{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,21]],"date-time":"2026-08-21T12:56:10Z","timestamp":1787316970592,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":11,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,5]],"date-time":"2024-12-05T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1733356800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,5]],"date-time":"2024-12-05T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1733356800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100004375","name":"Tel Aviv University","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100004375","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"crossref"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Int Urogynecol J"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,4]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Introduction and Hypothesis<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Sacrocolpopexy (SCP) is a recognized treatment for apical pelvic organ prolapse (POP). However, mesh erosion remains a concern, particularly when performed with concomitant hysterectomy. This video presents data on one case of a modified technique aimed at potentially minimizing mesh erosion in robotic SCP.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>This technique focuses on reinforcing the vaginal cuff and using a pedicled peritoneal graft to create a tissue barrier between the mesh and the vaginal vault. Procedural steps include intrafascial colpotomy, edge-to-edge cuff closure using barbed sutures, and joining anterior and posterior meshes away from the vaginal cuff.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The surgical technique was successfully implemented in this single patient presented in the video and was performed in ten more patients with no intraoperative or postoperative complications. During the follow-up period, there were no signs of mesh erosion or exposure.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>This approach emphasizing vaginal cuff strengthening and mesh separation using a pedicled peritoneal graft can be an option for reducing mesh erosion risk. This report does not provide definitive evidence that this approach reduces mesh erosion risk and further research and long-term follow-up are required to validate these findings and integrate this technique into standard management practices.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-024-06012-x","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,5]],"date-time":"2024-12-05T05:38:34Z","timestamp":1733377114000},"page":"923-927","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Intrafascial Colpotomy, Edge-to-Edge Closure, and Peritoneal Graft Technique for Minimizing Mesh Erosion in Concurrent Robotic Hysterectomy and Sacrocolpopexy"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"36","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-3560-6374","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Yael","family":"Yagur","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Assem","family":"Kalantan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Mujahid","family":"Bukhari","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Orla","family":"Donohoe","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Mohammed","family":"Almoqren","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jessica","family":"Robertson","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Sarah","family":"Choi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"David","family":"Rosen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Zhuoran","family":"Chen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Kate","family":"Moore","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Danny","family":"Chou","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,5]]},"reference":[{"key":"6012_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"94","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.12.029","volume":"245","author":"O Gluck","year":"2020","unstructured":"Gluck O, Blaganje M, Veit-Rubin N, et al. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: a comprehensive literature review on current practice. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020;245:94\u2013101.","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"6012_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"129","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.01.018","volume":"219","author":"KV Meriwether","year":"2018","unstructured":"Meriwether KV, Antosh DD, Olivera CK, et al. Uterine preservation vs hysterectomy in pelvic organ prolapse surgery: a systematic review with meta-analysis and clinical practice guidelines. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;219:129-146.e2.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"6012_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"401","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-019-04017-5","volume":"31","author":"A Dubinskaya","year":"2020","unstructured":"Dubinskaya A, Hernandez-Aranda D, Wakefield DB, Shepherd JP. Comparing laparoscopic and robotic sacrocolpopexy surgical outcomes with prior versus concomitant hysterectomy. Int Urogynecol J. 2020;31:401\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-019-04017-5.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"6012_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1889","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-021-04675-4","volume":"33","author":"O Brown","year":"2022","unstructured":"Brown O, Mou T, Das D, et al. Perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with and without hysterectomy: a secondary analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database. Int Urogynecol J. 2022;33:1889\u201395. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-021-04675-4.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"6012_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"791","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-020-04342-0","volume":"32","author":"EA Slopnick","year":"2021","unstructured":"Slopnick EA, Chapman GC, Roberts K, et al. Apical suspension is underutilized for repair of stage IV pelvic organ prolapse: an analysis of national practice patterns in the United States. Int Urogynecol J. 2021;32:791\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-020-04342-0.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"6012_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"546","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2014.01.004","volume":"21","author":"IL Parkes","year":"2014","unstructured":"Parkes IL, Shveiky D. Sacrocolpopexy for treatment of vaginal apical prolapse: evidence-based surgery. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014;21:546\u201357.","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"key":"6012_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"93","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-022-05350-y","volume":"34","author":"AMJ van Oudheusden","year":"2023","unstructured":"van Oudheusden AMJ, Eissing J, Terink IM, et al. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy versus abdominal sacrocolpopexy for vaginal vault prolapse: long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. Int Urogynecol J. 2023;34:93\u2013104. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-022-05350-y.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"6012_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"412","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000004901","volume":"140","author":"J Nassif","year":"2022","unstructured":"Nassif J, Yadav GS, Orejuela FJ, Turrentine MA. Rate of mesh erosion after sacrocolpopexy with concurrent supracervical compared with total hysterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2022;140:412\u201320.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"6012_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3213","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-022-05093-w","volume":"33","author":"KL Woodburn","year":"2022","unstructured":"Woodburn KL, El Haraki AS, Sokol AI, et al. Mesh exposure following vaginal versus laparoscopic hysterectomy at the time of sacrocolpopexy. Int Urogynecol J. 2022;33:3213\u201320. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-022-05093-w.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"6012_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"291","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-022-05388-y","volume":"34","author":"CA Matthews","year":"2023","unstructured":"Matthews CA, Myers EM, Henley BR, et al. Long-term mesh exposure after minimally invasive total hysterectomy and sacrocolpopexy. Int Urogynecol J. 2023;34:291\u20136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-022-05388-y.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"6012_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"731","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-013-2265-x","volume":"25","author":"PJ Culligan","year":"2014","unstructured":"Culligan PJ, Gurshumov E, Lewis C, et al. Subjective and objective results 1 year after robotic sacrocolpopexy using a lightweight Y-mesh. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2014;25:731\u20135. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-013-2265-x.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct"}],"container-title":["International Urogynecology Journal"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00192-024-06012-x.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00192-024-06012-x\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00192-024-06012-x.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,9]],"date-time":"2025-05-09T08:53:51Z","timestamp":1746780831000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00192-024-06012-x"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,5]]},"references-count":11,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,4]]}},"alternative-id":["6012"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-024-06012-x","relation":{},"ISSN":["0937-3462","1433-3023"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0937-3462","type":"print"},{"value":"1433-3023","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,5]]},"assertion":[{"value":"24 September 2024","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"15 November 2024","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"5 December 2024","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this video article and any accompanying images.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Informed Consent"}},{"value":"The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflicts of Interest"}}]}}