{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,15]],"date-time":"2026-10-15T18:45:16Z","timestamp":1792089916096,"version":"4.4.0"},"reference-count":43,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,16]],"date-time":"2026-09-16T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1789516800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,16]],"date-time":"2026-09-16T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1789516800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100002907","name":"Coloplast","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100002907","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/100008497","name":"Boston Scientific Corporation","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100008497","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/100004374","name":"Medtronic","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100004374","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"name":"Foundation for Female Health Awareness"},{"name":"Neomedic"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Int Urogynecol J"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Introduction and Hypothesis<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The Manchester procedure (MP) is the oldest uterus-sparing technique for uterine prolapse and has traditionally been used to treat cervical elongation (CE). However, its optimal application remains unclear. This review aimed to evaluate the best management of CE during primary uterovaginal prolapse repair, and to assess whether MP technique variations influence outcomes.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Following PRISMA guidelines, studies were retrieved from MEDLINE, Embase, and Pubmed through November 3, 2025. Evidence quality was assessed using GRADE criteria. Eligible studies included women undergoing surgery for primary uterovaginal prolapse. Outcomes included anatomic recurrence, patient-reported symptoms of vaginal bulge, and retreatment at\u2009\u2265\u200912\u00a0months. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed when\u2009\u2265\u20092 studies reported the same intervention and outcome. Evidence-based clinical statements were developed and evaluated through a consensus conference.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Of 456 screened abstracts, 12 studies met inclusion criteria (one RCT, one prospective cohort, ten retrospective cohorts). Overall study quality was low (grade C). Only one study clearly defined and measured CE, preventing determination of the most effective surgical approach for women with CE. MP techniques incorporating cardinal-ligament suspension showed lower anatomic failure rates than those without (9.16% vs 30.22;\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u20090.024). Patient-reported bulge symptoms were similar (17.59% vs 17.32%;\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u20090.969), as were retreatment rates (3.91% vs 9.45%;\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u20090.136).\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Current evidence does not identify an optimal surgical strategy for CE due to inconsistent definitions and limited reporting of CE measurement. MP techniques incorporating cardinal-ligament suspension may reduce anatomic recurrence, although data remain limited and heterogeneous. Standardized CE definitions and improved reporting are needed to strengthen the evidence base.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-026-06895-y","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,16]],"date-time":"2026-09-16T09:15:27Z","timestamp":1789550127000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["A Systematic Review (and Meta-Analysis) and Global Expert Consensus Statements (U-POP): The Manchester Procedure"],"prefix":"10.1007","author":[{"given":"Lisa M.","family":"Stoter","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Mette H.","family":"Bing","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Mackenzie","family":"Wood","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Kaidi","family":"Kang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Catherine A.","family":"Matthews","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Hugo W. F.","family":"van Eijndhoven","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,16]]},"reference":[{"issue":"9","key":"6895_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1037","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-009-0902-1","volume":"20","author":"MC Slieker-ten Hove","year":"2009","unstructured":"Slieker-ten Hove MC, Pool-Goudzwaard AL, Eijkemans MJ, Steegers-Theunissen RP, Burger CW, Vierhout ME. The prevalence of pelvic organ prolapse symptoms and signs and their relation with bladder and bowel disorders in a general female population. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2009;20(9):1037\u201345.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct"},{"issue":"4","key":"6895_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"501","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(97)00058-6","volume":"89","author":"AL Olsen","year":"1997","unstructured":"Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, Colling JC, Clark AL. Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;89(4):501\u20136.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"6895_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"781","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-012-1934-5","volume":"24","author":"RJ Detollenaere","year":"2013","unstructured":"Detollenaere RJ, den Boon J, Kluivers KB, Vierhout ME, van Eijndhoven HW. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse and uterine descent in the Netherlands. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24(5):781\u20138.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"1","key":"6895_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"99","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.17280","volume":"130","author":"SFM Schulten","year":"2023","unstructured":"Schulten SFM, Essers B, Notten KJB, Enklaar RA, van Leijsen SAL, van Eijndhoven HWF, et al. Patient\u2019s preference for sacrospinous hysteropexy or modified Manchester operation: a discrete choice experiment. BJOG. 2023;130(1):99\u2013106.","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"2","key":"6895_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"321","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-018-3852-7","volume":"31","author":"KR Husby","year":"2010","unstructured":"Husby KR, Lose G, Klarskov N. Trends in apical prolapse surgery between 2010 and 2016 in Denmark. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;31(2):321\u20137.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"1","key":"6895_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"155","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-022-05240-3","volume":"34","author":"RA Enklaar","year":"2023","unstructured":"Enklaar RA, Knapen F, Schulten SFM, van Osch L, van Leijsen SAL, Gondrie E, et al. The modified Manchester Fothergill procedure compared with vaginal hysterectomy with low uterosacral ligament suspension in patients with pelvic organ prolapse: long-term outcome. Int Urogynecol J. 2023;34(1):155\u201364.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"3","key":"6895_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"431","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-017-3519-9","volume":"29","author":"CK Tolstrup","year":"2018","unstructured":"Tolstrup CK, Husby KR, Lose G, Kopp TI, Viborg PH, Kesmodel US, et al. The Manchester-Fothergill procedure versus vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension: a matched historical cohort study. Int Urogynecol J. 2018;29(3):431\u201340.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"6895_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.15053","author":"Q Wang","year":"2025","unstructured":"Wang Q, Manodoro S, Jiang X, Lin C. Treatment outcomes of Manchester procedure versus vaginal hysterectomy for mid-compartment prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2025. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/aogs.15053.","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"7","key":"6895_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"626","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2023.13140","volume":"330","author":"RA Enklaar","year":"2023","unstructured":"Enklaar RA, Schulten SFM, van Eijndhoven HWF, Weemhoff M, van Leijsen SAL, van der Weide MC, et al. Manchester procedure vs sacrospinous hysteropexy for treatment of uterine descent: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2023;330(7):626\u201335.","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"issue":"7","key":"6895_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1371","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.70209","volume":"105","author":"S Elissaoui","year":"2026","unstructured":"Elissaoui S, Issaoui ME, Klarskov N, Husby K. The Manchester procedure: a systematic review of recurrence, perioperative measures, and financial cost, and a scoping review of sexual dysfunction, gynecologic cancer, and obstetric outcomes. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2026;105(7):1371\u201383.","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"6895_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"146","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1915.tb05951.x","volume":"27","author":"WE Fothergill","year":"1915","unstructured":"Fothergill WE. Anterior colporrhaphy and its combination with amputation of the cervix as a single operation. J Obstet Gynaecol British Empire. 1915;27:146\u20137.","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol British Empire"},{"issue":"6","key":"6895_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"484","DOI":"10.1007\/s13224-010-0058-4","volume":"60","author":"AETPD Dastur","year":"2011","unstructured":"Dastur AETPD. Archibald Donald, William Fothergill and the Manchester operation. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2011;60(6):484\u20135.","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol India"},{"issue":"1","key":"6895_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"10","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(96)70243-0","volume":"175","author":"RC Bump","year":"1996","unstructured":"Bump RC, Mattiasson A, B\u00f8 K, Brubaker LP, DeLancey JO, Klarskov P, et al. The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;175(1):10\u20137.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"6895_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"315","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.07.029","volume":"300","author":"S G\u00fcler \u00c7eki\u00e7","year":"2024","unstructured":"G\u00fcler \u00c7eki\u00e7 S, Aktoz F, Urman B, Aydin S. A systematic review of uterine cervical elongation and meta-analysis of Manchester repair. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2024;300:315\u201326.","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"1","key":"6895_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"10","DOI":"10.1002\/ijgo.13706","volume":"156","author":"GV Marquini","year":"2022","unstructured":"Marquini GV, de Jarmy di Bella ZIK, Sartori MGF. The Manchester-Fothergill technique: browsing in the cutting-edge art gallery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2022;156(1):10\u20136.","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"issue":"4","key":"6895_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"897","DOI":"10.1097\/00003081-199312000-00015","volume":"36","author":"JO DeLancey","year":"1993","unstructured":"DeLancey JO. Anatomy and biomechanics of genital prolapse. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1993;36(4):897\u2013909.","journal-title":"Clin Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"7454","key":"6895_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1490","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.328.7454.1490","volume":"328","author":"D Atkins","year":"2004","unstructured":"Atkins D, Best D, Briss PA, Eccles M, Falck-Ytter Y, Flottorp S, et al. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2004;328(7454):1490.","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"6895_CR18","unstructured":"Team RC. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2026."