{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,18]],"date-time":"2026-08-18T15:47:33Z","timestamp":1787068053562,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":24,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"8","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,9]],"date-time":"2026-02-09T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1770595200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,9]],"date-time":"2026-02-09T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1770595200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Int Urogynecol J"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,8]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-026-06543-5","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,9]],"date-time":"2026-02-09T12:29:32Z","timestamp":1770640172000},"page":"2417-2424","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Voiding Dysfunction After Prolapse Surgery: Uterosacral Ligament Suspension Versus Sacrospinous Ligament Suspension"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"37","author":[{"given":"Sofia Maria","family":"Tarchi","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Knar","family":"Krafian","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Rachan","family":"Ghandour","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Maura","family":"Kelly","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Vatche A.","family":"Minassian","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,9]]},"reference":[{"key":"6543_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"165","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-015-2932-1","volume":"27","author":"BT Haylen","year":"2016","unstructured":"Haylen BT, et al. An international urogynecological association (IUGA) \/ international continence society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27:165\u201394.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"6543_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e0276788","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0276788","volume":"17","author":"L Carroll","year":"2022","unstructured":"Carroll L, O\u2019 Sullivan C, Doody C, Perrotta C, Fullen B. Pelvic organ prolapse: the lived experience. PLoS One. 2022;17:e0276788.","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"6543_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3389\/fpubh.2022.975829","author":"B Wang","year":"2022","unstructured":"Wang B, et al. Global burden and trends of pelvic organ prolapse associated with aging women: an observational trend study from 1990 to 2019. Front Public Health. 2022. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fpubh.2022.975829","journal-title":"Front Public Health"},{"key":"6543_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"173","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-021-05018-z","volume":"33","author":"HW Brown","year":"2022","unstructured":"Brown HW, et al. International urogynecology consultation chapter 1 committee 2: epidemiology of pelvic organ prolapse: prevalence, incidence, natural history, and service needs. Int Urogynecol J. 2022;33:173\u201387.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"6543_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"39","DOI":"10.21037\/gpm-2020-pfd-03","volume":"3","author":"TG Lee","year":"2020","unstructured":"Lee TG, Unlu BS. Sacrospinous ligament suspension and uterosacral ligament suspension in the treatment of apical prolapse. Gynecol Pelvic Med. 2020;3:39\u201339.","journal-title":"Gynecol Pelvic Med"},{"key":"6543_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"133","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2022.04.012","volume":"166","author":"Y Chen","year":"2022","unstructured":"Chen Y, Peng L, Zhang J, Shen H, Luo D. Sacrospinous ligament fixation vs uterosacral ligaments suspension for pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Urology. 2022;166:133\u20139.","journal-title":"Urology"},{"key":"6543_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1999","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-021-04992-8","volume":"33","author":"AS El Haraki","year":"2022","unstructured":"El Haraki AS, Burns J, Crafton CL, Parker-Autry C, Matthews CA. Voiding function after sacrocolpopexy versus native tissue transvaginal repair for apical pelvic organ prolapse in an ERAS era: a retrospective cohort study. Int Urogynecol J. 2022;33:1999\u20132004.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"6543_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"167","DOI":"10.1097\/SPV.0000000000000675","volume":"25","author":"C Eto","year":"2019","unstructured":"Eto C, Ford AT, Smith M, Advolodkina P, Northington GM. Retrospective cohort study on the perioperative risk factors for transient voiding dysfunction after apical prolapse repair. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2019;25:167\u201371.","journal-title":"Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg"},{"key":"6543_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"154","DOI":"10.1186\/s12905-021-01309-1","volume":"21","author":"S Greisen","year":"2021","unstructured":"Greisen S, Axelsen SM, Bek KM, Guldberg R, Glavind-Kristensen M. Fast track sacrospinous ligament fixation: subjective and objective outcomes at 6 months. BMC Womens Health. 2021;21:154.","journal-title":"BMC Womens Health"},{"key":"6543_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"978","DOI":"10.3906\/sag-2005-117","volume":"50","author":"E Ba\u015fer","year":"2020","unstructured":"Ba\u015fer E, Se\u00e7kin KD, Kadiro\u011fullari P, Kiyak H. The effect of sacrospinous ligament fixation during vaginal hysterectomy on postoperative de novo stress incontinence occurrence: a prospective study with 2-year follow-up. Turk J Med Sci. 2020;50:978\u201384.","journal-title":"Turk J Med Sci"},{"key":"6543_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"829","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2020.07.013","volume":"28","author":"S Farag","year":"2021","unstructured":"Farag S, Padilla PF, Smith KA, Zimberg SE, Sprague ML. Postoperative urinary retention rates after autofill versus backfill void trial following total laparoscopic hysterectomy: a randomized controlled trial. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021;28:829\u201337.","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"key":"6543_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1999","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-021-04992-8","volume":"33","author":"AS El Haraki","year":"2022","unstructured":"El Haraki AS, Burns J, Crafton CL, Parker-Autry C, Matthews CA. Voiding function after sacrocolpopexy versus native tissue transvaginal repair for apical pelvic organ prolapse in an ERAS era: a retrospective cohort study. Int Urogynecol J. 2022;33:1999\u20132004.