{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,15]],"date-time":"2026-03-15T07:22:28Z","timestamp":1773559348446,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":58,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"9","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,10,23]],"date-time":"2021-10-23T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1634947200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,10,23]],"date-time":"2021-10-23T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1634947200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Abdom Radiol"],"DOI":"10.1007\/s00261-021-03264-9","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,10,23]],"date-time":"2021-10-23T10:02:42Z","timestamp":1634983362000},"page":"3189-3204","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":11,"title":["PET\/MR imaging in gynecologic cancer: tips for differentiating normal gynecologic anatomy and benign pathology versus cancer"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"47","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-1976-935X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Elizabeth A.","family":"Sadowski","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Ali","family":"Pirasteh","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Alan B.","family":"McMillan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Kathryn J.","family":"Fowler","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Joanna E.","family":"Kusmirek","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,10,23]]},"reference":[{"key":"3264_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"85","DOI":"10.1007\/s11912-017-0640-3","volume":"19","author":"SR Khan","year":"2017","unstructured":"Khan S.R., Arshad M., Wallitt K., Stewart V., Bharwani N., Barwick T.D. What's New in Imaging for Gynecologic Cancer? Curr Oncol Rep, 19 (2017) 85.","journal-title":"Curr Oncol Rep"},{"key":"3264_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2486","DOI":"10.1007\/s00261-015-0363-6","volume":"40","author":"J Kusmirek","year":"2015","unstructured":"Kusmirek J., Robbins J., Allen H., Barroilhet L., Anderson B., Sadowski E.A. PET\/CT and MRI in the imaging assessment of cervical cancer. Abdom Imaging, 40 (2015) 2486-2511.","journal-title":"Abdom Imaging"},{"key":"3264_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"156","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2014.07.092","volume":"135","author":"CH Lai","year":"2014","unstructured":"Lai C.H., Lin G., Yen T.C., Liu F.Y. Molecular imaging in the management of gynecologic malignancies. Gynecol Oncol, 135 (2014) 156-162.","journal-title":"Gynecol Oncol"},{"key":"3264_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"436","DOI":"10.2967\/jnumed.114.145011","volume":"56","author":"SI Lee","year":"2015","unstructured":"Lee S.I., Catalano O.A., Dehdashti F. Evaluation of gynecologic cancer with MR imaging, 18F-FDG PET\/CT, and PET\/MR imaging. J Nucl Med, 56 (2015) 436-443.","journal-title":"J Nucl Med"},{"key":"3264_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"289","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cpet.2017.11.011","volume":"13","author":"G Lin","year":"2018","unstructured":"Lin G., Lai C.H., Yen T.C. Emerging Molecular Imaging Techniques in Gynecologic Oncology. PET Clin, 13 (2018) 289-299.","journal-title":"PET Clin"},{"issue":"Suppl 2","key":"3264_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"109","DOI":"10.1002\/ijgo.12618","volume":"143","author":"MY Lin","year":"2018","unstructured":"Lin M.Y., Dobrotwir A., McNally O., Abu-Rustum N.R., Narayan K. Role of imaging in the routine management of endometrial cancer. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 143 Suppl 2 (2018) 109-117.","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"3264_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"292","DOI":"10.2214\/AJR.19.21941","volume":"215","author":"B Mansoori","year":"2020","unstructured":"Mansoori B., Khatri G., Rivera-Col\u00f3n G., Albuquerque K., Lea J., Pinho D.F. Multimodality Imaging of Uterine Cervical Malignancies. