","timestamp":1695377043000},"page":"2657-2688","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":27,"title":["International Urogynecology consultation chapter 2 committee 3: the clinical evaluation of pelvic organ prolapse including investigations into associated morbidity\/pelvic floor dysfunction"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"34","author":[{"given":"Heather","family":"Barbier","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Cassandra L.","family":"Carberry","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"P\u00e4ivi K.","family":"Karjalainen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Charlotte K.","family":"Mahoney","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Valent\u00edn Manr\u00edquez","family":"Gal\u00e1n","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Anna","family":"Rosamilia","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Esther","family":"Ruess","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"David","family":"Shaker","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Karishma","family":"Thariani","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,22]]},"reference":[{"issue":"10","key":"5629_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2575","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-021-04941-5","volume":"32","author":"MA Harvey","year":"2021","unstructured":"Harvey MA, Chih HJ, Geoffrion R, et al. International Urogynecology Consultation Chapter 1 Committee 5: relationship of pelvic organ prolapse to associated pelvic floor dysfunction symptoms: lower urinary tract, bowel, sexual dysfunction and abdominopelvic pain. Int Urogynecol J. 2021;32(10):2575\u201394 https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-021-04941-5.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"10","key":"5629_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2603","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-022-05315-1","volume":"33","author":"S Cichowski","year":"2022","unstructured":"Cichowski S, Grzybowska ME, Halder GE, et al. International Urogynecology consultation: patient reported outcome measures (PROs) use in the evaluation of patients with pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2022;33(10):2603\u201331. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-022-05315-1.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"5629_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Geomini PMAJ, Mol B-WJ, Bremer GL, Br\u00f6lmann HAM. Interobserver reproducibility of the Halfway grading system: a scoring system for assessment of pelvic organ prolapse. J Gynecol Surg. 2000;16(2):79\u201382. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1089\/gyn.2000.16.79.","DOI":"10.1089\/gyn.2000.16.79"},{"key":"5629_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"243","DOI":"10.1097\/01.spv.0000190322.85212.3e","volume":"11","author":"A Groenendijk","year":"2005","unstructured":"Groenendijk A, Blok S, Birnie E, Bonsel G. Interobserver agreement and intersystem comparison of the Halfway system of Baden and Walker versus the pelvic organ prolapse-quantitation prolapse classification system in assessing the severity of pelvic organ prolapse. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2005;11:243\u201350. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/01.spv.0000190322.85212.3e.","journal-title":"Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg"},{"issue":"3","key":"5629_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"347","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-010-1286-y","volume":"22","author":"J Manonai","year":"2011","unstructured":"Manonai J, Mouritsen L, Palma P, Contreras-Ortiz O, Korte JE, Swift S. The inter-system association between the simplified pelvic organ prolapse quantification system (S-POP) and the standard pelvic organ prolapse quantification system (POPQ) in describing pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2011;22(3):347\u201352. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-010-1286-y.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"6","key":"5629_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"645","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-011-1395-2","volume":"22","author":"M Parekh","year":"2011","unstructured":"Parekh M, Swift S, Lemos N, et al. Multicenter inter-examiner agreement trial for the validation of simplified POPQ system. Int Urogynecol J. 2011;22(6):645\u201350. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-011-1395-2.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"5629_CR7","unstructured":"Center-by-center results of a multicenter prospective trial to determine the inter-observer correlation of the simplified POP-Q in describing pelvic organ prolapse. Accessed 29 November 2022. https:\/\/www.researchgate.net\/publication\/51798389_Center-by-center_results_of_a_multicenter_prospective_trial_to_determine_the_inter-observer_correlation_of_the_simplified_POP-Q_in_describing_pelvic_organ_prolapse"},{"issue":"1","key":"5629_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"10","DOI":"10.1016\/s0002-9378(96)70243-0","volume":"175","author":"RC Bump","year":"1996","unstructured":"Bump RC, Mattiasson A, B\u00f8 K, et al. The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;175(1):10\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/s0002-9378(96)70243-0.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"5629_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"615","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-006-0076-z","volume":"17","author":"S Swift","year":"2006","unstructured":"Swift S, Morris S, McKinnie V, et al. Validation of a simplified technique for using the POPQ pelvic organ prolapse classification system. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2006;17(6):615\u201320. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-006-0076-z.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct"},{"issue":"8","key":"5629_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1005","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-010-1139-8","volume":"21","author":"DR Karp","year":"2010","unstructured":"Karp DR, Peterson TV, Jean-Michel M, Lefevre R, Davila GW, Aguilar VC. \u201cEyeball\u201d POP-Q examination: shortcut or valid assessment tool? Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21(8):1005\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-010-1139-8.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"1","key":"5629_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"37","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000131619.97936.e2","volume":"104","author":"WA Silva","year":"2004","unstructured":"Silva WA, Kleeman S, Segal J, Pauls R, Woods SE, Karram MM. Effects of a full bladder and patient positioning on pelvic organ prolapse assessment. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104(1):37\u201341. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/01.AOG.0000131619.97936.e2.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"5629_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"82","DOI":"10.1159\/000292507","volume":"70","author":"A Reich","year":"2010","unstructured":"Reich A, Kohorst F, Kreienberg R, Flock F. Influence of bladder volume on pelvic organ prolapse quantification results. Gynecol Obstet Investig. 2010;70(2):82\u20136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1159\/000292507.","journal-title":"Gynecol Obstet Investig"},{"issue":"6","key":"5629_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"681","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.15881","volume":"48","author":"KL Shek","year":"2016","unstructured":"Shek KL, Dietz HP. Assessment of pelvic organ prolapse: a review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;48(6):681\u201392 https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/uog.15881.","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"5629_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"18","DOI":"10.1016\/s0029-7844(00)00859-0","volume":"96","author":"MD Barber","year":"2000","unstructured":"Barber MD, Lambers A, Visco AG, Bump RC. Effect of patient position on clinical evaluation of pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;96(1):18\u201322. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/s0029-7844(00)00859-0.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"9","key":"5629_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1303","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-008-0635-6","volume":"19","author":"GA Digesu","year":"2008","unstructured":"Digesu GA, Khullar V, Cardozo L, Robinson D. Inter-observer reliability of digital vaginal examination using a four-grade scale in different patient positions. