{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,13]],"date-time":"2026-10-13T07:58:09Z","timestamp":1791878289870,"version":"4.3.4"},"reference-count":26,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"13","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,26]],"date-time":"2026-05-26T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1779753600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,26]],"date-time":"2026-05-26T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1779753600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100005758","name":"Universit\u00e0 Politecnica delle Marche","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100005758","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"crossref"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Aesth Plast Surg"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,7]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Prepectoral (PP) breast reconstruction has emerged as a muscle-sparing alternative to the subpectoral (SP) approach. While aesthetic and oncologic outcomes have been well studied, early functional recovery remains less explored.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>This retrospective study assessed upper-limb function in women who underwent implant-based breast reconstruction, comparing direct-to-implant PP and two-stage SP approaches. Outcomes at one month included Quick Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder e Hand (QuickDASH) questionnaire, shoulder range of motion (ROM), International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ), and Body Image Scale. An exploratory analysis within the PP cohort compared outcomes according to implant coverage materials: acellular dermal matrix (ADM), synthetic mesh, and polyurethane-coated (PU).<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Among 124 patients, 63 underwent PP and 61 SP reconstruction. PP patients reported lower disability (QuickDASH), better body image, and a lower prevalence of pathological shoulder ROM, particularly in internal rotation and flexion. Functional complications, including adherent scars, dysesthesia, lymphosclerosis, implant hypomobility, and pain, were less frequent in the PP group. Furthermore, fewer PP patients required postoperative rehabilitation. In multivariable analysis, only previous upper-limb dysfunction remained independently associated with higher QuickDASH scores. Within the PP group, ADM-and mesh-based reconstructions were associated with more favorable outcomes than PU implants and remained associated with lower disability after adjustment.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Early postoperative upper-limb function following implant-based reconstruction is influenced by both reconstructive approach and patient-related factors, e.g., preexisting upper-limb dysfunction. Muscle-sparing strategies may support a more favorable functional outcome in the short term, though this hypothesis must be interpreted cautiously given the retrospective design of our study.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Level of Evidence III<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors \u00a0\n                      <jats:ext-link xmlns:xlink=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/1999\/xlink\" xlink:href=\"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/00266\" ext-link-type=\"uri\">www.springer.com\/00266<\/jats:ext-link>\n                      .\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1007\/s00266-026-05915-y","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,26]],"date-time":"2026-05-26T16:22:33Z","timestamp":1779812553000},"page":"5091-5101","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["Unveiling Upper-Limb Dysfunction Early After Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: Insights from a Retrospective Cohort Study"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"50","author":[{"given":"Elisa","family":"Andrenelli","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-3926-8584","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Matteo","family":"Torresetti","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Enrico","family":"Lenti","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ilias","family":"Vurliotis","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ortensia","family":"Pirro","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Maria Gabriella","family":"Ceravolo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Giovanni","family":"Di Benedetto","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Marianna","family":"Capecci","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,26]]},"reference":[{"key":"5915_CR1","unstructured":"American Society of Plastic Surgeons. Plastic surgery statistics report 2024. 2025. https:\/\/www.plasticsurgery.org\/documents\/news\/statistics\/2024\/plastic-surgery-statistics-report-2024.pdf."},{"issue":"5","key":"5915_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/GOX.0000000000005808","volume":"12","author":"IT Nolan","year":"2024","unstructured":"Nolan IT, Farajzadeh MM, Bekisz JM, Boyd CJ, Gibson EG, Salibian AA. Prepectoral versus subpectoral breast reconstruction after nipple-sparing mastectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024;12(5):e5808.","journal-title":"Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open"},{"issue":"9","key":"5915_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1542","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2019.05.015","volume":"45","author":"L Li","year":"2019","unstructured":"Li L, Su Y, Xiu B, Huang X, Chi W, Hou J, et al. Comparison of prepectoral and subpectoral breast reconstruction after mastectomies: a systematic review and meta analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2019;45(9):1542\u201350.","journal-title":"Eur J Surg