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 215 (2020) 292-304.","journal-title":"AJR Am J Roentgenol"},{"key":"3264_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"792","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-018-5515-y","volume":"29","author":"S Nougaret","year":"2019","unstructured":"Nougaret S., Horta M., Sala E. et al. Endometrial Cancer MRI staging: Updated Guidelines of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology. Eur Radiol, 29 (2019) 792-805.","journal-title":"Eur Radiol"},{"key":"3264_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1814","DOI":"10.1007\/s00259-015-3131-5","volume":"42","author":"J Grueneisen","year":"2015","unstructured":"Grueneisen J., Schaarschmidt B.M., Heubner M. et al. Integrated PET\/MRI for whole-body staging of patients with primary cervical cancer: preliminary results. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 42 (2015) 1814-1824.","journal-title":"Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging"},{"key":"3264_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"667","DOI":"10.1016\/j.mric.2017.03.012","volume":"25","author":"MA Ohliger","year":"2017","unstructured":"Ohliger M.A., Hope T.A., Chapman J.S., Chen L.M., Behr S.C., Poder L. PET\/MR Imaging in Gynecologic Oncology. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am, 25 (2017) 667-684.","journal-title":"Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am"},{"key":"3264_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"265","DOI":"10.1002\/jmri.25161","volume":"44","author":"H Sotoudeh","year":"2016","unstructured":"Sotoudeh H., Sharma A., Fowler K.J., McConathy J., Dehdashti F. Clinical application of PET\/MRI in oncology. J Magn Reson Imaging, 44 (2016) 265-276.","journal-title":"J Magn Reson Imaging"},{"key":"3264_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"259","DOI":"10.1002\/jmri.24308","volume":"39","author":"KJ Fowler","year":"2014","unstructured":"Fowler K.J., McConathy J., Narra V.R. Whole-body simultaneous positron emission tomography (PET)-MR: optimization and adaptation of MRI sequences. J Magn Reson Imaging, 39 (2014) 259-268.","journal-title":"J Magn Reson Imaging"},{"key":"3264_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hirsch F.W., Sattler B., Sorge I. et al. PET\/MR in children. Initial clinical experience in paediatric oncology using an integrated PET\/MR scanner. Pediatr Radiol, 43 (2013) 860\u2013875.","DOI":"10.1007\/s00247-012-2570-4"},{"key":"3264_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"193","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2016151155","volume":"281","author":"AN Melsaether","year":"2016","unstructured":"Melsaether A.N., Raad R.A., Pujara A.C. et al. Comparison of Whole-Body (18)F FDG PET\/MR Imaging and Whole-Body (18)F FDG PET\/CT in Terms of Lesion Detection and Radiation Dose in Patients with Breast Cancer. Radiology, 281 (2016) 193-202.","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"3264_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"88","DOI":"10.2967\/jnumed.113.123547","volume":"55","author":"KZ Al-Nabhani","year":"2014","unstructured":"Al-Nabhani K.Z., Syed R., Michopoulou S. et al. Qualitative and quantitative comparison of PET\/CT and PET\/MR imaging in clinical practice. J Nucl Med, 55 (2014) 88-94.","journal-title":"J Nucl Med"},{"key":"3264_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Beiderwellen K., Grueneisen J., Ruhlmann V. et al. [(18)F]FDG PET\/MRI vs. PET\/CT for whole-body staging in patients with recurrent malignancies of the female pelvis: initial results. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 42 (2015) 56\u201365.","DOI":"10.1007\/s00259-014-2902-8"},{"key":"3264_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1787","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-018-5720-8","volume":"29","author":"D Botsikas","year":"2019","unstructured":"Botsikas D., Bagetakos I., Picarra M. et al. What is the diagnostic performance of 18-FDG-PET\/MR compared to PET\/CT for the N- and M- staging of breast cancer? Eur Radiol, 29 (2019) 1787-1798.","journal-title":"Eur Radiol"},{"key":"3264_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"845","DOI":"10.2967\/jnumed.111.098608","volume":"53","author":"A Drzezga","year":"2012","unstructured":"Drzezga A., Souvatzoglou M., Eiber M. et al. First clinical experience with integrated whole-body PET\/MR: comparison to PET\/CT in patients with oncologic diagnoses. J Nucl Med, 53 (2012) 845-855.","journal-title":"J Nucl