{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,11,3]],"date-time":"2026-11-03T12:35:06Z","timestamp":1793709306158,"version":"4.6.1"},"reference-count":20,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"10","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,2]],"date-time":"2026-06-02T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1780358400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,2]],"date-time":"2026-06-02T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1780358400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Int Urogynecol J"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,10]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-026-06706-4","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,2]],"date-time":"2026-06-02T15:10:38Z","timestamp":1780413038000},"page":"3395-3401","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Clinical Comparison of Sacrohysteropexy and Uterosacral Ligament Suspension in Uterovaginal Prolapse Repair: A Randomized Clinical Trial"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"37","author":[{"given":"Firoozeh","family":"Veisi","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Sanaz","family":"Salimi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Maryam","family":"Zangeneh","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Tahereh","family":"Parsajam","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Maryam","family":"Hemmati","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-6233-8117","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Kowsar","family":"Qaderi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,2]]},"reference":[{"issue":"12","key":"6706_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3122","DOI":"10.1016\/j.mayocp.2021.09.005","volume":"96","author":"R Raju","year":"2021","unstructured":"Raju R, Linder BJ. Evaluation and management of pelvic organ prolapse. Mayo Clin Proc. 2021;96(12):3122\u20139.","journal-title":"Mayo Clin Proc"},{"issue":"5","key":"6706_CR2","first-page":"5672","volume":"13","author":"H Zhu","year":"2021","unstructured":"Zhu H, Sun Y, Zheng X. A comparison of modified laparoscopic uterine suspension and vaginal hysterectomy with sacrospinous ligament fixation for treating pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Transl Res. 2021;13(5):5672\u20138.","journal-title":"Am J Transl Res"},{"key":"6706_CR3","volume":"19","author":"K Ramage","year":"2023","unstructured":"Ramage K, Ducey A, Scime NV, Knox E, Brennand EA. Factors affecting women\u2019s decision between uterine-preserving versus hysterectomy-based surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. Womens Health (Lond). 2023;19:17455057231181016.","journal-title":"Womens Health (Lond)"},{"key":"6706_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"175","DOI":"10.1017\/9781009128377.023","volume-title":"Laparoscopic urogynaecology: principles and practice","author":"V Kali\u0161","year":"2022","unstructured":"Kali\u0161 V, Ru\u0161av\u00fd Z, Ismail KM. Hysterectomy versus uterine preservation in the management of uterine prolapse. Laparoscopic urogynaecology: principles and practice. 2022:175. In: Phillips C, Jeffery S, O\u2019Reilly B, Paraiso MFR, Deval B, editors. Laparoscopic urogynaecology: principles and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2022. p. 175\u201386."},{"issue":"12","key":"6706_CR5","first-page":"763","volume":"26","author":"ER Davidson","year":"2020","unstructured":"Davidson ER, Casas-Puig V, Paraiso MFR, Ridgeway B, Ferrando CA. Pelvic organ prolapse recurrence and patient-centered outcomes following minimally invasive abdominal uterosacral ligament and mesh-augmented sacrohysteropexy. Urogynecology. 2020;26(12):763\u20138.","journal-title":"Urogynecology"},{"issue":"6","key":"6706_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"445","DOI":"10.1159\/000538787","volume":"89","author":"S Angioni","year":"2024","unstructured":"Angioni S, Saponara S, D\u2019Ancona G, Sicilia G, D\u2019Alterio MN, Vitale SG. Safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness of organ suspension in laparoscopic gynecologic surgery. A retrospective cohort study to validate an innovative technique: laparoscopic organ suspension sec. Angioni. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2024;89(6):445\u201352. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1159\/000538787.","journal-title":"Gynecol Obstet Invest"},{"issue":"2","key":"6706_CR7","first-page":"145","volume":"20","author":"AK Harzif","year":"2022","unstructured":"Harzif AK, Surya R, Muharam R, Pratama G, Meutia AP. Knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors of practitioners supporting cancer patients in fertility preservation in DKI Jakarta: a cross-sectional study. Int J Reprod Biomed. 2022;20(2):145\u201350.","journal-title":"Int J Reprod Biomed"},{"issue":"5","key":"6706_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"279","DOI":"10.1016\/j.acuro.2023.01.002","volume":"47","author":"ME Anter","year":"2023","unstructured":"Anter ME, Ellakwa HE, Sanad ZF, Nasr-Eldin MA-E, Rashid MR. Abdominal sacrohysteropexy using Proline mesh versus Mersilene tape in apical prolapse: a randomized clinical trial. Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed). 2023;47(5):279\u201387.","journal-title":"Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed)"},{"issue":"2","key":"6706_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"244","DOI":"10.1111\/ajo.13104","volume":"60","author":"S Daniels","year":"2020","unstructured":"Daniels S, Robson D, Palacz M, Howell S, Nguyen T, Behnia-Willison F. Success rates and outcomes of laparoscopic mesh sacrohysteropexy. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2020;60(2):244\u20139.","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"6706_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2595","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-020-04396-0","volume":"31","author":"ML Izett-Kay","year":"2020","unstructured":"Izett-Kay ML, Aldabeeb D, Kupelian AS, Cartwright R, Cutner AS, Jackson S, et al. Long-term mesh complications and reoperation after laparoscopic mesh sacrohysteropexy: A cross-sectional study. Int Urogynecol J. 2020;31:2595\u2013602.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"6706_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"945","DOI":"10.1201\/9781003144243-95","volume-title":"Textbook of female urology and urogynecology","author":"RP Goldberg","year":"2023","unstructured":"Goldberg RP, Moss NP. Uterine preservation and hysteropexy. In: Textbook of female urology and urogynecology. Cardozo L, Staskin D, editors. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2023. p. 945\u201357."},{"issue":"1","key":"6706_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"88","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2019.02.012","volume":"27","author":"R Haj-Yahya","year":"2020","unstructured":"Haj-Yahya R, Chill HH, Levin G, Reuveni-Salzman A, Shveiky D. Laparoscopic uterosacral ligament hysteropexy vs total vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension for anterior and apical prolapse: surgical outcome and patient satisfaction. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020;27(1):88\u201393.","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"6706_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"902","DOI":"10.1590\/s1677-5538.ibju.2020.0384","volume":"47","author":"N Kachroo","year":"2021","unstructured":"Kachroo N, Raffee S, Elshatanoufy S, Atiemo H. High uterosacral ligament hysteropexy for the management of pelvic organ prolapse. Int Braz J Urol. 2021;47(4):902\u20134.","journal-title":"Int Braz J Urol"},{"key":"6706_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"229","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-011-1529-6","volume":"23","author":"M Nojomi","year":"2012","unstructured":"Nojomi M, Digesu GA, Khullar V, Morovatdar N, Haghighi L, Alirezaei M, et al. Validation of Persian version of the Prolapse Quality-of-Life questionnaire (P-QOL). Int Urogynecol J. 2012;23:229\u201333.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"7","key":"6706_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1957","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-021-04932-6","volume":"33","author":"ML Izett-Kay","year":"2022","unstructured":"Izett-Kay ML, Rahmanou P, Cartwright RJ, Price N, Jackson SR. Laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy and apical suspension: 7-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. Int Urogynecol J. 2022;33(7):1957\u201365.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"6706_CR16","volume":"187","author":"W Zhang","year":"2022","unstructured":"Zhang W, Cheon WC, Ngan HYS, Wei Y, Lyu C. Laparoscopic non-mesh cerclage pectopexy for pelvic organ prolapse. J Vis Exp. 2022;187:e64388.","journal-title":"J Vis Exp"},{"key":"6706_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s13224-025-02151-3","author":"TI Patel","year":"2025","unstructured":"Patel TI, Tandale MS, Nagapurkar S, Nishat S. A conservative approach to uterovaginal prolapse: assessing the effectiveness and outcomes of abdominal sacrohysteropexy. J Obstet Gynecol India. 2025; https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s13224-025-02151-3.","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynecol India"},{"issue":"9","key":"6706_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1475","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-019-03952-7","volume":"30","author":"G Baines","year":"2019","unstructured":"Baines G, Price N, Jefferis H, Cartwright R, Jackson SR. Mesh-related complications of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. Int Urogynecol J. 2019;30(9):1475\u201381.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"3","key":"6706_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"262","DOI":"10.4103\/tcmj.tcmj_131_19","volume":"32","author":"PC Li","year":"2020","unstructured":"Li PC, Ding DC. Outcomes of laparoscopic hysteropexy and supracervical hysterectomy plus cervicopexy: a retrospective study. Tzu Chi Med J. 2020;32(3):262\u20136.","journal-title":"Tzu Chi Med J"},{"issue":"5","key":"6706_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"431","DOI":"10.30699\/jogcr.8.5.431","volume":"8","author":"Z Ghanbari","year":"2023","unstructured":"Ghanbari Z, Pourali L, Eftekhar T, Deldar Pesikhani M, Darvish S, Ayati E, et al. Surgical outcomes within 1 year after native-tissue apical suspension for pelvic organ prolapse: sacrospinous ligament fixation versus uterosacral ligament suspension. Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Cancer Research. 2023;8(5):431\u20137.","journal-title":"Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Cancer Research"}],"container-title":["International Urogynecology Journal"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00192-026-06706-4.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00192-026-06706-4","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00192-026-06706-4.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,11,3]],"date-time":"2026-11-03T11:58:46Z","timestamp":1793707126000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00192-026-06706-4"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,2]]},"references-count":20,"journal-issue":{"issue":"10","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,10]]}},"alternative-id":["6706"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-026-06706-4","relation":{},"ISSN":["0937-3462","1433-3023"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0937-3462","type":"print"},{"value":"1433-3023","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,2]]},"assertion":[{"value":"4 November 2025","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"26 April 2026","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"2 June 2026","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"Written informed consent letters were signed and obtained from the patients before enrollment and data gathering. Ethical approval was obtained from the ethics committee of Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences (Ethical code: IR.KUMS.MED.REC.1402.117) and it was registered in the Iranian registry of clinical trials: IRCT20130812014333N206\n                      \n                      , (8 November 2023). All experiments and methods were performed in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.","order":1,"name":"Ethics","label":"Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","label":"Consent for Publication","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"No competing interests to be declared.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","label":"Competing Interests","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"None.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","label":"Conflicts of Interest","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}}]}}