{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,10]],"date-time":"2026-09-10T17:18:12Z","timestamp":1789060692863,"version":"build-2803163510"},"reference-count":32,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"23","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,11]],"date-time":"2025-08-11T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1754870400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,11]],"date-time":"2025-08-11T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1754870400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"name":"Medizinische Hochschule Hannover (MHH)"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Aesth Plast Surg"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,12]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Aims<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Several approaches aim to reduce donor site morbidity in harvesting autologous deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps. This study aimed to demonstrate a short fasciotomy technique for DIEP flap harvest and to quantify the outcomes, analgesia requirements, and time to mobility compared with the conventional approach.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>This retrospective, single-center study included 22 patients who underwent unilateral breast reconstruction with autologous DIEP flaps between November 1, 2023 and March 1, 2025, performed by a single surgeon. Patients undergoing minimally invasive DIEP flap harvest were matched with those receiving conventional DIEP flap harvest based on key variables and characteristics.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Eleven patients underwent minimally invasive DIEP flap harvest with a mean operating time of 323.54 minutes. The mean length of fasciotomy was 2.79 cm in the minimally invasive group and 9.72 cm in the conventional group. The time to first mobility was 1.18 days in the minimally invasive cohort and 2.09 days in the control group (\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 0.0013). The postoperative mean total strong opioid requirement was 18 mg in the minimally invasive cohort and 42 mg in the control group (\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      &lt; 0.001). Patients in the minimally invasive cohort were discharged significantly earlier, with a mean of 5.2 days (\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      &lt; 0.0001). No flap loss occurred in either group.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Minimally invasive DIEP flap harvesting using small fasciotomies is a safe and promising technique that minimizes functional donor site morbidity and offers reliable outcomes, including faster mobilization, reduced postoperative opioid use, and shorter hospital stays.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Level of Evidence III<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors\n                      <jats:ext-link xmlns:xlink=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/1999\/xlink\" xlink:href=\"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/00266\" ext-link-type=\"uri\">www.springer.com\/00266<\/jats:ext-link>\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1007\/s00266-025-05163-6","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,11]],"date-time":"2025-08-11T14:12:45Z","timestamp":1754921565000},"page":"6623-6631","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"title":["Comparing Minimally Invasive and Conventional Approaches to DIEP Flap Harvest: A Matched-Pair Analysis from a High-Volume Center"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"49","author":[{"given":"Florian","family":"Bucher","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Martynas","family":"Tamulevicius","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Nadjib","family":"Dastagir","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Moritz","family":"Milewski","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Louisa Jutta","family":"Dietz","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Peter Maria","family":"Vogt","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Khaled","family":"Dastagir","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,11]]},"reference":[{"key":"5163_CR1","unstructured":"World Health Organization. Breast cancer. March 2024. Available online from: https:\/\/www.who.int\/news-room\/fact-sheets\/detail\/breast-cancer. Accessed 06.04.2025"},{"issue":"6","key":"5163_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"477","DOI":"10.3322\/caac.21863","volume":"74","author":"AN Giaquinto","year":"2024","unstructured":"Giaquinto AN, Sung H, Newman LA, Freedman RA, Smith RA, Star J, Jemal A, Siegel RL. Breast cancer statistics 2024. CA Cancer J Clin. 2024;74(6):477\u201395. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3322\/caac.21863.","journal-title":"CA Cancer J Clin"},{"issue":"3","key":"5163_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"144","DOI":"10.1053\/clon.2003.0206","volume":"15","author":"S Tyldesley","year":"2003","unstructured":"Tyldesley S, Foroudi F, Barbera L, Boyd C, Schulze K, Walker H, Mackillop WJ. The appropriate rate of breast conserving surgery: an evidence-based estimate. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2003;15(3):144\u201355. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1053\/clon.2003.0206.","journal-title":"Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)"},{"issue":"5","key":"5163_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"989","DOI":"10.1097\/PRS.0000000000010826","volume":"153","author":"PS Yesantharao","year":"2024","unstructured":"Yesantharao PS, Arquette C, Cheesborough JE, Lee GK, Nazerali RS. Paradigm shifts in alloplastic breast reconstruction: a nationwide analysis of direct-to-implant trends. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2024;153(5):989\u201398. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/PRS.0000000000010826.","journal-title":"Plast Reconstr Surg"},{"issue":"14","key":"5163_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"4168","DOI":"10.3390\/jcm13144168","volume":"13","author":"SE Hong","year":"2024","unstructured":"Hong SE, Kang D. Navigating the pandemic: shifts in breast reconstruction trends and surgical decision-making in the United States. J Clin Med. 2024;13(14):4168. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/jcm13144168.","journal-title":"J Clin Med"},{"issue":"1","key":"5163_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1097\/PRS.0b013e3181ab10b2","volume":"124","author":"ES Hu","year":"2009","unstructured":"Hu ES, Pusic AL, Waljee JF, Kuhn L, Hawley ST, Wilkins E, Alderman AK. Patient-reported aesthetic satisfaction with breast reconstruction during the long-term survivorship period. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124(1):1\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/PRS.0b013e3181ab10b2.","journal-title":"Plast Reconstr Surg"},{"issue":"22","key":"5163_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2499","DOI":"10.1200\/JCO.2016.69.9561","volume":"35","author":"AL Pusic","year":"2017","unstructured":"Pusic AL, Matros E, Fine N, Buchel E, Gordillo GM, Hamill JB, Kim HM, Qi J, Albornoz C, Klassen AF, Wilkins EG. Patient-reported outcomes 1 year after immediate breast reconstruction: results of the mastectomy reconstruction outcomes consortium study. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(22):2499\u2013506. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1200\/JCO.2016.69.9561.","journal-title":"J Clin Oncol"},{"issue":"5","key":"5163_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1438","DOI":"10.1097\/PRS.0b013e3181ea42ed","volume":"126","author":"JC Selber","year":"2010","unstructured":"Selber JC, Fosnot J, Nelson J, Goldstein J, Bergey M, Sonnad S, Serletti JM. A prospective study comparing the functional impact of SIEA, DIEP, and muscle-sparing free TRAM flaps on the abdominal wall: Part II. Bilateral reconstruction Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126(5):1438\u201353. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/PRS.0b013e3181ea42ed.","journal-title":"Plast Reconstr Surg."},{"issue":"2","key":"5163_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"331","DOI":"10.1097\/PRS.0b013e31823ae9a3","volume":"129","author":"S Colohan","year":"2012","unstructured":"Colohan S, Maia M, Langevin CJ, Donfrancesco A, Shirvani A, Trussler AP, Saint-Cyr M. The short- and ultrashort-pedicle deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;129(2):331\u201340. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/PRS.0b013e31823ae9a3.","journal-title":"Plast Reconstr Surg"},{"key":"5163_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Nores GDPG, Kanchwala S. Minimally invasive approaches to DIEP flap harvest: a review of current data. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2023;55(2):120\u20135. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1055\/a-1936-3464.","DOI":"10.1055\/a-1936-3464"},{"issue":"3","key":"5163_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"160","DOI":"10.1080\/13645700802103381","volume":"17","author":"HG Kenngott","year":"2008","unstructured":"Kenngott HG, Muller-Stich BP, Reiter MA, Rassweiler J, Gutt CN. Robotic suturing: technique and benefit in advanced laparoscopic surgery. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2008;17(3):160\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/13645700802103381.","journal-title":"Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol"},{"issue":"4","key":"5163_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"890","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bjps.2020.08.106","volume":"74","author":"M Piper","year":"2021","unstructured":"Piper M, Ligh CA, Shakir S, Messa C, Soriano I, Kanchwala S. Minimally invasive robotic-assisted harvest of the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap for autologous breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2021;74(4):890\u2013930. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.bjps.2020.08.106.","journal-title":"J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg"},{"issue":"7","key":"5163_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1053","DOI":"10.3109\/0284186X.2011.584554","volume":"50","author":"BO Christensen","year":"2011","unstructured":"Christensen BO, Overgaard J, Kettner LO, Damsgaard TE. Long-term evaluation of postmastectomy breast reconstruction. Acta Oncol. 2011;50(7):1053\u201361. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3109\/0284186X.2011.584554.","journal-title":"Acta Oncol"},{"issue":"3","key":"5163_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1108","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bjps.2021.11.020","volume":"75","author":"PH Hilven","year":"2022","unstructured":"Hilven PH, Vandevoort M, Bruyninckx F, De Baerdemaeker R, Dupont Y, Peeters Q, Nanhekhan L, Fabre G. Limiting the fascia incision length in a DIEP flap: repercussion on abdominal wall morbidity. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2022;75(3):1108\u201316. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.bjps.2021.11.020.","journal-title":"J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg"},{"issue":"3","key":"5163_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"583","DOI":"10.1097\/PRS.0000000000004631","volume":"142","author":"A Hembd","year":"2018","unstructured":"Hembd A, Teotia SS, Zhu H, Haddock NT. Optimizing perforator selection: a multivariable analysis of predictors for fat necrosis and abdominal morbidity in DIEP flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018;142(3):583\u201392. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/PRS.0000000000004631.","journal-title":"Plast Reconstr Surg"},{"issue":"6","key":"5163_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"972e","DOI":"10.1097\/PRS.0000000000010382","volume":"152","author":"J Kim","year":"2023","unstructured":"Kim J, Lee KT, Mun GH. Short fasciotomy-deep inferior epigastric perforator flap harvest for breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023;152(6):972e\u201384e. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/PRS.0000000000010382.","journal-title":"Plast Reconstr Surg"},{"issue":"3","key":"5163_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/GOX.0000000000004840","volume":"11","author":"SH Nelissen","year":"2023","unstructured":"Nelissen SH, Krijnen NA, Tsehaie J, Schellekens PPA, Paes EC, Simmermacher RKJ, Maarse W. Bulging after DIEP breast reconstruction: new insights concerning rectus diastasis and medial perforator harvest. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2023;11(3): e4840. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/GOX.0000000000004840.","journal-title":"Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open"},{"issue":"1","key":"5163_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"8","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0036-1586495","volume":"33","author":"AS Aukskalnis","year":"2017","unstructured":"Aukskalnis AS, Robinson JM. Reducing postoperative abdominal bulge following deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction with onlay monofilament poly-4-hydroxybutyrate biosynthetic mesh. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2017;33(1):8\u201318. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1055\/s-0036-1586495.","journal-title":"J Reconstr Microsurg"},{"key":"5163_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Burger JW, van 't Riet M, Jeekel J. Abdominal incisions: techniques and postoperative complications. Scand J Surg. 2002;91(4):315\u201321. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/145749690209100401.","DOI":"10.1177\/145749690209100401"},{"key":"5163_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3389\/fsurg.2021.743069","volume":"8","author":"J Song","year":"2021","unstructured":"Song J, Yang Y, Guan W, Jin G, Yang Y, Chen L, Wan Y, Li L, He Q, Zhang W, Zhu W, Chen L, Xiu D, Tian W, Yang D, Lou W, Zhang Z. Association of abdominal incision length with gastrointestinal function recovery post-operatively: a multicenter registry system-based retrospective cohort study. Front Surg. 2021;8: 743069. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fsurg.2021.743069.","journal-title":"Front Surg."},{"key":"5163_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Rivas E, Cohen B, Pu X, Xiang L, Saasouh W, Mao G, Minko P, Mosteller L, Volio A, Maheshwari K, Sessler DI, Turan A. Pain and opioid consumption and mobilization after surgery: post hoc analysis of two randomized trials. Anesthesiology. 2022;136(1):115\u201326. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/ALN.0000000000004037. Erratum In: Anesthesiology.2024;140(6):1245. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/ALN.0000000000004983","DOI":"10.1097\/ALN.0000000000004037"},{"key":"5163_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Kulkarni AR, Pusic AL, Hamill JB, Kim HM, Qi J, Wilkins EG, Roth RS. Factors associated with acute postoperative pain following breast reconstruction. JPRAS Open. 2017;11:1\u201313. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jpra.2016.08.005. Erratum in: JPRAS Open. 2021;30:170\u2013171. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jpra.2021.09.005.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jpra.2016.08.005"},{"issue":"9","key":"5163_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1178","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bjps.2016.05.028","volume":"69","author":"H Uda","year":"2016","unstructured":"Uda H, Tomioka YK, Sarukawa S, Sunaga A, Kamochi H, Sugawara Y, Yoshimura K. Abdominal morbidity after single- versus double-pedicled deep inferior epigastric perforator flap use. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2016;69(9):1178\u201383. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.bjps.2016.05.028.","journal-title":"J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg"},{"issue":"2","key":"5163_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"121","DOI":"10.2217\/cer-2021-0258","volume":"11","author":"R Tazreean","year":"2022","unstructured":"Tazreean R, Nelson G, Twomey R. Early mobilization in enhanced recovery after surgery pathways: current evidence and recent advancements. J Comp Eff Res. 2022;11(2):121\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2217\/cer-2021-0258.","journal-title":"J Comp Eff Res."