Oncol"},{"issue":"4","key":"5915_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"437","DOI":"10.1097\/SAP.0000000000002190","volume":"85","author":"Y Li","year":"2020","unstructured":"Li Y, Xu G, Yu N, Huang J, Long X. Prepectoral versus subpectoral implant-based breast reconstruction: a meta-analysis. Ann Plast Surg. 2020;85(4):437\u201347.","journal-title":"Ann Plast Surg"},{"issue":"1","key":"5915_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"10e","DOI":"10.1097\/PRS.0000000000010493","volume":"153","author":"YH Kim","year":"2024","unstructured":"Kim YH, Yang YJ, Lee DW, Song SY, Lew DH, Yang EJ. Prevention of postoperative complications by prepectoral versus subpectoral breast reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2024;153(1):10e\u201324e.","journal-title":"Plast Reconstr Surg"},{"issue":"3","key":"5915_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2520","DOI":"10.21037\/apm-20-1550","volume":"10","author":"JS Lee","year":"2021","unstructured":"Lee JS, Park E, Lee JH, Lee J, Park HY, Yang JD, et al. A prospective comparison study of early functional outcomes after implant-based breast reconstruction: subpectoral versus prepectoral technique. Ann Palliat Med. 2021;10(3):2520\u20139.","journal-title":"Ann Palliat Med."},{"issue":"4","key":"5915_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"344","DOI":"10.1016\/j.clbc.2020.11.013","volume":"21","author":"GG Caputo","year":"2021","unstructured":"Caputo GG, Zingaretti N, Kiprianidis I, Zanfisi C, Domenici L, Parodi PC, et al. Quality of life and early functional evaluation in direct-to-implant breast reconstruction after mastectomy: a comparative study between prepectoral versus dual-plane reconstruction. Clin Breast Cancer. 2021;21(4):344\u201351.","journal-title":"Clin Breast Cancer"},{"issue":"4","key":"5915_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e703","DOI":"10.1016\/j.clbc.2017.11.015","volume":"18","author":"L Cattelani","year":"2018","unstructured":"Cattelani L, Polotto S, Arcuri MF, Pedrazzi G, Linguadoca C, Bonati E. One-step prepectoral breast reconstruction with dermal matrix-covered implant compared to submuscular implantation: functional and cost evaluation. Clin Breast Cancer. 2018;18(4):e703\u201311.","journal-title":"Clin Breast Cancer"},{"issue":"1","key":"5915_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"132","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jseint.2022.09.008","volume":"7","author":"GS Fleisig","year":"2022","unstructured":"Fleisig GS, Slowik JS, Daggett M, Rothermich MA, Cain EL Jr, Wilk KE. Active range of motion of the shoulder: a cross-sectional study of 6635 subjects. JSES Int. 2022;7(1):132\u20137.","journal-title":"JSES Int."},{"key":"5915_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Cheli S, Agostini A, Herd-Smith A, Caligiani L, Martella F, Fioretto L.\u00a0Body image scale\u2014Italian version (BIS)\u00a0[Database record]. APA PsycTests. 2016.","DOI":"10.1037\/t56642-000"},{"issue":"21","key":"5915_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"4421","DOI":"10.1007\/s00266-024-04096-w","volume":"48","author":"X Zhang","year":"2024","unstructured":"Zhang X, Ning S, Zhang Y. Complications after prepectoral versus subpectoral breast reconstruction in patients receiving postmastectomy radiation therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2024;48(21):4421\u20139.","journal-title":"Aesthetic Plast Surg"},{"key":"5915_CR12","unstructured":"Solari F, Burns B. Anatomy, thorax, pectoralis major major. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing. 2023."},{"issue":"3","key":"5915_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"531","DOI":"10.1007\/s10549-020-05717-z","volume":"182","author":"ME Vidt","year":"2020","unstructured":"Vidt ME, Potochny J, Dodge D, Green M, Sturgeon K, Kass R, et al. The influence of mastectomy and reconstruction on residual upper limb function in breast cancer survivors. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020;182(3):531\u201341.","journal-title":"Breast Cancer Res Treat"},{"issue":"4","key":"5915_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/GOX.0000000000006742","volume":"13","author":"KL Stephens","year":"2025","unstructured":"Stephens KL, Liston JM, Berthelson PR, Kerrigan JL, Panzer MB, Campbell CA. Cadaveric biomechanical comparison of prepectoral and submuscular implant-based breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2025;13(4):e6742.","journal-title":"Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open"},{"issue":"3","key":"5915_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"432","DOI":"10.1097\/PRS.0000000000003627","volume":"140","author":"H Sbitany","year":"2017","unstructured":"Sbitany H, Piper M, Lentz R. Prepectoral breast reconstruction: a safe alternative to submuscular prosthetic reconstruction following nipple-sparing mastectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;140(3):432\u201343.","journal-title":"Plast Reconstr Surg"},{"issue":"5","key":"5915_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"850","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bjps.2019.11.038","volume":"73","author":"AU Patel","year":"2020","unstructured":"Patel AU, Day SJ, Pencek M, Roussel LO, Christiano JG, Punekar IR, et al. Functional return after implant-based breast reconstruction: a prospective study of objective and patient-reported outcomes. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2020;73(5):850\u20135.","journal-title":"J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg"},{"issue":"6S Suppl 5","key":"5915_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S399","DOI":"10.1097\/SAP.0000000000001669","volume":"82","author":"CV Schaeffer","year":"2019","unstructured":"Schaeffer CV, Dassoulas KR, Thuman J, Campbell CA. Early functional outcomes after prepectoral breast reconstruction: a case-matched cohort study. Ann Plast Surg. 2019;82(6S Suppl 5):S399\u2013403.","journal-title":"Ann Plast Surg"},{"key":"5915_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"251","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bjps.2023.09.042","volume":"86","author":"IT Nolan","year":"2023","unstructured":"Nolan IT, Farajzadeh MM, Boyd CJ, Bekisz JM, Gibson EG, Salibian AA. Do we need acellular dermal matrix in prepectoral breast reconstruction? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2023;86:251\u201360.","journal-title":"J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg"},{"key":"5915_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"32","DOI":"10.1016\/j.breast.2019.08.002","volume":"48","author":"R Reitsamer","year":"2019","unstructured":"Reitsamer R, Peintinger F, Klaassen-Federspiel F, Sir A. Prepectoral direct-to-implant breast reconstruction with complete ADM or synthetic mesh coverage - 36-months follow-up in 200 reconstructed breasts. Breast. 2019;48:32\u20137.","journal-title":"Breast"},{"issue":"2","key":"5915_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/GOX.0000000000004798","volume":"11","author":"JM Correia-Pinto","year":"2023","unstructured":"Correia-Pinto JM, Poleri F, Barbosa JP, Casimiro R, Azevedo MS, Andresen C, et al. Comparing polyurethane and acellular dermal matrix implant cover in prepectoral breast reconstruction: short-term complications. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2023;11(2):e4798.","journal-title":"Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open"},{"key":"5915_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"15","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bjps.2024.01.025","volume":"91","author":"JM Correia-Pinto","year":"2024","unstructured":"Correia-Pinto JM, Andresen C, Barbosa JP, Poleri F, Casimiro R, Gon\u00e7alves D, et al. Impact of polyurethane versus acellular dermal matrix coating on prepectoral reconstruction outcomes: interface does matter. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2024;91:15\u201323.","journal-title":"J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg"},{"issue":"6","key":"5915_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"567","DOI":"10.5999\/aps.2020.01207","volume":"47","author":"F Neamonitou","year":"2020","unstructured":"Neamonitou F, Mylvaganam S, Salem F, Vidya R. Outcome of complete acellular dermal matrix wrap with polyurethane implant in immediate prepectoral breast reconstruction. Arch Plast Surg. 2020;47(6):567\u201373.","journal-title":"Arch Plast Surg"},{"issue":"8","key":"5915_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1045","DOI":"10.3109\/0284186X.2012.695087","volume":"51","author":"D Shamley","year":"2012","unstructured":"Shamley D, Lascurain-Aguirrebe\u00f1a I, Oskrochi R, Srinaganathan R. Shoulder morbidity after treatment for breast cancer is bilateral and greater after mastectomy. Acta Oncol. 2012;51(8):1045\u201353.","journal-title":"Acta Oncol"},{"issue":"3","key":"5915_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"402","DOI":"10.1007\/s12282-022-01347-z","volume":"29","author":"S Ficarra","year":"2022","unstructured":"Ficarra S, Thomas E, Bianco A, Gentile A, Thaller P, Grassadonio F, et al. Impact of exercise interventions on physical fitness in breast cancer patients and survivors: a systematic review. Breast Cancer. 2022;29(3):402\u201318.","journal-title":"Breast Cancer"},{"issue":"4","key":"5915_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"272","DOI":"10.1016\/j.clbc.2017.01.006","volume":"17","author":"MC de Boer","year":"2017","unstructured":"de Boer MC, W\u00f6rner EA, Verlaan D, van Leeuwen PAM. The mechanisms and effects of physical activity on breast cancer. Clin Breast Cancer. 2017;17(4):272\u20138.","journal-title":"Clin Breast Cancer"},{"key":"5915_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"787","DOI":"10.1007\/s00520-020-05534-6","volume":"29","author":"DE McGhee","year":"2021","unstructured":"McGhee DE, Steele JR. Physical side-effects following breast reconstructive surgery impact physical activity and function. Support Care Cancer. 2021;29:787\u201394.","journal-title":"Support Care Cancer"}],"container-title":["Aesthetic Plastic Surgery"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00266-026-05915-y.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00266-026-05915-y","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00266-026-05915-y.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,3]],"date-time":"2026-08-03T19:11:37Z","timestamp":1785784297000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00266-026-05915-y"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,26]]},"references-count":26,"journal-issue":{"issue":"13","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,7]]}},"alternative-id":["5915"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00266-026-05915-y","relation":{},"ISSN":["0364-216X","1432-5241"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0364-216X","type":"print"},{"value":"1432-5241","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,26]]},"assertion":[{"value":"14 May 2025","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"17 April 2026","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"26 May 2026","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.","order":1,"name":"Ethics","label":"Conflict of interest","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"This study was conducted according to Good Clinical Practice requirements and the 1975 Declaration of Helsinki principles. The study was submitted to the institutional review board (Comitato Etico Territoriale delle Marche, PREPEC\/4252).","order":2,"name":"Ethics","label":"Ethical Approval","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"Written informed consent for surgery and use of data for academic and study purposes was obtained from all patients.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","label":"Informed Consent","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}}]}}