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008;19(9):1303\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-008-0635-6.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct"},{"issue":"8","key":"5629_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"979","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-009-0884-z","volume":"20","author":"GA Digesu","year":"2009","unstructured":"Digesu GA, Athanasiou S, Cardozo L, Hill S, Khullar V. Validation of the pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) system in left lateral position. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2009;20(8):979\u201383. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-009-0884-z.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct"},{"issue":"2","key":"5629_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"200.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.05.012","volume":"199","author":"M Pearce","year":"2008","unstructured":"Pearce M, Swift S, Goodnight W. Pelvic organ prolapse: is there a difference in POPQ exam results based on time of day, morning or afternoon? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199(2):200.e1\u20135. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.05.012.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"5629_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"415","DOI":"10.1097\/SPV.0000000000000608","volume":"25","author":"LL Ow","year":"2019","unstructured":"Ow LL, Subramaniam N, Kamisan Atan I, Friedman T, Martin A, Dietz HP. Should genital hiatus\/perineal body be measured at rest or on Valsalva? Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2019;25(6):415\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/SPV.0000000000000608.","journal-title":"Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg"},{"issue":"11","key":"5629_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1599","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-012-1771-6","volume":"23","author":"HD Brazell","year":"2012","unstructured":"Brazell HD, Claydon CS, Li J, et al. Does neuromuscular blockade affect the assessment of pelvic organ prolapse? Int Urogynecol J. 2012;23(11):1599\u2013603. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-012-1771-6.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"8","key":"5629_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1173","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-018-3579-5","volume":"29","author":"P Leerasiri","year":"2018","unstructured":"Leerasiri P, Wachasiddhisilpa P, Hengrasmee P, Asumpinwong C. Relationship of degree of uterine prolapse between pelvic examination in lithotomy position with cervical traction and pelvic examination in standing position. Int Urogynecol J. 2018;29(8):1173\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-018-3579-5.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J."},{"issue":"6","key":"5629_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"497","DOI":"10.1097\/SPV.0000000000000323","volume":"22","author":"GC Dunivan","year":"2016","unstructured":"Dunivan GC, Lyons KE, Jeppson PC, et al. Pelvic organ prolapse stage and the relationship to genital hiatus and perineal body measurements. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2016;22(6):497\u2013500. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/SPV.0000000000000323.","journal-title":"Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg"},{"issue":"6","key":"5629_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"718.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.12.027","volume":"214","author":"JL Lowder","year":"2016","unstructured":"Lowder JL, Oliphant SS, Shepherd JP, Ghetti C, Sutkin G. Genital hiatus size is associated with and predictive of apical vaginal support loss. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;214(6):718.e1\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.12.027.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"8","key":"5629_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1279","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-018-3779-z","volume":"30","author":"M Girgis","year":"2019","unstructured":"Girgis M, Shek KL, Dietz HP. Total vaginal length: does it matter for assessing uterine prolapse? Int Urogynecol J. 2019;30(8):1279\u201382. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-018-3779-z.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"4","key":"5629_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"399","DOI":"10.2522\/ptj.20060160","volume":"87","author":"DF Borello-France","year":"2007","unstructured":"Borello-France DF, Handa VL, Brown MB, et al. Pelvic-floor muscle function in women with pelvic organ prolapse. Phys Ther. 2007;87(4):399\u2013407. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2522\/ptj.20060160.","journal-title":"Phys Ther"},{"issue":"7","key":"5629_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"835","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-010-1125-1","volume":"21","author":"MF Felic\u00edssimo","year":"2010","unstructured":"Felic\u00edssimo MF, Carneiro MM, Saleme CS, Pinto RZ, da Fonseca AMRM, da Silva-Filho AL. Intensive supervised versus unsupervised pelvic floor muscle training for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence: a randomized comparative trial. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21(7):835\u201340. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-010-1125-1.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"6","key":"5629_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"432","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-004-1274-1","volume":"16","author":"C Ghetti","year":"2005","unstructured":"Ghetti C, Gregory WT, Edwards SR, Otto LN, Clark AL. Severity of pelvic organ prolapse associated with measurements of pelvic floor function. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2005;16(6):432\u20136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-004-1274-1.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct"},{"issue":"3","key":"5629_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"311","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-009-1037-0","volume":"21","author":"M Slieker-ten Hove","year":"2010","unstructured":"Slieker-ten Hove M, Pool-Goudzwaard A, Eijkemans M, Steegers-Theunissen R, Burger C, Vierhout M. Pelvic floor muscle function in a general population of women with and without pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21(3):311\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-009-1037-0.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"7","key":"5629_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"981","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-015-2637-5","volume":"26","author":"I Gruenwald","year":"2015","unstructured":"Gruenwald I, Mustafa S, Gartman I, Lowenstein L. Genital sensation in women with pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26(7):981\u20134. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-015-2637-5.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"6","key":"5629_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1381","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2000.111489","volume":"183","author":"TF Mattox","year":"2000","unstructured":"Mattox TF, Lucente V, McIntyre P, Miklos JR, Tomezsko J. Abnormal spinal curvature and its relationship to pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;183(6):1381\u20134discussion 1384. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1067\/mob.2000.111489.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"5629_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"219","DOI":"10.1097\/SPV.0000000000000271","volume":"22","author":"I Meyer","year":"2016","unstructured":"Meyer I, McArthur TA, Tang Y, McKinney JL, Morgan SL, Richter HE. Pelvic floor symptoms and spinal curvature in women. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2016;22(4):219\u201323. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/SPV.0000000000000271.","journal-title":"Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg"},{"issue":"3","key":"5629_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"241.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.10.040","volume":"200","author":"TA Stein","year":"2009","unstructured":"Stein TA, Kaur G, Summers A, Larson KA, Delancey JOL. Comparison of bony dimensions at the level of the pelvic floor in women with and without pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;200(3):241.e1\u20135. