{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,18]],"date-time":"2025-04-18T00:47:29Z","timestamp":1744937249783,"version":"3.40.4"},"reference-count":32,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,1,22]],"date-time":"2025-01-22T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1737504000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,1,22]],"date-time":"2025-01-22T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1737504000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Int Urogynecol J"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,3]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-024-06037-2","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,1,22]],"date-time":"2025-01-22T13:27:00Z","timestamp":1737552420000},"page":"655-661","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Long-term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Sacrohysteropexy with SERATEX\u00ae SlimSling\u00ae Mesh: A Retrospective Case Series"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"36","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-4063-5911","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Reut","family":"Rotem","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Yara","family":"Alkeesh","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-1094-1851","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Ayala","family":"Hirsch","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Inbar","family":"Ben-Shachar","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-8320-285X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Naama","family":"Marcus","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,1,22]]},"reference":[{"key":"6037_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Maher C, Yeung E, Haya N, et al. Surgery for women with apical vaginal prolapse. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023;2023(7). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/14651858.CD012376.pub2.","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD012376.pub2"},{"key":"6037_CR2","unstructured":"Silver Spring M. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. FDA takes action to protect women\u2019s health and orders manufacturers of surgical mesh in- tended for transvaginal repair of pelvic organ prolapse to stop selling all devices. 2019. https:\/\/www.fda.gov\/NewsEvents\/Newsroom\/PressAnnouncements\/ucm636114.htm."},{"issue":"4","key":"6037_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"805","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000139514.90897.07","volume":"104","author":"IE Nygaard","year":"2004","unstructured":"Nygaard IE, McCreery R, Brubaker L, et al. Abdominal sacrocolpopexy: a comprehensive review. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104(4):805\u201323. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/01.AOG.0000139514.90897.07.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"10","key":"6037_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2713","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-021-04998-2","volume":"33","author":"S Deblaere","year":"2022","unstructured":"Deblaere S, Hauspy J, Hansen K. Mesh exposure following minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy: a narrative review. Int Urogynecol J. 2022;33(10):2713\u201325. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-021-04998-2.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"6037_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Kali\u0161 V, Ru\u0161av\u00fd Z, Ismail KM. Hysterectomy versus uterine preservation in the management of uterine prolapse. In: Phillips C, Jeffery S, O\u2019Reilly B, Paraiso MFR, Deval B, editors. Laparoscopic urogynaecology: principles and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2022:175\u2013186. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/9781009128377.023.","DOI":"10.1017\/9781009128377.023"},{"issue":"2","key":"6037_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"129","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.01.018","volume":"219","author":"KV Meriwether","year":"2018","unstructured":"Meriwether KV, Antosh DD, Olivera CK, et al. Uterine preservation vs hysterectomy in pelvic organ prolapse surgery: a systematic review with meta-analysis and clinical practice guidelines. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;219(2):129-146.e2. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.01.018.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"6037_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"557","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-018-3678-3","volume":"30","author":"N Veit-Rubin","year":"2019","unstructured":"Veit-Rubin N, Dubuisson J, Constantin F, et al. Uterus preservation is superior to hysterectomy when performing laparoscopic lateral suspension with mesh. Int Urogynecol J. 2019;30(4):557\u201364. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-018-3678-3.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"6037_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"173","DOI":"10.1002\/ijgo.15343","volume":"2024","author":"I Porcari","year":"2023","unstructured":"Porcari I, Zorzato PC, Bosco M, et al. Clinician perspectives on hysterectomy versus uterine preservation in pelvic organ prolapse surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Gynecol Obstet. September 2023;2024:173\u201389. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/ijgo.15343.","journal-title":"Int J Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"6037_CR9","unstructured":"Cardozo L, Rovner E, Wagg A, Wein A. Incontinence 7th edition 2023 7th International consultation on incontinence ICUD editors. vol 7; 2023. www.icud.info."},{"issue":"2","key":"6037_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"244","DOI":"10.1111\/ajo.13104","volume":"60","author":"S Daniels","year":"2020","unstructured":"Daniels S, Robson D, Palacz M, Howell S, Nguyen T, Behnia-Willison F. Success rates and outcomes of laparoscopic mesh sacrohysteropexy. Aust New Zeal J Obstet Gynaecol. 