{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,1]],"date-time":"2025-11-01T17:31:24Z","timestamp":1762018284310},"reference-count":31,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"6","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,4,27]],"date-time":"2020-04-27T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1587945600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,4,27]],"date-time":"2020-04-27T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1587945600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,6]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s00270-020-02465-x","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,4,27]],"date-time":"2020-04-27T16:41:58Z","timestamp":1588005718000},"page":"889-896","update-policy":"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["Full Percutaneous Treatment of Degenerative Disc Disease with Intradiscal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Posterior Stabilization: Preliminary Results"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"43","author":[{"given":"R.","family":"Fiori","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"M.","family":"Forcina","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"L.","family":"Spiritigliozzi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"C.","family":"Di Donna","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"A. U.","family":"Cavallo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"A.","family":"D\u2019Onofrio","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"R.","family":"Floris","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,4,27]]},"reference":[{"key":"2465_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3171\/SPI.2008.9.08142","author":"SS Dhall","year":"2008","unstructured":"Dhall SS, Wang MY, Mummaneni PV. Clinical and radiographic comparison of mini\u2013open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in 42 patients with long-term follow-up. J Neurosurg Spine. 2008. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3171\/SPI.2008.9.08142.","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"key":"2465_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1398-9995.2009.01973.x","author":"JL Broek","year":"2009","unstructured":"Broek JL, Akl EA, Alonso-Coello P, et al. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in clinical practice guidelines: part 1 of 3. An overview of the GRADE approach and grading quality of evidence about interventions. Allergy Eur J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1398-9995.2009.01973.x.","journal-title":"Allergy Eur J Allergy Clin Immunol"},{"key":"2465_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/BSD.0b013e3182055cac","author":"O Adogwa","year":"2011","unstructured":"Adogwa O, Parker SL, Bydon A, Cheng J, McGirt MJ. Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: 2-year assessment of narcotic use, return to work, disability, and quality of life. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2011. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/BSD.0b013e3182055cac.","journal-title":"J Spinal Disord Tech"},{"key":"2465_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s11999-014-3465-5","author":"CL Goldstein","year":"2014","unstructured":"Goldstein CL, Macwan K, Sundararajan K, Rampersaud YR. Comparative outcomes of minimally invasive surgery for posterior lumbar fusion: a systematic review. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11999-014-3465-5.","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res"},{"key":"2465_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1155\/2017\/7236970","author":"D Serban","year":"2017","unstructured":"Serban D, Calina N, Tender G. Standard versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a prospective randomized study. Biomed Res Int. 2017. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1155\/2017\/7236970.","journal-title":"Biomed Res Int"},{"key":"2465_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3171\/2014.2.SPINE13794","author":"SW Terman","year":"2014","unstructured":"Terman SW, Yee TJ, Lau D, Khan AA, La Marca F, Park P. Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: comparison of clinical outcomes among obese patients. J Neurosurg Spine. 2014. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3171\/2014.2.SPINE13794.","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"key":"2465_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1155\/2016\/2518394","author":"WS Choi","year":"2016","unstructured":"Choi WS, Kim JS, Ryu KS, Hur JW, Seong JH. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion at L5-S1 through a unilateral approach: technical feasibility and outcomes. Biomed Res Int. 2016. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1155\/2016\/2518394.","journal-title":"Biomed Res Int"},{"key":"2465_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0035-1554809","author":"Y Lin","year":"2015","unstructured":"Lin Y, Chen W, Chen A, Li F. Comparison between minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a meta-analysis of clinical results and safety outcomes. J Neurol Surg Part A Cent Eur Neurosurg. 2015. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1055\/s-0035-1554809.","journal-title":"J Neurol Surg Part A Cent Eur Neurosurg"},{"key":"2465_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2147\/MDER.S112523","author":"JD Coe","year":"2016","unstructured":"Coe JD, Zucherman JF, Kucharzyk DW, Poelstra KA, Miller LE, Kunwar S. Multiexpandable cage for minimally invasive posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Med Dev Evid Res. 2016. