{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,22]],"date-time":"2026-07-22T22:13:59Z","timestamp":1784758439341,"version":"3.55.0"},"reference-count":34,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,3]],"date-time":"2025-11-03T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1762128000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,3]],"date-time":"2025-11-03T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1762128000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100000289","name":"Cancer Research UK","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["C22464"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["C22464"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100000289","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100000289","name":"Cancer Research UK","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["A12783"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["A12783"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100000289","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,3]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Purpose<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      To evaluate the diagnostic performance of quantitative measures derived from [\n                      <jats:sup>18<\/jats:sup>\n                      F]FDG PET\/CT, [\n                      <jats:sup>18<\/jats:sup>\n                      F]FEC PET\/CT, and DW-MRI in the detection of lymph node metastases in endometrial and cervical cancer with comparison to standard visual PET analysis with histology as the reference standard.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Subanalysis of quantitative data from the prospective multicentre MAPPING study. Nodal and tumour SUV\n                      <jats:sub>max<\/jats:sub>\n                      from [\n                      <jats:sup>18<\/jats:sup>\n                      F]FDG PET\/CT and [\n                      <jats:sup>18<\/jats:sup>\n                      F]FEC PET\/CT and ADC\n                      <jats:sub>mean<\/jats:sub>\n                      from DW-MRI were documented. Nodal-to-tumour ratios (NTR) and SUV\n                      <jats:sub>max<\/jats:sub>\n                      -to-ADC\n                      <jats:sub>mean<\/jats:sub>\n                      ratio (STAR) were calculated. Optimal cut-offs of quantitative measures were compared to visual assessment on a regional basis using histopathology as the reference standard.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Scans from 112 patients (36 cervical and 76 endometrial cancers; 340 nodal regions) were eligible for quantitative image analysis. Lower ADC\n                      <jats:sub>mean<\/jats:sub>\n                      on DW-MRI was observed in metastatic nodes for cervical cancer but not for endometrial cancer. Quantitative measures were significantly higher in malignant than benign nodal regions on [\n                      <jats:sup>18<\/jats:sup>\n                      F]FDG PET\/CT and [\n                      <jats:sup>18<\/jats:sup>\n                      F]FEC PET\/CT in endometrial cancer. SUV\n                      <jats:sub>max<\/jats:sub>\n                      cut-offs showed similar performance to visual assessment in the diagnosis of metastatic lymph nodes in endometrial cancer whilst ADC\n                      <jats:sub>mean<\/jats:sub>\n                      cut-offs showed significantly lower specificity than visual assessment. Interobserver agreement was excellent for SUV\n                      <jats:sub>max<\/jats:sub>\n                      measurements on both [\n                      <jats:sup>18<\/jats:sup>\n                      F]FDG PET\/CT and [\n                      <jats:sup>18<\/jats:sup>\n                      F]FEC PET\/CT, but poor for ADC\n                      <jats:sub>mean<\/jats:sub>\n                      on DW-MRI.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Quantitative measures from [\n                      <jats:sup>18<\/jats:sup>\n                      F]FDG PET\/CT, [\n                      <jats:sup>18<\/jats:sup>\n                      F]FEC PET\/CT, or DW-MRI did not outperform visual assessment in the detection of nodal metastases in endometrial cancer. Therefore, the implementation of these quantitative measures as standalone diagnostic tools in routine clinical practice is not recommended.