{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,24]],"date-time":"2026-10-24T18:26:44Z","timestamp":1792866404041,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":45,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,5]],"date-time":"2025-12-05T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1764892800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,5]],"date-time":"2025-12-05T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1764892800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100006260","name":"Technion - Israel Institute of Technology","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100006260","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"crossref"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["International Orthopaedics (SICOT)"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,2]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Purpose<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>To investigate the incidence and risk factors for dressing-induced allergic contact dermatitis (DIACD) following total hip and knee arthroplasty (THA and TKA, respectively) across different dressings and sealants.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>A retrospective review was conducted of patients who underwent primary, elective THA or TKA between 2019 and 2024 with \u2265\u200990 days of follow-up. Incidences of DIACD were identified by reviewing medical records for \u201callergy\u201d diagnoses and use of antihistamines or corticosteroids within 30 days postoperatively. Patient characteristics, prior exposure, treatment, dressing type, and allergy history were analyzed.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      A total of 61 (0.3%) of the 23,396 investigated patients developed a DIACD on average 12.2\u2009\u00b1\u20097.3 days postoperatively. Overall, 41% had a preoperative allergy (excluding seasonal), and 55.7% were treated with topical or low-dose oral antihistamines and corticosteroids. The majority (41%) of the DIACD involved mesh-adhesive dressings, and a liquid skin adhesive (2-octyl cyanoacrylate) was also used in 41% of cases, often in combination with the primary dressing. Of the 61 DIACD patients, 24 (39.3%) had previously undergone THA or TKA, and nearly half of these (\n                      <jats:italic>n<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u200911, 45.8%) had been exposed to the same dressing without prior occurrence of DIACD. DIACD patients were significantly more likely to have undergone TKA (73.8 vs. 58.3%,\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u20090.015) and to have never smoked (75.4 vs. 58.4%,\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u20090.014). The effect sizes of these findings were negligible (Cramer\u2019s V\u2009=\u20090.016 and 0.019, respectively).\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The incidence of DIACD following joint arthroplasty is low (0.3%) but remains a frustrating complication, primarily occurring two weeks postoperatively, with mesh-adhesive dressings most frequently implicated. Patients with prior exposure to dressings, those undergoing TKA, and non-smokers are at higher risk. Identifying at-risk patients can guide dressing selection and application.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1007\/s00264-025-06715-w","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,5]],"date-time":"2025-12-05T07:34:52Z","timestamp":1764920092000},"page":"371-379","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"title":["Dressing-induced allergic contact dermatitis in total joint arthroplasty"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"50","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-4882-209X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Farouk","family":"Khury","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Garrett","family":"Ruff","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Sophia","family":"Antonioli","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Daniel","family":"Sherwood","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ran","family":"Schwarzkopf","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Joshua","family":"Rozell","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,5]]},"reference":[{"issue":"1","key":"6715_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"125","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artd.2017.03.002","volume":"4","author":"KK Chen","year":"2018","unstructured":"Chen KK et al (2018) The effect of wound dressings on infection following total joint arthroplasty. Arthroplast Today 4(1):125\u2013129","journal-title":"Arthroplast Today"},{"issue":"18","key":"6715_CR2","first-page":"268","volume":"3","author":"M Chowdhry","year":"2015","unstructured":"Chowdhry M, Chen AF (2015) Wound dressings for primary and revision total joint arthroplasty. Ann Transl Med 3(18):268","journal-title":"Ann Transl Med"},{"issue":"10","key":"6715_CR3","first-page":"604","volume":"11","author":"CA Maury","year":"2023","unstructured":"Maury CA et al (2023) Allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) to topical products in orthopedic surgery: clinical characteristics and treatment strategies. Arch Bone Jt Surg 11(10):604\u2013616","journal-title":"Arch Bone Jt Surg"},{"issue":"11","key":"6715_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2307","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2023.05.013","volume":"38","author":"ZJ Coles","year":"2023","unstructured":"Coles ZJ et al (2023) Skin reactions following primary total knee arthroplasty