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2147\/MDER.S112523.","journal-title":"Med Dev Evid Res"},{"key":"2465_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.14444\/2041","author":"R Morgenstern","year":"2015","unstructured":"Morgenstern R, Morgenstern C. Percutaneous transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (pTLIF) with a posterolateral approach for the treatment of degenerative disk disease: feasibility and preliminary results. Int J Spine Surg. 2015. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.14444\/2041.","journal-title":"Int J Spine Surg"},{"key":"2465_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-200109010-00011","author":"CWA Pfirrmann","year":"2001","unstructured":"Pfirrmann CWA, Metzdorf A, Zanetti M, Hodler J, Boos N. Magnetic resonance classification of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration. Spine Phila Pa 1976. 2001. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/00007632-200109010-00011.","journal-title":"Spine Phila Pa 1976"},{"key":"2465_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-200011150-00017","author":"JCT Fairbank","year":"2000","unstructured":"Fairbank JCT, Pynsent PB. The oswestry disability index. Spine Phila Pa 1976. 2000. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/00007632-200011150-00017.","journal-title":"Spine Phila Pa 1976"},{"key":"2465_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00270-017-1703-4","author":"DK Filippiadis","year":"2017","unstructured":"Filippiadis DK, Binkert C, Pellerin O, Hoffmann RT, Krajina A, Pereira PL. Cirse quality assurance document and standards for classification of complications: the cirse classification system. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2017. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00270-017-1703-4.","journal-title":"Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol"},{"key":"2465_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jocn.2014.08.008","author":"AJ Talia","year":"2015","unstructured":"Talia AJ, Wong ML, Lau HC, Kaye AH. Comparison of the different surgical approaches for lumbar interbody fusion. J Clin Neurosci. 2015. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jocn.2014.08.008.","journal-title":"J Clin Neurosci"},{"key":"2465_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/brs.0b013e3182a8212d","author":"C Seng","year":"2013","unstructured":"Seng C, Siddiqui MA, Wong KPL, et al. Five-year outcomes of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a matched-pair comparison study. Spine Phila Pa 1976. 2013. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/brs.0b013e3182a8212d.","journal-title":"Spine Phila Pa 1976"},{"issue":"1","key":"2465_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2","DOI":"10.3978\/j.issn.2414-469X.2015.10.05","volume":"1","author":"R Mobbs","year":"2015","unstructured":"Mobbs R, Phan K, Malham G, et al. Lumbar interbody fusion: techniques, indications and comparison of interbody fusion options including PLIF, TLIF, MI-TLIF, OLIF\/ATP, LLIF and ALIF. J Spine Surg. 2015;1(1):2\u201318. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3978\/j.issn.2414-469X.2015.10.05.","journal-title":"J Spine Surg"},{"key":"2465_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jocn.2017.06.013","author":"I Teng","year":"2017","unstructured":"Teng I, Han J, Phan K, Mobbs R. A meta-analysis comparing ALIF, PLIF, TLIF and LLIF. J Clin Neurosci. 2017. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jocn.2017.06.013.","journal-title":"J Clin Neurosci"},{"key":"2465_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2013.06.066","author":"MG Lykissas","year":"2014","unstructured":"Lykissas MG, Aichmair A, Hughes AP, et al. Nerve injury after lateral lumbar interbody fusion: a review of 919 treated levels with identification of risk factors. Spine J. 2014. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.spinee.2013.06.066.","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"key":"2465_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cuor.2008.07.006","author":"TS Madhu","year":"2008","unstructured":"Madhu TS. Posterior and anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Curr Orthop. 2008. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.cuor.2008.07.006.","journal-title":"Curr Orthop"},{"key":"2465_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0035-1557141","author":"RJ Mobbs","year":"2015","unstructured":"Mobbs RJ, Phan K, Daly D, Rao PJ, Lennox A. Approach-related complications of anterior lumbar interbody fusion: results of a combined spine and vascular surgical team. Glob Spine J. 2015. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1055\/s-0035-1557141.","journal-title":"Glob Spine J"},{"key":"2465_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S1155-1704(07)89699-6","author":"V Rajaraman","year":"1999","unstructured":"Rajaraman V, Vingan R, Roth P, Heary RF, Conklin L, Jacobs GB. Visceral and vascular complications resulting from anterior lumbar interbody fusion. J Neurosurg Spine. 1999. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S1155-1704(07)89699-6.","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"key":"2465_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.inat.2016.07.001","author":"SL de Kunder","year":"2016","unstructured":"de Kunder SL, Rijkers K, van Hemert WLW, Willems PCPH, ter Laak-Poort MP, van Santbrink H. Transforaminal versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion as operative treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis, a retrospective case series. Interdiscip Neurosurg Adv Tech Case Manag. 