{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,29]],"date-time":"2026-09-29T02:57:18Z","timestamp":1790650638487,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":39,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,28]],"date-time":"2026-09-28T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1790553600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,28]],"date-time":"2026-09-28T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1790553600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/100007672","name":"L\u00e9ka\u0159sk\u00e1 Fakulta v Plzni, Univerzita Karlova","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100007672","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"name":"Integration of biomedical research and health care in the Pilsen metropolitan area co-funded by the European Union and by the State Budget of the Czech Republic.","award":["reg. no. CZ.02.01.01\/00\/23_021\/0008828)"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["reg. no. CZ.02.01.01\/00\/23_021\/0008828)"]}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Int Urogynecol J"],"DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-026-06873-4","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,28]],"date-time":"2026-09-28T13:15:27Z","timestamp":1790601327000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Pelvic Organ Prolapse with Concomitant Short Total Vaginal Length and Outcomes of Laparoscopic Mesh Sacrocolpopexy"],"prefix":"10.1007","author":[{"given":"Lubos","family":"Karasek","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Vladimir","family":"Kalis","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Matej","family":"Vidoman","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Martin","family":"Smazinka","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Zdenek","family":"Rusavy","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-9449-0706","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Khaled M.","family":"Ismail","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,28]]},"reference":[{"issue":"1","key":"6873_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"5","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-009-0976-9","volume":"21","author":"BT Haylen","year":"2010","unstructured":"Haylen BT, de Ridder D, Freeman RM, Swift SE, Berghmans B, Lee J, et al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)\/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21(1):5\u201326. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-009-0976-9.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"Suppl 6","key":"6873_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S39","DOI":"10.1002\/nau.23740","volume":"37","author":"C Madhu","year":"2018","unstructured":"Madhu C, Swift S, Moloney-Geany S, Drake MJ. How to use the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) system? Neurourol Urodyn. 2018;37(Suppl 6):S39\u201343. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/nau.23740.","journal-title":"Neurourol Urodyn"},{"issue":"8","key":"6873_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1279","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-018-3779-z","volume":"30","author":"M Girgis","year":"2019","unstructured":"Girgis M, Shek KL, Dietz HP. Total vaginal length: does it matter for assessing uterine prolapse? Int Urogynecol J. 2019;30(8):1279\u201382. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-018-3779-z.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"2","key":"6873_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"345","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2003.08.034","volume":"190","author":"JL Clemons","year":"2004","unstructured":"Clemons JL, Aguilar VC, Tillinghast TA, Jackson ND, Myers DL. Risk factors associated with an unsuccessful pessary fitting trial in women with pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;190(2):345\u201350. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2003.08.034.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"9","key":"6873_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1023","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-009-0866-1","volume":"20","author":"CW Nager","year":"2009","unstructured":"Nager CW, Richter HE, Nygaard I, Paraiso MFR, Wu JM, Kenton K, et al. Incontinence pessaries: size, POPQ measures, and successful fitting. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2009;20(9):1023\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-009-0866-1.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct"},{"issue":"8","key":"6873_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1197","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-016-3247-6","volume":"28","author":"A Collins","year":"2017","unstructured":"Collins A, Doyle P, Vilasagar S, Buchsbaum G. Utility of anterior vaginal wall length measurement in vaginal reconstructive surgery. Int Urogynecol J. 2017;28(8):1197\u2013201. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-016-3247-6.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"3","key":"6873_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"491","DOI":"10.1016\/j.tjog.2022.02.042","volume":"61","author":"S Kiremitli","year":"2022","unstructured":"Kiremitli S, Kiremitli T, Yildirim G, Gokcu M, Yildiz Y, Koyuncu K, et al. The effect of hysterectomy types on vaginal length, vaginal shortening rate and FSFI scores. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2022;61(3):491\u20136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.tjog.2022.02.042.","journal-title":"Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"6873_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"39","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2015.07.006","volume":"132","author":"\u00d6 Ercan","year":"2016","unstructured":"Ercan \u00d6, \u00d6zer A, K\u00f6st\u00fc B, Bakacak M, K\u0131ran G, Avc\u0131 F. Comparison of postoperative vaginal length and sexual function after abdominal, vaginal, and laparoscopic hysterectomy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016;132(1):39\u201341. