{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,8]],"date-time":"2026-08-08T21:09:34Z","timestamp":1786223374736,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":27,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,1,10]],"date-time":"2025-01-10T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1736467200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,1,10]],"date-time":"2025-01-10T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1736467200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"}],"funder":[{"name":"Research Grant from Richard Wolf"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Urolithiasis"],"DOI":"10.1007\/s00240-025-01691-7","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,1,10]],"date-time":"2025-01-10T11:08:12Z","timestamp":1736507292000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":5,"title":["Renal pelvis pressure and flowrate with a multi-channel ureteroscope: invoking the concept of outflow resistance"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"53","author":[{"given":"Anthony F.","family":"Bonzagni","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Timothy L.","family":"Hall","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Khurshid R.","family":"Ghani","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"William W.","family":"Roberts","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,1,10]]},"reference":[{"issue":"11","key":"1691_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1221","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2015.0260","volume":"29","author":"CA Dauw","year":"2015","unstructured":"Dauw CA, Simeon L, Alruwaily AF et al (2015) Contemporary practice patterns of flexible ureteroscopy for treating renal stones: results of a worldwide survey. J Endourol 29(11):1221\u20131230. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1089\/end.2015.0260","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"issue":"3","key":"1691_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"880","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2014.09.006","volume":"193","author":"DT Oberlin","year":"2015","unstructured":"Oberlin DT, Flum AS, Bachrach L et al (2015) Contemporary surgical trends in the management of upper tract calculi. J Urol 193(3):880\u2013884. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.juro.2014.09.006","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"issue":"6","key":"1691_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"45","DOI":"10.1007\/s11934-018-0807-y","volume":"19","author":"P Kronenberg","year":"2018","unstructured":"Kronenberg P, Somani B (2018) Advances in lasers for the treatment of stones\u2014a systematic review. Curr Urol Rep 19(6):45. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11934-018-0807-y. (published 2018 May 17)","journal-title":"Curr Urol Rep"},{"issue":"1","key":"1691_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"25","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2014.0409","volume":"29","author":"W Zhong","year":"2015","unstructured":"Zhong W, Leto G, Wang L et al (2015) Systemic inflammatory response syndrome after flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy: a study of risk factors. J Endourol 29(1):25\u201328. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1089\/end.2014.0409","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"issue":"9","key":"1691_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2147","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2008.0001","volume":"22","author":"W Zhong","year":"2008","unstructured":"Zhong W, Zeng G, Wu K et al (2008) Does a smaller tract in percutaneous nephrolithotomy contribute to high renal pelvic pressure and postoperative fever? J Endourol 22(9):2147\u20132151. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1089\/end.2008.0001","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"issue":"3","key":"1691_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"446","DOI":"10.1016\/s0022-5347(17)50442-5","volume":"131","author":"RH Whitaker","year":"1984","unstructured":"Whitaker RH, Buxton-Thomas MS (1984) A comparison of pressure flow studies and renography in equivocal upper urinary tract obstruction. J Urol 131(3):446\u2013449. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/s0022-5347(17)50442-5","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"issue":"11","key":"1691_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e0208209","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0208209","volume":"13","author":"AT Oratis","year":"2018","unstructured":"Oratis AT, Subasic JJ, Hernandez N et al (2018) A simple fluid dynamic model of renal pelvis pressures during ureteroscopic kidney stone treatment. PLoS ONE 13(11):e0208209. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0208209. (published 2018 Nov 29)","journal-title":"PLoS ONE"},{"issue":"1","key":"1691_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"112","DOI":"10.1007\/s00240-023-01484-w","volume":"51","author":"C Miguel","year":"2023","unstructured":"Miguel C, Sangani A, Wiener S (2023) Exploring ureteroscope design with computational fluid dynamics for improved intra-pelvic pressure. Urolithiasis 51(1):112. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00240-023-01484-w. (published 2023 Sep 14)","journal-title":"Urolithiasis"},{"issue":"1","key":"1691_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"33","DOI":"10.1089\/089277904322836631","volume":"18","author":"BK Auge","year":"2004","unstructured":"Auge BK, Pietrow PK, Lallas CD et al (2004) Ureteral access sheath provides protection against elevated renal pressures during routine flexible ureteroscopic stone manipulation. J Endourol 18(1):33\u201336. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1089\/089277904322836631","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"issue":"9","key":"1691_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"725","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2019.0317","volume":"33","author":"YA Noureldin","year":"2019","unstructured":"Noureldin YA, Kallidonis P, Ntasiotis P et al (2019) The effect of irrigation power and ureteral access sheath diameter on the maximal intra-pelvic pressure during ureteroscopy: in vivo experimental study in a live anesthetized pig. J Endourol 33(9):725\u2013729. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1089\/end.2019.0317","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"issue":"7","key":"1691_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2709","DOI":"10.1007\/s00345-020-03450-2","volume":"39","author":"S Doizi","year":"2021","unstructured":"Doizi S, Uzan A, Keller EX et al (2021) Comparison of intrapelvic pressures during flexible ureteroscopy, mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy, standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy, and endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery in a kidney model. World J Urol 39(7):2709\u20132717. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00345-020-03450-2","journal-title":"World J Urol"},{"issue":"4","key":"1691_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"512","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2020.0838","volume":"35","author":"E MacCraith","year":"2021","unstructured":"MacCraith E, Yap LC, Elamin M et al (2021) Evaluation of the impact of ureteroscope, access sheath, and irrigation system selection on intrarenal pressures in a porcine kidney model. J Endourol 35(4):512\u2013517. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1089\/end.2020.0838","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"issue":"3","key":"1691_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"883","DOI":"10.1007\/s00345-020-03259-z","volume":"39","author":"RM Patel","year":"2021","unstructured":"Patel RM, Jefferson FA, Owyong M et al (2021) Characterization of intracalyceal pressure during ureteroscopy. World J Urol 39(3):883\u2013889. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00345-020-03259-z","journal-title":"World J Urol"},{"issue":"11","key":"1691_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1200","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2022.0841","volume":"37","author":"BH Chew","year":"2023","unstructured":"Chew BH, Shalabi N, Herout R et al (2023) Intrarenal pressure measured using a novel flexible ureteroscope with pressure sensing capabilities: a study of the effects of ureteral access sheath, irrigation, and working channel accessories. J Endourol 37(11):1200\u20131208. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1089\/end.2022.0841","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"issue":"4","key":"1691_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"713","DOI":"10.1016\/s0090-4295(02)02440-8","volume":"61","author":"J Rehman","year":"2003","unstructured":"Rehman J, Monga M, Landman J et al (2003) Characterization of intrapelvic pressure during ureteropyeloscopy with ureteral access sheaths. Urology 61(4):713\u2013718. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/s0090-4295(02)02440-8","journal-title":"Urology"},{"issue":"3","key":"1691_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"439","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2004.04.060","volume":"64","author":"M Monga","year":"2004","unstructured":"Monga M, Bodie J, Ercole B (2004) Is there a role for small-diameter ureteral access sheaths? Impact on irrigant flow and intrapelvic pressures. Urology 64(3):439\u2013442. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.urology.2004.04.060","journal-title":"Urology"},{"issue":"12","key":"1691_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1915","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2010.0188","volume":"24","author":"YH Ng","year":"2010","unstructured":"Ng YH, Somani BK, Dennison A et al (2010) Irrigant flow and intrarenal pressure during flexible ureteroscopy: the effect of different access sheaths, working channel instruments, and hydrostatic pressure. J Endourol 24(12):1915\u20131920. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1089\/end.2010.0188","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"issue":"4","key":"1691_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"434","DOI":"10.5173\/ceju.2015.604","volume":"68","author":"A Wright","year":"2015","unstructured":"Wright A, Williams K, Somani B et al (2015) Intrarenal pressure and irrigation flow with commonly used ureteric access sheaths and instruments. Cent Eur J Urol 68(4):434\u2013438. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5173\/ceju.2015.604","journal-title":"Cent Eur J Urol"},{"key":"1691_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Sener TE, Cloutier J, Villa L et al (2016) Can we provide low intrarenal pressures with good irrigation flow by decreasing the size of ureteral access sheaths? [published correction appears in J Endourol. 2017 Jan;31(1):110. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1089\/end.2015.0387.correx].\u00a0J Endourol 30(1):49\u201355. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1089\/end.2015.0387","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2015.0387.correx"},{"issue":"12","key":"1691_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1142","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2018.0501","volume":"32","author":"T Yoshida","year":"2018","unstructured":"Yoshida T, Inoue T, Abe T et al (2018) Evaluation of intrapelvic pressure when using small-sized ureteral access sheaths of \u226410\/12f in an ex vivo porcine kidney model. J Endourol 32(12):1142\u20131147. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1089\/end.2018.0501","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"issue":"2","key":"1691_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"132","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2018.0774","volume":"33","author":"L Fang","year":"2019","unstructured":"Fang L, Xie G, Zheng Z et al (2019) The effect of ratio of endoscope-sheath diameter on intrapelvic pressure during flexible ureteroscopic lasertripsy. J Endourol 33(2):132\u2013139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1089\/end.2018.0774","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"issue":"3","key":"1691_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"873","DOI":"10.1007\/s00345-023-04299-x","volume":"41","author":"HJ Kim","year":"2023","unstructured":"Kim HJ, Louters MM, Dau JJ et al (2023) Quantification of outflow resistance for ureteral drainage devices used during ureteroscopy. World J Urol 41(3):873\u2013878. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00345-023-04299-x","journal-title":"World J Urol"},{"issue":"2","key":"1691_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"580","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2012.08.197","volume":"189","author":"O Traxer","year":"2013","unstructured":"Traxer O, Thomas A (2013) Prospective evaluation and classification of ureteral wall injuries resulting from insertion of a ureteral access sheath during retrograde intrarenal surgery. J Urol 189(2):580\u2013584. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.juro.2012.08.197","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"issue":"8","key":"1691_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"583","DOI":"10.1089\/089277902320913288","volume":"16","author":"CD Lallas","year":"2002","unstructured":"Lallas CD, Auge BK, Raj GV et al (2002) Laser Doppler flowmetric determination of ureteral blood flow after ureteral access sheath placement. J Endourol 16(8):583\u2013590. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1089\/089277902320913288","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"issue":"5","key":"1691_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1083","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2008.0016","volume":"22","author":"MS Michel","year":"2008","unstructured":"Michel MS, Honeck P, Alken P (2008) Conventional high pressure versus newly developed continuous-flow ureterorenoscope: urodynamic pressure evaluation of the renal pelvis and flow capacity. J Endourol 22(5):1083\u20131085. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1089\/end.2008.0016","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"issue":"1","key":"1691_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"268","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2014.09.032","volume":"85","author":"A Lusch","year":"2015","unstructured":"Lusch A, Okhunov Z, del Junco M et al (2015) Comparison of optics and performance of single channel and a novel dual-channel fiberoptic ureteroscope. Urology 85(1):268\u2013272. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.urology.2014.09.032","journal-title":"Urology"},{"issue":"9","key":"1691_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1411","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2010.0642","volume":"25","author":"K Haberman","year":"2011","unstructured":"Haberman K, Ortiz-Alvarado O, Chotikawanich E et al (2011) A dual-channel flexible ureteroscope: evaluation of deflection, flow, illumination, and optics. J Endourol 25(9):1411\u20131414. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1089\/end.2010.0642","journal-title":"J Endourol"}],"container-title":["Urolithiasis"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00240-025-01691-7.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00240-025-01691-7","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00240-025-01691-7.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,23]],"date-time":"2025-12-23T23:03:02Z","timestamp":1766530982000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00240-025-01691-7"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,1,10]]},"references-count":27,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,12]]}},"alternative-id":["1691"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00240-025-01691-7","relation":{},"ISSN":["2194-7236"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2194-7236","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,1,10]]},"assertion":[{"value":"10 November 2024","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"2 January 2025","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"10 January 2025","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"WW Roberts has a consulting relationship with Boston Scientific. KR Ghani has a consulting relationships with Boston Scientific, Olympus, Coloplast, Karl Storz, Ambu, Lumibird. AF Bonzagni, TL Hall have no disclosures.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}}],"article-number":"22"}}