Med"},{"key":"3264_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2103","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejca.2009.04.006","volume":"45","author":"SK Kim","year":"2009","unstructured":"Kim S.K., Choi H.J., Park S.Y. et al. Additional value of MR\/PET fusion compared with PET\/CT in the detection of lymph node metastases in cervical cancer patients. Eur J Cancer, 45 (2009) 2103-2109.","journal-title":"Eur J Cancer"},{"key":"3264_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1672","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejrad.2013.05.005","volume":"82","author":"K Kitajima","year":"2013","unstructured":"Kitajima K., Suenaga Y., Ueno Y. et al. Value of fusion of PET and MRI for staging of endometrial cancer: comparison with 18F-FDG contrast-enhanced PET\/CT and dynamic contrast-enhanced pelvic MRI. Eur J Radiol, 82 (2013) 1672-1676.","journal-title":"Eur J Radiol"},{"key":"3264_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"95","DOI":"10.1007\/s11604-009-0387-3","volume":"28","author":"K Nakajo","year":"2010","unstructured":"Nakajo K., Tatsumi M., Inoue A. et al. Diagnostic performance of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography\/magnetic resonance imaging fusion images of gynecological malignant tumors: comparison with positron emission tomography\/computed tomography. Jpn J Radiol, 28 (2010) 95-100.","journal-title":"Jpn J Radiol"},{"key":"3264_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2222","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-015-3657-8","volume":"25","author":"MA Queiroz","year":"2015","unstructured":"Queiroz M.A., Kubik-Huch R.A., Hauser N. et al. PET\/MRI and PET\/CT in advanced gynaecological tumours: initial experience and comparison. Eur Radiol, 25 (2015) 2222-2230.","journal-title":"Eur Radiol"},{"key":"3264_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Riola-Parada C., Garc\u00eda-Ca\u00f1amaque L., P\u00e9rez-Due\u00f1as V., Garcerant-Tafur M., Carreras-Delgado J.L. Simultaneous PET\/MRI vs PET\/CT in oncology. A systematic review. Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol, 35 (2016) 306\u2013312.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.remnie.2016.06.006"},{"key":"3264_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"582","DOI":"10.2967\/jnumed.115.167486","volume":"57","author":"LM Sawicki","year":"2016","unstructured":"Sawicki L.M., Grueneisen J., Buchbender C. et al. Comparative Performance of (1)(8)F-FDG PET\/MRI and (1)(8)F-FDG PET\/CT in Detection and Characterization of Pulmonary Lesions in 121 Oncologic Patients. J Nucl Med, 57 (2016) 582-586.","journal-title":"J Nucl Med"},{"key":"3264_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"366","DOI":"10.1007\/s12149-017-1164-5","volume":"31","author":"A Singnurkar","year":"2017","unstructured":"Singnurkar A., Poon R., Metser U. Comparison of 18F-FDG-PET\/CT and 18F-FDG-PET\/MR imaging in oncology: a systematic review. Ann Nucl Med, 31 (2017) 366-378.","journal-title":"Ann Nucl Med"},{"key":"3264_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"241","DOI":"10.1097\/RLI.0b013e31826f2de9","volume":"48","author":"P Stolzmann","year":"2013","unstructured":"Stolzmann P., Veit-Haibach P., Chuck N. et al. Detection rate, location, and size of pulmonary nodules in trimodality PET\/CT-MR: comparison of low-dose CT and Dixon-based MR imaging. Invest Radiol, 48 (2013) 241-246.","journal-title":"Invest Radiol"},{"key":"3264_CR27","unstructured":"Kusmirek J., Cho S., Ibrahim N., McMillan A., Sadowski E. Detection of Lung Nodules: Low-dose CT versus Fast Spoiled Gradient Echo MR images acquired during PET\/MR. ARRS Annual Meeting, Virtual,(April 2021)"},{"key":"3264_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"877","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejrad.2013.01.019","volume":"82","author":"C Buchbender","year":"2013","unstructured":"Buchbender C., Hartung-Knemeyer V., Beiderwellen K. et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging as part of hybrid PET\/MRI protocols for whole-body cancer staging: does it benefit lesion detection? Eur J Radiol, 82 (2013) 877-882.","journal-title":"Eur J Radiol"},{"key":"3264_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1930","DOI":"10.2967\/jnumed.114.146886","volume":"55","author":"J Grueneisen","year":"2014","unstructured":"Grueneisen J., Schaarschmidt B.M., Beiderwellen K. et al. Diagnostic value of diffusion-weighted imaging in simultaneous 18F-FDG PET\/MR imaging for whole-body staging of women with pelvic malignancies. J Nucl Med, 55 (2014) 1930-1935.","journal-title":"J Nucl Med"},{"key":"3264_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"130","DOI":"10.1007\/s13139-013-0248-y","volume":"48","author":"J Choi","year":"2014","unstructured":"Choi J., Kim H.J., Jeong Y.H. et al. The Role of (18)\u2009F-FDG PET\/CT in Assessing Therapy Response in Cervix Cancer after Concurrent Chemoradiation Therapy. Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 48 (2014) 130-136.","journal-title":"Nucl Med Mol Imaging"},{"key":"3264_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"932","DOI":"10.2967\/jnumed.106.035774","volume":"48","author":"M Soret","year":"2007","unstructured":"Soret M., Bacharach S.L., Buvat I. Partial-volume effect in PET tumor imaging. J Nucl Med, 48 (2007) 932-945.","journal-title":"J Nucl Med"},{"key":"3264_CR32","first-page":"983","volume":"46","author":"WA Weber","year":"2005","unstructured":"Weber W.A. Use of PET for monitoring cancer therapy and for predicting outcome. J Nucl Med, 46 (2005) 983-995.","journal-title":"J Nucl Med"},{"key":"3264_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1247","DOI":"10.1002\/jmri.25711","volume":"46","author":"EC Ehman","year":"2017","unstructured":"Ehman E.C., Johnson G.B., Villanueva-Meyer J.E. et al. PET\/MRI: Where might it replace PET\/CT? J Magn Reson Imaging, 46 (2017) 1247-1262.","journal-title":"J Magn Reson Imaging"},{"key":"3264_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"220","DOI":"10.1016\/j.acra.2015.09.008","volume":"23","author":"TJ Fraum","year":"2016","unstructured":"Fraum T.J., Fowler K.J., McConathy J. PET\/MRI: Emerging Clinical Applications in Oncology. Acad Radiol, 23 (2016) 220-236.","journal-title":"Acad Radiol"},{"key":"3264_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"438","DOI":"10.5152\/dir.2014.14008","volume":"20","author":"F Nensa","year":"2014","unstructured":"Nensa F., Beiderwellen K., Heusch P., Wetter A. Clinical applications of PET\/MRI: current status and future perspectives. Diagn Interv Radiol, 20 (2014) 438-447.","journal-title":"Diagn Interv Radiol"},{"key":"3264_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"26","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.13121038","volume":"267","author":"DA Torigian","year":"2013","unstructured":"Torigian D.A., Zaidi H., Kwee T.C. et al. PET\/MR imaging: technical aspects and potential clinical applications. Radiology, 267 (2013) 26-44.","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"3264_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"808","DOI":"10.1097\/RLI.0000000000000086","volume":"49","author":"J Grueneisen","year":"2014","unstructured":"Grueneisen J., Beiderwellen K., Heusch P. et al. Simultaneous positron emission tomography\/magnetic resonance imaging for whole-body staging in patients with recurrent gynecological malignancies of the pelvis: a comparison to whole-body magnetic resonance imaging alone. Invest Radiol, 49 (2014) 808-815.","journal-title":"Invest Radiol"},{"key":"3264_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Reinhold C., Rockall A., Sadowski E.A. et al. Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting Lexicon for MRI: A White Paper of the ACR Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data Systems MRI Committee. J Am Coll Radiol. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jacr.2020.12.022(2021)","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2020.12.022(2021"},{"key":"3264_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"679","DOI":"10.1007\/s00261-017-1272-7","volume":"43","author":"EA Sadowski","year":"2018","unstructured":"Sadowski E.A., Robbins J.B., Rockall A.G., Thomassin-Naggara I. A systematic approach to adnexal masses discovered on ultrasound: the ADNEx MR scoring system. Abdom Radiol (NY), 43 (2018) 679-695.","journal-title":"Abdom Radiol (NY)"},{"key":"3264_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Dejanovic D., Hansen N.L., Loft A. PET\/CT Variants and Pitfalls in Gynecological Cancers. Semin Nucl Med. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1053\/j.semnuclmed.2021.06.006(2021)","DOI":"10.1053\/j.semnuclmed.2021.06.006(2021"},{"key":"3264_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1031","DOI":"10.1148\/rg.254045155","volume":"25","author":"N Subhas","year":"2005","unstructured":"Subhas N., Patel P.V., Pannu H.K., Jacene H.A., Fishman E.K., Wahl R.L. Imaging of pelvic malignancies with in-line FDG PET-CT: case examples and common pitfalls of FDG PET. Radiographics, 25 (2005) 1031-1043.","journal-title":"Radiographics"},{"key":"3264_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"48","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.04.009","volume":"237","author":"A Uglietti","year":"2019","unstructured":"Uglietti A., Buggio L., Farella M. et al. The risk of malignancy in uterine polyps: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 237 (2019) 48-56.","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"3264_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1179","DOI":"10.1148\/radiographics.19.5.g99se131179","volume":"19","author":"E Murase","year":"1999","unstructured":"Murase E., Siegelman E.S., Outwater E.K., Perez-Jaffe L.A., Tureck R.W. Uterine leiomyomas: histopathologic features, MR imaging findings, differential diagnosis, and treatment. Radiographics, 19 (1999) 1179-1197.","journal-title":"Radiographics"},{"key":"3264_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"361","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2020191658","volume":"297","author":"Wahab C Abdel","year":"2020","unstructured":"Abdel Wahab C., Jannot A.S., Bonaffini P.A. et al. Diagnostic Algorithm to Differentiate Benign Atypical Leiomyomas from Malignant Uterine Sarcomas with Diffusion-weighted MRI. Radiology, 297 (2020) 361-371.","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"3264_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"281","DOI":"10.1097\/00002142-200308000-00003","volume":"14","author":"SM Ascher","year":"2003","unstructured":"Ascher S.M., Jha R.C., Reinhold C. Benign myometrial conditions: leiomyomas and adenomyosis. Top Magn Reson Imaging, 14 (2003) 281-304.","journal-title":"Top Magn Reson Imaging"},{"key":"3264_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Reinhold C., Tafazoli F., Mehio A. et al. Uterine adenomyosis: endovaginal US and MR imaging features with histopathologic correlation. Radiographics, 19 Spec No (1999) S147\u2013160.","DOI":"10.1148\/radiographics.19.suppl_1.g99oc13s147"},{"key":"3264_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"W556","DOI":"10.2214\/AJR.14.13746","volume":"205","author":"EA Sadowski","year":"2015","unstructured":"Sadowski E.A., Robbins J.B., Guite K. et al. Preoperative Pelvic MRI and Serum Cancer Antigen-125: Selecting Women With Grade 1 Endometrial Cancer for Lymphadenectomy. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 205 (2015) W556-564.","journal-title":"AJR Am J Roentgenol"},{"key":"3264_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"358","DOI":"10.1053\/j.sult.2019.04.004","volume":"40","author":"MA Khalifa","year":"2019","unstructured":"Khalifa M.A., Atri M., Klein M.E., Ghatak S., Murugan P. Adenomyosis As a Confounder to Accurate Endometrial Cancer Staging. Semin Ultrasound CT MR, 40 (2019) 358-363.","journal-title":"Semin Ultrasound CT MR"},{"key":"3264_CR49","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"28","DOI":"10.2463\/mrms.mp.2016-0128","volume":"17","author":"M Takeuchi","year":"2018","unstructured":"Takeuchi M., Matsuzaki K., Harada M. Evaluating Myometrial Invasion in Endometrial Cancer: Comparison of Reduced Field-of-view Diffusion-weighted Imaging and Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging. Magn Reson Med Sci, 17 (2018) 28-34.","journal-title":"Magn Reson Med Sci"},{"key":"3264_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"721","DOI":"10.1097\/RCT.0000000000000765","volume":"42","author":"P Balcacer","year":"2018","unstructured":"Balcacer P., Cooper K.A., Huber S., Spektor M., Pahade J.K., Israel G.M. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Features of Endometrial Polyps: Frequency of Occurrence and Interobserver Reliability. J Comput Assist Tomogr, 42 (2018) 721-726.","journal-title":"J Comput Assist Tomogr"},{"key":"3264_CR51","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"47","DOI":"10.1148\/radiology.214.1.r00ja3647","volume":"214","author":"RP Grasel","year":"2000","unstructured":"Grasel R.P., Outwater E.K., Siegelman E.S., Capuzzi D., Parker L., Hussain S.M. Endometrial polyps: MR imaging features and distinction from endometrial carcinoma. Radiology, 214 (2000) 47-52.","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"3264_CR52","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"39","DOI":"10.1016\/j.maturitas.2009.02.005","volume":"63","author":"JV Lacey Jr","year":"2009","unstructured":"Lacey J.V., Jr., Chia V.M. Endometrial hyperplasia and the risk of progression to carcinoma. Maturitas, 63 (2009) 39-44.","journal-title":"Maturitas"},{"key":"3264_CR53","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1817","DOI":"10.1148\/rg.336125105","volume":"33","author":"GA Ulaner","year":"2013","unstructured":"Ulaner G.A., Lyall A. Identifying and distinguishing treatment effects and complications from malignancy at FDG PET\/CT. Radiographics, 33 (2013) 1817-1834.","journal-title":"Radiographics"},{"key":"3264_CR54","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"679","DOI":"10.1007\/s13244-010-0062-3","volume":"2","author":"NM Long","year":"2011","unstructured":"Long N.M., Smith C.S. Causes and imaging features of false positives and false negatives on F-PET\/CT in oncologic imaging. Insights Imaging, 2 (2011) 679-698.","journal-title":"Insights Imaging"},{"key":"3264_CR55","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3870","DOI":"10.1002\/cncr.28849","volume":"120","author":"AN Viswanathan","year":"2014","unstructured":"Viswanathan A.N., Lee L.J., Eswara J.R. et al. Complications of pelvic radiation in patients treated for gynecologic malignancies. Cancer, 120 (2014) 3870-3883.","journal-title":"Cancer"},{"key":"3264_CR56","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"498","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2007.04.030","volume":"106","author":"KN Moore","year":"2007","unstructured":"Moore K.N., Gold M.A., McMeekin D.S., Zorn K.K. Vesicovaginal fistula formation in patients with Stage IVA cervical carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol, 106 (2007) 498-501.","journal-title":"Gynecol Oncol"},{"key":"3264_CR57","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"139","DOI":"10.1016\/j.clinimag.2009.12.026","volume":"35","author":"A Salavati","year":"2011","unstructured":"Salavati A., Shah V., Wang Z.J., Yeh B.M., Costouros N.G., Coakley F.V. F-18 FDG PET\/CT findings in postradiation pelvic insufficiency fracture. Clin Imaging, 35 (2011) 139-142.","journal-title":"Clin Imaging"},{"key":"3264_CR58","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"183","DOI":"10.3389\/fonc.2019.00183","volume":"9","author":"X Zhong","year":"2019","unstructured":"Zhong X., Li J., Zhang L. et al. Characterization of Insufficiency Fracture and Bone Metastasis After Radiotherapy in Patients With Cervical Cancer Detected by Bone Scan: Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Front Oncol, 9 (2019) 183.","journal-title":"Front Oncol"}],"container-title":["Abdominal Radiology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00261-021-03264-9.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00261-021-03264-9\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00261-021-03264-9.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,8,18]],"date-time":"2022-08-18T06:03:10Z","timestamp":1660802590000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00261-021-03264-9"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,10,23]]},"references-count":58,"journal-issue":{"issue":"9","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,9]]}},"alternative-id":["3264"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00261-021-03264-9","relation":{},"ISSN":["2366-0058"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2366-0058","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,10,23]]},"assertion":[{"value":"30 April 2021","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"24 August 2021","order":2,"name":"revised","label":"Revised","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"25 August 2021","order":3,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"23 October 2021","order":4,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"Ali Pirasteh has Institutional research support from GE Healthcare. Elizabeth A. Sadowski, Alan B. McMillan, Kathryn J. Fowler and Joanna E. Kusmirek have no conflict of interest.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}}]}}