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1007\/s00259-025-07587-3","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,3]],"date-time":"2025-11-03T00:11:02Z","timestamp":1762128662000},"page":"2414-2426","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["Diagnostic performance of quantitative measures from [18F]FDG PET\/CT, [18F]FEC PET\/CT, and DW-MRI in the detection of lymph node metastases in endometrial and cervical cancer: data from the MAPPING study"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"53","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0005-0476-3181","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Ben G","family":"King","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-6236-1480","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Nishat","family":"Bharwani","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0004-5576-0135","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"William","family":"Wilson","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-8732-8134","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Gary J.R","family":"Cook","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-7774-9886","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Aslam","family":"Sohaib","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Marielle","family":"Nobbenhuis","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-7141-2139","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Victoria","family":"Warbey","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-2209-2076","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Marc E.","family":"Miquel","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-7654-8011","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Dow-Mu","family":"Koh","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-2891-7545","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Katja N","family":"De Paepe","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-0520-0066","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Pierre","family":"Martin-Hirsch","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-7369-5080","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Sadaf","family":"Ghaem-Maghami","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-6375-9645","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Christina","family":"Fotopoulou","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0001-1697-9052","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Helen","family":"Stringfellow","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-5843-3015","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Sudha","family":"Sundar","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-3381-5057","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Ranjit","family":"Manchanda","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-8520-3031","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Anju","family":"Sahdev","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-5570-5070","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Allan","family":"Hackshaw","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-9776-8766","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Tara D.","family":"Barwick","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-8270-5597","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Andrea G.","family":"Rockall","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,3]]},"reference":[{"key":"7587_CR1","first-page":"10","volume":"75","author":"RL Siegel","year":"2025","unstructured":"Siegel RL, Kratzer TB, Giaquinto AN, Sung H, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2025. CA Cancer J Clin. 2025;75:10\u201345.","journal-title":"CA Cancer J Clin"},{"key":"7587_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"433","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.08.020","volume":"256","author":"N Reed","year":"2021","unstructured":"Reed N, Balega J, Barwick T, Buckley L, Burton K, Eminowicz G, et al. British gynaecological cancer society (BGCS) cervical cancer guidelines: recommendations for practice. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021;256:433\u201365.","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"7587_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e423","DOI":"10.1016\/S1470-2045(25)00167-6","volume":"26","author":"N Concin","year":"2025","unstructured":"Concin N, Matias-Guiu X, Cibula D, Colombo N, Creutzberg CL, Ledermann J, et al. ESGO\u2013ESTRO\u2013ESP guidelines for the management of patients with endometrial carcinoma: update 2025. Lancet Oncol. 2025;26:e423\u201335.","journal-title":"Lancet Oncol"},{"key":"7587_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1287","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2006.03.043","volume":"195","author":"D Querleu","year":"2006","unstructured":"Querleu D, Leblanc E, Cartron G, Narducci F, Ferron G, Martel P. Audit of preoperative and early complications of laparoscopic lymph node dissection in 1000 gynecologic cancer patients. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;195:1287\u201392.