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"6543_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"260.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.06.001","volume":"223","author":"JS Schachar","year":"2020","unstructured":"Schachar JS, et al. Optimal timing of a second postoperative voiding trial in women with incomplete bladder emptying after vaginal reconstructive surgery: a randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;223:260.e1-260.e9.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"6543_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3390\/jcm12103436","volume":"12","author":"N Chansriniyom","year":"2023","unstructured":"Chansriniyom N, et al. Rate of postoperative urinary retention after anterior compartment prolapse surgery: a randomized controlled trial comparing early versus conventional transurethral catheter removal. J Clin Med. 2023;12:3436.","journal-title":"J Clin Med"},{"key":"6543_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1182","DOI":"10.1002\/nau.24676","volume":"40","author":"BY Zhang","year":"2021","unstructured":"Zhang BY, Wong JMH, Koenig A, Lee T, Geoffrion R. Risk factors for urinary retention after urogynecologic surgery: a retrospective cohort study and prediction model. Neurourol Urodyn. 2021;40:1182\u201391.","journal-title":"Neurourol Urodyn"},{"key":"6543_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"178","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cct.2008.12.001","volume":"30","author":"MD Barber","year":"2009","unstructured":"Barber MD, et al. Operations and pelvic muscle training in the management of apical support loss (OPTIMAL) trial: design and methods. Contemp Clin Trials. 2009;30:178\u201389.","journal-title":"Contemp Clin Trials"},{"key":"6543_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1554","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2018.2827","volume":"319","author":"JE Jelovsek","year":"2018","unstructured":"Jelovsek JE, et al. Effect of uterosacral ligament suspension vs sacrospinous ligament fixation with or without perioperative behavioral therapy for pelvic organ vaginal prolapse on surgical outcomes and prolapse symptoms at 5 years in the OPTIMAL randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2018;319:1554.","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"6543_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"39","DOI":"10.21037\/gpm-2020-pfd-03","volume":"3","author":"TG Lee","year":"2020","unstructured":"Lee TG, Unlu BS. Sacrospinous ligament suspension and uterosacral ligament suspension in the treatment of apical prolapse. Gynecol Pelvic Med. 2020;3:39\u201339.","journal-title":"Gynecol Pelvic Med"},{"key":"6543_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1160","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2021.01.016","volume":"28","author":"AA Dieter","year":"2021","unstructured":"Dieter AA, et al. A systematic review of randomized trials investigating methods of postoperative void trials following benign gynecologic and urogynecologic surgeries. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021;28:1160-1170.e2.","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"key":"6543_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1215","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-016-2975-y","volume":"27","author":"R Wang","year":"2016","unstructured":"Wang R, et al. Voiding trial outcome following pelvic floor repair without incontinence procedures. Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27:1215\u201320.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"6543_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"351","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2020.07.002","volume":"28","author":"MT Siedhoff","year":"2021","unstructured":"Siedhoff MT, Wright KN, Misal MA, Molina AL, Greene NH. Postoperative urinary retention after benign gynecologic surgery with a liberal versus strict voiding protocol. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021;28:351\u20137.","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"key":"6543_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s13643-023-02233-1","volume":"12","author":"X Dong","year":"2023","unstructured":"Dong X, et al. Methods of postoperative void trial management after urogynecologic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Syst Rev. 2023;12:115.","journal-title":"Syst Rev"},{"key":"6543_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1794","DOI":"10.1002\/nau.23526","volume":"37","author":"JJ Yune","year":"2018","unstructured":"Yune JJ, et al. Postoperative urinary retention after pelvic organ prolapse repair: vaginal versus robotic transabdominal approach. Neurourol Urodyn. 2018;37:1794\u2013800.","journal-title":"Neurourol Urodyn"},{"key":"6543_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s12905-021-01330-4","volume":"21","author":"BC Anglim","year":"2021","unstructured":"Anglim BC, Ramage K, Sandwith E, Brennand EA. Postoperative urinary retention after pelvic organ prolapse surgery: influence of peri-operative factors and trial of void protocol. BMC Womens Health. 2021;21:195.","journal-title":"BMC Womens Health"}],"container-title":["International Urogynecology Journal"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00192-026-06543-5.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00192-026-06543-5","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00192-026-06543-5.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,18]],"date-time":"2026-08-18T15:03:52Z","timestamp":1787065432000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00192-026-06543-5"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,9]]},"references-count":24,"journal-issue":{"issue":"8","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,8]]}},"alternative-id":["6543"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-026-06543-5","relation":{},"ISSN":["0937-3462","1433-3023"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0937-3462","type":"print"},{"value":"1433-3023","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,9]]},"assertion":[{"value":"26 November 2025","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"14 January 2026","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"9 February 2026","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Mass General Brigham Institutional Review Board, protocol number 2024P000461.","order":1,"name":"Ethics","label":"Ethical Approval","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"None.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","label":"Conflicts of interest","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}}]}}