{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,23]],"date-time":"2026-10-23T21:38:59Z","timestamp":1792791539951,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":33,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,1,8]],"date-time":"2025-01-08T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1736294400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,1,8]],"date-time":"2025-01-08T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1736294400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100019871","name":"Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100019871","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100004047","name":"Karolinska Institute","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100004047","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"crossref"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Int Urogynecol J"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,3]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Introduction and Hypothesis<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>The aim of the study was to compare clinical outcomes when using robotic-assisted sacral hysterocolpopexy (RASC) and vaginal surgery using the Uphold\u2122 Vaginal Support System mesh for pelvic organ prolapse repair.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>This was a nonrandomized, prospective, multicenter study in which 72 women underwent RASC, and 73 Uphold\u2122 surgery, for apical prolapse (POP-Q C\u2009\u2265\u2009stage II). Anatomical outcomes were assessed using the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP\u2013Q) system. Subjective outcomes were evaluated using the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory 20 (PFDI-20), the Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire \u2013 short form (PFIQ-7), and the Pelvic Organ Prolapse\/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12), as well as pain estimation using the visual analog scale (0\u201310).<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>One year after surgery, an optimal apical segment outcome (POP-Q C stage 0\u20131) was achieved in 96.4% and 93.3% for the RASC and Uphold\u2122 respectively, <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u20090.49. However, reoperation for prolapse recurrence was significantly more common after RASC (11 out of 72 [15.3%] vs Uphold\u2122 (2 out of 71 [2.8%], <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u20090.005), and an optimal outcome of the anterior vaginal wall was higher after Uphold\u2122 (<jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u2009&lt;\u20090.001). Postoperative PFDI-20, PFIQ-7, and pain significantly improved for both RASC and Uphold\u2122 (<jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u20090.004 to &lt;\u20090.001), but a more pronounced improvement in the total PFDI-20 and POPDI-6 sub-scores was observed after Uphold\u2122 than after RASC (\u221273\u2009\u00b1\u200955.6 vs \u221249.2\u2009\u00b1\u200943.7, <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u20090.005 and \u221239.6\u2009\u00b1\u200923.6 vs \u221227\u2009\u00b1\u200923.9, <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u2009&lt;\u20090.001 respectively).<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>Reoperation for prolapse recurrence within 1 year was more common after RASC than after Uphold\u2122. However, the rate of complications was low overall and there were few and largely insignificant differences in outcomes when comparing RASC and Uphold\u2122.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-024-06017-6","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,1,8]],"date-time":"2025-01-08T11:23:08Z","timestamp":1736335388000},"page":"585-597","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":6,"title":["Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair Using Robotic-Assisted Sacral Hysterocolpopexy vs Vaginal Surgery with the Uphold\u2122 System: 1-Year Clinical Outcomes"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"36","author":[{"given":"Georgios","family":"Poutakidis","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Christian","family":"Falconer","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Daniel","family":"Altman","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ulrika","family":"Johannesson","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Anju","family":"Zhang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Charlotta","family":"Ericson","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Mats","family":"Stenberg","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Sabine","family":"Altrock","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Edward","family":"Morcos","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,1,8]]},"reference":[{"issue":"11","key":"6017_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1815","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-013-2172-1","volume":"24","author":"MD Barber","year":"2013","unstructured":"Barber MD, Maher C. Apical prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24(11):1815\u201333.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"6","key":"6017_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1418Y1421","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(96)70084-4","volume":"175","author":"JT Benson","year":"1996","unstructured":"Benson JT, Lucente V, McClellan E. Vaginal versus abdominal reconstructive surgery for the treatment of pelvic support defects: a prospective randomized study with long-term outcome evaluation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;175(6):1418Y1421; discussion 1421Y1422.