{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,7]],"date-time":"2026-10-07T22:37:31Z","timestamp":1791412651936,"version":"4.3.3"},"reference-count":33,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2017,8,24]],"date-time":"2017-08-24T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1503532800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,1]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s00259-017-3809-y","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2017,8,24]],"date-time":"2017-08-24T03:57:07Z","timestamp":1503547027000},"page":"67-76","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":64,"title":["Comparison of 18F-FDG PET\/MRI and MRI for pre-therapeutic tumor staging of patients with primary cancer of the uterine cervix"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"45","author":[{"given":"Theresia","family":"Sarabhai","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Benedikt M.","family":"Schaarschmidt","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Axel","family":"Wetter","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Julian","family":"Kirchner","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Bahriye","family":"Aktas","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Michael","family":"Forsting","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Verena","family":"Ruhlmann","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ken","family":"Herrmann","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Lale","family":"Umutlu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Johannes","family":"Grueneisen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2017,8,24]]},"reference":[{"key":"3809_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015;65(2):87\u2013108. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3322\/caac.21262\n                    \n                  .","DOI":"10.3322\/caac.21262"},{"key":"3809_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Pecorelli S, Zigliani L, Odicino F. Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the cervix. Int J Gynaecol Obstet Off Organ Int Fed Gynaecol Obstet. 2009;105(2):107\u20138. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ijgo.2009.02.009\n                    \n                  .","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2009.02.009"},{"issue":"1","key":"3809_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"90","DOI":"10.1016\/0090-8258(80)90013-X","volume":"9","author":"LD Lagasse","year":"1980","unstructured":"Lagasse LD, Creasman WT, Shingleton HM, Ford JH, Blessing JA. Results and complications of operative staging in cervical cancer: Experience of the gynecologic oncology group. Gynecol Oncol. 1980;9(1):90\u20138.","journal-title":"Gynecol Oncol"},{"key":"3809_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Sala E, Wakely S, Senior E, Lomas D. MRI of malignant neoplasms of the uterine corpus and cervix. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;188(6):1577\u201387. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2214\/ajr.06.1196\n                    \n                  .","DOI":"10.2214\/ajr.06.1196"},{"issue":"1","key":"3809_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"59","DOI":"10.1016\/S0090-8258(03)00409-8","volume":"91","author":"S Bipat","year":"2003","unstructured":"Bipat S, Glas AS, van der Velden J, Zwinderman AH, Bossuyt PM, Stoker J. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in staging of uterine cervical carcinoma: A systematic review. Gynecol Oncol. 2003;91(1):59\u201366.","journal-title":"Gynecol Oncol"},{"key":"3809_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Grant P, Sakellis C, Jacene HA. Gynecologic oncologic imaging with PET\/CT. Semin Nucl Med. 2014;44(6):461\u201378. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1053\/j.semnuclmed.2014.06.005\n                    \n                  .","DOI":"10.1053\/j.semnuclmed.2014.06.005"},{"key":"3809_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Choi HJ, Roh JW, Seo SS, Lee S, Kim JY, Kim SK, et al. Comparison of the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography\/computed tomography in the presurgical detection of lymph node metastases in patients with uterine cervical carcinoma: A prospective study. Cancer. 2006;106(4):914\u201322. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/cncr.21641\n                    \n                  .","DOI":"10.1002\/cncr.21641"},{"key":"3809_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Selman TJ, Mann C, Zamora J, Appleyard TL, Khan K. Diagnostic accuracy of tests for lymph node status in primary cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. CMAJ: Can Med Assoc J = J l'Assoc Med Can. 2008;178(7):855\u201362. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1503\/cmaj.071124\n                    \n                  .","DOI":"10.1503\/cmaj.071124"},{"key":"3809_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Heusch P, Nensa F, Schaarschmidt B, Sivanesapillai R, Beiderwellen K, Gomez B, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of whole-body PET\/MRI and whole-body PET\/CT for TNM staging in oncology. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015;42(1):42\u20138. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00259-014-2885-5\n                    \n                  .","DOI":"10.1007\/s00259-014-2885-5"},{"key":"3809_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Schafer JF, Gatidis S, Schmidt H, Guckel B, Bezrukov I, Pfannenberg CA, et al. Simultaneous whole-body PET\/MR imaging in comparison to PET\/CT in pediatric oncology: Initial results. Radiology. 2014;273(1):220\u201331. