{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,4]],"date-time":"2026-09-04T00:51:05Z","timestamp":1788483065843,"version":"build-2803163510"},"reference-count":19,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"12","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,31]],"date-time":"2025-07-31T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1753920000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,31]],"date-time":"2025-07-31T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1753920000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Int Urogynecol J"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,12]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-025-06253-4","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,31]],"date-time":"2025-07-31T13:19:10Z","timestamp":1753967950000},"page":"2467-2472","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Robotic Sacrocolpopexy With Versus Without Supracervical Hysterectomy"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"36","author":[{"given":"Alicia","family":"Blondeau","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Margot","family":"Chommeloux","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Camille","family":"Haudebert","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Claire","family":"Richard","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Alexandre","family":"Dubois","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Juan","family":"Penafiel","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Andrea","family":"Manunta","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Juliette","family":"Hascoet","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Benoit","family":"Peyronnet","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,31]]},"reference":[{"issue":"1","key":"6253_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"49","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-014-2413-y","volume":"26","author":"E L\u00f8wenstein","year":"2015","unstructured":"L\u00f8wenstein E, Ottesen B, Gimbel H. Incidence and lifetime risk of pelvic organ prolapse surgery in Denmark from 1977 to 2009. Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26(1):49\u201355. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-014-2413-y","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"5","key":"6253_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"252","DOI":"10.1097\/SPV.0000000000000070","volume":"20","author":"CO Hudson","year":"2014","unstructured":"Hudson CO, Northington GM, Lyles RH, Karp DR. Outcomes of robotic sacrocolpopexy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2014;20(5):252\u201360. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/SPV.0000000000000070","journal-title":"Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg"},{"issue":"6","key":"6253_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"509","DOI":"10.5468\/ogs.23073","volume":"66","author":"S Oh","year":"2023","unstructured":"Oh S, Shin JH. Outcomes of robotic sacrocolpopexy. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2023;66(6):509\u201317. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5468\/ogs.23073","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol Sci"},{"issue":"3","key":"6253_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"469","DOI":"10.1111\/ans.18268","volume":"93","author":"T Mollah","year":"2023","unstructured":"Mollah T, Brennan J. Australian trends in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse in the non-mesh era. ANZ J Surg. 2023;93(3):469\u201375. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/ans.18268","journal-title":"ANZ J Surg"},{"issue":"1","key":"6253_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"33","DOI":"10.1097\/SPV.0000000000000036","volume":"20","author":"PA Nosti","year":"2014","unstructured":"Nosti PA, Andy UU, Kane S, White DE, Harvie HS, Lowenstein L, et al. Outcomes of abdominal and minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy: a retrospective cohort study. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2014;20(1):33\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/SPV.0000000000000036.","journal-title":"Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg"},{"issue":"3","key":"6253_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"284","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2015.08.008","volume":"132","author":"K Pan","year":"2016","unstructured":"Pan K, Zhang Y, Wang Y, Wang Y, Xu H. A systematic review and meta-analysis of conventional laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy versus robot-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016;132(3):284\u201391. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ijgo.2015.08.008.","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"issue":"2","key":"6253_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"297","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-021-04741-x","volume":"33","author":"CL Chang","year":"2022","unstructured":"Chang CL, Chen CH, Chang SJ. Comparing the outcomes and effectiveness of robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2022;33(2):297\u2013308. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-021-04741-x","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"2","key":"6253_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"129","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.01.018","volume":"219","author":"KV Meriwether","year":"2018","unstructured":"Meriwether KV, Antosh DD, Olivera CK, Kim-Fine S, Balk EM, Murphy M, et al. Uterine preservation vs hysterectomy in pelvic organ prolapse surgery: a systematic review with meta-analysis and clinical practice guidelines. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;219(2):129-146.e2. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.01.018","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"6253_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"603","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-018-3769-1","volume":"30","author":"EA Slopnick","year":"2019","unstructured":"Slopnick EA, Petrikovets A, Sheyn D, Kim SP, Nguyen CT, Hijaz AK. Surgical trends and patient factors associated with the treatment of apical pelvic organ prolapse from a national sample. Int Urogynecol J. 2019;30(4):603\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-018-3769-1","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"1","key":"6253_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"321","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-023-07112-7","volume":"309","author":"JM Selle","year":"2023","unstructured":"Selle JM, Hokenstad ED, Habermann EB, Bews KA, Occhino JA. The effect of concomitant hysterectomy on complications following pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023;309(1):321\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00404-023-07112-7","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"issue":"1","key":"6253_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"135","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-022-05263-w","volume":"34","author":"JY Kikuchi","year":"2023","unstructured":"Kikuchi JY, Yanek LR, Handa VL, Chen CCG, Jacobs S, Blomquist J, et al. Prolapse and mesh reoperations following sacrocolpopexy: comparing supracervical hysterectomy, total hysterectomy, and no hysterectomy. Int Urogynecol J. 2023;34(1):135\u201345. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-022-05263-w","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"6253_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Swallow C, Imamoglu M, Imamoglu AG, Xu X, Harmanli O. The effect of concomitant hysterectomy route on robotic sacrocolpopexy outcomes. UROGC. 2025 [cited 2025 Apr 16]. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/SPV.0000000000001659","DOI":"10.1097\/SPV.0000000000001659"},{"issue":"1","key":"6253_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"207","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-023-05658-3","volume":"35","author":"S Glass Clark","year":"2024","unstructured":"Glass Clark S, Bretschneider CE, Bradley MS, Rhodes S, Shoag J, Sheyn D. Risk of postoperative mesh exposure following sacrocolpopexy with supracervical versus total concomitant laparoscopic hysterectomy. Int Urogynecol J. 2024;35(1):207\u201313. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-023-05658-3","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"6","key":"6253_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1328","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000002913","volume":"132","author":"K Dallas","year":"2018","unstructured":"Dallas K, Elliott CS, Syan R, Sohlberg E, Enemchukwu E, Rogo-Gupta L. Association between concomitant hysterectomy and repeat surgery for pelvic organ prolapse repair in a cohort of nearly 100,000 women. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;132(6):1328\u201336. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/AOG.0000000000002913","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"6253_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"721","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000004776","volume":"139","author":"VL Jacoby","year":"2022","unstructured":"Jacoby VL, Sawaya G. The swinging pendulum: elective oophorectomy at the time of hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol. 2022;139(5):721\u20133. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/AOG.0000000000004776","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"6253_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"669","DOI":"10.1097\/JU.0000000000002262","volume":"207","author":"K Dallas","year":"2022","unstructured":"Dallas K, Taich L, Kuhlmann P, et al. Supracervical hysterectomy is protective against mesh complications after minimally invasive abdominal sacrocolpopexy: a population-based cohort study of 12,189 patients. J Urol. 2022;207(3):669\u201376. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/JU.0000000000002262.","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"key":"6253_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Le Normand L, Cosson M, Cour F, Deffieux X, Donon L, Ferry P, Fatton B, Hermieu J-F, Marret H, Meurette G, Cortesse A, Wagner L, Fritel X. Clinical practice guidelines: Synthesis of the guidelines for the surgical treatment of primary pelvic organ prolapse in women by the AFU, CNGOF, SIFUD-PP, SNFCP, and SCGP. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2016;45(10):1606-1613. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jgyn.2016.09.020","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2016.09.020"},{"key":"6253_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1803","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-013-2171-2","volume":"24","author":"R Gutman","year":"2013","unstructured":"Gutman R, Maher C. Uterine-preserving POP surgery. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24:1803\u201313. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-013-2171-2.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"5","key":"6253_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"470.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.08.003","volume":"209","author":"NB Korbly","year":"2013","unstructured":"Korbly NB, Kassis NC, Good MM, Richardson ML, Book NM, Yip S, Saguan D, Gross C, Evans J, Lopes VV, Harvie HS, Sung VW. Patient preferences for uterine preservation and hysterectomy in women with pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;209(5):470.e1-470.e6. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.08.003.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"}],"container-title":["International Urogynecology Journal"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00192-025-06253-4.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00192-025-06253-4","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00192-025-06253-4.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,31]],"date-time":"2025-12-31T11:52:14Z","timestamp":1767181934000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00192-025-06253-4"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,31]]},"references-count":19,"journal-issue":{"issue":"12","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,12]]}},"alternative-id":["6253"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-025-06253-4","relation":{},"ISSN":["0937-3462","1433-3023"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0937-3462","type":"print"},{"value":"1433-3023","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,31]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2 May 2025","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"14 July 2025","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"31 July 2025","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"This study was approved by the CNIL (Comit\u00e9 National Informatique et Libert\u00e9, CNIL 2238623 v 0), and was conducted following the principles of the Helsinki declaration.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethical Approval"}},{"value":"Beno\u00eet Peyronnet is a consultant for Boston Scientific, Intuitive, Medtronic, Pierre Fabre, Ibsa, Coloplast, Ipsen, AbbVie. The other authors have nothing to disclose.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}}]}}