},{"key":"6895_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-026-06758-6","author":"A Gupta","year":"2026","unstructured":"Gupta A, Grimes CL, Badlani G, Bortolini MAT, Rosamilia A, Robinson D, et al. A global consensus conference on surgical management of primary uterovaginal prolapse and lower urinary tract dysfunction: combining evidence with expert opinion. Int Urogynecol J. 2026. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-026-06758-6","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"6895_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"83","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2022.02.001","volume":"271","author":"M Doganay","year":"2022","unstructured":"Doganay M, Tugrul D, Ersak B, KuntayKokanal\u0131 M, Cavkaytar S, Seyfi AO. A blind spot: Manchester Fothergill operation for cervical elongation without uterine descensus. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2022;271:83\u20137.","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"4","key":"6895_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1273","DOI":"10.1111\/jog.15574","volume":"49","author":"Q Wang","year":"2023","unstructured":"Wang Q, Wu N, Li Y, Lin C, Xu Y, Chen X. Outcomes of Manchester procedure combined with high uterosacral ligament suspension for uterine prolapse. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2023;49(4):1273\u201382.","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Res"},{"issue":"12","key":"6895_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2441","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-025-06237-4","volume":"36","author":"Y Chen","year":"2025","unstructured":"Chen Y, Xu S, Luo N, Du L. Medium- to long-term follow-up study on modified Manchester procedure for pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2025;36(12):2441\u20136.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"3","key":"6895_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"228","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2005.12.002","volume":"92","author":"A Ayhan","year":"2006","unstructured":"Ayhan A, Esin S, Guven S, Salman C, Ozyuncu O. The Manchester operation for uterine prolapse. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2006;92(3):228\u201333.","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"issue":"8","key":"6895_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1193","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-018-3622-6","volume":"29","author":"SH Oversand","year":"2018","unstructured":"Oversand SH, Staff AC, Borstad E, Svenningsen R. The Manchester procedure: anatomical, subjective and sexual outcomes. Int Urogynecol J. 2018;29(8):1193\u2013201.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"11","key":"6895_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1313","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-009-0945-3","volume":"20","author":"TA de Boer","year":"2009","unstructured":"de Boer TA, Milani AL, Kluivers KB, Withagen MI, Vierhout ME. The effectiveness of surgical correction of uterine prolapse: cervical amputation with uterosacral ligament plication (modified Manchester) versus vaginal hysterectomy with high uterosacral ligament plication. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2009;20(11):1313\u20139.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct"},{"issue":"9","key":"6895_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1171","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-011-1422-3","volume":"22","author":"SD Thys","year":"2011","unstructured":"Thys SD, Coolen A, Martens IR, Oosterbaan HP, Roovers J, Mol B, et al. A comparison of long-term outcome between Manchester Fothergill and vaginal hysterectomy as treatment for uterine descent. Int Urogynecol J. 2011;22(9):1171\u20138.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"9","key":"6895_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1867","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-019-04206-2","volume":"31","author":"R Milani","year":"2020","unstructured":"Milani R, Manodoro S, Cola A, Bellante N, Palmieri S, Frigerio M. Transvaginal uterosacral ligament hysteropexy versus hysterectomy plus uterosacral ligament suspension: a matched cohort study. Int Urogynecol J. 2020;31(9):1867\u201372.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"7","key":"6895_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2005","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-021-04987-5","volume":"33","author":"LC Hickman","year":"2022","unstructured":"Hickman LC, Tran MC, Paraiso MFR, Walters MD, Ferrando CA. Intermediate term outcomes after transvaginal uterine-preserving surgery in women with uterovaginal prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2022;33(7):2005\u201312.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"12","key":"6895_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2617","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-020-04426-x","volume":"31","author":"I Alay","year":"2020","unstructured":"Alay I, Kaya C, Karaca I, Yildiz S, Cengiz H, Ekin M, et al. Diagnostic value of preoperative ultrasonography, cervical length measurement, and POP-Q examination in cervical elongation estimation. Int Urogynecol J. 2020;31(12):2617\u201323.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"5","key":"6895_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"792","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.15053","volume":"104","author":"Q Wang","year":"2025","unstructured":"Wang Q, Manodoro S, Jiang X, Lin C. Treatment outcomes of Manchester procedure versus vaginal hysterectomy for mid-compartment prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2025;104(5):792\u2013803.","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"11","key":"6895_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1887","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-019-03950-9","volume":"30","author":"KR Husby","year":"2019","unstructured":"Husby KR, Larsen MD, Lose G, Klarskov N. Surgical treatment of primary uterine prolapse: a comparison of vaginal native tissue surgical techniques. Int Urogynecol J. 2019;30(11):1887\u201393.