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1148\/radiol.14131732\n                    \n                  .","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.14131732"},{"key":"3809_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Melsaether AN, Raad RA, Pujara AC, Ponzo FD, Pysarenko KM, Jhaveri K, et al. Comparison of whole-body (18)F FDG PET\/MR imaging and whole-body (18)F FDG PET\/CT in terms of lesion detection and radiation dose in patients with breast cancer. Radiology. 2016;281(1):193\u2013202. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1148\/radiol.2016151155\n                    \n                  .","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2016151155"},{"key":"3809_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Grueneisen J, Schaarschmidt BM, Heubner M, Aktas B, Kinner S, Forsting M, et al. Integrated PET\/MRI for whole-body staging of patients with primary cervical cancer: Preliminary results. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015;42(12):1814\u201324. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00259-015-3131-5\n                    \n                  .","DOI":"10.1007\/s00259-015-3131-5"},{"key":"3809_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Edge SB, Compton CC. The American joint committee on cancer: The 7th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual and the future of TNM. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17(6):1471\u20134. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1245\/s10434-010-0985-4\n                    \n                  .","DOI":"10.1245\/s10434-010-0985-4"},{"key":"3809_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Beiderwellen K, Gomez B, Buchbender C, Hartung V, Poeppel TD, Nensa F, et al. Depiction and characterization of liver lesions in whole body [(1)(8)F]-FDG PET\/MRI. Eur J Radiol. 2013;82(11):e669\u201375. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejrad.2013.07.027\n                    \n                  .","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejrad.2013.07.027"},{"key":"3809_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Buchbender C, Hartung-Knemeyer V, Beiderwellen K, Heusch P, Kuhl H, Lauenstein TC, et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging as part of hybrid PET\/MRI protocols for whole-body cancer staging: Does it benefit lesion detection? Eur J Radiol. 2013;82(5):877\u201382. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejrad.2013.01.019\n                    \n                  .","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejrad.2013.01.019"},{"key":"3809_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Platzek I, Beuthien-Baumann B, Schramm G, Maus J, Laniado M, Kotzerke J, et al. FDG PET\/MR in initial staging of sarcoma: Initial experience and comparison with conventional imaging. Clin Imaging. 2017;42:126\u201332. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.clinimag.2016.11.016\n                    \n                  .","DOI":"10.1016\/j.clinimag.2016.11.016"},{"key":"3809_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Micco M, Sala E, Lakhman Y, Hricak H, Vargas HA. Role of imaging in the pretreatment evaluation of common gynecological cancers. Women\u2019s health (Lond Engl). 2014;10(3):299\u2013321. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2217\/whe.14.19\n                    \n                  .","DOI":"10.2217\/whe.14.19"},{"key":"3809_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Addley HC, Vargas HA, Moyle PL, Crawford R, Sala E. Pelvic imaging following chemotherapy and radiation therapy for gynecologic malignancies. Radiogr Rev Publ Radiol Soc N Am Inc. 2010;30(7):1843\u201356. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1148\/rg.307105063\n                    \n                  .","DOI":"10.1148\/rg.307105063"},{"key":"3809_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Sala E, Rockall AG, Freeman SJ, Mitchell DG, Reinhold C. The added role of MR imaging in treatment stratification of patients with gynecologic malignancies: What the radiologist needs to know. Radiology. 2013;266(3):717\u201340. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1148\/radiol.12120315\n                    \n                  .","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.12120315"},{"issue":"4","key":"3809_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"582","DOI":"10.1097\/00004728-199307000-00012","volume":"17","author":"CK Hoh","year":"1993","unstructured":"Hoh CK, Hawkins RA, Glaspy JA, Dahlbom M, Tse NY, Hoffman EJ, et al. Cancer detection with whole-body PET using 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1993;17(4):582\u20139.","journal-title":"J Comput Assist Tomogr"},{"key":"3809_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Schwarz JK, Grigsby PW, Dehdashti F, Delbeke D. The role of 18F-FDG PET in assessing therapy response in cancer of the cervix and ovaries. J Nucl Med Off Publ Soc Nucl Med. 2009;50(Suppl 1):64s\u201373s. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2967\/jnumed.108.057257\n                    \n                  .","DOI":"10.2967\/jnumed.108.057257"},{"key":"3809_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Yoshida Y, Kurokawa T, Kawahara K, Yagihara A, Tsuchida T, Okazawa H, et al. Metabolic monitoring of advanced uterine cervical cancer neoadjuvant chemotherapy by using [F-18]-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography: Preliminary results in three patients. Gynecol Oncol. 2004;95(3):597\u2013602. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ygyno.2004.08.037\n                    \n                  .","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2004.08.037"},{"key":"3809_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Nishiyama Y, Yamamoto Y, Kanenishi K, Ohno M, Hata T, Kushida Y, et al. Monitoring the neoadjuvant therapy response in gynecological cancer patients using FDG PET. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2008;35(2):287\u201395. