{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,25]],"date-time":"2026-09-25T22:03:19Z","timestamp":1790373799934,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":19,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"8","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,1,7]],"date-time":"2019-01-07T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1546819200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,1,7]],"date-time":"2019-01-07T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1546819200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,7,1]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s00259-018-4256-0","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2019,1,7]],"date-time":"2019-01-07T07:06:29Z","timestamp":1546844789000},"page":"1745-1750","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":61,"title":["Digital vs. analog PET\/CT: intra-subject comparison of the SUVmax in target lesions and reference regions"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"46","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-5859-5196","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Francisco","family":"Fuentes-Ocampo","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Diego Alfonso","family":"L\u00f3pez-Mora","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Albert","family":"Flotats","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Gabriela","family":"Paillahueque","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Valle","family":"Camacho","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Joan","family":"Duch","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Alejandro","family":"Fern\u00e1ndez","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Anna","family":"Dom\u00e8nech","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Montserrat","family":"Estorch","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ignasi","family":"Carri\u00f3","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2019,1,7]]},"reference":[{"key":"4256_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rausch I, Ruiz A, Valverde-Pascual I, Cal-Gonzalez J, Beyer T, Carrio I. Performance evaluation of the Philips Vereos PET\/CT system according to the NEMA NU2-2012 standard. J Nucl Med. 2018; in press.","DOI":"10.2967\/jnumed.118.215541"},{"key":"4256_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"5","DOI":"10.1053\/j.semnuclmed.2015.09.006","volume":"46","author":"PJ Slomka","year":"2016","unstructured":"Slomka PJ, Pan T, Germano G. Recent advances and future progress in PET instrumentation. Semin Nucl Med. 2016;46:5\u201319.","journal-title":"Semin Nucl Med"},{"key":"4256_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"566","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pcad.2015.02.002","volume":"57","author":"PJ Slomka","year":"2015","unstructured":"Slomka PJ, Pan T, Berman DS, Germano G. Advances in SPECT and PET hardware. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2015;57:566\u201378.","journal-title":"Prog Cardiovasc Dis"},{"key":"4256_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1378","DOI":"10.2967\/jnumed.114.148338","volume":"56","author":"NC Nguyen","year":"2015","unstructured":"Nguyen NC, Vercher-Conejero JL, Sattar A, Miller MA, Maniawski PJ, Jordan DW, et al. Image quality and diagnostic performance of a digital PET prototype in patients with oncologic diseases: initial experience and comparison with analog PET. J Nucl Med. 2015;56:1378\u201385.","journal-title":"J Nucl Med"},{"key":"4256_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Wright CL, Binzel K, Zhang J, Knopp MV. Advanced functional tumor imaging and precision nuclear medicine enabled by digital PET technologies. Contrast Media Mol Imaging. 2017. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1155\/2017\/5260305\n                    \n                  .","DOI":"10.1155\/2017\/5260305"},{"key":"4256_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1358","DOI":"10.1007\/s10439-011-0266-9","volume":"39","author":"E Roncali","year":"2011","unstructured":"Roncali E, Cherry SR. Application of silicon photomultipliers to positron emission tomography. Ann Biomed Eng. 2011;39:1358\u201377.","journal-title":"Ann Biomed Eng"},{"key":"4256_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Frach T, Prescher G, Degenhardt C, de Gruyter R, Schmitz A, Ballizany R. The digital silicon photomultiplier \u2014 principle of operation and intrinsic detector performance. IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record (NSS\/MIC), Orlando, FL. 2009. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/NSSMIC.2009.5402143\n                    \n                  .","DOI":"10.1109\/NSSMIC.2009.5402143"},{"key":"4256_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"779","DOI":"10.1007\/s00259-013-2343-9","volume":"40","author":"G Cheng","year":"2013","unstructured":"Cheng G, Torigian DA, Zhuang H, Alavi A. When should we recommend use of dual time-point and delayed time-point imaging techniques in FDG PET? Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2013;40:779\u201387.","journal-title":"Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging"},{"key":"4256_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"118","DOI":"10.1007\/s11307-008-0177-9","volume":"11","author":"BB Chin","year":"2009","unstructured":"Chin BB, Green ED, Turkington TG, Hawk TC, Coleman RE. Increasing uptake time in FDG-PET: standardized uptake values in normal tissues at 1 versus 3 h. Mol Imaging Biol. 2009;11:118\u201322.","journal-title":"Mol Imaging Biol"},{"key":"4256_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0048430","volume":"7","author":"DE Oprea-Lager","year":"2012","unstructured":"Oprea-Lager DE, Vincent AD, van Moorselaar RJ, Gerritsen WR, van den Eertwegh AJ, Eriksson J, et al. Dual-phase PET-CT to differentiate [18F]Fluoromethylcholine uptake in reactive and malignant lymph nodes in patients with prostate cancer. PLoS One. 2012;7:e48430. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0048430\n                    \n                  .","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"4256_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"925","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.09090413","volume":"254","author":"M Beheshti","year":"2010","unstructured":"Beheshti M, Imamovic L, Broinger G, Vali R, Waldenberger P, Stoiber F, et al. 18F choline PET\/CT in the preoperative staging of prostate cancer in patients with intermediate or high risk of extracapsular disease: a prospective study of 130 patients. Radiology. 2010;254:925\u201333.","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"4256_CR12","first-page":"262","volume":"47","author":"SA Kwee","year":"2006","unstructured":"Kwee SA, Wei H, Sesterhenn I, Yun D, Coel MN. Localization of primary prostate cancer with dual-phase 18F-fluorocholine PET. J Nucl Med. 2006;47:262\u20139.","journal-title":"J Nucl Med"},{"key":"4256_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1387","DOI":"10.1007\/s00259-006-0150-2","volume":"33","author":"M Cimitan","year":"2006","unstructured":"Cimitan M, Bortolus R, Morassut S, Canzonieri V, Garbeglio A, Baresic T, et al. [18F]fluorocholine PET\/CT imaging for the detection of recurrent prostate cancer at PSA relapse: experience in 100 consecutive patients. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2006;33:1387\u201398.","journal-title":"Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging"},{"key":"4256_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"486","DOI":"10.1016\/j.clinimag.2015.12.010","volume":"40","author":"AK Tong","year":"2016","unstructured":"Tong AK, Zhang ZX, Zaheer S, Yan XS. Dual-phase (18)F-fluorocholine PET\/CT to detect locoregional recurrence of prostate cancer: comparison between each time point of imaging and a summation scan. Clin Imaging. 2016;40:486\u201391.","journal-title":"Clin Imaging"},{"key":"4256_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"345","DOI":"10.1007\/s11307-012-0600-0","volume":"15","author":"G Cheng","year":"2013","unstructured":"Cheng G, Alavi A, Lim E, Werner TJ, Del Bello CV, Akers SR. Dynamic changes of FDG uptake and clearance in normal tissues. Mol Imaging Biol. 2013;15:345\u201352.","journal-title":"Mol Imaging Biol"},{"key":"4256_CR16","first-page":"424","volume":"46","author":"CJ Jaskowiak","year":"2005","unstructured":"Jaskowiak CJ, Bianco JA, Perlman SB, Fine JP. Influence of reconstruction iterations on 18F-FDG PET\/CT standardized uptake values. J Nucl Med. 2005;46:424\u20138.","journal-title":"J Nucl Med"},{"key":"4256_CR17","first-page":"1519","volume":"45","author":"R Boellaard","year":"2004","unstructured":"Boellaard R, Krak NC, Hoekstra OS, Lammertsma AA. Effects of noise, image resolution, and ROI definition on the accuracy of standard uptake values: a simulation study. J Nucl Med. 2004;45:1519\u201327.","journal-title":"J Nucl Med"},{"key":"4256_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"99","DOI":"10.1186\/s40658-014-0099-3","volume":"1","author":"IS Armstrong","year":"2014","unstructured":"Armstrong IS, Kelly MD, Williams HA, Matthews JC. Impact of point spread function modelling and time of flight on FDG uptake measurements in lung lesions using alternative filtering strategies. EJNMMI Phys. 2014;1:99.","journal-title":"EJNMMI Phys"},{"key":"4256_CR19","first-page":"127","volume":"16","author":"R Sharifpour","year":"2017","unstructured":"Sharifpour R, Ghafarian P, Bakhshayesh-Karam M, Jamaati H, Ay MR. Impact of time-of-flight and point-spread-function for respiratory artifact reduction in PET\/CT imaging: focus on standardized uptake value. Tanaffos. 2017;16:127\u201335.","journal-title":"Tanaffos"}],"updated-by":[{"DOI":"10.1007\/s00259-019-04280-0","type":"correction","label":"Correction","source":"publisher","updated":{"date-parts":[[2019,2,9]],"date-time":"2019-02-09T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1549670400000}}],"container-title":["European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00259-018-4256-0\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00259-018-4256-0.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00259-018-4256-0.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2020,9,16]],"date-time":"2020-09-16T19:14:15Z","timestamp":1600283655000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00259-018-4256-0"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2019,1,7]]},"references-count":19,"journal-issue":{"issue":"8","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,7,1]]}},"alternative-id":["4256"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00259-018-4256-0","relation":{"correction":[{"id-type":"doi","id":"10.1007\/s00259-019-04280-0","asserted-by":"object"}]},"ISSN":["1619-7070","1619-7089"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1619-7070","type":"print"},{"value":"1619-7089","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2019,1,7]]},"assertion":[{"value":"8 October 2018","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"27 December 2018","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"7 January 2019","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"9 February 2019","order":4,"name":"change_date","label":"Change Date","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"Correction","order":5,"name":"change_type","label":"Change Type","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"The article Digital vs. analog PET\/CT: intra-subject comparison of the SUVmax in target lesions and reference regions, written by Francisco Fuentes-Ocampo, Diego Alfonso L\u00f3pez-Mora, Albert Flotats, Gabriela Paillahueque","order":6,"name":"change_details","label":"Change Details","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Compliance with ethical standards"}},{"value":"All authors declare no conflicts of interest.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}},{"value":"All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and\/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethical approval"}},{"value":"Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Informed consent"}}]}}