{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,21]],"date-time":"2026-10-21T13:40:29Z","timestamp":1792590029970,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":27,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"10","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,8,1]],"date-time":"2024-08-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1722470400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,8,1]],"date-time":"2024-08-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1722470400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Int Urogynecol J"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,10]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Introduction and Hypothesis<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Multicompartment prolapse is a complex pelvic floor condition that can involve coordination of both urogynecologists and colorectal surgeons.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Concomitant sacrocolpopexy and ventral rectopexy is a safe and effective approach to treating this condition.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The combined procedure has high rates of patient satisfaction and symptom improvement, including defecatory dysfunction, sexual health, and overall increased quality of life.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Concomitant sacrocolpopexy with ventral rectopexy is safe and improves overall outcomes.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-024-05869-2","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,8,1]],"date-time":"2024-08-01T12:02:14Z","timestamp":1722513734000},"page":"1955-1960","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":9,"title":["The Current Evidence and How-To on Combined Sacrocolpopexy and Rectopexy"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"35","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-1873-200X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Amy D.","family":"Gee","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Sunny Kairi","family":"Lee","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Kristen","family":"Ban","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Marie Fidela R.","family":"Paraiso","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,8,1]]},"reference":[{"issue":"11","key":"5869_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1311","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.300.11.1311","volume":"300","author":"I Nygaard","year":"2008","unstructured":"Nygaard I, Barber MD, Burgio KL, et al. Prevalence of symptomatic pelvic floor disorders in US women. JAMA. 2008;300(11):1311\u20136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jama.300.11.1311.","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"issue":"6","key":"5869_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1396","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000263469.68106.90","volume":"109","author":"G Rortveit","year":"2007","unstructured":"Rortveit G, Brown JS, Thom DH, et al. Symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse: prevalence and risk factors in a population-based, racially diverse cohort. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109(6):1396\u2013403. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/01.AOG.0000263469.68106.90.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"5869_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"28","DOI":"10.1007\/s10350-005-0217-3","volume":"49","author":"D Altman","year":"2006","unstructured":"Altman D, Zetterstrom J, Schultz I, et al. Pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence in women with surgically managed rectal prolapse: a population-based case-control study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2006;49(1):28\u201335. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10350-005-0217-3.","journal-title":"Dis Colon Rectum"},{"issue":"10","key":"5869_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1453","DOI":"10.1007\/s00384-018-3140-5","volume":"33","author":"CB Geltzeiler","year":"2018","unstructured":"Geltzeiler CB, Birnbaum EH, Silviera ML, et al. Combined rectopexy and sacrocolpopexy is safe for correction of pelvic organ prolapse. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2018;33(10):1453\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00384-018-3140-5.","journal-title":"Int J Colorectal Dis"},{"issue":"5","key":"5869_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"336","DOI":"10.1097\/SPV.0000000000000444","volume":"24","author":"K Jallad","year":"2018","unstructured":"Jallad K, Ridgeway B, Paraiso MF, et al. Long-term outcomes after ventral rectopexy with sacrocolpo- or hysteropexy for the treatment of concurrent rectal and pelvic organ prolapse. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2018;24(5):336\u201340. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/SPV.0000000000000444.","journal-title":"Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg"},{"issue":"12","key":"5869_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1415","DOI":"10.1097\/DCR.0b013e3182a62dbb","volume":"56","author":"Y Watadani","year":"2013","unstructured":"Watadani Y, Vogler SA, Warshaw JS, et al. Sacrocolpopexy with rectopexy for pelvic floor prolapse improves bowel function and quality of life. Dis Colon Rectum. 2013;56(12):1415\u201322. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/DCR.0b013e3182a62dbb.","journal-title":"Dis Colon Rectum"},{"key":"5869_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/SPV.0000000000001412","author":"JH Ross","year":"2023","unstructured":"Ross JH, Yao M, Wallace SL, et al. Patient outcomes after robotic ventral rectopexy with sacrocolpopexy. Urogynecology (Phila). 2023. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/SPV.0000000000001412.","journal-title":"Urogynecology (Phila)"},{"issue":"5","key":"5869_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1533","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.06.109","volume":"191","author":"JL Whiteside","year":"2004","unstructured":"Whiteside JL, Weber AM, Meyn LA, et al. Risk factors for prolapse recurrence after vaginal repair. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191(5):1533\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.06.109.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"7","key":"5869_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"861","DOI":"10.1097\/DCR.0000000000001023","volume":"61","author":"T Catanzarite","year":"2018","unstructured":"Catanzarite T, Klaristenfeld DD, Tomassi MJ, et al. Recurrence of rectal prolapse after surgical repair in women with pelvic organ prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum. 2018;61(7):861\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/DCR.0000000000001023.","journal-title":"Dis Colon Rectum"},{"issue":"4","key":"5869_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"501","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(97)00058-6","volume":"89","author":"AL Olsen","year":"1997","unstructured":"Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, et al. Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;89(4):501\u20136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0029-7844(97)00058-6.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"5869_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"385","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-018-3699-y","volume":"30","author":"D Weinberg","year":"2019","unstructured":"Weinberg D, Qeadan F, McKee R, et al. Safety of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with concurrent rectopexy: peri-operative morbidity in a nationwide cohort. Int Urogynecol J. 2019;30(3):385\u201392. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-018-3699-y.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"5","key":"5869_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"302","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0041-1726351","volume":"34","author":"S Wallace","year":"2022","unstructured":"Wallace S, Gurland B. Approaching combined rectal and vaginal prolapse. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2022;34(5):302\u201310. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1055\/s-0041-1726351.","journal-title":"Clin Colon Rectal Surg"},{"issue":"9","key":"5869_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1412","DOI":"10.1007\/s10350-007-0255-0","volume":"50","author":"M Lim","year":"2007","unstructured":"Lim M, Sagar PM, Gonsalves S, Thekkinkattil D, et al. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in females: functional outcome of mesh sacrocolpopexy and rectopexy as a combined procedure. Dis Colon Rectum. 2007;50(9):1412\u201321. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10350-007-0255-0.","journal-title":"Dis Colon Rectum"},{"issue":"2","key":"5869_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"101","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0036-1580721","volume":"29","author":"K Jallad","year":"2016","unstructured":"Jallad K, Gurland B. Multidisciplinary approach to the treatment of concomitant rectal and vaginal prolapse. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2016;29(2):101\u20135. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1055\/s-0036-1580721.","journal-title":"Clin Colon Rectal Surg"},{"issue":"9","key":"5869_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2401","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-021-04778-y","volume":"32","author":"SL Wallace","year":"2021","unstructured":"Wallace SL, Enemchukwu EA, Mishra K, et al. Postoperative complications and recurrence rates after rectal prolapse surgery versus combined rectal prolapse and pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Int Urogynecol J. 2021;32(9):2401\u201311. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-021-04778-y.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"12","key":"5869_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1446","DOI":"10.1097\/DCR.0000000000000248","volume":"57","author":"B Gurland","year":"2014","unstructured":"Gurland B. Ventral mesh rectopexy: is this the new standard for surgical treatment of pelvic organ prolapse? Dis Colon Rectum. 2014;57(12):1446\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/DCR.0000000000000248.","journal-title":"Dis Colon Rectum"},{"issue":"5","key":"5869_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1001","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-024-05748-w","volume":"35","author":"LL Lua-Mailland","year":"2024","unstructured":"Lua-Mailland LL, Stanley EE, Yao M, et al. Healthcare resource utilization following minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy: impact of concomitant rectopexy. Int Urogynecol J. 2024;35(5):1001-10. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-024-05748-w","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"5","key":"5869_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1059","DOI":"10.1007\/s11605-013-2427-7","volume":"18","author":"L Bordeianou","year":"2014","unstructured":"Bordeianou L, Hicks CW, Kaiser AM, et al. Rectal prolapse: an overview of clinical features, diagnosis, and patient-specific management strategies. J Gastrointest Surg. 2014;18(5):1059\u201369. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11605-013-2427-7.","journal-title":"J Gastrointest Surg"},{"issue":"6","key":"5869_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"376","DOI":"10.1097\/SPV.0000000000000797","volume":"26","author":"PE Smith","year":"2020","unstructured":"Smith PE, Hade EM, Pandya LK, et al. Perioperative outcomes for combined ventral rectopexy with sacrocolpopexy compared to perineal rectopexy with vaginal apical suspension. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2020;26(6):376\u201381. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/SPV.0000000000000797.","journal-title":"Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg"},{"issue":"1","key":"5869_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"5","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0036-1593433","volume":"30","author":"K Blaker","year":"2017","unstructured":"Blaker K, Anandam JL. Functional disorders: rectoanal intussusception. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2017;30(1):5\u201311. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1055\/s-0036-1593433.","journal-title":"Clin Colon Rectal Surg"},{"issue":"6","key":"5869_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"515","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1463-1318.2009.01886.x","volume":"12","author":"MS Sajid","year":"2010","unstructured":"Sajid MS, Siddiqui MR, Baig MK. Open vs laparoscopic repair of full-thickness rectal prolapse: a re-meta-analysis. Colorectal Dis. 2010;12(6):515\u201325. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1463-1318.2009.01886.x.","journal-title":"Colorectal Dis"},{"issue":"10","key":"5869_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2101","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-020-04394-2","volume":"31","author":"SL Wallace","year":"2020","unstructured":"Wallace SL, Syan R, Enemchukwu EA, et al. Surgical approach, complications, and reoperation rates of combined rectal and pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Int Urogynecol J. 2020;31(10):2101\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-020-04394-2.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"5869_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"18","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eclinm.2019.08.014","volume":"16","author":"J Hidaka","year":"2019","unstructured":"Hidaka J, Elfeki H, Duelund-Jakobsen J, et al. Functional outcome after laparoscopic posterior sutured rectopexy versus ventral mesh rectopexy for rectal prolapse: six-year follow-up of a double-blind, randomized single-center study. EClinicalMedicine. 2019;16:18\u201322. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.eclinm.2019.08.014.","journal-title":"EClinicalMedicine"},{"issue":"10","key":"5869_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"565","DOI":"10.1007\/s10151-015-1358-6","volume":"19","author":"F Reche","year":"2015","unstructured":"Reche F, Faucheron JL. Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy is the gold standard treatment for rectal prolapse. Tech Coloproctol. 2015;19(10):565\u20136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10151-015-1358-6.","journal-title":"Tech Coloproctol"},{"issue":"5","key":"5869_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1089","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2009.01.048","volume":"55","author":"AM Ganatra","year":"2009","unstructured":"Ganatra AM, Rozet F, Sanchez-Salas R, et al. The current status of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: a review. Eur Urol. 2009;55(5):1089\u2013103. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.eururo.2009.01.048.","journal-title":"Eur Urol"},{"issue":"2","key":"5869_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"343","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-021-04868-x","volume":"33","author":"E Grinstein","year":"2022","unstructured":"Grinstein E, Abdelkhalek Y, Veit-Rubin N, et al. Long term outcomes of laparoscopic sacro\/colpo-hysteropexy with and without rectopexy for the treatment of prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2022;33(2):343\u201350. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-021-04868-x.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"8","key":"5869_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1136","DOI":"10.1007\/s10350-006-0616-0","volume":"49","author":"G Portier","year":"2006","unstructured":"Portier G, Iovino F, Lazorthes F. Surgery for rectal prolapse: Orr-Loygue ventral rectopexy with limited dissection prevents postoperative-induced constipation without increasing recurrence. Dis Colon Rectum. 2006;49(8):1136\u201340. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10350-006-0616-0.","journal-title":"Dis Colon Rectum"}],"container-title":["International Urogynecology Journal"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00192-024-05869-2.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00192-024-05869-2\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00192-024-05869-2.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,11,4]],"date-time":"2024-11-04T21:01:56Z","timestamp":1730754116000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00192-024-05869-2"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,8,1]]},"references-count":27,"journal-issue":{"issue":"10","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,10]]}},"alternative-id":["5869"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-024-05869-2","relation":{},"ISSN":["0937-3462","1433-3023"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0937-3462","type":"print"},{"value":"1433-3023","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,8,1]]},"assertion":[{"value":"1 April 2024","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"20 June 2024","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"1 August 2024","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The research conducted in this study did not require Institutional Review Board approval as it solely a review article. All information used in this article was obtained from current literature and expert opinion.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Institutional Review Board Approval"}},{"value":"None.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflicts of Interest"}}]}}