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00259-007-0627-7\n                    \n                  .","DOI":"10.1007\/s00259-007-0627-7"},{"key":"3809_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Schwarz JK, Siegel BA, Dehdashti F, Grigsby PW. Association of posttherapy positron emission tomography with tumor response and survival in cervical carcinoma. JAMA. 2007;298(19):2289\u201395. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jama.298.19.2289\n                    \n                  .","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.298.19.2289"},{"issue":"2","key":"3809_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"353","DOI":"10.1016\/S0360-3016(02)02705-0","volume":"53","author":"TR Miller","year":"2002","unstructured":"Miller TR, Grigsby PW. Measurement of tumor volume by PET to evaluate prognosis in patients with advanced cervical cancer treated by radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002;53(2):353\u20139.","journal-title":"Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys"},{"issue":"6","key":"3809_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"455","DOI":"10.3109\/02841868409136048","volume":"23","author":"Y Tanaka","year":"1984","unstructured":"Tanaka Y, Sawada S, Murata T. Relationship between lymph node metastases and prognosis in patients irradiated postoperatively for carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Acta Radiol Oncol. 1984;23(6):455\u20139.","journal-title":"Acta Radiol Oncol"},{"issue":"5","key":"3809_CR27","first-page":"507","volume":"46","author":"MS Piver","year":"1975","unstructured":"Piver MS, Chung WS. Prognostic significance of cervical lesion size and pelvic node metastases in cervical carcinoma. Obstet Gynecol. 1975;46(5):507\u201310.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"3809_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"34","DOI":"10.1016\/0090-8258(89)90598-2","volume":"33","author":"AF Fuller Jr","year":"1989","unstructured":"Fuller AF Jr, Elliott N, Kosloff C, Hoskins WJ, Lewis JL Jr. Determinants of increased risk for recurrence in patients undergoing radical hysterectomy for stage IB and IIA carcinoma of the cervix. Gynecol Oncol. 1989;33(1):34\u20139.","journal-title":"Gynecol Oncol"},{"key":"3809_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Havrilesky LJ, Kulasingam SL, Matchar DB, Myers ER. FDG-PET for management of cervical and ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2005;97(1):183\u201391. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ygyno.2004.12.007\n                    \n                  .","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2004.12.007"},{"key":"3809_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Kitajima K, Suenaga Y, Ueno Y, Kanda T, Maeda T, Deguchi M, et al. Fusion of PET and MRI for staging of uterine cervical cancer: Comparison with contrast-enhanced (18)F-FDG PET\/CT and pelvic MRI. Clin Imaging. 2014;38(4):464\u20139. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.clinimag.2014.02.006\n                    \n                  .","DOI":"10.1016\/j.clinimag.2014.02.006"},{"key":"3809_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Queiroz MA, Kubik-Huch RA, Hauser N, Freiwald-Chilla B, von Schulthess G, Froehlich JM, et al. PET\/MRI and PET\/CT in advanced gynaecological tumours: Initial experience and comparison. Eur Radiol. 2015;25(8):2222\u201330. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00330-015-3657-8\n                    \n                  .","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-015-3657-8"},{"key":"3809_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Pandharipande PV, Choy G, del Carmen MG, Gazelle GS, Russell AH, Lee SI. MRI and PET\/CT for triaging stage IB clinically operable cervical cancer to appropriate therapy: Decision analysis to assess patient outcomes. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;192(3):802\u201314. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2214\/ajr.08.1224\n                    \n                  .","DOI":"10.2214\/ajr.08.1224"},{"key":"3809_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Beckmann MW, Mallmann P. Interdisciplinary S2k guideline on the diagnosis and treatment of cervical carcinoma. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2009;135(9):1197\u2013206. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00432-009-0560-1\n                    \n                  .","DOI":"10.1007\/s00432-009-0560-1"}],"container-title":["European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00259-017-3809-y\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00259-017-3809-y.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00259-017-3809-y.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,2,8]],"date-time":"2019-02-08T14:55:43Z","timestamp":1549637743000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00259-017-3809-y"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2017,8,24]]},"references-count":33,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,1]]}},"alternative-id":["3809"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00259-017-3809-y","relation":{},"ISSN":["1619-7070","1619-7089"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1619-7070","type":"print"},{"value":"1619-7089","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2017,8,24]]},"assertion":[{"value":"31 May 2017","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"10 August 2017","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"24 August 2017","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Compliance with ethical standards"}},{"value":"None.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}},{"value":"All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Institutional Research Committee and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Research involving human participants and\/or animals"}},{"value":"Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Informed consent"}}]}}