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"7587_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"81","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2012.10.011","volume":"39","author":"A Achouri","year":"2013","unstructured":"Achouri A, Huchon C, Bats AS, Bensaid C, Nos C, L\u00e9curu F. Complications of lymphadenectomy for gynecologic cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2013;39:81\u20136.","journal-title":"Eur J Surg Oncol"},{"key":"7587_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"879","DOI":"10.2967\/jnumed.115.170597","volume":"57","author":"VR Bollineni","year":"2016","unstructured":"Bollineni VR, Ytre-Hauge S, Bollineni-Balabay O, Salvesen HB, Haldorsen IS. High diagnostic value of 18F-FDG PET\/CT in endometrial cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. J Nucl Med. 2016;57:879\u201385.","journal-title":"J Nucl Med"},{"key":"7587_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"367","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejrad.2010.01.026","volume":"76","author":"E Sala","year":"2010","unstructured":"Sala E, Rockall A, Rangarajan D, Kubik-Huch RA. The role of dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging in the female pelvis. Eur J Radiol. 2010;76:367\u201385.","journal-title":"Eur J Radiol"},{"key":"7587_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1094","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(15)00130-0","volume":"387","author":"P Morice","year":"2016","unstructured":"Morice P, Leary A, Creutzberg C, Abu-Rustum N, Darai E. Endometrial cancer. Lancet Lond Engl. 2016;387:1094\u2013108.","journal-title":"Lancet Lond Engl"},{"key":"7587_CR9","unstructured":"The Royal College of Radiologists. Evidence-based indications for the use of PET-CT in the United Kingdom 2022. 2022."},{"key":"7587_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"7673","DOI":"10.1158\/1078-0432.CCR-11-2048","volume":"17","author":"K Contractor","year":"2011","unstructured":"Contractor K, Challapalli A, Barwick T, Winkler M, Hellawell G, Hazell S, et al. Use of [11 C]choline PET-CT as a noninvasive method for detecting pelvic lymph node status from prostate cancer and relationship with choline kinase expression. Clin Cancer Res. 2011;17:7673\u201383.","journal-title":"Clin Cancer Res"},{"key":"7587_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"6457","DOI":"10.1158\/1078-0432.CCR-21-1834","volume":"27","author":"AG Rockall","year":"2021","unstructured":"Rockall AG, Barwick TD, Wilson W, Singh N, Bharwani N, Sohaib A, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of FEC-PET\/CT, FDG-PET\/CT, and diffusion-weighted MRI in detection of nodal metastases in surgically treated endometrial and cervical carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2021;27:6457\u201366.","journal-title":"Clin Cancer Res"},{"key":"7587_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"65","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-012-2575-2","volume":"23","author":"G Rechichi","year":"2013","unstructured":"Rechichi G, Galimberti S, Oriani M, Perego P, Valsecchi MG, Sironi S. ADC maps in the prediction of pelvic lymph nodal metastatic regions in endometrial cancer. Eur Radiol. 2013;23:65\u201374.","journal-title":"Eur Radiol"},{"key":"7587_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"102","DOI":"10.1007\/s00261-009-9590-z","volume":"36","author":"YB Chen","year":"2011","unstructured":"Chen YB, Liao J, Xie R, Chen GL, Chen G. Discrimination of metastatic from hyperplastic pelvic lymph nodes in patients with cervical cancer by diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Abdom Imaging. 2011;36:102\u20139.","journal-title":"Abdom Imaging"},{"key":"7587_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"19","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2011.03.023","volume":"122","author":"Y Liu","year":"2011","unstructured":"Liu Y, Liu H, Bai X, Ye Z, Sun H, Bai R, et al. Differentiation of metastatic from non-metastatic lymph nodes in patients with uterine cervical cancer using diffusion-weighted imaging. Gynecol Oncol. 2011;122:19\u201324.","journal-title":"Gynecol Oncol"},{"key":"7587_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"383","DOI":"10.1002\/jmri.21635","volume":"29","author":"SO Park","year":"2009","unstructured":"Park SO, Kim JK, Kim KA, Park B-W, Kim N, Cho G, et al. Relative apparent diffusion coefficient: determination of reference site and validation of benefit for detecting metastatic lymph nodes in uterine cervical cancer. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2009;29:383\u201390.","journal-title":"J Magn Reson Imaging"},{"key":"7587_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1175","DOI":"10.1258\/ar.2011.110202","volume":"52","author":"M Kim","year":"2011","unstructured":"Kim M, Kim JK, Lee Y, Park B-W, Lee CK, Kim N, et al. Diagnosis of lymph node metastasis in uterine cervical cancer: usefulness of computer-aided diagnosis with comprehensive evaluation of MR images and clinical findings. Acta Radiol. 2011;52:1175\u201383.","journal-title":"Acta Radiol"},{"key":"7587_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"128","DOI":"10.1002\/jmri.21412","volume":"28","author":"G Lin","year":"2008","unstructured":"Lin G, Ho K-C, Wang J-J, Ng K-K, Wai Y-Y, Chen Y-T, et al. Detection of lymph node metastasis in cervical and uterine cancers by diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging at 3T. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008;28:128\u201335.","journal-title":"J Magn Reson Imaging"},{"key":"7587_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1259\/bjr.20200203","volume":"95","author":"Q Song","year":"2022","unstructured":"Song Q, Yu Y, Zhang X, Zhu Y, Luo Y, Yu T, et al. Value of MRI and diffusion-weighted imaging in diagnosing normal-sized pelvic lymph nodes metastases in patients with cervical cancer. Br J Radiol. 2022;95:20200203.","journal-title":"Br J Radiol"},{"key":"7587_CR19","first-page":"1580","volume":"61","author":"A Arian","year":"2020","unstructured":"Arian A, Easa AM, Arab-Ahmadi M. Diagnostic value of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in discriminating between metastatic and non-metastatic pelvic lymph nodes in endometrial cancer. Acta Radiol Stockh Swed 1987. 2020;61:1580\u20136.","journal-title":"Acta Radiol Stockh Swed 1987"},{"key":"7587_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"104","DOI":"10.1007\/s12149-015-1037-8","volume":"30","author":"HJ Kim","year":"2016","unstructured":"Kim HJ, Cho A, Yun M, Kim YT, Kang WJ. Comparison of FDG PET\/CT and MRI in lymph node staging of endometrial cancer. Ann Nucl Med. 2016;30:104\u201313.","journal-title":"Ann Nucl Med"},{"key":"7587_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"793","DOI":"10.1097\/RLU.0000000000002252","volume":"43","author":"LL Brunette","year":"2018","unstructured":"Brunette LL, Bonyadlou S, Ji L, Groshen S, Shuster D, Mehta A, et al. Predictive value of FDG PET\/CT to detect lymph node metastases in cervical cancer. Clin Nucl Med. 2018;43:793\u2013801.","journal-title":"Clin Nucl Med"},{"key":"7587_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"28285","DOI":"10.18632\/oncotarget.16043","volume":"8","author":"A Surov","year":"2017","unstructured":"Surov A, Meyer HJ, Schob S, H\u00f6hn A-K, Bremicker K, Exner M, et al. Parameters of simultaneous 18F-FDG-PET\/MRI predict tumor stage and several histopathological features in uterine cervical cancer. Oncotarget. 2017;8:28285\u201396.","journal-title":"Oncotarget"},{"key":"7587_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"77","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2105-12-77","volume":"12","author":"X Robin","year":"2011","unstructured":"Robin X, Turck N, Hainard A, Tiberti N, Lisacek F, Sanchez J-C, et al. pROC: an open-source package for R and S\u2009+\u2009to analyze and compare ROC curves. BMC Bioinformatics. 2011;12:77.","journal-title":"BMC Bioinformatics"},{"key":"7587_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.18637\/jss.v098.i11","volume":"98","author":"C Thiele","year":"2021","unstructured":"Thiele C, Hirschfeld G. Cutpointr: improved estimation and validation of optimal cutpoints in R. J Stat Softw. 2021;98:1\u201327.","journal-title":"J Stat Softw"},{"key":"7587_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"764","DOI":"10.1097\/RCT.0b013e318153fd43","volume":"32","author":"G Nakai","year":"2008","unstructured":"Nakai G, Matsuki M, Inada Y, Tatsugami F, Tanikake M, Narabayashi I, et al. Detection and evaluation of pelvic lymph nodes in patients with gynecologic malignancies using body diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2008;32:764\u20138.","journal-title":"J Comput Assist Tomogr"},{"key":"7587_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1259\/bjr.20150063","volume":"88","author":"G Shen","year":"2015","unstructured":"Shen G, Zhou H, Jia Z, Deng H. Diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted MRI for detection of pelvic metastatic lymph nodes in patients with cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Radiol. 2015;88:20150063.","journal-title":"Br J Radiol"},{"key":"7587_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"588","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2020.08.021","volume":"159","author":"JA Adam","year":"2020","unstructured":"Adam JA, van Diepen PR, Mom CH, Stoker J, van Eck-Smit BLF, Bipat S. [18F]fdg-pet or pet\/ct in the evaluation of pelvic and para-aortic lymph nodes in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer: a systematic review of the literature. Gynecol Oncol. 