{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,12]],"date-time":"2026-10-12T23:53:39Z","timestamp":1791849219398,"version":"4.3.4"},"reference-count":39,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,13]],"date-time":"2026-10-13T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1791849600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,13]],"date-time":"2026-10-13T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1791849600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100009778","name":"Region J\u00e4mtland H\u00e4rjedalen","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100009778","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Skeletal Radiol"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Objective<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>We wanted to investigate and compare the reliability of two measuring methods for glenoid bone loss, one linear- and one surface area method, in acute glenoid fractures after dislocation. This was an experimental study.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Method<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Thirty CT-shoulder scans in patients with an acute glenoid rim fracture were measured in a lateral\u201den face\u201d view in 2D and 3D by two independent assessors. In 10 of 30 patients contralateral shoulder CT-scan was obtained for reference circle placement. Intra- and interrater reliability was analysed by Intra Class Correlation. Wilcoxon signed rank test was performed for comparison of bone loss estimates between methods.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The reliability ranged from 0.85 to 0.97 for the two methods in both 2D and 3D, which is considered good to excellent. The bone loss estimates were significantly larger with linear method than area method. Drawing of a best-fitting-circle had a good reliability between assessors.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Linear- and surface area methods demonstrated comparable reliability in assessing glenoid bone loss in acute fractures and we found no difference between 2D- and 3D-modalities. However, linear methods may overestimate defect in cases with irregular fracture lines, suggesting area method may be preferable in acute fractures.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1007\/s00256-026-05389-8","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,12]],"date-time":"2026-10-12T23:20:48Z","timestamp":1791847248000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Acute glenoid rim fractures: reliability of linear and surface area methods for CT-based bone loss assessment"],"prefix":"10.1007","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0001-8364-1000","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Katarina","family":"Lindgren","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-7873-3093","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Lars","family":"Adolfsson","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-6261-2024","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Anders","family":"St\u00e5lman","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-7557-4816","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Erica","family":"Domeij-Arverud","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-4686-0941","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Karin","family":"Kockum","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,13]]},"reference":[{"issue":"1","key":"5389_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"41","DOI":"10.1177\/03635465980260012301","volume":"26","author":"LU Bigliani","year":"1998","unstructured":"Bigliani LU, Steinmann SP, Connor PM, et al. Glenoid rim lesions associated with recurrent anterior dislocation of the shoulder. Am J Sports Med. 1998;26(1):41\u20135. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/03635465980260012301.","journal-title":"Am J Sports Med"},{"issue":"7","key":"5389_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"677","DOI":"10.1053\/jars.2000.17715","volume":"16","author":"SS Burkhart","year":"2000","unstructured":"Burkhart SS, De Beer JF. Traumatic glenohumeral bone defects and their relationship to failure of arthroscopic Bankart repairs: significance of the inverted-pear glenoid and the humeral engaging Hill-Sachs lesion. Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg. 2000;16(7):677\u201394. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1053\/jars.2000.17715.","journal-title":"Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg"},{"key":"5389_CR3","first-page":"40","volume":"20","author":"CR Rowe","year":"1961","unstructured":"Rowe CR, Sakellarides HT. Factors related to recurrences of anterior dislocations of the shoulder. Clin Orthop. 1961;20:40\u20138.","journal-title":"Clin Orthop"},{"key":"5389_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"568","DOI":"10.1007\/s00167-004-0495-7","volume":"12","author":"M Scheibel","year":"2004","unstructured":"Scheibel M, Magosch P, Lichtenberg S, et al. Open reconstruction of anterior glenoid rim fractures. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2004;12:568\u201373. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00167-004-0495-7.","journal-title":"Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc"},{"issue":"8","key":"5389_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"731","DOI":"10.1007\/s00256-008-0506-8","volume":"37","author":"VS Barchilon","year":"2008","unstructured":"Barchilon VS, Kotz E, Barchilon Ben-Av M, et al. A simple method for quantitative evaluation of the missing area of the anterior glenoid in anterior instability of the glenohumeral joint. Skeletal Radiol. 2008;37(8):731\u20136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00256-008-0506-8.","journal-title":"Skeletal Radiol"},{"issue":"6","key":"5389_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1490","DOI":"10.2214\/AJR.07.2473","volume":"189","author":"JF Griffith","year":"2007","unstructured":"Griffith JF, Yung PS, Antonio GE, et al. CT compared with arthroscopy in quantifying glenoid bone loss. Am J Roentgenol. 2007;189(6):1490\u20133. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2214\/AJR.07.2473.","journal-title":"Am J Roentgenol"},{"key":"5389_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2581","DOI":"10.1007\/s00264-016-3253-9","volume":"40","author":"AM Kubicka","year":"2016","unstructured":"Kubicka AM, Stefaniak J, Lubiatowski P, et al. Reliability of measurements performed on two dimensional and three dimensional computed tomography in glenoid assessment for instability. Int Orthop. 2016;40:2581\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00264-016-3253-9.","journal-title":"Int Orthop"},{"issue":"1","key":"5389_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"84","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2017.07.032","volume":"34","author":"SA Parada","year":"2018","unstructured":"Parada SA, Eichinger JK, Dumont GD, et al. Accuracy and reliability of a simple calculation for measuring glenoid bone loss on 3-dimensional computed tomography scans. J Arthrosc Rel Surg. 2018;34(1):84\u201392. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.arthro.2017.07.032.","journal-title":"J Arthrosc Rel Surg"},{"issue":"7","key":"5389_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1719","DOI":"10.1177\/0363546515578250","volume":"43","author":"JS Shaha","year":"2015","unstructured":"Shaha JS, Cook JB, Song DJ, et al. Redefining \u201ccritical\u201d bone loss in shoulder instability: functional outcomes worsen with \u201csubcritical\u201d bone loss. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43(7):1719\u201325. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0363546515578250.","journal-title":"Am J Sports Med"},{"issue":"5","key":"5389_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"878","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-200305000-00016","volume":"85-A","author":"H Sugaya","year":"2003","unstructured":"Sugaya H, Moriishi J, Dohi M, et al. Glenoid rim morphology in recurrent anterior glenohumeral instability. J Bone Joint Surg. 2003;85-A(5):878\u201384. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2106\/00004623-200305000-00016.","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg"},{"key":"5389_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"369","DOI":"10.1007\/s12178-022-09773-4","volume":"15","author":"K Gouveia","year":"2022","unstructured":"Gouveia K, Rizvi SFH, Dagher D, et al. Assessing bone loss in the unstable shoulder: a scoping review. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2022;15:369\u201376. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s12178-022-09773-4.","journal-title":"Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med"},{"issue":"13","key":"5389_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3629","DOI":"10.1177\/03635465211041386","volume":"49","author":"A Arenas-Miquelez","year":"2021","unstructured":"Arenas-Miquelez A, Dabirrahmani D, Sharma G, et al. A cadaveric study comparing different measurement techniques for glenoid bone loss. Am J Sports Med. 2021;49(13):3629\u201337. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/03635465211041386.","journal-title":"Am J Sports Med"},{"issue":"7","key":"5389_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1726","DOI":"10.1177\/0363546515581468","volume":"43","author":"JW Giles","year":"2015","unstructured":"Giles JW, Owens BD, Athwal GS. Estimating glenoid width for instability-related bone loss: a CT-evaluation of an MRI-formula. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43(7):1726\u201330. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0363546515581468.","journal-title":"Am J Sports Med"},{"issue":"3","key":"5389_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"325","DOI":"10.1007\/s00256-016-2559-4","volume":"46","author":"L Stillwater","year":"2017","unstructured":"Stillwater L, Koenig J, Maycher B, et al. 3D-MR vs. 3D-CT of the shoulder in patients with glenohumeral instability. Skeletal Radiol. 2017;46(3):325\u201331. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00256-016-2559-4.","journal-title":"Skeletal Radiol"},{"issue":"10","key":"5389_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1880","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2015.03.024","volume":"31","author":"NK Bakshi","year":"2015","unstructured":"Bakshi NK, Patel I, Jacobson JA, et al. Comparison of 3-dimensional computed tomography\u2013based measurement of glenoid bone loss with arthroscopic defect size estimation in patients with anterior shoulder instability. Arthroscopy. 2015;31(10):1880\u20135. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.arthro.2015.03.024.","journal-title":"Arthroscopy"},{"issue":"2","key":"5389_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"213","DOI":"10.1007\/s00256-013-1774-5","volume":"43","author":"S Gyftopoulos","year":"2014","unstructured":"Gyftopoulos S, Beltran LS, Yemin A, et al. Use of 3D MR reconstructions in the evaluation of glenoid bone loss: a clinical study. Skeletal Radiol. 2014;43(2):213\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00256-013-1774-5.","journal-title":"Skeletal Radiol"},{"key":"5389_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"873","DOI":"10.2214\/AJR.11.7639","volume":"199","author":"S Gyftopoulos","year":"2012","unstructured":"Gyftopoulos S, Hasan S, Bencardino J, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of MRI in the measurement of glenoid bone loss. Am J Roentgenol. 2012;199:873\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2214\/AJR.11.7639.","journal-title":"Am J Roentgenol"},{"issue":"1","key":"5389_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"112","DOI":"10.1177\/03635465030310010301","volume":"31","author":"E Itoi","year":"2003","unstructured":"Itoi E, Lee S-B, Amrami KK, et al. Quantitative assessment of classic anteroinferior bony Bankart lesions by radiography and computed tomography. Am J Sports Med. 2003;31(1):112\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/03635465030310010301.","journal-title":"Am J Sports Med"},{"key":"5389_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"54","DOI":"10.1007\/s00276-003-0167-1","volume":"26","author":"LF De Wilde","year":"2004","unstructured":"De Wilde LF, Berghs BM, Audenaert E, et al. About the variability of the shape of the glenoid cavity. Surg Radiol Anat. 2004;26:54\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00276-003-0167-1.","journal-title":"Surg Radiol Anat"},{"issue":"2","key":"5389_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"398","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2017.08.234","volume":"34","author":"P Moroder","year":"2018","unstructured":"Moroder P, Plachel F, Huettner A, et al. The effect of scapula tilt and best-fit circle placement when measuring glenoid bone loss in shoulder instability patients. Arthroscopy. 2018;34(2):398\u2013404. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.arthro.2017.08.234.","journal-title":"Arthroscopy"},{"issue":"4","key":"5389_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"376","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2007.10.008","volume":"24","author":"TY Chuang","year":"2008","unstructured":"Chuang TY, Adams CR, Burkhart SS. Use of preoperative three-dimensional computed tomography to quantify glenoid bone loss in shoulder instability. Arthroscopy. 2008;24(4):376\u201382. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.arthro.2007.10.008.","journal-title":"Arthroscopy"},{"issue":"2","key":"5389_CR22","first-page":"145","volume":"90","author":"P Baudi","year":"2005","unstructured":"Baudi P, Righi P, Bolognesi D, et al. How to identify and calculate glenoid bone deficit. Chir Organi Mov. 2005;90(2):145\u201352.","journal-title":"Chir Organi Mov"},{"issue":"11","key":"5389_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2569","DOI":"10.1177\/0363546512458247","volume":"40","author":"AJ Bois","year":"2012","unstructured":"Bois AJ, Fening SD, Polster J, et al. Quantifying glenoid bone loss in anterior shoulder instability. Am J Sports Med. 2012;40(11):2569\u201377. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0363546512458247.","journal-title":"Am J Sports Med"},{"key":"5389_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"164","DOI":"10.1186\/s12891-015-0607-1","volume":"16","author":"DJ Saliken","year":"2015","unstructured":"Saliken DJ, Bornes TD, Bouliane MJ, et al. Imaging methods for quantifying glenoid and Hill-Sachs bone loss in traumatic instability of the shoulder: a scoping review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015;16:164. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12891-015-0607-1.","journal-title":"BMC Musculoskelet Disord"},{"issue":"8","key":"5389_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2295","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2020.04.012","volume":"36","author":"LP Verweij","year":"2020","unstructured":"Verweij LP, Schuit AA, Kerkhoffs GM, et al. Accuracy of current available methods in quantifying anterior glenoid bone loss: controversy regarding gold standard \u2013 a systematic review. Arthroscopy. 2020;36(8):2295\u2013313. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.arthro.2020.04.012.","journal-title":"Arthroscopy"},{"key":"5389_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1096","DOI":"10.2214\/AJR.18.20504","volume":"212","author":"WR Walter","year":"2019","unstructured":"Walter WR, Samim M, La Polla FW, et al. Imaging quantification of glenoid bone loss in patients with glenohumeral instability: a systematic review. Am J Roentgenol. 2019;212:1096\u2013105. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2214\/AJR.18.20504.","journal-title":"Am J Roentgenol"},{"issue":"1","key":"5389_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"12","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.104B1","volume":"104-B","author":"S Weil","year":"2022","unstructured":"Weil S, Arnander M, Pearse Y, et al. Reporting of glenoid bone loss measurement in clinical studies and the need for standardization. Bone Joint J. 2022;104-B(1):12\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1302\/0301-620X.104B1.","journal-title":"Bone Joint J"},{"key":"5389_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"759","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jse.2005.09.001","volume":"15","author":"PE Huysmans","year":"2006","unstructured":"Huysmans PE, Haen PS, Kidd M, et al. The shape of the inferior part of the glenoid: a cadaveric study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2006;15:759\u201363. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jse.2005.09.001.","journal-title":"J Shoulder Elbow Surg"},{"key":"5389_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"155","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcm.2016.02.012","volume":"15","author":"TK Koo","year":"2016","unstructured":"Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med. 2016;15:155\u201363. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jcm.2016.02.012.","journal-title":"J Chiropr Med"},{"issue":"2","key":"5389_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"420","DOI":"10.1037\/0033-2909.86.2.420","volume":"86","author":"PE Shrout","year":"1979","unstructured":"Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull. 1979;86(2):420\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/0033-2909.86.2.420.","journal-title":"Psychol Bull"},{"issue":"10","key":"5389_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3222","DOI":"10.1007\/s00167-019-05391-9","volume":"27","author":"L Lacheta","year":"2019","unstructured":"Lacheta L, Herbst E, Voss A, et al. Insufficient consensus regarding circle size and bone loss width using the ratio-\"best fit circle\"-method even with three-dimensional computed tomography. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019;27(10):3222\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00167-019-05391-9.","journal-title":"Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc"},{"issue":"10","key":"5389_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2472","DOI":"10.1177\/0363546518783724","volume":"46","author":"NK Bakshi","year":"2018","unstructured":"Bakshi NK, Cibulas GA, Sekiya JK, et al. A clinical comparison of linear- and surface area-based methods of measuring glenoid bone loss. Am J Sports Med. 2018;46(10):2472\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0363546518783724.","journal-title":"Am J Sports Med"},{"issue":"9","key":"5389_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2060","DOI":"10.1177\/03635465251346838","volume":"53","author":"CL Brown","year":"2025","unstructured":"Brown CL, Le Vasseur CM, Scott D, et al. Best-fit circle missing area method shows good accuracy and interrater reliability when assessing glenoid bone loss. Am J Sports Med. 2025;53(9):2060\u20135. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/03635465251346838.","journal-title":"Am J Sports Med"},{"key":"5389_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2023.103745","author":"M Maiotti","year":"2025","unstructured":"Maiotti M, De Nigris S, Tardioli S, et al. IODA-shoulder\u00ae, a 3-dimensional automated software for glenoid bone loss quantification in shoulder instability. A validation study. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2025. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.otsr.2023.103745.","journal-title":"Orthop Traumatol Surg Res"},{"issue":"2","key":"5389_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.asmr.2024.100889","volume":"6","author":"N Parnes","year":"2024","unstructured":"Parnes N, Klahs K, Sandler AB, et al. The perfect-circle technique demonstrates poor inter-rater reliability in measuring posterior glenoid bone loss on magnetic resonance imaging. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2024;6(2):1\u20136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.asmr.2024.100889.","journal-title":"Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil"},{"issue":"2477","key":"5389_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.3390\/diagnostics16152477","volume":"16","author":"S Strasser","year":"2026","unstructured":"Strasser S, Pallua JD, Aschaber A, et al. Intra- and interobserver reliability of the CT-based glenoid arc-angle method using injured-side and contralateral reference circles: a diagnostic reliability study. Diagnostics (Basel). 