2020;60(2):244\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/ajo.13104.","journal-title":"Aust New Zeal J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"6037_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.7759\/cureus.13087","volume":"13","author":"SR Samantray","year":"2021","unstructured":"Samantray SR, Mohapatra I. Successful pregnancy outcome after laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy for pelvic organ prolapse. Cureus. 2021;13(2):1\u20136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7759\/cureus.13087.","journal-title":"Cureus"},{"issue":"1","key":"6037_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1186\/s10397-017-1017-1","volume":"14","author":"H Jefferis","year":"2017","unstructured":"Jefferis H, Price N, Jackson S. Pregnancy following laparoscopic hysteropexy\u2014a case series. Gynecol Surg. 2017;14(1):1\u20135. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s10397-017-1017-1.","journal-title":"Gynecol Surg"},{"key":"6037_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"88","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.02.013","volume":"235","author":"NM Braun","year":"2019","unstructured":"Braun NM, Andraos W, Bettin S. Safety and efficacy of spider anchoring device for apical repair in laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: retrospective cohort study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019;235:88\u201392. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.02.013.","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"6","key":"6037_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"802","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.07.035","volume":"213","author":"BM Ridgeway","year":"2015","unstructured":"Ridgeway BM. Does prolapse equal hysterectomy? the role of uterine conservation in women with uterovaginal prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;213(6):802\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.07.035.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"6037_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"93","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-015-2775-9","volume":"27","author":"K Pan","year":"2016","unstructured":"Pan K, Cao L, Ryan NA, Wang Y, Xu H. Laparoscopic sacral hysteropexy versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27(1):93\u2013101. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-015-2775-9.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"4","key":"6037_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"276","DOI":"10.1097\/GCO.0000000000000377","volume":"29","author":"O Zwain","year":"2017","unstructured":"Zwain O, Aoun J, Eisenstein D. Minimally invasive surgery in pelvic floor repair. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2017;29(4):276\u201381. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/GCO.0000000000000377.","journal-title":"Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"6037_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"447","DOI":"10.1093\/jsxmed\/qdac051","volume":"20","author":"SJ Dedden","year":"2023","unstructured":"Dedden SJ, Werner MA, Steinweg J, et al. Hysterectomy and sexual function: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Sex Med. 2023;20(4):447\u201366. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/jsxmed\/qdac051.","journal-title":"J Sex Med"},{"issue":"1","key":"6037_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"5","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2013.12.017","volume":"174","author":"M Darwish","year":"2014","unstructured":"Darwish M, Atlantis E, Mohamed-Taysir T. Psychological outcomes after hysterectomy for benign conditions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014;174(1):5\u201319. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2013.12.017.","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"5","key":"6037_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"470.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.08.003","volume":"209","author":"NB Korbly","year":"2013","unstructured":"Korbly NB, Kassis NC, Good MM, et al. Patient preferences for uterine preservation and hysterectomy in women with pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;209(5):470.e1-470.e6. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.08.003.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"6037_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"358","DOI":"10.1016\/j.maturitas.2008.09.015","volume":"61","author":"H Celik","year":"2008","unstructured":"Celik H, Gurates B, Yavuz A, Nurkalem C, Hanay F, Kavak B. The effect of hysterectomy and bilaterally salpingo-oophorectomy on sexual function in post-menopausal women. Maturitas. 2008;61(4):358\u201363. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.maturitas.2008.09.015.","journal-title":"Maturitas"},{"key":"6037_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Goktas SB, Gun I, Yildiz T, Sakar MN, Caglayan S. The effect of total hysterectomy on sexual function and depression. Pakistan J Med Sci. 2015;31(3):700\u2013705. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.12669\/pjms.313.7368.","DOI":"10.12669\/pjms.313.7368"},{"issue":"1","key":"6037_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"29","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2018.11.004","volume":"48","author":"M Do\u011fanay","year":"2019","unstructured":"Do\u011fanay M, Kokanal\u0131 D, Kokanal\u0131 MK, Cavkaytar S, Aksakal OS. Comparison of female sexual function in women who underwent abdominal or vaginal hysterectomy with or without bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2019;48(1):29\u201332. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jogoh.2018.11.004.","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod"},{"issue":"4","key":"6037_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"264","DOI":"10.1002\/smrj.59","volume":"3","author":"R Thakar","year":"2015","unstructured":"Thakar R. Is the uterus a sexual organ? sexual function following hysterectomy. Sex Med Rev. 2015;3(4):264\u201378. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/smrj.59.","journal-title":"Sex Med Rev"},{"issue":"9","key":"6037_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"983","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1997.tb12053.x","volume":"104","author":"R Thakar","year":"1997","unstructured":"Thakar R, Manyonda I, Stanton SL, Clarkson P, Robinson G. Bladder, bowel and sexual function after hysterectomy for benign conditions. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997;104(9):983\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1997.tb12053.x.","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"1\u20132","key":"6037_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"122","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jad.2008.08.017","volume":"115","author":"R Cooper","year":"2009","unstructured":"Cooper R, Mishra G, Hardy R, Kuh D. Hysterectomy and subsequent psychological health: findings from a British birth cohort study. J Affect Disord. 2009;115(1\u20132):122\u201330. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jad.2008.08.017.","journal-title":"J Affect Disord"},{"issue":"3","key":"6037_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"580","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.14751","volume":"103","author":"U Johannesson","year":"2024","unstructured":"Johannesson U, Amato M, Forsgren C. Pelvic floor and sexual function 3 years after hysterectomy \u2013 a prospective cohort study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2024;103(3):580\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/aogs.14751.","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"3","key":"6037_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.3390\/jpm14030265","volume":"14","author":"A Yurtkal","year":"2024","unstructured":"Yurtkal A, Canday M. Optimizing hysterectomy: a prospective comparative analysis of surgical techniques and their impact on women\u2019s lives. J Pers Med. 2024;14(3):1\u201321. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/jpm14030265.","journal-title":"J Pers Med"},{"issue":"1","key":"6037_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.300.11.1311.Prevalence","volume":"23","author":"I Nygaard","year":"2008","unstructured":"Nygaard I, Barber MD, Burgio KL, Kenton K, Meikle S, Schaffer J, et al. PN and SS Prevalence of symptomatic POP. JAMA. 2008;23(1):1\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jama.300.11.1311.Prevalence.","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"issue":"2","key":"6037_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"345","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-022-05306-2","volume":"34","author":"SB Andebrhan","year":"2023","unstructured":"Andebrhan SB, Caron AT, Szlachta-McGinn A, et al. Pelvic organ prolapse recurrence after pregnancy following uterine-sparing prolapse repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J. 2023;34(2):345\u201356. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-022-05306-2.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"April","key":"6037_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"215","DOI":"10.1002\/nau","volume":"32","author":"K B\u00f8","year":"2013","unstructured":"B\u00f8 K, Hilde G. Retest reliability of surface electromyography on the pelvic floor musclesGrape, HH Dedering, A Jonasson AF. Neurourol Urodyn. 2013;32(April):215\u201323. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/nau.","journal-title":"Neurourol Urodyn"},{"issue":"6","key":"6037_CR31","first-page":"412","volume":"84","author":"M Va\u0161\u00ed\u010dek","year":"2019","unstructured":"Va\u0161\u00ed\u010dek M, Pilka R, Eim JB. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy using Seratex Slimsling: pilot study. Ces Gynekol. 2019;84(6):412\u20137.","journal-title":"Ces Gynekol"},{"key":"6037_CR32","unstructured":"SERATEX\u00ae SlimSling\u00ae: SERAG-WIESSNER. Accessed July 1, 2024. https:\/\/www.serag-wiessner.de\/en\/products\/textile-implants\/seratexr-slimsling."}],"container-title":["International Urogynecology Journal"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00192-024-06037-2.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00192-024-06037-2\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00192-024-06037-2.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,16]],"date-time":"2025-04-16T13:33:07Z","timestamp":1744810387000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00192-024-06037-2"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,1,22]]},"references-count":32,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,3]]}},"alternative-id":["6037"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-024-06037-2","relation":{},"ISSN":["0937-3462","1433-3023"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0937-3462"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1433-3023"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,1,22]]},"assertion":[{"value":"31 October 2024","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"8 December 2024","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"22 January 2025","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"Ethical approval was obtained from the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of Ziv Medical Center in accordance to Helsinki guidelines. All data were anonymized, and patient consent was waived owing to the retrospective nature of the study.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethical Approval"}},{"value":"The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of Interest"}}]}}