2020;159:588\u201396.","journal-title":"Gynecol Oncol"},{"key":"7587_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"357","DOI":"10.1007\/s40336-020-00385-x","volume":"8","author":"LM Garau","year":"2020","unstructured":"Garau LM, Niccoli-Asabella A, Ferrari C, Sardaro A, Pisani A, Rubini G. The role of 18F-FDG PET\/CT in endometrial adenocarcinoma: a review of the literature and recent advances. Clin Transl Imaging. 2020;8:357\u201364.","journal-title":"Clin Transl Imaging"},{"key":"7587_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"121","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2023.02.013","volume":"171","author":"SM Bj\u00f8rnholt","year":"2023","unstructured":"Bj\u00f8rnholt SM, Sponholtz SE, Mogensen O, Bouchelouche K, Parner ET, Neumann G, et al. The sentirec-endo study - Risks and benefits of a national adoption of Sentinel node mapping in low and intermediate risk endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2023;171:121\u20138.","journal-title":"Gynecol Oncol"},{"key":"7587_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"689","DOI":"10.1007\/s11547-023-01633-6","volume":"128","author":"P Clauser","year":"2023","unstructured":"Clauser P, Rasul S, Kapetas P, Fueger BJ, Milos R-I, Balber T, et al. Prospective validation of 18F-fluoroethylcholine as a tracer in PET\/MRI for the evaluation of breast lesions and prediction of lymph node status. Radiol Med. 2023;128:689\u201398.","journal-title":"Radiol Med"},{"key":"7587_CR31","first-page":"1056","volume":"185","author":"P Heusch","year":"2013","unstructured":"Heusch P, Buchbender C, K\u00f6hler J, Nensa F, Beiderwellen K, K\u00fchl H, et al. Correlation of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) with the standardized uptake value (SUV) in hybrid 18F-FDG PET\/MRI in Non-Small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) lesions: initial results. R\u00f6Fo. 2013;185:1056\u201362.","journal-title":"R\u00f6Fo"},{"key":"7587_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e0116277","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0116277","volume":"10","author":"BM Schaarschmidt","year":"2015","unstructured":"Schaarschmidt BM, Buchbender C, Nensa F, Grueneien J, Gomez B, K\u00f6hler J, et al. Correlation of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) with the standardized uptake value (SUV) in lymph node metastases of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients using hybrid 18F-FDG PET\/MRI. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0116277.","journal-title":"PLoS ONE"},{"key":"7587_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"16","DOI":"10.1186\/s40644-020-00372-5","volume":"21","author":"A Steiner","year":"2021","unstructured":"Steiner A, Narva S, Rinta-Kiikka I, Hietanen S, Hynninen J, Virtanen J. Diagnostic efficiency of whole-body 18F-FDG PET\/MRI, MRI alone, and SUV and ADC values in staging of primary uterine cervical cancer. Cancer Imaging. 2021;21:16.","journal-title":"Cancer Imaging"},{"key":"7587_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1209","DOI":"10.3390\/diagnostics13071209","volume":"13","author":"M AlRasheedi","year":"2023","unstructured":"AlRasheedi M, Han S, Thygesen H, Neilson M, Hendry F, Alkarn A, et al. A comparative evaluation of mediastinal nodal SUVmax and derived ratios from 18F-FDG PET\/CT imaging to predict nodal metastases in non-small cell lung cancer. Diagnostics. 2023;13:1209.","journal-title":"Diagnostics"}],"container-title":["European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00259-025-07587-3.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00259-025-07587-3","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00259-025-07587-3.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,19]],"date-time":"2026-02-19T05:38:53Z","timestamp":1771479533000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00259-025-07587-3"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,3]]},"references-count":34,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,3]]}},"alternative-id":["7587"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00259-025-07587-3","relation":{},"ISSN":["1619-7070","1619-7089"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1619-7070","type":"print"},{"value":"1619-7089","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,3]]},"assertion":[{"value":"27 May 2025","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"11 September 2025","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"3 November 2025","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"AGR sits on the advisory board of RoClub (not related to the subject of the paper).","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}]}}