2026;16(2477):1\u201319. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/diagnostics16152477.","journal-title":"Diagnostics (Basel)"},{"key":"5389_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1824","DOI":"10.1007\/s43465-022-00720-6","volume":"56","author":"J Chen","year":"2022","unstructured":"Chen J, Fang Z, Cai J, et al. Glenoid bone loss determination: validity and reliability of the constellation technique versus the sagittal best fit circle technique. Indian J Orthop. 2022;56:1824\u201333. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s43465-022-00720-6.","journal-title":"Indian J Orthop"},{"key":"5389_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"471","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2012.10.017","volume":"29","author":"M De Filippo","year":"2013","unstructured":"De Filippo M, Castagna A, Steinbach LS, et al. Reproducible noninvasive method for evaluation of glenoid bone loss by multiplanar reconstruction curved computed tomographic imaging using a cadaveric model. Arthroscopy. 2013;29:471\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.arthro.2012.10.017.","journal-title":"Arthroscopy"},{"key":"5389_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00256-026-05357-2","author":"M De Filippo","year":"2026","unstructured":"De Filippo M, Fischetti M, De Biase CF, et al. CT-based methods for the assessment of glenoid bone loss. Skeletal Radiol. 2026. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00256-026-05357-2. (accepted in 18 August).","journal-title":"Skeletal Radiol"}],"container-title":["Skeletal Radiology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00256-026-05389-8.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00256-026-05389-8","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00256-026-05389-8.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,12]],"date-time":"2026-10-12T23:20:50Z","timestamp":1791847250000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00256-026-05389-8"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,13]]},"references-count":39,"alternative-id":["5389"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00256-026-05389-8","relation":{},"ISSN":["0364-2348","1432-2161"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0364-2348","type":"print"},{"value":"1432-2161","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,13]]},"assertion":[{"value":"31 May 2026","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"1 October 2026","order":2,"name":"revised","label":"Revised","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"3 October 2026","order":3,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"13 October 2026","order":4,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"The research has been conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and ethical approval for this study was obtained from the Swedish Ethical Review Authority (Etikpr\u00f6vningsmyndigheten), study number\/dnr 2024\u201301325-01.","order":1,"name":"Ethics","label":"Ethical approval","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"For the ten patients who were called for an extra CT-scan informed consent was collected.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","label":"Informed consent","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"NA. The study is a small technical investigation and comparison of measuring methods.\n                      Guarantor:\n                      Katarina Lindgren.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","label":"Trial registration","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"Hereby I, Katarina Lindgren, consciously assure that for the manuscript \u2018Comparable Reliability of Linear- and Area Based Glenoid Measurements in Acute Fractures: Implications for Clinical Practice\u2019 the following is fulfilled:1) This material is the authors' own original work, which has not been previously published elsewhere.2) The paper is not currently being considered for publication elsewhere.3) The paper reflects the authors' own research and analysis in a truthful and complete manner.4) The paper properly credits the meaningful contributions of co-authors and co-researchers.5) The results are appropriately placed in the context of prior and existing research.6) All sources used are properly disclosed (correct citation). Literally copying of text is indicated as such by using quotation marks and giving proper reference.7) All authors have been personally and actively involved in substantial work leading to the paper, and will take public responsibility for its content.I agree with the above statements and declare that this submission follows the policies of Solid State Ionics as outlined in the Guide for Authors and in the Ethical Statement.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","label":"Ethical statement for solid state ionics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors declare no conflict of interest (separate CoI for each author is available).","order":5,"name":"Ethics","label":"Conflict of interest","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}}]}}