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ijgo.2015.07.006.","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"issue":"2","key":"6873_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"190","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2010.03.031","volume":"151","author":"AM Abdelmonem","year":"2010","unstructured":"Abdelmonem AM. Vaginal length and incidence of dyspareunia after total abdominal versus vaginal hysterectomy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010;151(2):190\u20132. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2010.03.031.","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"1","key":"6873_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"143","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-021-04697-y","volume":"33","author":"S Angl\u00e8s-Acedo","year":"2022","unstructured":"Angl\u00e8s-Acedo S, Ros C, Bataller E, Espu\u00f1a-Pons M, Carmona F, Angl\u00e8s S, et al. Female sexuality before and after sacrocolpopexy or vaginal mesh: is vaginal length one of the key factors? Int Urogynecol J. 2022;33(1):143\u201352. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-021-04697-y.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"2","key":"6873_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"167","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2018.01.044","volume":"74","author":"JP Lucot","year":"2018","unstructured":"Lucot JP, Cosson M, Bader G, Debodinance P, Akladios C, Ferry P, et al. Safety of vaginal mesh surgery versus laparoscopic mesh sacropexy for cystocele repair: results of the Prosthetic Pelvic Floor Repair randomized controlled trial. Eur Urol. 2018;74(2):167\u201376. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.eururo.2018.01.044.","journal-title":"Eur Urol"},{"issue":"4","key":"6873_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"360.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.11.016","volume":"204","author":"CF Maher","year":"2011","unstructured":"Maher CF, Feiner B, DeCuyper EM, Nichlos CJ, Hickey KV, O\u2019Rourke P. Laparoscopic sacral colpopexy versus total vaginal mesh for vaginal vault prolapse: a randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;204(4):360.e1\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.11.016.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"6873_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"511","DOI":"10.1046\/j.0960-7692.2001.00494.x","volume":"18","author":"HP Dietz","year":"2001","unstructured":"Dietz HP, Haylen BT, Broome J. Ultrasound in the quantification of female pelvic organ prolapse. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2001;18(5):511\u20134. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1046\/j.0960-7692.2001.00494.x.","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"6873_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"60","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.10.049","volume":"244","author":"V Kalis","year":"2020","unstructured":"Kalis V, Smazinka M, Rusavy Z, Havelkova L, Ismail KM, Huser M, et al. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy as the mainstay management for significant apical pelvic organ prolapse (LAP) study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020;244:60\u20135. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.10.049.","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"8","key":"6873_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1655","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-019-04076-8","volume":"31","author":"M Smazinka","year":"2020","unstructured":"Smazinka M, Kalis V, Havir M, Havelkova L, Ismail KM, Rusavy Z. Obesity and its long-term impact on sacrocolpopexy key outcomes (OBELISK). Int Urogynecol J. 2020;31(8):1655\u201362. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-019-04076-8.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"6","key":"6873_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1155","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-024-05780-w","volume":"35","author":"M Vidoman","year":"2024","unstructured":"Vidoman M, Kalis V, Smazinka M, Havir M, Rusavy Z, Ismail KM. Pilsner modification of mesh sacrohysterocolpopexy (PiMMS): an initial report on safety and efficacy. Int Urogynecol J. 2024;35(6):1155\u201362. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-024-05780-w.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"2","key":"6873_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"205","DOI":"10.1097\/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae","volume":"240","author":"D Dindo","year":"2004","unstructured":"Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240(2):205\u201313. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae.","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"issue":"5","key":"6873_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"523","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-009-1069-5","volume":"21","author":"S Srikrishna","year":"2010","unstructured":"Srikrishna S, Robinson D, Cardozo L. Validation of the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) for urogenital prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21(5):523\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-009-1069-5.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"1","key":"6873_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"103","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.12.025","volume":"193","author":"MD Barber","year":"2005","unstructured":"Barber MD, Walters MD, Bump RC. Short forms of two condition-specific quality-of-life questionnaires for women with pelvic floor disorders: PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193(1):103\u201313. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.12.025.