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"5","key":"6895_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"532","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.14340","volume":"101","author":"M Brunes","year":"2022","unstructured":"Brunes M, Johannesson U, Drca A, Bergman I, S\u00f6derberg M, Warnqvist A, et al. Recurrent surgery in uterine prolapse: a nationwide register study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2022;101(5):532\u201341.","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"6895_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Joint report on terminology for surgical procedures to treat pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2020;31(3):429\u201363.","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-020-04236-1"},{"issue":"2","key":"6895_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"165","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-015-2932-1","volume":"27","author":"BT Haylen","year":"2016","unstructured":"Haylen BT, Maher CF, Barber MD, Camargo S, Dandolu V, Digesu A, et al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)\/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27(2):165\u201394.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"8","key":"6895_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"995","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-010-1131-3","volume":"21","author":"OA Ibeanu","year":"2010","unstructured":"Ibeanu OA, Chesson RR, Sandquist D, Perez J, Santiago K, Nolan TE. Hypertrophic cervical elongation: clinical and histological correlations. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21(8):995\u20131000.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"8","key":"6895_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1095","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-012-1747-6","volume":"23","author":"MB Berger","year":"2012","unstructured":"Berger MB, Ramanah R, Guire KE, DeLancey JO. Is cervical elongation associated with pelvic organ prolapse? Int Urogynecol J. 2012;23(8):1095\u2013103.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"4","key":"6895_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"457","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-013-2255-z","volume":"25","author":"CE Dancz","year":"2014","unstructured":"Dancz CE, Werth L, Sun V, Lee S, Walker D, \u00d6zel B. Comparison of the POP-Q examination, transvaginal ultrasound, and direct anatomic measurement of cervical length. Int Urogynecol J. 2014;25(4):457\u201364.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"6","key":"6895_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"881","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-017-3464-7","volume":"29","author":"KS Williams","year":"2018","unstructured":"Williams KS, Rosen L, Pilkinton ML, Dhariwal L, Winkler HA. Putting POP-Q to the test: does C - D = cervical length? Int Urogynecol J. 2018;29(6):881\u20135.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"7","key":"6895_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1881","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-022-05196-4","volume":"33","author":"KR Husby","year":"2022","unstructured":"Husby KR, Gradel KO, Klarskov N. Endometrial cancer after the Manchester procedure: a nationwide cohort study. Int Urogynecol J. 2022;33(7):1881\u20138.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"8","key":"6895_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1837","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-023-05481-w","volume":"34","author":"KR Husby","year":"2023","unstructured":"Husby KR, Gradel KO, Klarskov N. Cervical cancer after the Manchester procedure: a nationwide cohort study. Int Urogynecol J. 2023;34(8):1837\u201342.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"6","key":"6895_CR41","first-page":"e2846","volume":"10","author":"S Eid","year":"2018","unstructured":"Eid S, Iwanaga J, Oskouian RJ, Loukas M, Tubbs RS. Comprehensive review of the cardinal ligament. Cureus. 2018;10(6):e2846.","journal-title":"Cureus"},{"issue":"1","key":"6895_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"37","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-012-1801-4","volume":"24","author":"L Chen","year":"2013","unstructured":"Chen L, Ramanah R, Hsu Y, Ashton-Miller JA, Delancey JO. Cardinal and deep uterosacral ligament lines of action: MRI based 3D technique development and preliminary findings in normal women. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24(1):37\u201345.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"6895_CR43","unstructured":"Stata Statistical Software. College Station: StataCorp LLC; 2023."}],"container-title":["International Urogynecology Journal"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00192-026-06895-y.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00192-026-06895-y","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00192-026-06895-y.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,15]],"date-time":"2026-10-15T17:45:40Z","timestamp":1792086340000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00192-026-06895-y"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,16]]},"references-count":43,"alternative-id":["6895"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-026-06895-y","relation":{},"ISSN":["0937-3462","1433-3023"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0937-3462","type":"print"},{"value":"1433-3023","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,16]]},"assertion":[{"value":"31 May 2026","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"23 August 2026","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"16 September 2026","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"No institutional review board or ethics committee approval was required for this study, as it is a systematic review based exclusively on previously published data.","order":1,"name":"Ethics","label":"Ethical Approval","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"Catherine Matthews: Grant support from Coloplast and Boston Scientific; Consultant to Coloplast; Speaker fees from Neomedic; Expert Witness Johnson & Johnson.The other authors have no conflict to report.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","label":"Conflicts of interest","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}}]}}