with an adhesive superficial closure system: A case series. J Arthroplast 38(11):2307\u20132310e1","journal-title":"J Arthroplast"},{"issue":"20","key":"6715_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e26053","DOI":"10.1097\/MD.0000000000026053","volume":"100","author":"SP So","year":"2021","unstructured":"So SP, Yoon JY, Kim JW (2021) Postoperative contact dermatitis caused by skin adhesives used in orthopedic surgery: Incidence, characteristics, and difference from surgical site infection. Med (Baltim) 100(20):e26053","journal-title":"Med (Baltim)"},{"issue":"6","key":"6715_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e515","DOI":"10.3928\/01477447-20200827-01","volume":"43","author":"BM Ricciardo","year":"2020","unstructured":"Ricciardo BM et al (2020) Allergic contact dermatitis to dermabond Prineo after elective orthopedic surgery. Orthopedics 43(6):e515\u2013e522","journal-title":"Orthopedics"},{"issue":"2","key":"6715_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e203","DOI":"10.1097\/BPO.0000000000002549","volume":"44","author":"K Koritz","year":"2024","unstructured":"Koritz K et al (2024) Incidence of skin sensitivity following dermabond application in pediatric orthopedic surgery. J Pediatr Orthop 44(2):e203\u2013e208","journal-title":"J Pediatr Orthop"},{"issue":"2","key":"6715_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e39","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.CC.17.00064","volume":"7","author":"FJ Chan","year":"2017","unstructured":"Chan FJ, Richardson K, Kim SJ (2017) Allergic dermatitis after total knee arthroplasty using the Prineo Wound-Closure device: A report of three cases. JBJS Case Connect 7(2):e39","journal-title":"JBJS Case Connect"},{"issue":"7\u20138","key":"6715_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1529","DOI":"10.1111\/ans.16009","volume":"90","author":"K Dear","year":"2020","unstructured":"Dear K, Nixon R, Ricciardo B (2020) Post-operative rashes in the orthopaedic ward caused by allergic contact dermatitis to dermabond Prineo. ANZ J Surg 90(7\u20138):1529","journal-title":"ANZ J Surg"},{"issue":"3","key":"6715_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e839","DOI":"10.1016\/j.asmr.2023.04.013","volume":"5","author":"DE Ojo","year":"2023","unstructured":"Ojo DE et al (2023) Documented contact allergy impacts risk for surgical Adhesive-Associated contact dermatitis after shoulder arthroplasty. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil 5(3):e839\u2013e842","journal-title":"Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil"},{"key":"6715_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Zhang AS et al (2023) Severe hypersensitivity reaction to dermabond Prineo after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: A case report, vol 13. JBJS Case Connect, 1","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.CC.22.00668"},{"issue":"2","key":"6715_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"191","DOI":"10.21037\/jss-22-93","volume":"9","author":"CM Coppola","year":"2023","unstructured":"Coppola CM, Tobin JG, Lawrence JP (2023) Allergic contact dermatitis to dermabond Prineo after abdominal wound closure for anterior lumbar interbody fusion: case report. J Spine Surg 9(2):191\u2013194","journal-title":"J Spine Surg"},{"key":"6715_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"p642595","DOI":"10.1155\/2015\/642595","volume":"2015","author":"RW Knackstedt","year":"2015","unstructured":"Knackstedt RW et al (2015) Rash with DERMABOND PRINEO skin closure system use in bilateral reduction mammoplasty: A case series. Case Rep Med 2015:p642595","journal-title":"Case Rep Med"},{"issue":"3","key":"6715_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"222","DOI":"10.1177\/22925503211015448","volume":"30","author":"NN Alotaibi","year":"2022","unstructured":"Alotaibi NN et al (2022) Type IV hypersensitivity reaction to dermabond (2-Octyl Cyanoacrylate) in plastic surgical patients: A retrospective study. Plast Surg (Oakv) 30(3):222\u2013226","journal-title":"Plast Surg (Oakv)"},{"issue":"12","key":"6715_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3742","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2017.07.012","volume":"32","author":"BP Chalmers","year":"2017","unstructured":"Chalmers BP et al (2017) Characterizing the diagnosis and treatment of allergic contact dermatitis to 2-Octyl cyanoacrylate used for skin closure in elective orthopedic surgery. J Arthroplasty 32(12):3742\u20133747","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"issue":"1","key":"6715_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e0306","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.CC.18.00306","volume":"10","author":"RC Pate","year":"2020","unstructured":"Pate RC, Neumeister MW (2020) Severe wound complication due to Prineo surgical dressing in shoulder hemiarthroplasty: A case report. JBJS Case Connect 10(1):e0306","journal-title":"JBJS Case Connect"},{"issue":"11","key":"6715_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2307","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2023.05.013","volume":"38","author":"ZJ Coles","year":"2023","unstructured":"Coles ZJ et al (2023) Skin reactions following primary total knee arthroplasty with an adhesive superficial closure system: A case series. J Arthroplasty 38(11):2307\u20132310e1","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"issue":"6","key":"6715_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1160","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2023.02.074","volume":"38","author":"A Premkumar","year":"2023","unstructured":"Premkumar