{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,19]],"date-time":"2026-10-19T07:40:12Z","timestamp":1792395612695,"version":"4.4.0"},"reference-count":18,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"8","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,29]],"date-time":"2026-04-29T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1777420800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,29]],"date-time":"2026-04-29T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1777420800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Skeletal Radiol"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,8]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Objective<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>This study aimed to analyze knee MRI reporting templates among radiologists of the International Skeletal Society (ISS) and to determine standardized information in the form of common data elements.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Materials and methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>A total of 510 radiologists, all members of the ISS, were invited to complete a survey and submit knee MRI reporting templates used in clinical practice. Each template was analyzed for structure and common data elements, as defined by the National Institutes of Health. Common data elements were classified as value list, text, or number. Multi-option value list elements were recoded into binary values. The results were aggregated to quantify the prevalence of individual common data elements and groups.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>A total of 73 of 510 (14%) invited ISS members completed the survey. Forty-one respondents (56%) reported using templates, whereas 32 (44%) did not. Thirty-nine respondents submitted 62 templates from 22 countries. Templates originated mainly from Europe (38%), North America (31%), and Asia (18%). Among respondents who submitted templates, 49% used highly structured templates, 33% intermediate-structure templates, and 18% low-structure templates. Most intermediate templates were anatomy-based (62%) rather than compartment-based (38%). A total of 507 common data elements were extracted, comprising 75% value list elements, 23% text elements, and 2% number elements.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Knee MRI reporting in this sample of ISS respondents was not standardized, with only a slight majority reporting template use and substantial heterogeneity in template structure. The analysis identified essential and consistently reported items.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1007\/s00256-026-05231-1","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,29]],"date-time":"2026-04-29T01:13:09Z","timestamp":1777425189000},"page":"2109-2121","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["Consistency in knee MRI reporting templates: an ISS survey and common data element analysis"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"55","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0004-1713-116X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Maximilian","family":"Paul","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Fabio","family":"Dennst\u00e4dt","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Paul Martin","family":"Putora","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Sebastian","family":"Leschka","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Tim Steffen","family":"Fischer","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Reto","family":"Sutter","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Tobias Johannes","family":"Dietrich","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,29]]},"reference":[{"key":"5231_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1440","DOI":"10.1016\/j.acra.2019.12.019","volume":"27","author":"K Chundru","year":"2020","unstructured":"Chundru K, Roudenko A, Pham H, Benitez CL. Analysis of different levels of structured reporting in knee magnetic resonance imaging. Acad Radiol. 2020;27:1440\u20136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.acra.2019.12.019.","journal-title":"Acad Radiol"},{"key":"5231_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1069","DOI":"10.2214\/AJR.14.13216","volume":"204","author":"AB Rosskopf","year":"2015","unstructured":"Rosskopf AB, Dietrich TJ, Hirschmann A, Buck FM, Sutter R, Pfirrmann CWA. Quality management in musculoskeletal imaging: form, content, and diagnosis of knee MRI reports and effectiveness of three different quality improvement measures. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015;204:1069\u201374. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2214\/AJR.14.13216.","journal-title":"AJR Am J Roentgenol"},{"key":"5231_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"261","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rcl.2022.10.005","volume":"61","author":"B Fritz","year":"2023","unstructured":"Fritz B, Fritz J. MR imaging of acute knee injuries: systematic evaluation and reporting. Radiol Clin North Am. 2023;61:261\u201380. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.rcl.2022.10.005.","journal-title":"Radiol Clin North Am"},{"key":"5231_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"4110","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-017-4778-z","volume":"27","author":"S Gassenmaier","year":"2017","unstructured":"Gassenmaier S, Armbruster M, Haasters F, et al. Structured reporting of MRI of the shoulder \u2013 improvement of report quality? Eur Radiol. 2017;27:4110\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00330-017-4778-z.","journal-title":"Eur Radiol"},{"key":"5231_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"European Society of Radiology (ESR). ESR paper on structured reporting in radiology-update 2023. Insights Imaging. 2023;14:199. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s13244-023-01560-0","DOI":"10.1186\/s13244-023-01560-0"},{"key":"5231_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2106","DOI":"10.1148\/rg.2017160106","volume":"37","author":"JY Chen","year":"2017","unstructured":"Chen JY, Sippel Schmidt TM, Carr CD, Kahn CE. Enabling the next-generation radiology report: description of two new system standards. RadioGraphics Radiol Soc North Am. 2017;37:2106\u201312. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1148\/rg.2017160106.","journal-title":"RadioGraphics Radiol Soc North Am"},{"key":"5231_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"330","DOI":"10.1093\/bjr\/tqae253","volume":"98","author":"KL Gormly","year":"2025","unstructured":"Gormly KL. Improving radiology reporting locally and globally: who, how, and why? Br J Radiol. 