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"6017_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"805Y823","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000139514.90897.07","volume":"104","author":"IE Nygaard","year":"2004","unstructured":"Nygaard IE, McCreery R, Brubaker L, Connolly AM, Cundiff G, Weber AM, et al. Abdominal sacrocolpopexy: a comprehensive review. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104(4):805Y823.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"6017_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e0017","DOI":"10.5041\/RMMJ.10294","volume":"8","author":"J Geynisman-Tan","year":"2017","unstructured":"Geynisman-Tan J,\u00a0Kenton K. Surgical updates in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. Rambam Maimonides Med J. 2017;8(2):e0017.","journal-title":"Ram Maimonides Med J"},{"issue":"7","key":"6017_CR5","first-page":"CD012376","volume":"7","author":"C Maher","year":"2023","unstructured":"Maher C,\u00a0Yeung E,\u00a0Haya N,\u00a0Christmann-Schmid C,\u00a0Mowat A,\u00a0Chen Z,\u00a0Baessler K. Surgery for women with apical vaginal prolapse. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023;7(7):CD012376.","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"2","key":"6017_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"297","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-021-04741-x","volume":"33","author":"CL Chang","year":"2022","unstructured":"Chang CL, Chen CH, Chang SJ. Comparing the outcomes and effectiveness of robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2022;33(2):297\u2013308.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"6017_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"60","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.503","volume":"205","author":"E Costantini","year":"2016","unstructured":"Costantini E, Brubaker L, Cervigni M, Matthews CA, O\u2019Reilly BA, Rizk D, Giannitsas K, Maher CF. Sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: evidence-based review and recommendations. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016;205:60\u20135.","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"5","key":"6017_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"922","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000004761","volume":"139","author":"PJ Culligan","year":"2022","unstructured":"Culligan PJ, Saiz CM, Rosenblatt PL. Contemporary use and techniques of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with or without robotic assistance for pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 2022;139(5):922\u201332.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"6017_CR9","unstructured":"FDA. 2019. https:\/\/www.fda.gov\/news-events\/press-announcements\/fda-takes-action-protect-womens-health-orders-manufacturers-surgical-mesh-intended-transvaginal. Accessed 16 Apr 2019."},{"issue":"3","key":"6017_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"200","DOI":"10.1097\/SPV.0000000000000530","volume":"25","author":"P Rahkola-Soisalo","year":"2019","unstructured":"Rahkola-Soisalo P, Mikkola TS, Altman D, Falconer C; Nordic TVM Group. Pelvic organ prolapse repair using the Uphold\u2122 vaginal support system: 5-year follow-up. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2019;25(3):200\u20135.","journal-title":"Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg"},{"issue":"1","key":"6017_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"135","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-020-05764-3","volume":"303","author":"C Falconer","year":"2020","unstructured":"Falconer C, Altman D,\u00a0Poutakidis G,\u00a0Rahkola-Soisalo P,\u00a0Mikkola T,\u00a0Morcos E. Long-term outcomes of pelvic organ prolapse repair using a mesh-capturing device when comparing single- versus multicenter use. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2020;303(1):135\u201342. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00404-020-05764-3.","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"issue":"4","key":"6017_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"793","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-019-04106-5","volume":"31","author":"M Gillor","year":"2020","unstructured":"Gillor M, Langer S, Dietz HP. A long-term comparative study of Uphold\u2122 transvaginal mesh kit against anterior colporrhaphy. Int Urogynecol J. 2020;31(4):793\u20137.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"8","key":"6017_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2242","DOI":"10.1002\/nau.24125","volume":"38","author":"L Allegre","year":"2019","unstructured":"Allegre L, Debodinance P, Demattei C, Peray FP, Cayrac M, Fritel X, Courtieu C, Fatton B, de Tayrac R. Clinical evaluation of the Uphold\u2122 LITE mesh for the surgical treatment of anterior and apical prolapse: a prospective, multicentre trial. Neurourol Urodyn. 2019;38(8):2242\u20139.","journal-title":"Neurourol Urodyn"},{"key":"6017_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1163","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-018-3691-6","volume":"30","author":"TS Lo","year":"2019","unstructured":"Lo TS, Pue LB, Tan YL, Hsieh WC, Kao CC, Uy-Patrimonio MC. Anterior-apical single-incision mesh surgery (Uphold\u2122): 1-year outcomes on lower urinary tract symptoms, anatomy and ultrasound. Int Urogynecol J. 2019;30:1163\u201372.