{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,22]],"date-time":"2026-04-22T02:44:21Z","timestamp":1776825861537,"version":"3.51.2"},"reference-count":14,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"8","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,16]],"date-time":"2025-06-16T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1750032000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,16]],"date-time":"2025-06-16T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1750032000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Int Urogynecol J"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,8]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-025-06194-y","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,16]],"date-time":"2025-06-16T11:13:57Z","timestamp":1750072437000},"page":"1671-1677","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":4,"title":["Retrospective Cohort Study of Mesh-Related Complications of Minimally Invasive Sacrocervicopexy in 603 cases"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"36","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-3122-4966","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Vi","family":"Duong","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Stephanie","family":"Schatzman-Bone","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Joe","family":"Shi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Kaitlyn","family":"James","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Milena M.","family":"Weinstein","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,16]]},"reference":[{"issue":"11","key":"6194_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1783","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-013-2169-9","volume":"24","author":"MD Barber","year":"2013","unstructured":"Barber MD, Maher C. Epidemiology and outcome assessment of pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24(11):1783\u201390. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-013-2169-9","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"4","key":"6194_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"546","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2014.01.004","volume":"21","author":"IL Parkes","year":"2014","unstructured":"Parkes IL, Shveiky D. Sacrocolpopexy for treatment of vaginal apical prolapse: evidence-based surgery. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014;21(4):546\u201357. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jmig.2014.01.004","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"6194_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"862","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2018.03.131","volume":"200","author":"BJ Linder","year":"2018","unstructured":"Linder BJ, Occhino JA, Habermann EB, Glasgow AE, Bews KA, Gershman B. A national contemporary analysis of perioperative outcomes of open versus minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy. J Urol. 2018;200(4):862\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.juro.2018.03.131","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"issue":"10","key":"6194_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1469","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-017-3296-5","volume":"28","author":"ALWM Coolen","year":"2017","unstructured":"Coolen ALWM, van Oudheusden AMJ, Mol BWJ, van Eijndhoven HWF, Roovers JPWR, Bongers MY. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy compared with open abdominal sacrocolpopexy for vault prolapse repair: a randomised controlled trial. Int Urogynecol J. 2017;28(10):1469\u201379. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-017-3296-5","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"2","key":"6194_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"129","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.01.018","volume":"219","author":"KV Meriwether","year":"2018","unstructured":"Meriwether KV, Antosh DD, Olivera CK, et al. Uterine preservation vs hysterectomy in pelvic organ prolapse surgery: a systematic review with meta-analysis and clinical practice guidelines. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;219(2):129-146.e2. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.01.018","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"6194_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"669","DOI":"10.1097\/JU.0000000000002262","volume":"207","author":"K Dallas","year":"2022","unstructured":"Dallas K, Taich L, Kuhlmann P, et al. Supracervical hysterectomy is protective against mesh complications after minimally invasive abdominal sacrocolpopexy: a population-based cohort study of 12,189 patients. J Urol. 2022;207(3):669\u201376. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/JU.0000000000002262","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"issue":"3","key":"6194_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"412","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000004901","volume":"140","author":"J Nassif","year":"2022","unstructured":"Nassif J, Yadav GS, Orejuela FJ, Turrentine MA. Rate of mesh erosion after sacrocolpopexy with concurrent supracervical compared with total hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol. 2022;140(3):412\u201320. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/AOG.0000000000004901","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"6194_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"207","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-023-05658-3","volume":"35","author":"S Glass Clark","year":"2024","unstructured":"Glass Clark S, Bretschneider CE, Bradley MS, Rhodes S, Shoag J, Sheyn D. Risk of postoperative mesh exposure following sacrocolpopexy with supracervical versus total concomitant laparoscopic hysterectomy. Int Urogynecol J. 2024;35(1):207\u201313. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-023-05658-3","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"9","key":"6194_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2507","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-022-05251-0","volume":"33","author":"D Das","year":"2022","unstructured":"Das D, Carroll A, Mueller M, et al. Mesh complications after total vs supracervical laparoscopic hysterectomy at time of minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy. Int Urogynecol J. 2022;33(9):2507\u201314. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-022-05251-0","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"2","key":"6194_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"85","DOI":"10.1097\/SPV.0000000000001087","volume":"28","author":"A Gupta","year":"2022","unstructured":"Gupta A, Ton JB, Maheshwari D, et al. Route of hysterectomy at the time of sacrocolpopexy: a multicenter retrospective cohort study. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2022;28(2):85\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/SPV.0000000000001087","journal-title":"Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg"},{"issue":"7","key":"6194_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"415","DOI":"10.1097\/SPV.0000000000000950","volume":"27","author":"EA Slopnick","year":"2021","unstructured":"Slopnick EA, Roberts K, Sheyn DD, Chapman GC, El-Nashar S, Mahajan ST. Factors influencing selection of concomitant total versus supracervical hysterectomy at the time of sacrocolpopexy and associated perioperative outcomes. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2021;27(7):415\u201320. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/SPV.0000000000000950","journal-title":"Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg"},{"issue":"2","key":"6194_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"85","DOI":"10.1097\/SPV.0000000000001087","volume":"28","author":"A Gupta","year":"2022","unstructured":"Gupta A, Ton JB, Maheshwari D, et al. Route of hysterectomy at the time of sacrocolpopexy: a multicenter retrospective cohort study. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2022;28(2):85\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/SPV.0000000000001087","journal-title":"Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg"},{"issue":"2","key":"6194_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"355","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000003884","volume":"136","author":"CA Matthews","year":"2020","unstructured":"Matthews CA, Geller EJ, Henley BR, et al. Permanent compared with absorbable suture for vaginal mesh fixation during total hysterectomy and sacrocolpopexy. Obstet Gynecol. 2020;136(2):355\u201364. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/AOG.0000000000003884","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"6194_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"229","DOI":"10.1097\/SPV.0b013e3181d683a3","volume":"16","author":"JP Shepherd","year":"2010","unstructured":"Shepherd JP, Higdon HL, Stanford EJ, Mattox TF. Effect of suture selection on the rate of suture or mesh erosion and surgery failure in abdominal sacrocolpopexy. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2010;16(4):229\u201333. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/SPV.0b013e3181d683a3.","journal-title":"Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg"}],"container-title":["International Urogynecology Journal"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00192-025-06194-y.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00192-025-06194-y\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00192-025-06194-y.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,25]],"date-time":"2025-09-25T13:35:36Z","timestamp":1758807336000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00192-025-06194-y"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,16]]},"references-count":14,"journal-issue":{"issue":"8","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,8]]}},"alternative-id":["6194"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-025-06194-y","relation":{},"ISSN":["0937-3462","1433-3023"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0937-3462","type":"print"},{"value":"1433-3023","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,16]]},"assertion":[{"value":"31 January 2025","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"25 May 2025","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"16 June 2025","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"This study was deemed exempt from institutional review board (IRB) review by Massachusetts General Brigham.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethical Approval"}},{"value":"The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflicts of interest"}}]}}