2025;98:330\u20135. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/bjr\/tqae253.","journal-title":"Br J Radiol"},{"key":"5231_CR8","unstructured":"NIH Common Data Elements (CDE) Repository [Internet]. [cited 2025 Oct 26]. https:\/\/cde.nlm.nih.gov\/home. Accessed 26 Oct 2025"},{"key":"5231_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00256-026-05123-4","author":"M Peter","year":"2026","unstructured":"Peter M, Dietrich TJ, Guggenberger R, Falkowski AL, Fischer TS. Structured reporting in knee MRI. Skeletal Radiol. 2026. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00256-026-05123-4.","journal-title":"Skeletal Radiol"},{"key":"5231_CR10","unstructured":"Home [Internet]. International Skeletal Society. [cited 2026 Mar 4]. https:\/\/internationalskeletalsociety.com\/. Accessed 4 Mar 2026"},{"key":"5231_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"327","DOI":"10.1159\/000534204","volume":"102","author":"F Dennst\u00e4dt","year":"2024","unstructured":"Dennst\u00e4dt F, Putora PM, Heuser M, et al. Extraction of interoperable data from healthcare documents by identifying common data elements: an analysis of radiation therapy planning CT physician order entry records. Oncology. 2024;102:327\u201336. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1159\/000534204.","journal-title":"Oncology"},{"key":"5231_CR12","unstructured":"NIH CDE Definition [Internet]. [cited 2025 Oct 26]. https:\/\/cde.nlm.nih.gov\/guides#what-are-common-data-elements-. Accessed 26 Oct 2025"},{"key":"5231_CR13","unstructured":"Home | RadReport [Internet]. [cited 2025 Sept 21]. https:\/\/radreport.org\/home\/303\/2014-04-30%2000:00:00. Accessed 21 Sept 2025"},{"key":"5231_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S11902","DOI":"10.1117\/1.JMI.10.S1.S11902","volume":"10","author":"D Harris","year":"2023","unstructured":"Harris D, Yousem DM, Krupinski EA, Motaghi M. Eye-tracking differences between free text and template radiology reports: a pilot study. J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2023;10:S11902. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1117\/1.JMI.10.S1.S11902.","journal-title":"J Med Imaging (Bellingham)"},{"key":"5231_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1007\/s00256-020-03465-1","volume":"49","author":"W Palmer","year":"2020","unstructured":"Palmer W, Bancroft L, Bonar F, et al. Glossary of terms for musculoskeletal radiology. Skeletal Radiol. 2020;49:1\u201333. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00256-020-03465-1.","journal-title":"Skeletal Radiol"},{"key":"5231_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"385","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2392042127","volume":"239","author":"E Lazarus","year":"2006","unstructured":"Lazarus E, Mainiero MB, Schepps B, Koelliker SL, Livingston LS. BI-RADS lexicon for US and mammography: interobserver variability and positive predictive value. Radiology. 2006;239:385\u201391. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1148\/radiol.2392042127.","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"5231_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.15557\/jou.2024.0015","volume":"24","author":"TJ Dietrich","year":"2024","unstructured":"Dietrich TJ, Mascarenhas VV, Cerezal L, Afonso PD, Sudo\u0142-Szopi\u0144ska I. Overview for developing Delphi-based interdisciplinary consensus statements on imaging: pros and cons. J Ultrason. 2024;24:1\u20136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15557\/jou.2024.0015.","journal-title":"J Ultrason."},{"key":"5231_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"123","DOI":"10.1186\/s13244-025-02012-7","volume":"16","author":"A Naimi","year":"2025","unstructured":"Naimi A, Putora PM, Rothermundt C, et al. Diagnostic work-up of lipomatous tumors: a decision-making analysis among European sarcoma centers. Insights Imaging. 2025;16:123. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s13244-025-02012-7.","journal-title":"Insights Imaging"}],"container-title":["Skeletal Radiology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00256-026-05231-1.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00256-026-05231-1","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00256-026-05231-1.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,19]],"date-time":"2026-10-19T06:48:45Z","timestamp":1792392525000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00256-026-05231-1"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,29]]},"references-count":18,"journal-issue":{"issue":"8","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,8]]}},"alternative-id":["5231"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00256-026-05231-1","relation":{},"ISSN":["0364-2348","1432-2161"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0364-2348","type":"print"},{"value":"1432-2161","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,29]]},"assertion":[{"value":"10 January 2026","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"7 April 2026","order":2,"name":"revised","label":"Revised","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"18 April 2026","order":3,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"29 April 2026","order":4,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"9 October 2026","order":6,"name":"change_date","label":"Change Date","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"Update","order":7,"name":"change_type","label":"Change Type","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"This article was originally published under the subscription model but it is now published under an Open Access license.","order":8,"name":"change_details","label":"Change Details","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"Institutional Review Board approval was not required under applicable local regulations for this survey study of radiologists. Participation was voluntary. The present study fulfilled the conditions for not requiring official approval for operation under applicable regulations.","order":1,"name":"Ethics","label":"Ethics approval and consent to participate","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors declare no conflicts of interest.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","label":"Conflict of interest","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}}]}}