},{"issue":"5","key":"5163_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"790e","DOI":"10.1097\/PRS.0000000000002716","volume":"138","author":"AT Mohan","year":"2016","unstructured":"Mohan AT, Zhu L, Wang Z, Vijayasekaran A, Saint-Cyr M. Techniques and perforator selection in single, dominant DIEP flap breast reconstruction: algorithmic approach to maximize efficiency and safety. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;138(5):790e\u2013803e. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/PRS.0000000000002716.","journal-title":"Plast Reconstr Surg"},{"issue":"6","key":"5163_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"627","DOI":"10.1002\/micr.31056","volume":"43","author":"Z Wang","year":"2023","unstructured":"Wang Z, Jiao L, Chen S, Li Z, Xiao Y, Du F, Huang J, Long X. Flap perfusion assessment with indocyanine green angiography in deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Microsurgery. 2023;43(6):627\u201338. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/micr.31056.","journal-title":"Microsurgery"},{"issue":"1","key":"5163_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"362","DOI":"10.1097\/SCS.0000000000010790","volume":"36","author":"S Morkuzu","year":"2025","unstructured":"Morkuzu S, Bayezid KC, Ozmen BB, Eren SF, Farhat S, McLennan AL, James AJ, Nikkhah D, Azoury SC, Djohan RS, Bishop SN, Schwarz GS. Evolution and adaptations of robotic DIEP flap surgery: a systematic review. J Craniofac Surg. 2025;36(1):362\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/SCS.0000000000010790.","journal-title":"J Craniofac Surg"},{"issue":"6","key":"5163_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1383","DOI":"10.1097\/PRS.0b013e3182a805a3","volume":"132","author":"EI Chang","year":"2013","unstructured":"Chang EI, Chang EI, Soto-Miranda MA, Zhang H, Nosrati N, Robb GL, Chang DW. Comprehensive analysis of donor-site morbidity in abdominally based free flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;132(6):1383\u201391. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/PRS.0b013e3182a805a3.","journal-title":"Plast Reconstr Surg"},{"issue":"2","key":"5163_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"304","DOI":"10.1097\/PRS.0000000000008181","volume":"148","author":"JH Choi","year":"2021","unstructured":"Choi JH, Song SY, Park HS, Kim CH, Kim JY, Lew DH, Roh TS, Lee DW. Robotic DIEP flap harvest through a totally extraperitoneal approach using a single-port surgical robotic system. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021;148(2):304\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/PRS.0000000000008181.","journal-title":"Plast Reconstr Surg"},{"issue":"3","key":"5163_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"396","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2018.06.001","volume":"26","author":"X Zhang","year":"2019","unstructured":"Zhang X, Ding Y, Hua K, Liu S, Jia N. Combined laparoscopic and vaginal cervicovaginal reconstruction using acellular porcine small intestinal submucosa graft in a patient with mayer-Rokitansky-K\u00fcster-Hauser Syndrome (U5aC4V4). J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2019;26(3):396\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jmig.2018.06.001.","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"5163_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"189","DOI":"10.1007\/s11701-024-01913-x","volume":"18","author":"AM Elameen","year":"2024","unstructured":"Elameen AM, Dahy AA. Surgical outcomes of robotic versus conventional autologous breast reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Robot Surg. 2024;18(1):189. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11701-024-01913-x.","journal-title":"J Robot Surg"},{"issue":"1","key":"5163_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"360","DOI":"10.1016\/j.asjsur.2021.06.059","volume":"45","author":"M Yoshino","year":"2022","unstructured":"Yoshino M, Oda G, Nakagawa T, Uemura N, Mori H, Mori M, Fujioka T. Higher body mass index is a more important risk factor than sarcopenia for complications in reconstruction of the deep inferior epigastric perforator. Asian J Surg. 2022;45(1):360\u20136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.asjsur.2021.06.059.","journal-title":"Asian J Surg"}],"container-title":["Aesthetic Plastic Surgery"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00266-025-05163-6.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00266-025-05163-6","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00266-025-05163-6.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,24]],"date-time":"2025-12-24T15:04:58Z","timestamp":1766588698000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00266-025-05163-6"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,11]]},"references-count":32,"journal-issue":{"issue":"23","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,12]]}},"alternative-id":["5163"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00266-025-05163-6","relation":{},"ISSN":["0364-216X","1432-5241"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0364-216X","type":"print"},{"value":"1432-5241","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,11]]},"assertion":[{"value":"30 April 2025","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"17 July 2025","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"11 August 2025","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors and co-authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}},{"value":"Being a retrospective analysis of an anonymous database using routine data, approval by the local ethics committee was not required.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethical Approval"}}]}}