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.10.040.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"5629_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"378","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-004-1196-y","volume":"15","author":"JL Segal","year":"2004","unstructured":"Segal JL, Vassallo BJ, Kleeman SD, Silva WA, Karram MM. Paravaginal defects: prevalence and accuracy of preoperative detection. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2004;15(6):378\u201383discussion 383. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-004-1196-y.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct"},{"issue":"1","key":"5629_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"100","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.01.053","volume":"191","author":"JL Whiteside","year":"2004","unstructured":"Whiteside JL, Barber MD, Paraiso MF, Hugney CM, Walters MD. Clinical evaluation of anterior vaginal wall support defects: interexaminer and intraexaminer reliability. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191(1):100\u20134. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.01.053.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"5629_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"200","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2012.08.177","volume":"189","author":"CS Elliott","year":"2013","unstructured":"Elliott CS, Yeh J, Comiter CV, Chen B, Sokol ER. The predictive value of a cystocele for concomitant vaginal apical prolapse. J Urol. 2013;189(1):200\u20133. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.juro.2012.08.177.","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"issue":"7","key":"5629_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"893","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-013-2303-8","volume":"25","author":"CL Grimes","year":"2014","unstructured":"Grimes CL, Tan-Kim J, Nager CW, et al. Outcome measures to assess anatomy and function of the posterior vaginal compartment. Int Urogynecol J. 2014;25(7):893\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-013-2303-8.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"9","key":"5629_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1291","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-008-0632-9","volume":"19","author":"AG Groenendijk","year":"2008","unstructured":"Groenendijk AG, van der Hulst VP, Birnie E, Bonsel GJ. Correlation between posterior vaginal wall defects assessed by clinical examination and by defecography. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008;19(9):1291\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-008-0632-9.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct"},{"issue":"9","key":"5629_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1401","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-017-3285-8","volume":"28","author":"S Rachaneni","year":"2017","unstructured":"Rachaneni S, Atan IK, Shek KL, Dietz HP. Digital rectal examination in the evaluation of rectovaginal septal defects. Int Urogynecol J. 2017;28(9):1401\u20135. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-017-3285-8.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"1","key":"5629_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"47","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-018-3681-8","volume":"30","author":"R Patnam","year":"2019","unstructured":"Patnam R, Edenfield A, Swift S. Defining normal apical vaginal support: a relook at the POSST study. Int Urogynecol J. 2019;30(1):47\u201351. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-018-3681-8.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"5629_CR39","unstructured":"Comparison of estimated cervical length from the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification exam and actual cervical length at hysterectomy: can we accurately determine cervical elongation? Accessed 29 November 2022. https:\/\/www.researchgate.net\/publication\/232187684_Comparison_of_Estimated_Cervical_Length_From_the_Pelvic_Organ_Prolapse_Quantification_Exam_and_Actual_Cervical_Length_at_Hysterectomy_Can_We_Accurately_Determine_Cervical_Elongation"},{"issue":"5","key":"5629_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"278","DOI":"10.1097\/SPV.0b013e31829c6365","volume":"19","author":"EC Crosby","year":"2013","unstructured":"Crosby EC, Sharp KM, Gasperut A, Delancey JOL, Morgan DM. Apical descent in the office and the operating room: the effect of prolapse size. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2013;19(5):278\u201381. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/SPV.0b013e31829c6365.","journal-title":"Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg"},{"issue":"5","key":"5629_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"510.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.01.033","volume":"218","author":"MB Berger","year":"2018","unstructured":"Berger MB, Kolenic GE, Fenner DE, Morgan DM, DeLancey JOL. Structural, functional, and symptomatic differences between women with rectocele versus cystocele and normal support. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;218(5):510.e1\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.01.033.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"5629_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"152","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000297309.25091.a0","volume":"111","author":"JL Lowder","year":"2008","unstructured":"Lowder JL, Park AJ, Ellison R, et al. The role of apical vaginal support in the appearance of anterior and posterior vaginal prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;111(1):152\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/01.AOG.0000297309.25091.a0.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"10","key":"5629_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2633","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-022-05324-0","volume":"33","author":"K B\u00f8","year":"2022","unstructured":"B\u00f8 K, Angl\u00e8s-Acedo S, Batra A, et al. International urogynecology consultation chapter 3 committee 2; conservative treatment of patient with pelvic organ prolapse: pelvic floor muscle training. Int Urogynecol J. 2022;33(10):2633\u201367. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-022-05324-0.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"2","key":"5629_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"119","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2010.06.007","volume":"111","author":"L Dain","year":"2010","unstructured":"Dain L, Auslander R, Rosen T, Segev Y, Goldschmidt E, Abramov Y. Urodynamic findings in women with pelvic organ prolapse and obstructive voiding symptoms. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2010;111(2):119\u201321. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ijgo.2010.06.007.","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"issue":"8","key":"5629_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1111","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-017-3532-z","volume":"29","author":"M Frigerio","year":"2018","unstructured":"Frigerio M, Manodoro S, Cola A, Palmieri S, Spelzini F, Milani R. Detrusor underactivity in pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2018;29(8):1111\u20136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-017-3532-z.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"6","key":"5629_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"515","DOI":"10.1002\/nau.20568","volume":"27","author":"E Mueller","year":"2008","unstructured":"Mueller E, Wei J, Nygaard I, et al. The correlation of voiding variables between non-instrumented uroflowmetry and pressure-flow studies in women with pelvic organ prolapse. Neurourol Urodyn. 2008;27(6):515\u201321. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/nau.20568.","journal-title":"Neurourol Urodyn"},{"issue":"3","key":"5629_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"175","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-004-1138-8","volume":"15","author":"G Lazarou","year":"2004","unstructured":"Lazarou G, Scotti RJ, Mikhail MS, Zhou HS, Powers K. Pessary reduction and postoperative cure of retention in women with anterior vaginal wall prolapse. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2004;15(3):175\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-004-1138-8.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct"},{"issue":"4","key":"5629_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"575","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-016-3144-z","volume":"28","author":"TS Lo","year":"2017","unstructured":"Lo TS, Shailaja N, Hsieh WC, Uy-Patrimonio MC, Yusoff FM, Ibrahim R. Predictors of voiding dysfunction following extensive vaginal pelvic reconstructive surgery. Int Urogynecol J. 2017;28(4):575\u201382. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-016-3144-z.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"5629_CR49","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Ulrich A, Davis P, Propst K, O\u02bcSullivan DM, Tulikangas P. Elevated postvoid residual urine volume: identifying risk factors and predicting resolution in women with pelvic organ prolapse. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2018;24(6):444\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/SPV.0000000000000471.","DOI":"10.1097\/SPV.0000000000000471"},{"issue":"11","key":"5629_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1301","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-009-0954-2","volume":"20","author":"I Araki","year":"2009","unstructured":"Araki I, Haneda Y, Mikami Y, Takeda M. Incontinence and detrusor dysfunction associated with pelvic organ prolapse: clinical value of preoperative urodynamic evaluation. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2009;20(11):1301\u20136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-009-0954-2.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct"},{"issue":"8","key":"5629_CR51","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2841","DOI":"10.1002\/nau.23796","volume":"37","author":"V Asfour","year":"2018","unstructured":"Asfour V, Gargasole C, Fernando R, Digesu GG, Khullar V. Urodynamics are necessary for patients with asymptomatic pelvic organ prolapse. Neurourol Urodyn. 2018;37(8):2841\u20136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/nau.23796.","journal-title":"Neurourol Urodyn"},{"issue":"5","key":"5629_CR52","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"423","DOI":"10.1034\/j.1600-0412.2001.080005423.x","volume":"80","author":"OT Yalcin","year":"2001","unstructured":"Yalcin OT, Yildirim A, Hassa H. The effects of severe cystocele on urogynecologic symptoms and findings. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2001;80(5):423\u20137.","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"8","key":"5629_CR53","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"813","DOI":"10.1097\/GME.0b013e31827f09a0","volume":"20","author":"CC Liang","year":"2013","unstructured":"Liang CC, Chang YL, Lin YH, Chang SD. Significance of bladder trabeculation in postmenopausal women with severe pelvic organ prolapse: clinical and urodynamic assessments. Menopause. 2013;20(8):813\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/GME.0b013e31827f09a0.","journal-title":"Menopause"},{"issue":"2","key":"5629_CR54","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"233","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.14678","volume":"46","author":"J Cassad\u00f3","year":"2015","unstructured":"Cassad\u00f3 J, Espu\u00f1a-Pons M, D\u00edaz-Cuervo H, Rebollo P; GISPEM group. How can we measure bladder volumes in women with advanced pelvic organ prolapse? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;46(2):233\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/uog.14678.","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"5629_CR55","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"14","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1464-410x.1999.00121.x","volume":"84","author":"P Abrams","year":"1999","unstructured":"Abrams P. Bladder outlet obstruction index, bladder contractility index and bladder voiding efficiency: three simple indices to define bladder voiding function. BJU Int. 1999;84(1):14\u20135. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1046\/j.1464-410x.1999.00121.x.","journal-title":"BJU Int"},{"issue":"1","key":"5629_CR56","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"47","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00182666","volume":"13","author":"W Sch\u00e4fer","year":"1995","unstructured":"Sch\u00e4fer W. Analysis of bladder-outlet function with the linearized passive urethral resistance relation, linPURR, and a disease-specific approach for grading obstruction: from complex to simple. World J Urol. 1995;13(1):47\u201358. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/BF00182666.","journal-title":"World J Urol"},{"key":"5629_CR57","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"141","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2018.12.024","volume":"233","author":"M Frigerio","year":"2019","unstructured":"Frigerio M, Manodoro S, Cola A, Palmieri S, Spelzini F, Milani R. Risk factors for persistent, de novo and overall overactive bladder syndrome after surgical prolapse repair. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019;233:141\u20135. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2018.12.024.","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"8","key":"5629_CR58","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1663","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-019-04084-8","volume":"31","author":"D Glass","year":"2020","unstructured":"Glass D, Lin FC, Khan AA, et al. Impact of preoperative urodynamics on women undergoing pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Int Urogynecol J. 2020;31(8):1663\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-019-04084-8.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"3","key":"5629_CR59","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"320","DOI":"10.1080\/01443610802044825","volume":"28","author":"S Jha","year":"2008","unstructured":"Jha S, Toozs-Hobson P, Parsons M, Gull F. Does preoperative urodynamics change the management of prolapse? J Obstet Gynaecol. 2008;28(3):320\u20132. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/01443610802044825.","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"5629_CR60","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"192","DOI":"10.1002\/nau.23273","volume":"37","author":"TS Lo","year":"2018","unstructured":"Lo TS, Nagashu S, Hsieh WC, Uy-Patrimonio MC, Yi-Hao L. Predictors for detrusor overactivity following extensive vaginal pelvic reconstructive surgery. Neurourol Urodyn. 2018;37(1):192\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/nau.23273.","journal-title":"Neurourol Urodyn"},{"issue":"2","key":"5629_CR61","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"170","DOI":"10.1002\/nau.20328","volume":"26","author":"JPWR Roovers","year":"2007","unstructured":"Roovers JPWR, van Laar JOEH, Loffeld C, Bremer GL, Mol BW, Bongers MY. Does urodynamic investigation improve outcome in patients undergoing prolapse surgery? Neurourol Urodyn. 2007;26(2):170\u20135. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/nau.20328.","journal-title":"Neurourol Urodyn"},{"issue":"2","key":"5629_CR62","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"253","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2011.03.010","volume":"60","author":"M Serati","year":"2011","unstructured":"Serati M, Salvatore S, Siesto G, et al. Urinary symptoms and urodynamic findings in women with pelvic organ prolapse: is there a correlation? Results of an artificial neural network analysis. Eur Urol. 2011;60(2):253\u201360. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.eururo.2011.03.010.","journal-title":"Eur Urol"},{"issue":"2","key":"5629_CR63","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"819","DOI":"10.1002\/nau.24288","volume":"39","author":"M Espu\u00f1a-Pons","year":"2020","unstructured":"Espu\u00f1a-Pons M, Diez-Itza I, Angl\u00e8s-Acedo S, Covernton PJO. Cough stress tests to diagnose stress urinary incontinence in women with pelvic organ prolapse with indication for surgical treatment. Neurourol Urodyn. 2020;39(2):819\u201325. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/nau.24288.","journal-title":"Neurourol Urodyn"},{"issue":"4","key":"5629_CR64","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"662","DOI":"10.1016\/s0029-7844(03)00067-x","volume":"101","author":"JT Pollak","year":"2003","unstructured":"Pollak JT, Jenkins P, Kopka SL, Davila GW. Effect of genital prolapse on assessment of bladder neck mobility by the Q-tip test. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;101(4):662\u20135. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/s0029-7844(03)00067-x.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"5629_CR65","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"687","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-010-1316-9","volume":"22","author":"SO Kim","year":"2011","unstructured":"Kim SO, Chung HS, Hwang EC, Oh KJ, Kwon D. Point aa of the POP-Q system as a predictive value of urethral mobility in women. Int Urogynecol J. 2011;22(6):687\u201391. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-010-1316-9.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"3","key":"5629_CR66","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"485","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-012-1888-7","volume":"24","author":"J Leruth","year":"2013","unstructured":"Leruth J, Fillet M, Waltregny D. Incidence and risk factors of postoperative stress urinary incontinence following laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy in patients with negative preoperative prolapse reduction stress testing. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24(3):485\u201391. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-012-1888-7.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"4","key":"5629_CR67","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"583","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-016-3149-7","volume":"28","author":"AN Alas","year":"2017","unstructured":"Alas AN, Chinthakanan O, Espaillat L, Plowright L, Davila GW, Aguilar VC. De novo stress urinary incontinence after pelvic organ prolapse surgery in women without occult incontinence. Int Urogynecol J. 2017;28(4):583\u201390. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-016-3149-7.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"11","key":"5629_CR68","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1517","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-014-2410-1","volume":"25","author":"MJ Jeon","year":"2014","unstructured":"Jeon MJ, Kim JY, Moon YJ, Bai SW, Yoo EH. Two-year urinary outcomes of sacrocolpopexy with or without transobturator tape: results of a prolapse-reduction stress test-based approach. Int Urogynecol J. 2014;25(11):1517\u201322. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-014-2410-1.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"5","key":"5629_CR69","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"487.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.07.006","volume":"205","author":"S Kasturi","year":"2011","unstructured":"Kasturi S, Diaz SI, McDermott CD, et al. De novo stress urinary incontinence after negative prolapse reduction stress testing for total vaginal mesh procedures: incidence and risk factors. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;205(5):487.e1\u20134. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.07.006.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"7","key":"5629_CR70","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"857","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-011-1648-0","volume":"23","author":"J Park","year":"2012","unstructured":"Park J, McDermott CD, Terry CL, Bump RC, Woodman PJ, Hale DS. Use of preoperative prolapse reduction stress testing and the risk of a second surgery for urinary symptoms following laparoscopic sacral colpoperineopexy. Int Urogynecol J. 2012;23(7):857\u201364. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-011-1648-0.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"3","key":"5629_CR71","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"399","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-015-2837-z","volume":"27","author":"TS Lo","year":"2016","unstructured":"Lo TS, Nawawi EA, Wu PY, bt Karim N, Al-Kharabsheh A. Predictors for persistent urodynamic stress incontinence following extensive pelvic reconstructive surgery with and without midurethral sling. Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27(3):399\u2013406. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-015-2837-z.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"3","key":"5629_CR72","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"349","DOI":"10.1002\/ijgo.12443","volume":"141","author":"M Frigerio","year":"2018","unstructured":"Frigerio M, Manodoro S, Palmieri S, Spelzini F, Milani R. Risk factors for stress urinary incontinence after native-tissue vaginal repair of pelvic organ prolapse. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2018;141(3):349\u201353. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/ijgo.12443.","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"5629_CR73","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Van der Ploeg JM, Steyerberg EW, Zwolsman SE, van der Vaart CH, Roovers JPWR. Stress urinary incontinence after vaginal prolapse repair: development and internal validation of a prediction model with and without the stress test. Neurourol Urodyn. 2019;38(4):1086\u201392. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/nau.23958.","DOI":"10.1002\/nau.23958"},{"issue":"2","key":"5629_CR74","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"165","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-015-2932-1","volume":"27","author":"BT Haylen","year":"2016","unstructured":"Haylen BT, Maher CF, Barber MD, et al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)\/International Continence society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27(2):165\u201394. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-015-2932-1.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"2","key":"5629_CR75","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"679","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2008.10.009","volume":"181","author":"KN Ballert","year":"2009","unstructured":"Ballert KN, Biggs GY, Isenalumhe A, Rosenblum N, Nitti VW. Managing the urethra at transvaginal pelvic organ prolapse repair: a urodynamic approach. J Urol. 2009;181(2):679\u201384. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.juro.2008.10.009.","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"issue":"3","key":"5629_CR76","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"788","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2006.08.034","volume":"51","author":"E Costantini","year":"2007","unstructured":"Costantini E, Zucchi A, Giannantoni A, Mearini L, Bini V, Porena M. Must colposuspension be associated with sacropexy to prevent postoperative urinary incontinence? Eur Urol. 2007;51(3):788\u201394. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.eururo.2006.08.034.","journal-title":"Eur Urol"},{"issue":"5","key":"5629_CR77","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"488","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0412.2011.01087.x","volume":"90","author":"AM Ellstr\u00f6m Engh","year":"2011","unstructured":"Ellstr\u00f6m Engh AM, Ekeryd A, Magnusson \u00c5, Olsson I, Otterlind L, Tobiasson G. Can de novo stress incontinence after anterior wall repair be predicted? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2011;90(5):488\u201393. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1600-0412.2011.01087.x.","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"7","key":"5629_CR78","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"851","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-012-1765-4","volume":"23","author":"S Ennemoser","year":"2012","unstructured":"Ennemoser S, Sch\u00f6nfeld M, von Bodungen V, Dian D, Friese K, Jundt K. Clinical relevance of occult stress urinary incontinence (OSUI) following vaginal prolapse surgery: long-term follow-up. Int Urogynecol J. 2012;23(7):851\u20135.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"3","key":"5629_CR79","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"598","DOI":"10.1097\/JU.0000000000000575","volume":"203","author":"E Goessens","year":"2020","unstructured":"Goessens E, Deriemaeker H, Cammu H. The use of a vaginal pessary to decide whether a mid urethral sling should be added to prolapse surgery. J Urol. 2020;203(3):598\u2013603. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/JU.0000000000000575.","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"issue":"2","key":"5629_CR80","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"227","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2012.12.029","volume":"168","author":"BA Hafidh","year":"2013","unstructured":"Hafidh BA, Chou Q, Khalil MM, Al-Mandeel H. De novo stress urinary incontinence after vaginal repair for pelvic organ prolapse: one-year follow-up. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013;168(2):227\u201330. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2012.12.029.","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"1","key":"5629_CR81","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"105","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2010.08.003","volume":"154","author":"A Karateke","year":"2011","unstructured":"Karateke A, Tug N, Cam C, Selcuk S, Asoglu MR. Concomitant surgical correction of occult stress urinary incontinence by TOT in patients with pelvic organ prolapse. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011;154(1):105\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2010.08.003.","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"1","key":"5629_CR82","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"27","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-005-1367-5","volume":"17","author":"S Kleeman","year":"2006","unstructured":"Kleeman S, Vassallo B, Segal J, Hungler M, Karram M. The ability of history and a negative cough stress test to detect occult stress incontinence in patients undergoing surgical repair of advanced pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2006;17(1):27\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-005-1367-5.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct"},{"issue":"6","key":"5629_CR83","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1378","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2000.106176","volume":"182","author":"JJ Klutke","year":"2000","unstructured":"Klutke JJ, Ramos S. Urodynamic outcome after surgery for severe prolapse and potential stress incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;182(6):1378\u201381. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1067\/mob.2000.106176.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"5629_CR84","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"795","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000140689.90131.01","volume":"104","author":"CC Liang","year":"2004","unstructured":"Liang CC, Chang YL, Chang SD, Lo TS, Soong YK. Pessary test to predict postoperative urinary incontinence in women undergoing hysterectomy for prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104(4):795\u2013800. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/01.AOG.0000140689.90131.01.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"5629_CR85","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"280","DOI":"10.1097\/SPV.0000000000000272","volume":"22","author":"S Manodoro","year":"2016","unstructured":"Manodoro S, Spelzini F, Frigerio M, Nicoli E, Verri D, Milani R. Is occult stress urinary incontinence a reliable predictive marker? Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2016;22(4):280\u20132. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/SPV.0000000000000272.","journal-title":"Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg"},{"issue":"5","key":"5629_CR86","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"594","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1464-410X.2007.07291.x","volume":"101","author":"V Misra\u00ef","year":"2008","unstructured":"Misra\u00ef V, Roupr\u00eat M, Cour F, Chartier-Kastler E, Richard F. De novo urinary stress incontinence after laparoscopic sacral colpopexy. BJU Int. 2008;101(5):594\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1464-410X.2007.07291.x.","journal-title":"BJU Int"},{"issue":"1","key":"5629_CR87","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"31","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2006.12.011","volume":"97","author":"C Reena","year":"2007","unstructured":"Reena C, Kekre AN, Kekre N. Occult stress incontinence in women with pelvic organ prolapse. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2007;97(1):31\u20134. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ijgo.2006.12.011.","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"issue":"1","key":"5629_CR88","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"33","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-013-2150-7","volume":"25","author":"L Schierlitz","year":"2014","unstructured":"Schierlitz L, Dwyer PL, Rosamilia A, et al. Pelvic organ prolapse surgery with and without tension-free vaginal tape in women with occult or asymptomatic urodynamic stress incontinence: a randomised controlled trial. Int Urogynecol J. 2014;25(1):33\u201340. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-013-2150-7.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"7","key":"5629_CR89","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1119","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-018-03864-y","volume":"30","author":"T Sierra","year":"2019","unstructured":"Sierra T, Sullivan G, Leung K, Flynn M. The negative predictive value of preoperative urodynamics for stress urinary incontinence following prolapse surgery. Int Urogynecol J. 2019;30(7):1119\u201324. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-018-03864-y.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"3","key":"5629_CR90","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"361","DOI":"10.1007\/s00345-015-1590-8","volume":"34","author":"X Song","year":"2016","unstructured":"Song X, Zhu L, Ding J. The value of the preoperative 1-h pad test with pessary insertion for predicting the need for a mid-urethral sling following pelvic prolapse surgery: a cohort study. World J Urol. 2016;34(3):361\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00345-015-1590-8.","journal-title":"World J Urol"},{"issue":"2","key":"5629_CR91","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"171","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-010-1253-7","volume":"22","author":"S Srikrishna","year":"2011","unstructured":"Srikrishna S, Robinson D, Cardozo L. Ringing the changes in evaluation of urogenital prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2011;22(2):171\u20135. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-010-1253-7.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"7","key":"5629_CR92","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"843","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-012-1764-5","volume":"23","author":"R Svenningsen","year":"2012","unstructured":"Svenningsen R, Borstad E, Spydslaug AE, Sandvik L, Staff AC. Occult incontinence as predictor for postoperative stress urinary incontinence following pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Int Urogynecol J. 2012;23(7):843\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-012-1764-5.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"7","key":"5629_CR93","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1029","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-015-2924-1","volume":"27","author":"JM van der Ploeg","year":"2016","unstructured":"van der Ploeg JM, Oude Rengerink K, van der Steen A, et al. Vaginal prolapse repair with or without a midurethral sling in women with genital prolapse and occult stress urinary incontinence: a randomized trial. Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27(7):1029\u201338. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-015-2924-1.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"3","key":"5629_CR94","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1011","DOI":"10.1002\/nau.23384","volume":"37","author":"JM van der Ploeg","year":"2018","unstructured":"van der Ploeg JM, Zwolsman SE, Posthuma S, Wiarda HS, van der Vaart CH, Roovers JPWR. The predictive value of demonstrable stress incontinence during basic office evaluation and urodynamics in women without symptomatic urinary incontinence undergoing vaginal prolapse surgery. Neurourol Urodyn. 2018;37(3):1011\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/nau.23384.","journal-title":"Neurourol Urodyn"},{"issue":"5","key":"5629_CR95","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"607","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-007-0498-2","volume":"19","author":"AG Visco","year":"2008","unstructured":"Visco AG, Brubaker L, Nygaard I, et al. The role of preoperative urodynamic testing in stress-continent women undergoing sacrocolpopexy: the colpopexy and urinary reduction efforts (CARE) randomized surgical trial. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008;19(5):607\u201314. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-007-0498-2.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct"},{"issue":"25","key":"5629_CR96","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2358","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1111967","volume":"366","author":"JT Wei","year":"2012","unstructured":"Wei JT, Nygaard I, Richter HE, et al. A midurethral sling to reduce incontinence after vaginal prolapse repair. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(25):2358\u201367. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1056\/NEJMoa1111967.","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"issue":"11","key":"5629_CR97","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"599","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1442-2042.2001.00387.x","volume":"8","author":"T Yamada","year":"2001","unstructured":"Yamada T, Ichiyanagi N, Kamata S, et al. Need for sling surgery in patients with large cystoceles and masked stress urinary incontinence. Int J Urol. 2001;8(11):599\u2013603. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1046\/j.1442-2042.2001.00387.x.","journal-title":"Int J Urol"},{"issue":"1","key":"5629_CR98","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"189","DOI":"10.1007\/s00345-018-2366-8","volume":"37","author":"SM Hwang","year":"2019","unstructured":"Hwang SM, de Toledo LGM, da Silva CS, Frade AB, Matos AC, Auge APF. Is urodynamics necessary to identify occult stress urinary incontinence? World J Urol. 2019;37(1):189\u201393. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00345-018-2366-8.","journal-title":"World J Urol"},{"issue":"9","key":"5629_CR99","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1313","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-015-2685-x","volume":"26","author":"TS Lo","year":"2015","unstructured":"Lo TS, Bt Karim N, Nawawi EA, Wu PY, Nusee Z. Predictors for de novo stress urinary incontinence following extensive pelvic reconstructive surgery. Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26(9):1313\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-015-2685-x.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"6","key":"5629_CR100","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"678","DOI":"10.4103\/0366-6999.201592","volume":"130","author":"SY Wang","year":"2017","unstructured":"Wang SY, Cao TT, Wang RZ, Yang X, Sun XL, Wang JL. Incidence and risk factors of de novo stress urinary incontinence after pelvic floor reconstruction: a nested case-control study. Chin Med J. 2017;130(6):678\u201383. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4103\/0366-6999.201592.","journal-title":"Chin Med J"},{"issue":"8","key":"5629_CR101","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1355","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-012-2019-1","volume":"24","author":"TM Smith","year":"2013","unstructured":"Smith TM, DeLancey JOL, Fenner DE. Post-reduction stress urinary incontinence rates in posterior versus anterior pelvic organ prolapse: a secondary analysis. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24(8):1355\u201360. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-012-2019-1.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"1","key":"5629_CR102","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"87","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2006.09.068","volume":"69","author":"JN Nguyen","year":"2007","unstructured":"Nguyen JN, Yazdany T, Burchette RJ. Urodynamic evaluation of urethral competency in women with posterior vaginal support defects. Urology. 2007;69(1):87\u201390. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.urology.2006.09.068.","journal-title":"Urology"},{"issue":"2 Pt 1","key":"5629_CR103","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"279","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000094","volume":"123","author":"JE Jelovsek","year":"2014","unstructured":"Jelovsek JE, Chagin K, Brubaker L, et al. A model for predicting the risk of de novo stress urinary incontinence in women undergoing pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123(2 Pt 1):279\u201387. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000094.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"5629_CR104","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"683","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000003158","volume":"133","author":"JE Jelovsek","year":"2019","unstructured":"Jelovsek JE, van der Ploeg JM, Roovers JP, Barber MD. Validation of a model predicting de novo stress urinary incontinence in women undergoing pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;133(4):683\u201390. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/AOG.0000000000003158.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"10","key":"5629_CR105","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1719","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-018-3805-1","volume":"30","author":"J Sabadell","year":"2019","unstructured":"Sabadell J, Salicr\u00fa S, Montero-Armengol A, Rodriguez-Mias N, Gil-Moreno A, Poza JL. External validation of de novo stress urinary incontinence prediction model after vaginal prolapse surgery. Int Urogynecol J. 2019;30(10):1719\u201323. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-018-3805-1.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"21","key":"5629_CR106","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1987","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1113595","volume":"366","author":"CW Nager","year":"2012","unstructured":"Nager CW, Brubaker L, Litman HJ, et al. A randomized trial of urodynamic testing before stress-incontinence surgery. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(21):1987\u201397. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1056\/NEJMoa1113595.","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"5629_CR107","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Van Leijsen SAL, Kluivers KB, Mol BWJ, et al. Value of urodynamics before stress urinary incontinence surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;121(5):999\u20131008. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31828c68e3.","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31828c68e3"},{"issue":"1","key":"5629_CR108","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1186\/s12916-014-0241-z","volume":"13","author":"GS Collins","year":"2015","unstructured":"Collins GS, Reitsma JB, Altman DG, Moons KG. Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement. BMC Med. 2015;13(1):1. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12916-014-0241-z.","journal-title":"BMC Med"},{"issue":"2","key":"5629_CR109","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"250","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2015.05.005","volume":"86","author":"CE Dancz","year":"2015","unstructured":"Dancz CE, Walker D, Thomas D, \u00d6zel B. Prevalence of hydronephrosis in women with advanced pelvic organ prolapse. Urology. 2015;86(2):250\u20134. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.urology.2015.05.005.","journal-title":"Urology"},{"issue":"1","key":"5629_CR110","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"85","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-014-2450-6","volume":"26","author":"N Pillalamarri","year":"2015","unstructured":"Pillalamarri N, Shalom D, Sanidad S, Akerman M, Lind L, Winkler H. The prevalence of microscopic hematuria in a cohort of women with pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26(1):85\u201390. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-014-2450-6.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"5629_CR111","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"31","DOI":"10.2214\/ajr.173.1.10397095","volume":"173","author":"FM Kelvin","year":"1999","unstructured":"Kelvin FM, Hale DS, Maglinte DDT, Patten BJ, Benson JT. Female pelvic organ prolapse: diagnostic contribution of dynamic cystoproctography and comparison with physical examination. Am J Roentgenol. 1999;173:31\u20137.","journal-title":"Am J Roentgenol"},{"key":"5629_CR112","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1575","DOI":"10.1007\/BF02234374","volume":"44","author":"H Kaufman","year":"2001","unstructured":"Kaufman H, Buller J, Thompson J, et al. Dynamic pelvic magnetic resonance imaging and cystocolpoproctography alter surgical management of pelvic floor disorders. Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;44:1575\u201383.","journal-title":"Dis Colon Rectum"},{"key":"5629_CR113","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"22","DOI":"10.1007\/s001920200005","volume":"13","author":"A Lopez","year":"2002","unstructured":"Lopez A, Anzen B, Bremmer S, et al. Cystodefecoperitoneography in patients with genital prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2002;13:22\u20139.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"10","key":"5629_CR114","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S6","DOI":"10.1007\/BF02237219","volume":"43","author":"M Takano","year":"2000","unstructured":"Takano M, Hamada A. Evaluation of pelvic descent disorders by dynamic contrast roentgenography. Dis Colon Rectum. 