A et al (2023) Wound complications are affected by different skin closure methods in primary hip and knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 38(6):1160\u20131165","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"key":"6715_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Jones CM et al (2025) Repeat exposure to Mesh-Glue dressing is associated with allergic contact dermatitis: A prospective cohort study. J Arthroplasty","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2025.05.001"},{"issue":"10","key":"6715_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"808","DOI":"10.1099\/0022-1317-51-10-808","volume":"51","author":"I Brook","year":"2002","unstructured":"Brook I (2002) Secondary bacterial infections complicating skin lesions. J Med Microbiol 51(10):808\u2013812","journal-title":"J Med Microbiol"},{"issue":"10","key":"6715_CR21","first-page":"476","volume":"39","author":"AG Miller","year":"2010","unstructured":"Miller AG, Swank ML (2010) Dermabond efficacy in total joint arthroplasty wounds. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 39(10):476\u2013478","journal-title":"Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ)"},{"issue":"1","key":"6715_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"19764","DOI":"10.1038\/srep19764","volume":"6","author":"W Zhang","year":"2016","unstructured":"Zhang W et al (2016) Barbed versus traditional sutures for wound closure in knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep 6(1):19764","journal-title":"Sci Rep"},{"key":"6715_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sah AP (2015) Is there an advantage to knotless barbed suture in TKA wound closure? A randomized trial in simultaneous bilateral TKAs. Clin Orthop Relat Research\u00ae, 473(6)","DOI":"10.1007\/s11999-015-4157-5"},{"issue":"3","key":"6715_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"350","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artd.2020.05.002","volume":"6","author":"FL Anderson","year":"2020","unstructured":"Anderson FL et al (2020) Polyester mesh dressings reduce delayed wound healing and reoperations compared with Silver-Impregnated occlusive dressings after knee arthroplasty. Arthroplast Today 6(3):350\u2013353","journal-title":"Arthroplast Today"},{"issue":"2","key":"6715_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"158","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artd.2020.01.013","volume":"6","author":"CL Herndon","year":"2020","unstructured":"Herndon CL et al (2020) Polyester mesh dressings reduce delayed wound healing rates after total hip arthroplasty compared with silver-impregnated occlusive dressings. Arthroplasty Today 6(2):158\u2013162","journal-title":"Arthroplasty Today"},{"issue":"3","key":"6715_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"593","DOI":"10.1016\/j.surg.2004.02.015","volume":"136","author":"R Gennari","year":"2004","unstructured":"Gennari R et al (2004) A prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial of tissue adhesive (2-octylcyanoacrylate) versus standard wound closure in breast surgery. Surgery 136(3):593\u2013599","journal-title":"Surgery"},{"issue":"4","key":"6715_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"209","DOI":"10.1089\/lap.2004.14.209","volume":"14","author":"N Jallali","year":"2004","unstructured":"Jallali N, Haji A, Watson CJE (2004) A prospective randomized trial comparing 2-Octyl cyanoacrylate to conventional suturing in closure of laparoscopic cholecystectomy incisions. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 14(4):209\u2013211","journal-title":"J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech"},{"issue":"5","key":"6715_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"382","DOI":"10.1136\/emj.19.5.382","volume":"19","author":"A Mattick","year":"2002","unstructured":"Mattick A (2002) Use of tissue adhesives in the management of paediatric lacerations. Emerg Med J 19(5):382\u2013385","journal-title":"Emerg Med J"},{"issue":"4","key":"6715_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"483","DOI":"10.1007\/s10143-010-0258-5","volume":"33","author":"D Wachter","year":"2010","unstructured":"Wachter D et al (2010) 2-Octyl-cyanoacrylate for wound closure in cervical and lumbar spinal surgery. Neurosurg Rev 33(4):483\u2013489","journal-title":"Neurosurg Rev"},{"issue":"4","key":"6715_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"878","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2023.12.032","volume":"39","author":"M Ainslie-Garcia","year":"2024","unstructured":"Ainslie-Garcia M et al (2024) International Delphi study on wound closure and dressing management in joint arthroplasty: part 1: total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 39(4):878\u2013883","journal-title":"J Arthroplast"},{"issue":"6","key":"6715_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1524","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2024.01.047","volume":"39","author":"M Ainslie-Garcia","year":"2024","unstructured":"Ainslie-Garcia M et al (2024) International Delphi study on wound closure and incision management in joint arthroplasty part 2: total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 39(6):1524\u20131529","journal-title":"J Arthroplast"},{"issue":"2","key":"6715_CR32","first-page":"e289","volume":"41","author":"NH Lake","year":"2018","unstructured":"Lake NH et al (2018) Contact dermatitis reaction to 2-octyl cyanoacrylate following 3 orthopedic procedures. Orthopedics 41(2):e289\u2013e291","journal-title":"Orthopedics"},{"key":"6715_CR33","unstructured":"Perera