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"6873_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"411","DOI":"10.1002\/nau.20674","volume":"28","author":"A Klovning","year":"2009","unstructured":"Klovning A, Avery K, Sandvik H, Hunskaar S. Comparison of two questionnaires for assessing the severity of urinary incontinence: the ICIQ-UI SF versus the Incontinence Severity Index. Neurourol Urodyn. 2009;28(5):411\u20135. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/nau.20674.","journal-title":"Neurourol Urodyn"},{"issue":"1","key":"6873_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"38.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.08.035","volume":"216","author":"RE Gutman","year":"2017","unstructured":"Gutman RE, Rardin CR, Sokol ER, Matthews C, Park AJ, Iglesia CB, et al. Vaginal and laparoscopic mesh hysteropexy for uterovaginal prolapse: a parallel cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;216(1):38.e1\u201311. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.08.035.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"6873_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"72","DOI":"10.1186\/s12905-021-01208-5","volume":"21","author":"D Gagyor","year":"2021","unstructured":"Gagyor D, Kalis V, Smazinka M, Rusavy Z, Pilka R, Ismail KM. Pelvic organ prolapse and uterine preservation: a cohort study (POP-UP study). BMC Womens Health. 2021;21(1):72. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12905-021-01208-5.","journal-title":"BMC Womens Health"},{"issue":"4","key":"6873_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"451","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-013-2307-4","volume":"25","author":"HP Dietz","year":"2014","unstructured":"Dietz HP, Mann KP. What is clinically relevant prolapse? An attempt at defining cutoffs for the clinical assessment of pelvic organ descent. Int Urogynecol J. 2014;25(4):451\u20135. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-013-2307-4.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"1","key":"6873_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2","DOI":"10.1002\/nau.21036","volume":"30","author":"BT Haylen","year":"2011","unstructured":"Haylen BT, Freeman RM, Swift SE, Cosson M, Davila GW, Deprest J, et al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)\/International Continence Society (ICS) joint terminology and classification of the complications related directly to the insertion of prostheses and grafts in female pelvic floor surgery. Neurourol Urodyn. 2011;30(1):2\u201312. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/nau.21036.","journal-title":"Neurourol Urodyn"},{"issue":"5","key":"6873_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"529","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-010-1308-9","volume":"22","author":"K Svab\u00edk","year":"2011","unstructured":"Svab\u00edk K, Martan A, Masata J, El-Haddad R, Hubka P, Pavlikova M. Ultrasound appearances after mesh implantation\u2014evidence of mesh contraction or folding? Int Urogynecol J. 2011;22(5):529\u201333. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-010-1308-9.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"3","key":"6873_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"156","DOI":"10.1097\/SPV.0000000000000233","volume":"22","author":"MF Aslam","year":"2016","unstructured":"Aslam MF, Osmundsen B, Edwards SR, Matthews C, Gregory WT. Preoperative prolapse stage as predictor of failure of sacrocolpopexy. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2016;22(3):156\u201360. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/SPV.0000000000000233.","journal-title":"Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg"},{"issue":"1","key":"6873_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.xagr.2021.100035","volume":"2","author":"EK Welch","year":"2022","unstructured":"Welch EK, Dengler KL, Guirguis M, Strauchon C, Olsen C, Von Pechmann W. Risk factors of lower urinary tract injury with laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. AJOG Glob Rep. 2022;2(1):100035. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.xagr.2021.100035.","journal-title":"AJOG Glob Rep"},{"issue":"3","key":"6873_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"158","DOI":"10.1097\/SPV.0b013e31824b218d","volume":"18","author":"DD Antosh","year":"2012","unstructured":"Antosh DD, Grotzke SA, McDonald MA, Shveiky D, Park AJ, Gutman RE, et al. Short-term outcomes of robotic versus conventional laparoscopic sacral colpopexy. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2012;18(3):158\u201361. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/SPV.0b013e31824b218d.","journal-title":"Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg"},{"issue":"3","key":"6873_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"393","DOI":"10.1007\/s00345-011-0748-2","volume":"30","author":"J Seror","year":"2012","unstructured":"Seror J, Yates DR, Seringe E, Vaessen C, Bitker MO, Chartier-Kastler E, et al. Prospective comparison of short-term functional outcomes obtained after pure laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. World J Urol. 2012;30(3):393\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00345-011-0748-2.","journal-title":"World J Urol"},{"issue":"3","key":"6873_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"284","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2015.08.008","volume":"132","author":"K Pan","year":"2016","unstructured":"Pan K, Zhang Y, Wang Y, Wang Y, Xu H. A systematic review and meta-analysis of conventional laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy versus robot-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016;132(3):284\u201391. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ijgo.2015.08.008.","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"issue":"2","key":"6873_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"401","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-019-04017-5","volume":"31","author":"A Dubinskaya","year":"2020","unstructured":"Dubinskaya A, Hernandez-Aranda D, Wakefield DB, Shepherd JP. Comparing laparoscopic and robotic sacrocolpopexy surgical outcomes with prior versus concomitant hysterectomy. Int Urogynecol J. 2020;31(2):401\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-019-04017-5.