2000;43(10):S6\u2013S11.","journal-title":"Dis Colon Rectum"},{"issue":"11","key":"5629_CR115","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1547","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2005.00734.x","volume":"112","author":"J Roovers","year":"2005","unstructured":"Roovers JP, van der Bom JG, van der Vaart CH, Heintz AP. Prediction of findings at defecography in patients with genital prolapse. BJOG. 2005;112(11):1547\u201353.","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"9","key":"5629_CR116","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1291","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-008-0632-9","volume":"19","author":"AG Groenendijk","year":"2008","unstructured":"Groenendijk AG, van der Hulst VP, Birnie E, Bonsel GJ. Correlation between posterior vaginal wall defects assessed by clinical examination and by defecography. Int Urogynecol J. 2008;19(9):1291\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-008-0632-9.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"4","key":"5629_CR117","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"231","DOI":"10.1159\/000360135","volume":"77","author":"JH Kim","year":"2014","unstructured":"Kim JH, Park SJ, Yi BH, Lee KW, Kim ME, Kim YH. Diagnostic effectiveness of dynamic colpocystoproctography in women planning for combined surgery with urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse. Gynecol Obstet Investig. 2014;77(4):231\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1159\/000360135.","journal-title":"Gynecol Obstet Investig"},{"key":"5629_CR118","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"373","DOI":"10.1002\/(SICI)1522-2586(199903)9:3<373::AID-JMRI2>3.0.CO;2-H","volume":"377","author":"D Vanbeckevoort","year":"1999","unstructured":"Vanbeckevoort D, Van Hoe L, Oyen R, Ponette E, De Ridder D, Deprest J. Pelvic floor descent in females: comparative study of colpocystodefecography and dynamic fast MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1999;377:373\u20137.","journal-title":"J Magn Reson Imaging"},{"key":"5629_CR119","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"17","DOI":"10.1007\/s10151-009-0454-x","volume":"13","author":"R Hausammann","year":"2009","unstructured":"Hausammann R, Steffen T, Weishaupt D, Beutner U, Hetzer F. Rectocele and intussusception: is there any coherence in symptoms or additional pelvic floor disorders? Tech Coloproctol. 2009;13:17\u201326. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10151-009-0454-x.","journal-title":"Tech Coloproctol"},{"key":"5629_CR120","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1390","DOI":"10.1007\/s00261-019-02327-2","volume":"46","author":"M Aziz","year":"2021","unstructured":"Aziz M, Khatri G, Hess D, Zimmern P. Anterior enterocele as an etiology for anterior vaginal wall prolapse: a magnetic resonance defecography case series. Abdom Radiol. 2021;46:1390\u20134.","journal-title":"Abdom Radiol"},{"issue":"4","key":"5629_CR121","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1373","DOI":"10.1007\/s00261-019-02313-8","volume":"46","author":"GR Pollock","year":"2021","unstructured":"Pollock GR, Twiss CO, Chartier S, Vedantham S, Funk J, Arif H. Comparison of magnetic resonance defecography grading with POP - Q staging and Baden \u2013 Walker grading in the evaluation of female pelvic organ prolapse. Abdom Radiol. 2021;46(4):1373\u201380.","journal-title":"Abdom Radiol"},{"key":"5629_CR122","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"49","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2018.05.031","volume":"119","author":"F Lin","year":"2018","unstructured":"Lin F, Funk J, Tiwari H, Kalb B, Twiss C. Dynamic pelvic magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of pelvic organ prolapse compared to physical examination findings. Urology. 2018;119:49\u201354.","journal-title":"Urology"},{"issue":"4","key":"5629_CR123","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"342","DOI":"10.1067\/j.cpradiol.2018.08.005","volume":"48","author":"H Arif-Tiwari","year":"2019","unstructured":"Arif-Tiwari H, Twiss CO, Lin FC, et al. Improved detection of pelvic organ prolapse: comparative utility of defecography phase sequence to nondefecography Valsalva maneuvers in dynamic pelvic floor magnetic resonance imaging. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2019;48(4):342\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1067\/j.cpradiol.2018.08.005.","journal-title":"Curr Probl Diagn Radiol"},{"key":"5629_CR124","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"O240","DOI":"10.1111\/codi.12586","volume":"16","author":"J Faucheron","year":"2014","unstructured":"Faucheron J, Barot S, Collomb D, Hohn N, Anglade D, Dubreuil A. Dynamic cystocolpoproctography is superior to functional pelvic MRI in the diagnosis of posterior pelvic floor disorders: results of a prospective study. Colorectal Dis. 2014;16:O240\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/codi.12586.","journal-title":"Colorectal Dis"},{"issue":"2","key":"5629_CR125","first-page":"206","volume":"43","author":"A Lienemann","year":"2000","unstructured":"Lienemann A, Anthuber C, Baron A, Reiser MDAM. Diagnosing enteroceles using dynamic magnetic resonance imaging. Colon Rectum. 2000;43(2):206\u201312.","journal-title":"Colon Rectum"},{"key":"5629_CR126","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Groenendijk AG, Birnie E, Boeckxstaens GE, Roovers J-PW, Bonsel GJ. Anorectal function testing and anal endosonography in the diagnostic work-up of patients with primary pelvic organ prolapse. Gynecol Obstet Investig. 2009;67:187\u201394. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1159\/000187650.","DOI":"10.1159\/000187650"},{"key":"5629_CR127","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"307","DOI":"10.1007\/s003840100315","volume":"16","author":"AP Zbar","year":"2001","unstructured":"Zbar AP, Beer-Gabel M, Aslam M. Rectoanal inhibition and rectocele: physiology versus categorization. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2001;16:307\u201312. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s003840100315.","journal-title":"Int J Colorectal Dis"},{"issue":"4","key":"5629_CR128","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"800","DOI":"10.2214\/AJR.21.26488","volume":"217","author":"BH Gurland","year":"2021","unstructured":"Gurland BH, Khatri G, Ram R, et al. Consensus definitions and interpretation templates for magnetic resonance imaging of defecatory pelvic floor disorders: proceedings of the Consensus Meeting of the Pelvic Floor Disorders Consortium of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, the Society of Abdominal Radiology, the International Continence Society, the American Urogynecologic Society, the International Urogynecological Association, and the Society of Gynecologic Surgeons. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2021;217(4):800\u201312.","journal-title":"AJR Am J Roentgenol"},{"key":"5629_CR129","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Paquette I, Rosman D, Sayed R El, et al. Correction to: Consensus definitions and interpretation templates for fluoroscopic imaging of defecatory pelvic floor disorders: proceedings of the Consensus Meeting of the Pelvic Floor Consortium of the American Association of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, the Society of Abdominal Radiology, the International Continence Society, the American Urogynecologic Society, the International Urogynecological Association, and the Society of Gynecologic Surgeons. Tech Coloproctol 2021;25(3):357. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10151-021-02412-z","DOI":"10.1007\/s10151-021-02412-z"}],"container-title":["International Urogynecology Journal"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00192-023-05629-8.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00192-023-05629-8\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00192-023-05629-8.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,11,27]],"date-time":"2023-11-27T09:04:56Z","timestamp":1701075896000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00192-023-05629-8"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,22]]},"references-count":129,"journal-issue":{"issue":"11","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,11]]}},"alternative-id":["5629"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-023-05629-8","relation":{},"ISSN":["0937-3462","1433-3023"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0937-3462","type":"print"},{"value":"1433-3023","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,22]]},"assertion":[{"value":"1 May 2023","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"22 July 2023","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"22 September 2023","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"None.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflicts of interest"}}]}}