AGN, Tavarez MM (2025) 2-Octyl Cyanoacrylate, in StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing Copyright \u00a9 2025, StatPearls Publishing LLC.: Treasure Island (FL)"},{"issue":"7","key":"6715_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"271","DOI":"10.12968\/jowc.2002.11.7.26413","volume":"11","author":"SK Gupta","year":"2002","unstructured":"Gupta SK, Lee S, Moseley LG (2002) Postoperative wound blistering: is there a link with dressing usage? J Wound Care 11(7):271\u2013273","journal-title":"J Wound Care"},{"issue":"2","key":"6715_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"81","DOI":"10.1111\/cod.13044","volume":"79","author":"L Mestach","year":"2018","unstructured":"Mestach L et al (2018) Allergic contact dermatitis caused by acrylic-based medical dressings and adhesives. Contact Dermat 79(2):81\u201384","journal-title":"Contact Dermat"},{"issue":"3","key":"6715_CR36","first-page":"364","volume":"157","author":"BL Adler","year":"2021","unstructured":"Adler BL, DeLeo VA (2021) Allergic Contact Dermat JAMA Dermatol 157(3):364","journal-title":"Allergic Contact Dermat JAMA Dermatol"},{"issue":"3","key":"6715_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"157","DOI":"10.1111\/cod.12647","volume":"75","author":"A Spencer","year":"2016","unstructured":"Spencer A, Gazzani P, Thompson DA (2016) Acrylate and methacrylate contact allergy and allergic contact disease: a 13-year review. Contact Dermat 75(3):157\u2013164","journal-title":"Contact Dermat"},{"issue":"3","key":"6715_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"180","DOI":"10.1111\/cod.12578","volume":"75","author":"K Muttardi","year":"2016","unstructured":"Muttardi K, White IR, Banerjee P (2016) The burden of allergic contact dermatitis caused by acrylates. Contact Dermat 75(3):180\u2013184","journal-title":"Contact Dermat"},{"issue":"4","key":"6715_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"555","DOI":"10.5114\/ada.2020.95848","volume":"38","author":"M Kucharczyk","year":"2021","unstructured":"Kucharczyk M et al (2021) Acrylates as a significant cause of allergic contact dermatitis: new sources of exposure. Postepy Dermatol Alergol 38(4):555\u2013560","journal-title":"Postepy Dermatol Alergol"},{"issue":"3","key":"6715_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"216","DOI":"10.1111\/cod.13278","volume":"81","author":"L Stingeni","year":"2019","unstructured":"Stingeni L et al (2019) Contact sensitivity to 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate in consecutive patients: a 1-year multicentre SIDAPA study. Contact Dermat 81(3):216\u2013218","journal-title":"Contact Dermat"},{"issue":"4","key":"6715_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"231","DOI":"10.1111\/cod.13440","volume":"82","author":"K Hansel","year":"2020","unstructured":"Hansel K et al (2020) Acrylate and methacrylate allergy: when is patch testing with acrylic acid recommended? Contact Dermat 82(4):231\u2013233","journal-title":"Contact Dermat"},{"issue":"3","key":"6715_CR42","first-page":"249","volume":"82","author":"RP Usatine","year":"2010","unstructured":"Usatine RP, Riojas M (2010) Diagnosis and management of contact dermatitis. Am Fam Physician 82(3):249\u2013255","journal-title":"Am Fam Physician"},{"issue":"11","key":"6715_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"7655","DOI":"10.4049\/jimmunol.180.11.7655","volume":"180","author":"NC Mishra","year":"2008","unstructured":"Mishra NC et al (2008) Nicotine primarily suppresses lung Th2 but not goblet cell and muscle cell responses to allergens. J Immunol 180(11):7655\u20137663","journal-title":"J Immunol"},{"issue":"1","key":"6715_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"268","DOI":"10.18632\/oncotarget.13613","volume":"8","author":"F Qiu","year":"2017","unstructured":"Qiu F et al (2017) Impacts of cigarette smoking on immune responsiveness: up and down or upside down? Oncotarget 8(1):268\u2013284","journal-title":"Oncotarget"},{"issue":"1","key":"6715_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"38","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jaci.2007.09.052","volume":"121","author":"RJ Hancox","year":"2008","unstructured":"Hancox RJ et al (2008) Cigarette smoking and allergic sensitization: A 32-year population-based cohort study. J Allergy Clin Immunol 121(1):38\u201342e3","journal-title":"J Allergy Clin Immunol"}],"container-title":["International Orthopaedics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00264-025-06715-w.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00264-025-06715-w","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00264-025-06715-w.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,18]],"date-time":"2026-02-18T10:26:19Z","timestamp":1771410379000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00264-025-06715-w"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,5]]},"references-count":45,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,2]]}},"alternative-id":["6715"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00264-025-06715-w","relation":{},"ISSN":["0341-2695","1432-5195"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0341-2695","type":"print"},{"value":"1432-5195","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,5]]},"assertion":[{"value":"10 November 2025","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"24 November 2025","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"5 December 2025","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Human ethics and consent to participate declaration"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}]}}