{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,30]],"date-time":"2025-10-30T07:17:25Z","timestamp":1761808645150},"reference-count":25,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,1,11]],"date-time":"2024-01-11T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1704931200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,1,11]],"date-time":"2024-01-11T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1704931200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Int Urogynecol J"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,2]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-023-05701-3","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,1,11]],"date-time":"2024-01-11T12:01:47Z","timestamp":1704974507000},"page":"457-465","update-policy":"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"title":["Determinants of Dissatisfaction After Laparoscopic Cure of Vaginal and\/or Rectal Prolapse using Mesh: a Comprehensive Retrospective Cohort Study"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"35","author":[{"given":"Wissam","family":"Arab","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"David","family":"Lukanovi\u0107","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Miha","family":"Matja\u0161i\u010d","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Mija","family":"Blaganje","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Bruno","family":"Deval","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,1,11]]},"reference":[{"issue":"6","key":"5701_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"584.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.09.011","volume":"209","author":"AC Kirby","year":"2013","unstructured":"Kirby AC, Luber KM, Menefee SA. An update on the current and future demand for care of pelvic floor disorders in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;209(6):584.e1\u20135. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.09.011.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"5701_CR2","unstructured":"Scottish Government. Halt in use of transvaginal mesh. Published 12 September 2018. https:\/\/www.gov.scot\/news\/halt-in-use-of-transvaginal-mesh\/."},{"issue":"2","key":"5701_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"129","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.01.018","volume":"219","author":"KV Meriwether","year":"2018","unstructured":"Meriwether KV, Antosh DD, Olivera CK, et al. Uterine preservation vs hysterectomy in pelvic organ prolapse surgery: a systematic review with meta-analysis and clinical practice guidelines. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;219(2):129\u2013146.e2. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.01.018.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"5701_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Maher C, Feiner B, Baessler K, Schmid C. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;(4):CD004014. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/14651858.CD004014.pub5.","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD004014.pub5"},{"issue":"7","key":"5701_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1957","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-021-04932-6","volume":"33","author":"ML Izett-Kay","year":"2022","unstructured":"Izett-Kay ML, Rahmanou P, Cartwright RJ, Price N, Jackson SR. Laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy and apical suspension: 7-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. Int Urogynecol J. 2022;33(7):1957\u201365. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-021-04932-6.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"7","key":"5701_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"957","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-011-1631-9","volume":"23","author":"CM Lewis","year":"2012","unstructured":"Lewis CM, Culligan P. Sacrohysteropexy followed by successful pregnancy and eventual reoperation for prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2012;23(7):957\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-011-1631-9.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"9","key":"5701_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1481","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-012-2041-3","volume":"24","author":"E Costantini","year":"2013","unstructured":"Costantini E, Porena M, Lazzeri M, Mearini L, Bini V, Zucchi A. Changes in female sexual function after pelvic organ prolapse repair: role of hysterectomy. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24(9):1481\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-012-2041-3.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"6","key":"5701_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"795","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-017-3476-3","volume":"29","author":"S Jha","year":"2018","unstructured":"Jha S, Cutner A, Moran P. The UK National Prolapse Survey: 10 years on. Int Urogynecol J. 2018;29(6):795\u2013801. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-017-3476-3.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"5701_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"188","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2022.03.037","volume":"272","author":"Z Rusavy","year":"2022","unstructured":"Rusavy Z, Najib B, Abdelkhalek Y, Grinstein E, Gluck O, Deval B. Outcomes of sacrocolpopexy\/sacrohysteropexy with mesh placement targeted to affected compartment. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2022;272:188\u201392. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2022.03.037.","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"2","key":"5701_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"439","DOI":"10.2214\/ajr.172.2.9930799","volume":"172","author":"DD Maglinte","year":"1999","unstructured":"Maglinte DD, Kelvin FM, Fitzgerald K, Hale DS, Benson JT. Association of compartment defects in pelvic floor dysfunction. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999;172(2):439\u201344. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2214\/ajr.172.2.9930799.","journal-title":"AJR Am J Roentgenol"},{"issue":"6","key":"5701_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"650","DOI":"10.1111\/codi.12219","volume":"15","author":"NJ Smart","year":"2013","unstructured":"Smart NJ, Pathak S, Boorman P, Daniels IR. Synthetic or biological mesh use in laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy\u2014a systematic review. Colorectal Dis. 2013;15(6):650\u20134. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/codi.12219.","journal-title":"Colorectal Dis"},{"issue":"4","key":"5701_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e205","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0038-1675358","volume":"4","author":"N Ahmad","year":"2018","unstructured":"Ahmad N, Stefan S, Adukia V, Naqvi S, Khan J. Laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy: functional outcomes after surgery. Surg J. 2018;4(4):e205\u201311. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1055\/s-0038-1675358.","journal-title":"Surg J"},{"key":"5701_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eclinm.2019.10.010","volume":"16","author":"ARL Stevenson","year":"2019","unstructured":"Stevenson ARL. What does the future hold for ventral rectopexy? EClinicalMedicine. 2019;16:2\u20133. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.eclinm.2019.10.010.","journal-title":"EClinicalMedicine"},{"issue":"6","key":"5701_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"693","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.13222","volume":"43","author":"D Ulrich","year":"2014","unstructured":"Ulrich D, Guzman Rojas R, Dietz HP, Mann K, Trutnovsky G. Use of a visual analog scale for evaluation of bother from pelvic organ prolapse. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014;43(6):693\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/uog.13222.","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"5701_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"946","DOI":"10.1111\/jan.12875","volume":"72","author":"A Voutilainen","year":"2016","unstructured":"Voutilainen A, Pitk\u00e4aho T, Kvist T, Vehvil\u00e4inen-Julkunen K. How to ask about patient satisfaction? The visual analogue scale is less vulnerable to confounding factors and ceiling effect than a symmetric Likert scale. J Adv Nurs. 2016;72(4):946\u201357. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/jan.12875.","journal-title":"J Adv Nurs"},{"issue":"1","key":"5701_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"191","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-022-05102-y","volume":"34","author":"Z Rusavy","year":"2023","unstructured":"Rusavy Z, Grinstein E, Gluck O, Abdelkhalek Y, Deval B. Long-term development of surgical outcome of laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy with anterior and posterior mesh extension. Int Urogynecol J. 2023;34(1):191\u2013200. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-022-05102-y.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"2","key":"5701_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"96","DOI":"10.4103\/GMIT.GMIT_67_20","volume":"10","author":"M Obut","year":"2021","unstructured":"Obut M, O\u011flak SC, Akg\u00f6l S. Comparison of the quality of life and female sexual function following laparoscopic pectopexy and laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy in apical prolapse patients. Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2021;10(2):96\u2013103. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4103\/GMIT.GMIT_67_20.","journal-title":"Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther"},{"issue":"5","key":"5701_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"523","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-009-1069-5","volume":"21","author":"S Srikrishna","year":"2010","unstructured":"Srikrishna S, Robinson D, Cardozo L. Validation of the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) for urogenital prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21(5):523\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-009-1069-5.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"1","key":"5701_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"165","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.04.047","volume":"191","author":"ES Lukacz","year":"2004","unstructured":"Lukacz ES, Lawrence JM, Burchette RJ, Luber KM, Nager CW, Galen BJ. The use of Visual Analog Scale in urogynecologic research: a psychometric evaluation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191(1):165\u201370. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.04.047.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"5701_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"21","DOI":"10.5114\/pm.2021.104473","volume":"20","author":"MM Farghali","year":"2021","unstructured":"Farghali MM, Abdelzaher A, Abdelazim IA. Surgical and quality of life outcomes after pelvic organ prolapse surgery in older postmenopausal women. Przeglad Menopauzalny Menopause Rev. 2021;20(1):21\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5114\/pm.2021.104473.","journal-title":"Przeglad Menopauzalny Menopause Rev"},{"issue":"5","key":"5701_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2093","DOI":"10.1016\/S0022-5347(05)65092-6","volume":"167","author":"B Deval","year":"2002","unstructured":"Deval B, Jeffry L, Al Najjar F, Soriano D, Darai E. Determinants of patient dissatisfaction after a tension-free vaginal tape procedure for urinary incontinence. J Urol. 2002;167(5):2093\u20137.","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"issue":"12","key":"5701_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2595","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-020-04396-0","volume":"31","author":"ML Izett-Kay","year":"2020","unstructured":"Izett-Kay ML, Aldabeeb D, Kupelian AS, et al. Long-term mesh complications and reoperation after laparoscopic mesh sacrohysteropexy: a cross-sectional study. Int Urogynecol J. 2020;31(12):2595\u2013602. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-020-04396-0.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"5701_CR23","unstructured":"Hunter JG, Spight DH, Sandone C, Fairman JE. Rectopexy and posterior mesh repair for rectal prolapse. In: Atlas of Minimally Invasive Surgical Operations. McGraw-Hill Education; 2018. Accessed 18 May 2023. accesssurgery.mhmedical.com\/content.aspx?aid=1162531962."},{"issue":"11","key":"5701_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S101","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2021.09.132","volume":"28","author":"O Gluck","year":"2021","unstructured":"Gluck O, Grinstein E, Deval B. Effect of age on surgical outcomes and rate of complication in women undergoing laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy and sacrohysteropexy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021;28(11):S101. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jmig.2021.09.132.","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"5701_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"537","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-015-2840-4","volume":"27","author":"MD Larsen","year":"2016","unstructured":"Larsen MD, Lose G, Guldberg R, Gradel KO. Discrepancies between patient-reported outcome measures when assessing urinary incontinence or pelvic-prolapse surgery. Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27(4):537\u201343. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-015-2840-4.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"}],"container-title":["International Urogynecology Journal"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00192-023-05701-3.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00192-023-05701-3\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00192-023-05701-3.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,3,2]],"date-time":"2024-03-02T14:03:09Z","timestamp":1709388189000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00192-023-05701-3"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,1,11]]},"references-count":25,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,2]]}},"alternative-id":["5701"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-023-05701-3","relation":{},"ISSN":["0937-3462","1433-3023"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0937-3462","type":"print"},{"value":"1433-3023","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,1,11]]},"assertion":[{"value":"18 July 2023","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"15 November 2023","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"11 January 2024","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"None.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflicts of interest"}}]}}