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"1","key":"6873_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"44","DOI":"10.1097\/SPV.0000000000000046","volume":"20","author":"CG Salamon","year":"2014","unstructured":"Salamon CG, Lewis CM, Priestley J, Culligan PJ. Sexual function before and 1 year after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2014;20(1):44\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/SPV.0000000000000046.","journal-title":"Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg"},{"issue":"9","key":"6873_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1603","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2021.01.021","volume":"28","author":"EJ Geller","year":"2021","unstructured":"Geller EJ, Bretschneider CE, Wu JM, Kenton K, Matthews CA. Sexual function after minimally invasive total hysterectomy and sacrocolpopexy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021;28(9):1603\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jmig.2021.01.021.","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"6873_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"278","DOI":"10.48095\/cccg2024278","volume":"89","author":"V Boh\u00e1\u010d","year":"2024","unstructured":"Boh\u00e1\u010d V, Ma\u0161ata J, \u0160vab\u00edk K. Incidence of stress urinary incontinence after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. Cesk Gynekol. 2024;89(4):278\u201381. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48095\/cccg2024278.","journal-title":"Cesk Gynekol"},{"issue":"9","key":"6873_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1207","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-014-2369-y","volume":"25","author":"D Sarlos","year":"2014","unstructured":"Sarlos D, Kots L, Ryu G, Schaer G. Long-term follow-up of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. Int Urogynecol J. 2014;25(9):1207\u201312. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-014-2369-y.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"7","key":"6873_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1599","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-022-05434-9","volume":"34","author":"Y Kim","year":"2023","unstructured":"Kim Y, Rowley JE, Ortega MV, James KE, Von Bargen E. Incidence of de novo stress urinary incontinence following minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy. Int Urogynecol J. 2023;34(7):1599\u2013605. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-022-05434-9.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"6","key":"6873_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"744","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.13337","volume":"97","author":"C Christmann-Schmid","year":"2018","unstructured":"Christmann-Schmid C, Koerting I, Ruess E, Faehnle I, Krebs J. Functional outcome after laparoscopic nerve-sparing sacrocolpopexy: a prospective cohort study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2018;97(6):744\u201350. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/aogs.13337.","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"4","key":"6873_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"545","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-018-3702-7","volume":"30","author":"E Bataller","year":"2019","unstructured":"Bataller E, Ros C, Angl\u00e8s S, Gallego M, Espu\u00f1a-Pons M, Carmona F. Anatomical outcomes 1 year after pelvic organ prolapse surgery in patients with and without a uterus at a high risk of recurrence: a randomised controlled trial comparing laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy\/cervicopexy and anterior vaginal mesh. Int Urogynecol J. 2019;30(4):545\u201355. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-018-3702-7.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"10","key":"6873_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"558","DOI":"10.1016\/j.purol.2016.02.009","volume":"26","author":"A Chevrot","year":"2016","unstructured":"Chevrot A, Droupy S, Linares E, de Tayrac R, Costa P, Wagner L. Impact of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy on symptoms, health-related quality of life and sexuality: a 3-year prospective study. Prog Urol. 2016;26(10):558\u201365. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.purol.2016.02.009.","journal-title":"Prog Urol"}],"container-title":["International Urogynecology Journal"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00192-026-06873-4.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00192-026-06873-4","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00192-026-06873-4.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,29]],"date-time":"2026-09-29T02:04:01Z","timestamp":1790647441000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00192-026-06873-4"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,28]]},"references-count":39,"alternative-id":["6873"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-026-06873-4","relation":{},"ISSN":["0937-3462","1433-3023"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0937-3462","type":"print"},{"value":"1433-3023","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,28]]},"assertion":[{"value":"25 January 2026","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"9 August 2026","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"28 September 2026","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"Data collection and analysis of our unit\u2019s urogynecological database for research purposes was approved by the University Hospital of Pilsen ethics committee (ref. 2392020).","order":1,"name":"Ethics","label":"Ethics Declarations","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"None.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","label":"Conflicts of interest","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}}]}}