{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,30]],"date-time":"2026-09-30T13:00:05Z","timestamp":1790773205623,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":26,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,30]],"date-time":"2026-09-30T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1790726400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,30]],"date-time":"2026-09-30T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1790726400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Int Urogynecol J"],"DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-026-06924-w","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,30]],"date-time":"2026-09-30T12:23:52Z","timestamp":1790771032000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Robotic vs Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy During the Early Training Phase: A Single Center Study"],"prefix":"10.1007","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0005-5939-7094","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Margot","family":"Chommeloux","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Alicia","family":"Blondeau","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Camille","family":"Haudebert","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Krystel","family":"Nyangoh Timoh","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Juliette","family":"Hascoet","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Benoit","family":"Peyronnet","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,30]]},"reference":[{"issue":"5","key":"6924_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"504.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.068","volume":"225","author":"JE Jelovsek","year":"2021","unstructured":"Jelovsek JE, Gantz MG, Lukacz ES, Zyczynski HM, Sridhar A, Kery C, et al. Subgroups of failure after surgery for pelvic organ prolapse and associations with quality of life outcomes: a longitudinal cluster analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021;225(5):504.e1\u2013504.e22. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.068","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"6924_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"33","DOI":"10.1097\/SPV.0000000000000036","volume":"20","author":"PA Nosti","year":"2014","unstructured":"Nosti PA, Umoh Andy U, Kane S, White DE, Harvie HS, Lowenstein L, et al. Outcomes of abdominal and minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy: a retrospective cohort study. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2014;20(1):33\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/SPV.0000000000000036","journal-title":"Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg"},{"issue":"4","key":"6924_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"471","DOI":"10.1007\/s00345-011-0776-y","volume":"30","author":"K Cvach","year":"2012","unstructured":"Cvach K, Dwyer P. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse: abdominal and vaginal approaches. World J Urol. 2012;30(4):471\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00345-011-0776-y","journal-title":"World J Urol"},{"issue":"3","key":"6924_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"235","DOI":"10.1007\/s11934-012-0299-0","volume":"14","author":"BJ Linder","year":"2013","unstructured":"Linder BJ, Elliott DS. Robotic sacrocolpopexy: how does it compare with other prolapse repair techniques? Curr Urol Rep. 2013;14(3):235\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11934-012-0299-0","journal-title":"Curr Urol Rep"},{"issue":"4","key":"6924_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"745","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000003488","volume":"134","author":"WD Winkelman","year":"2019","unstructured":"Winkelman WD, Modest AM, Richardson ML. U.S. Food and Drug Administration statements about transvaginal mesh and changes in apical prolapse surgery. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;134(4):745\u201352. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/AOG.0000000000003488","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"6924_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"331","DOI":"10.5152\/tud.2019.19068","volume":"45","author":"RD Sussman","year":"2019","unstructured":"Sussman RD, Peyronnet B, Brucker BM. The current state and the future of robotic surgery in female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery. Turk J Urol. 2019;45(5):331\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5152\/tud.2019.19068","journal-title":"Turk J Urol"},{"issue":"1","key":"6924_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s11701-023-01799-1","volume":"18","author":"N Evangelopoulos","year":"2024","unstructured":"Evangelopoulos N, Nessi A, Achtari C. Minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy: efficiency of robotic assistance compared to standard laparoscopy. J Robot Surg. 2024;18(1):72. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11701-023-01799-1","journal-title":"J Robot Surg"},{"issue":"1","key":"6924_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"763","DOI":"10.1007\/s11701-025-02785-5","volume":"19","author":"KK Howard","year":"2025","unstructured":"Howard KK, Makki H, Mi M, Novotny NM, Nguyen N. The value of simulation for training general surgery novices in robotic surgery: a systematic review. J Robot Surg. 2025;19(1):763. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11701-025-02785-5","journal-title":"J Robot Surg"},{"issue":"3","key":"6924_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e20240494","DOI":"10.1590\/s1677-5538.ibju.2024.0494","volume":"51","author":"SV Ferreira","year":"2025","unstructured":"Ferreira SV, Sugai MH, Nascimento GCD, Souza Netto ACD, Cabrini GC, Rodrigues FM, et al. Feasibility and initial outcomes of telesurgery in urology: a systematic review of the literature. Int Braz J Urol. 2025;51(3):e20240494. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1590\/s1677-5538.ibju.2024.0494","journal-title":"Int Braz J Urol"},{"issue":"3","key":"6924_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"355","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-015-2763-0","volume":"27","author":"M De Gouveia De Sa","year":"2016","unstructured":"De Gouveia De Sa M, Claydon LS, Whitlow B, Dolcet Artahona MA. Robotic versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for treatment of prolapse of the apical segment of the vagina: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27(3):355\u201366. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-015-2763-0","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"1","key":"6924_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"38","DOI":"10.1097\/SPV.0000000000000047","volume":"20","author":"PG Barboglio","year":"2014","unstructured":"Barboglio PG, Toler AJW, Triaca V. Robotic sacrocolpopexy for the management of pelvic organ prolapse: a review of midterm surgical and quality of life outcomes. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2014;20(1):38\u201343. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/SPV.0000000000000047","journal-title":"Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg"},{"issue":"6","key":"6924_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"531","DOI":"10.1097\/MOU.0000000000000932","volume":"31","author":"DY Pushkar","year":"2021","unstructured":"Pushkar DY, Kasyan GR, Popov AA. Robotic sacrocolpopexy in pelvic organ prolapse: a review of current literature. Curr Opin Urol. 2021;31(6):531\u20136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/MOU.0000000000000932","journal-title":"Curr Opin Urol"},{"issue":"5","key":"6924_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"252","DOI":"10.1097\/SPV.0000000000000070","volume":"20","author":"CO Hudson","year":"2014","unstructured":"Hudson CO, Northington GM, Lyles RH, Karp DR. Outcomes of robotic sacrocolpopexy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg sept. 2014;20(5):252\u201360. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/SPV.0000000000000070","journal-title":"Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg sept"},{"issue":"6","key":"6924_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"509","DOI":"10.5468\/ogs.23073","volume":"66","author":"S Oh","year":"2023","unstructured":"Oh S, Shin JH. Outcomes of robotic sacrocolpopexy. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2023;66(6):509\u201317. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5468\/ogs.23073","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol Sci"},{"issue":"9","key":"6924_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"6672","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-023-10275-8","volume":"37","author":"M Kawka","year":"2023","unstructured":"Kawka M, Fong Y, Gall TMH. Laparoscopic versus robotic abdominal and pelvic surgery: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Surg Endosc. 2023;37(9):6672\u201381. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00464-023-10275-8","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"issue":"5","key":"6924_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1005","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e318231537c","volume":"118","author":"MFR Paraiso","year":"2011","unstructured":"Paraiso MFR, Jelovsek JE, Frick A, Chen CCG, Barber MD. Laparoscopic compared with robotic sacrocolpopexy for vaginal prolapse: a randomized controlled trial - PARAISO 2011. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;118(5):1005\u201313. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/AOG.0b013e318231537c","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"6924_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"5","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000006","volume":"123","author":"JT Anger","year":"2014","unstructured":"Anger JT, Mueller ER, Tarnay C, Smith B, Stroupe K, Rosenman A, et al. Robotic compared with laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: a randomized controlled trial - ANGER 2014. Obstet Gynecol janv. 2014;123(1):5\u201312. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000006","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol janv"},{"issue":"11","key":"6924_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1445","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-011-1542-9","volume":"22","author":"CM Maher","year":"2011","unstructured":"Maher CM, Feiner B, Baessler K, Glazener CMA. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women: the updated summary version Cochrane review. Int Urogynecol J. 2011;22(11):1445\u201357. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-011-1542-9","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"7","key":"6924_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1355","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-025-06158-2","volume":"36","author":"B Grigoryan","year":"2025","unstructured":"Grigoryan B, Kasyan G, Shapovalenko R, Popov A, Pushkar D. The safety of robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy in pelvic organ prolapse treatment: systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J. 2025;36(7):1355\u201372. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-025-06158-2","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"6","key":"6924_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1123","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-024-06016-7","volume":"36","author":"H Salehi-Pourmehr","year":"2025","unstructured":"Salehi-Pourmehr H, Tahmasbi F, Hosseinpour S, Nouri O, Lotfi B, Iranmanesh P, et al. The learning curve in urogynecology and functional urology: a systematic review. Int Urogynecol J. 2025;36(6):1123\u201348. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-024-06016-7","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"4","key":"6924_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1048","DOI":"10.1097\/00003081-197212000-00020","volume":"15","author":"WF Baden","year":"1972","unstructured":"Baden WF, Walked TA. Genesis of the vaginal profile: a correlated classification of vaginal relaxation. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1972;15(4):1048\u201354. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/00003081-197212000-00020","journal-title":"Clin Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"6924_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"127","DOI":"10.4103\/ua.ua_7_25","volume":"17","author":"P Kallidonis","year":"2025","unstructured":"Kallidonis P, Tatanis V, Tsaturyan A, Peteinaris A, Faitatziadis S, Faria-Costa G, et al. How to reduce intraoperative preparation and docking time to minimal in a team with a robotic na\u00efve surgical experience? Urol Ann. 2025;17(2):127\u201331. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4103\/ua.ua_7_25","journal-title":"Urol Ann"},{"issue":"5","key":"6924_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"252","DOI":"10.1097\/SPV.0000000000000070","volume":"20","author":"CO Hudson","year":"2014","unstructured":"Hudson CO, Northington GM, Lyles RH, Karp DR. Outcomes of robotic sacrocolpopexy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2014;20(5):252\u201360. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/SPV.0000000000000070","journal-title":"Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg"},{"issue":"7","key":"6924_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"435","DOI":"10.1097\/OGX.0000000000000335","volume":"71","author":"P Campbell","year":"2016","unstructured":"Campbell P, Cloney L, Jha S. Abdominal versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2016;71(7):435\u201342. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/OGX.0000000000000335","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol Surv"},{"issue":"6","key":"6924_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"449","DOI":"10.21037\/atm-20-4347","volume":"9","author":"J Yang","year":"2021","unstructured":"Yang J, He Y, Zhang X, Wang Z, Zuo X, Gao L, et al. Robotic and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Transl Med. 2021;9(6):449. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.21037\/atm-20-4347","journal-title":"Ann Transl Med"},{"issue":"11","key":"6924_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2799","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-023-05631-0","volume":"34","author":"E Bauters","year":"2023","unstructured":"Bauters E, Page AS, Cattani L, Housmans S, Van der Aa F, D\u2019Hoore A, et al. Safety and medium-term outcome of redo laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: a matched case-control study. Int Urogynecol J. 2023;34(11):2799\u2013807. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-023-05631-0","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"}],"container-title":["International Urogynecology Journal"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00192-026-06924-w.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00192-026-06924-w","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00192-026-06924-w.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,30]],"date-time":"2026-09-30T12:23:53Z","timestamp":1790771033000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00192-026-06924-w"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,30]]},"references-count":26,"alternative-id":["6924"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-026-06924-w","relation":{},"ISSN":["0937-3462","1433-3023"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0937-3462","type":"print"},{"value":"1433-3023","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,30]]},"assertion":[{"value":"5 April 2026","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"16 September 2026","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"30 September 2026","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"This study did not require institutional review board approval as it was a non-interventional retrospective study. However, it was approved by the French\n                      Commission Nationale de l\u2019Informatique et des Libert\u00e9s\n                      (CNIL) [CNIL 2238623 v 0], which ensures compliance with regulations governing the processing of personal data.","order":1,"name":"Ethics","label":"Ethical Approval","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"Beno\u00eet Peyronnet is a consultant for Boston Scientific, Intuitive, Medtronic, Pierre Fabre, Ibsa, Coloplast, Ipsen, AbbVie.Krystel Nyangoh Timoh is a consultant for Intuitive, Medtronic, Exeltis, G\u00e9d\u00e9on Richter, Quomeda, Sofradim.The other authors have nothing to disclose.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","label":"Conflicts of interest","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}}]}}