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"9","key":"6017_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1337","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-016-2973-0","volume":"27","author":"D Altman","year":"2016","unstructured":"Altman D, Mikkola TS, Bek KM, Rahkola-Soisalo P, Gunnarsson J, Engh ME, Falconer C; Nordic TVM group. Pelvic organ prolapse repair using the Uphold\u2122\u2122 Vaginal Support System: a 1-year multicenter study. Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27(9):1337\u201345.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"1","key":"6017_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"91","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-017-3364-x","volume":"29","author":"E Morcos","year":"2018","unstructured":"Morcos E, Altman D, Hunde D, Falconer C, Nordic TVM group. Comparison of single- versus multicenter outcomes for pelvic organ prolapse repair using a mesh-capturing device. Int Urogynecol J. 2018;29(1):91\u20137.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"3","key":"6017_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"343","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ucl.2012.06.008","volume":"39","author":"O Ramm","year":"2012","unstructured":"Ramm O, Kenton K. Robotic\/laparoscopic prolapse repair: role of hysteropexy: a urogynecology perspective. Urol Clin North Am. 2012;39(3):343\u20138.","journal-title":"Urol Clin North Am"},{"issue":"1","key":"6017_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"93","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-015-2775-9","volume":"27","author":"K Pan","year":"2016","unstructured":"Pan K, Cao L, Ryan NA, Wang Y, Xu H. Laparoscopic sacral hysteropexy versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27(1):93\u2013101.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"5","key":"6017_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1089","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2009.01.048","volume":"55","author":"AM Ganatra","year":"2009","unstructured":"Ganatra AM, Rozet F, Sanchez-Salas R, Barret E, Galiano M, Cathelineau X, Vallancien G. The current status of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: a review. Eur Urol. 2009;55(5):1089\u2013103.","journal-title":"Eur Urol"},{"issue":"1","key":"6017_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"62","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2009.02396.x","volume":"117","author":"N Price","year":"2010","unstructured":"Price N, Slack A, Jackson SR. Laparoscopic hysteropexy: the initial results of a uterine suspension procedure for uterovaginal prolapse. BJOG. 2010;117(1):62\u20138.","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"6017_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1753","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-012-1780-5","volume":"23","author":"MK Vu","year":"2012","unstructured":"Vu MK, Letko J, Jirschele K, Gafni-Kane A, Nguyen A, Du H, et al. Minimal mesh repair for apical and anterior prolapse: initial anatomical and subjective outcomes. Int Urogynecol J. 2012;23:1753\u201361.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"1","key":"6017_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"10","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(96)70243-0","volume":"175","author":"RC Bump","year":"1996","unstructured":"Bump RC, Mattiasson A, B\u00f8 K, Brubaker LP, DeLancey JO, Klarskov P, Shull BL, Smith AR. The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;175(1):10\u20137.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"6017_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"103","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.12.025","volume":"193","author":"MD Barber","year":"2005","unstructured":"Barber MD, Walters MD, Bump RC. Short forms of two condition-specific quality-of-life questionnaires for women with pelvic floor disorders (PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7). Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193(1):103\u201313.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"6017_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"552","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2001.111100","volume":"184","author":"RG Rogers","year":"2001","unstructured":"Rogers RG, Kammerer-Doak D, Villarreal A, Coates K, Qualls C. A new instrument to measure sexual function in women with urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;184(4):552\u20138.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"6017_CR25","first-page":"1","volume":"22","author":"SH Wagemakers","year":"2019","unstructured":"Wagemakers SH, van der Velden JM, Gerlich AS, Hindriks-Keegstra AW, van Dijk JFM, Verhoeff JJC. A systematic review of devices and techniques that objectively measure patients\u2019 pain. Pain Physician. 2019;22(1):1\u201313.","journal-title":"Pain Physician"},{"issue":"8","key":"6017_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"845","DOI":"10.1001\/jamasurg.2024.1206","volume":"159","author":"S Menefee","year":"2024","unstructured":"Menefee SA\u00a0,\u00a0Richter HE,\u00a0Myers D,\u00a0Moalli P,\u00a0Weidner AC,\u00a0Harvie HS,\u00a0Rahn DD,\u00a0Meriwether KV,\u00a0Paraiso MFR,\u00a0Whitworth R,\u00a0Mazloomdoost D,\u00a0Thomas S;\u00a0NICHD Pelvic Floor Disorders Network. Apical suspension repair for vaginal vault prolapse: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg. 2024;159(8):845\u201355. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jamasurg.2024.1206.","journal-title":"JAMA Surg"},{"issue":"4","key":"6017_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"511","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.02.001","volume":"43","author":"R Geoffrion","year":"2021","unstructured":"Geoffrion R,\u00a0Larouche M. Guideline No. 413: Surgical Management of Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse in Women. J Obstet Gynaecol Can.\u00a02021;43(4):511\u201323.e1.","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Can"},{"issue":"1","key":"6017_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"38.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.08.035","volume":"216","author":"RE Gutman","year":"2017","unstructured":"Gutman RE, Rardin CR, Sokol ER, Matthews C, Park AJ, Iglesia CB, Geoffrion R, Sokol AI, Karram M, Cundiff GW, Blomquist JL, Barber MD. Vaginal and laparoscopic mesh hysteropexy for uterovaginal prolapse: a parallel cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;216(1):38.e1\u201311.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"10","key":"6017_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1997","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-020-04407-0","volume":"31","author":"N Ng-Stollmann","year":"2020","unstructured":"Ng-Stollmann N, F\u00fcnfgeld C, Gabriel B, Niesel A. The international discussion and the new regulations concerning transvaginal mesh implants in pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Int Urogynecol J. 2020;31(10):1997\u20132002.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"4","key":"6017_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"353","DOI":"10.1007\/s002460010079","volume":"21","author":"NR Lundstr\u00f6m","year":"2000","unstructured":"Lundstr\u00f6m NR, Berggren H, Bj\u00f6rkhem G, J\u00f6gi P, Sunneg\u00e2rdh J. Centralization of pediatric heart surgery in Sweden. Pediatr Cardiol. 2000;21(4):353\u20137.","journal-title":"Pediatr Cardiol"},{"issue":"1","key":"6017_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"128","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2015.04.031","volume":"138","author":"JK Chan","year":"2015","unstructured":"Chan JK, Gardner AB, Taylor K, Blansit K, Thompson CA, Brooks R, Yu X, Kapp DS. The centralization of robotic surgery in high volume centers for endometrial cancer patients\u2014a study of 6560 cases in the U.S. Gynecol Oncol. 2015;138(1):128\u201332.","journal-title":"Gynecol Oncol"},{"issue":"11","key":"6017_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3007","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-021-04698-x","volume":"32","author":"E Morcos","year":"2021","unstructured":"Morcos E, Falconer C, Grip ET, Geale K, Hellgren K, Poutakidis G, Altman D. Association between surgical volumes and real-world healthcare cost when using a mesh capturing device for pelvic organ prolapse: a 5-years comparison between single- versus multicenter use. Int Urogynecol J. 2021;32(11):3007\u201315.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"7","key":"6017_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"655","DOI":"10.1111\/iju.13587","volume":"25","author":"D Obinata","year":"2018","unstructured":"Obinata D, Sugihara T, Yasunaga H, Mochida J, Yamaguchi K, Murata Y, Yoshizawa T, Matsui T, Hiroki Matsui H, Sasabuchi Y, Fujimura T, Homma Y, Takahashi S. Tension-free vaginal mesh surgery versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: analysis of perioperative outcomes using a Japanese national inpatient database. Int J Urol. 2018;25(7):655\u20139.","journal-title":"Int J Urol"}],"container-title":["International Urogynecology Journal"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00192-024-06017-6.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00192-024-06017-6\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00192-024-06017-6.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,16]],"date-time":"2025-04-16T13:32:47Z","timestamp":1744810367000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00192-024-06017-6"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,1,8]]},"references-count":33,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,3]]}},"alternative-id":["6017"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-024-06017-6","relation":{},"ISSN":["0937-3462","1433-3023"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0937-3462","type":"print"},{"value":"1433-3023","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,1,8]]},"assertion":[{"value":"4 July 2024","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"15 November 2024","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"8 January 2025","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The study was approved (IRB Dnr: 2017\/1988-31) by The Stockholm Regional Board of Ethics at Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.The study was registered at : NCT03878056.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethical Approval"}},{"value":"None.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflicts of Interest"}},{"value":"G.P.: none. C.F. has received speaking and advisory honoraria from Boston Scientific and Johnson & Johnson. D.A. has received speaking and advisory honoraria from Gedeon Richter, Pfizer, Astellas, Invent Medic, and Gynecare. U.J.: has received honoraria from Intuitive Surgical for proctoring. A.Z.: none. C.E.: has received honoraria from Intuitive Surgical for proctoring. M.S.: none. S.A.: none. E.M.: investigator for Ethicon research.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Financial Disclosure"}}]}}