{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,21]],"date-time":"2025-02-21T22:24:58Z","timestamp":1740176698455,"version":"3.37.3"},"reference-count":25,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"12","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,7,18]],"date-time":"2024-07-18T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1721260800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,7,18]],"date-time":"2024-07-18T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1721260800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Abdom Radiol"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Purpose<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>The aim of this study is to prospectively evaluate whether women with copper-containing intrauterine devices (Cu-IUD), currently listed as MR conditional, can safely undergo 3.0 Tesla (3\u00a0T) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>73 women, age 18\u201354\u00a0years old, with a Cu-IUD who were undergoing MRI for any reason were included consecutively. Pre- and post-MRI standard pelvic ultrasound examinations were completed to determine the appropriate pre- and post-MRI positioning of the Cu-IUD. Displaced IUDs were defined by IUD crossbars not in the fundal portion of the endometrial cavity, a visualized tip in the mid or lower uterus, any part of the device located in the cervical canal or outside of the endometrial canal, a fractured device, or a non-visualized IUD. Additionally, a questionnaire was completed by participants to determine the level of pre- and post-MRI pelvic pain.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>There were zero observed displaced Cu-IUDs on post-MRI pelvic ultrasounds (p\u2009=\u20090\/70, 95% CI 0, .043). Three participants were dropped from the study due to malpositioned IUDs on pre-MRI pelvic ultrasound. Six patients reported new or worsening pelvic pain\/discomfort during or after their MRI examination.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>Our results suggest that performing 3\u00a0T MRI using a low SAR setting does not cause displacement of Cu-IUDs, with zero out of 70 patients demonstrating IUD displacement.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Graphical Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                \n              <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1007\/s00261-024-04493-4","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,7,18]],"date-time":"2024-07-18T06:01:46Z","timestamp":1721282506000},"page":"4592-4599","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["An in-vivo study of the safety of copper-containing intrauterine devices in 3.0 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"49","author":[{"given":"Jeffrey","family":"Moy","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Matthew","family":"Landon","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"John","family":"Vigilante","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Benjamin","family":"Lehmann","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Amber","family":"DeChambeau","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Frederick","family":"Rohlfing","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-1463-718X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Robert","family":"Marks","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,7,18]]},"reference":[{"key":"4493_CR1","unstructured":"Paragard Intrauterine Copper Contraceptive [prescribing information]. Trumbull, CT: Copper Surgical, Inc; 1984. Revised 2\/2020 ."},{"issue":"5","key":"4493_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1105","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31821188ad","volume":"117","author":"JF Peipert","year":"2011","unstructured":"Peipert, J.F., et al., Continuation and satisfaction of reversible contraception. Obstet Gynecol, 2011. 117(5): p. 1105-1113.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"4493_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kulier, R., et al., Copper containing, framed intra-uterine devices for contraception. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2007(4): p. CD005347.","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD005347.pub3"},{"issue":"6","key":"4493_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"486","DOI":"10.1080\/13625187.2021.1943739","volume":"26","author":"CU de Albuquerque","year":"2021","unstructured":"de Albuquerque, C.U., et al., Continuation and satisfaction with intrauterine copper device inserted during caesarean delivery. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care, 2021. 26(6): p. 486-490.","journal-title":"Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care"},{"issue":"21","key":"4493_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1998","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1110855","volume":"366","author":"B Winner","year":"2012","unstructured":"Winner, B., et al., Effectiveness of long-acting reversible contraception. N Engl J Med, 2012. 366(21): p. 1998-2007.","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"4493_CR6","unstructured":"Emily L. Lanzola , K.K., Intrauterine Device. 2023, StatPearls: Treasure Island, FL."},{"issue":"6","key":"4493_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"759","DOI":"10.2217\/whe.15.77","volume":"11","author":"NS Whaley","year":"2015","unstructured":"Whaley, N.S. and A.E. Burke, Intrauterine contraception. Womens Health (Lond), 2015. 11(6): p. 759-67.","journal-title":"Womens Health (Lond)"},{"key":"4493_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hofmeyr, G.J., M. Singata, and T.A. Lawrie, Copper containing intra-uterine devices versus depot progestogens for contraception. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2010. 2010(6): p. CD007043.","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007043.pub2"},{"issue":"3","key":"4493_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"248","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2007.10.787","volume":"198","author":"PF Thonneau","year":"2008","unstructured":"Thonneau, P.F. and T. Almont, Contraceptive efficacy of intrauterine devices. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2008. 198(3): p. 248-53.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"4493_CR10","unstructured":"Horvath S, S.C., Sonalkar S., Contraception [Updated 2018 Jan 17], in Endotext [Internet], A.B. Feingold KR, Blackman MR, et al., Editor. 2000-, MDText.com, Inc.: South Dartmouth (MA)."},{"issue":"7","key":"4493_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1994","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/des140","volume":"27","author":"K Cleland","year":"2012","unstructured":"Cleland, K., et al., The efficacy of intrauterine devices for emergency contraception: a systematic review of 35 years of experience. Hum Reprod, 2012. 27(7): p. 1994-2000.","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"issue":"1","key":"4493_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"66","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00619957","volume":"6","author":"T Hess","year":"1996","unstructured":"Hess, T., B. Stepanow, and M.V. Knopp, Safety of intrauterine contraceptive devices during MR imaging. Eur Radiol, 1996. 6(1): p. 66-8.","journal-title":"Eur Radiol"},{"issue":"2","key":"4493_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"311","DOI":"10.1148\/radiology.162.2.3797642","volume":"162","author":"AS Mark","year":"1987","unstructured":"Mark, A.S. and H. Hricak, Intrauterine contraceptive devices: MR imaging. Radiology, 1987. 162(2): p. 311-4.","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"issue":"3","key":"4493_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"169","DOI":"10.1016\/S0010-7824(97)00019-X","volume":"55","author":"SA Pasquale","year":"1997","unstructured":"Pasquale, S.A., et al., Lack of interaction between magnetic resonance imaging and the copper-T380A IUD. Contraception, 1997. 55(3): p. 169-73.","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"issue":"2","key":"4493_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"93","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2006.07.016","volume":"75","author":"M Zieman","year":"2007","unstructured":"Zieman, M. and E. Kanal, Copper T 380A IUD and magnetic resonance imaging. Contraception, 2007. 75(2): p. 93-5.","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"issue":"6","key":"4493_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"538","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.10.011","volume":"85","author":"L Correia","year":"2012","unstructured":"Correia, L., et al., Magnetic resonance imaging and gynecological devices. Contraception, 2012. 85(6): p. 538-43.","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"4493_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Berger-Kulemann, V., et al., Magnetic field interactions of copper-containing intrauterine devices in 3.0-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging: in vivo study. Korean J Radiol, 2013. 14(3): p. 416\u201322.","DOI":"10.3348\/kjr.2013.14.3.416"},{"issue":"6","key":"4493_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"587","DOI":"10.1007\/s10552-021-01410-8","volume":"32","author":"LA King","year":"2021","unstructured":"King, L.A., et al., Trends in oral contraceptive and intrauterine device use among reproductive-aged women in the US from 1999 to 2017. Cancer Causes Control, 2021. 32(6): p. 587-595.","journal-title":"Cancer Causes Control"},{"issue":"1","key":"4493_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"70","DOI":"10.1186\/s12978-017-0334-1","volume":"14","author":"B Howard","year":"2017","unstructured":"Howard, B., et al., Trends in use of and complications from intrauterine contraceptive devices and tubal ligation or occlusion. Reprod Health, 2017. 14(1): p. 70.","journal-title":"Reprod Health"},{"issue":"10","key":"4493_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1389","DOI":"10.7863\/jum.2007.26.10.1389","volume":"26","author":"N Peri","year":"2007","unstructured":"Peri, N., D. Graham, and D. Levine, Imaging of intrauterine contraceptive devices. J Ultrasound Med, 2007. 26(10): p. 1389-401.","journal-title":"J Ultrasound Med"},{"key":"4493_CR21","unstructured":"Shellock R & D Services, I.a.F.G.S., Ph.D. Intrauterine Contraceptive Devices (IUDs) and Other Contraceptive Devices. 2024 [cited 2024 2\/19\/2024]; Available from: https:\/\/mrisafety.com\/OBJ_STATUS_view.php?editid1=11."},{"issue":"13","key":"4493_CR22","first-page":"1743","volume":"249","author":"JA Hanley","year":"1983","unstructured":"Hanley, J.A. and A. Lippman-Hand, If nothing goes wrong, is everything all right? Interpreting zero numerators. JAMA, 1983. 249(13): p. 1743-5.","journal-title":"Interpreting zero numerators. JAMA"},{"key":"4493_CR23","unstructured":"Nova T 380 Intrauterine Device [Proprietary name and dosage form]. Bayer (Pty) Ltd. Isando, South Africa. 03 June 2011."},{"issue":"6","key":"4493_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2812","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-018-5864-6","volume":"29","author":"W Neumann","year":"2019","unstructured":"Neumann, W., et al., Risk assessment of copper-containing contraceptives: the impact for women with implanted intrauterine devices during clinical MRI and CT examinations. Eur Radiol, 2019. 29(6): p. 2812-2820.","journal-title":"Eur Radiol"},{"issue":"10","key":"4493_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0204220","volume":"13","author":"S Bussmann","year":"2018","unstructured":"Bussmann, S., et al., Safety of intrauterine devices in MRI. PLoS One, 2018. 13(10): p. e0204220.","journal-title":"PLoS One"}],"container-title":["Abdominal Radiology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00261-024-04493-4.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00261-024-04493-4\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00261-024-04493-4.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,10,29]],"date-time":"2024-10-29T11:09:10Z","timestamp":1730200150000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00261-024-04493-4"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,7,18]]},"references-count":25,"journal-issue":{"issue":"12","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,12]]}},"alternative-id":["4493"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00261-024-04493-4","relation":{},"ISSN":["2366-0058"],"issn-type":[{"type":"electronic","value":"2366-0058"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,7,18]]},"assertion":[{"value":"26 April 2024","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"2 July 2024","order":2,"name":"revised","label":"Revised","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"2 July 2024","order":3,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"18 July 2024","order":4,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}}]}}