2016. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.inat.2016.07.001.","journal-title":"Interdiscip Neurosurg Adv Tech Case Manag"},{"key":"2465_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.5435\/JAAOS-20-05-283","author":"J Chrastil","year":"2012","unstructured":"Chrastil J, Patel AA. Complications associated with posterior and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2012. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5435\/JAAOS-20-05-283.","journal-title":"J Am Acad Orthop Surg"},{"key":"2465_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/01.bsd.0000185277.14484.4e","author":"AT Villavicencio","year":"2006","unstructured":"Villavicencio AT, Burneikiene S, Bulsara KR, Thramann JJ. Perioperative complications in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus anterior-posterior reconstruction for lumbar disc degeneration and instability. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2006. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/01.bsd.0000185277.14484.4e.","journal-title":"J Spinal Disord Tech"},{"key":"2465_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.4103\/2152-7806.92933","author":"S Burneikiene","year":"2012","unstructured":"Burneikiene S, Mason A, Serxner B, Nelson E, Rajpal S, Villavicencio A. Complications in patients undergoing combined transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and posterior instrumentation with deformity correction for degenerative scoliosis and spinal stenosis. Surg Neurol Int. 2012. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4103\/2152-7806.92933.","journal-title":"Surg Neurol Int"},{"key":"2465_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2017.01.114","author":"N Lee","year":"2017","unstructured":"Lee N, Kim KN, Yi S, et al. Comparison of outcomes of anterior, posterior, and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion surgery at a single lumbar level with degenerative spinal disease. World Neurosurg. 2017. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.wneu.2017.01.114.","journal-title":"World Neurosurg"},{"key":"2465_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00402-012-1546-z","author":"SD Jiang","year":"2012","unstructured":"Jiang SD, Chen JW, Jiang LS. Which procedure is better for lumbar interbody fusion: anterior lumbar interbody fusion or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion? Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2012. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00402-012-1546-z.","journal-title":"Arch Orthop Trauma Surg"},{"key":"2465_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2013.11.050","author":"V Goz","year":"2014","unstructured":"Goz V, Weinreb JH, Schwab F, Lafage V, Errico TJ. Comparison of complications, costs, and length of stay of three different lumbar interbody fusion techniques: an analysis of the nationwide inpatient sample database. Spine J. 2014. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.spinee.2013.11.050.","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"key":"2465_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/brs.0000000000002248","author":"R Qureshi","year":"2017","unstructured":"Qureshi R, Puvanesarajah V, Jain A, Shimer AL, Shen FH, Hassanzadeh H. A comparison of anterior and posterior lumbar interbody fusions\u2014complications, readmissions, discharge dispositions and costs. Spine Phila Pa 1976. 2017. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/brs.0000000000002248.","journal-title":"Spine Phila Pa 1976"},{"key":"2465_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1155\/2019\/3091459","author":"J Yang","year":"2019","unstructured":"Yang J, Liu C, Hai Y, et al. Percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: preliminary report of seven cases with 12-month follow-up. Biomed Res Int. 2019. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1155\/2019\/3091459.","journal-title":"Biomed Res Int"},{"key":"2465_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.14444\/5083","author":"R Morgenstern","year":"2018","unstructured":"Morgenstern R, Morgenstern C. Feasibility of full percutaneous segmental stabilization of the lumbar spine with a combination of an expandable interbody cage and an interspinous spacer: preliminary results. Int J Spine Surg. 2018. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.14444\/5083.","journal-title":"Int J Spine Surg"}],"container-title":["CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00270-020-02465-x.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00270-020-02465-x\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00270-020-02465-x.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,4,26]],"date-time":"2021-04-26T23:45:38Z","timestamp":1619480738000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00270-020-02465-x"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,4,27]]},"references-count":31,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,6]]}},"alternative-id":["2465"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00270-020-02465-x","relation":{},"ISSN":["0174-1551","1432-086X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0174-1551","type":"print"},{"value":"1432-086X","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,4,27]]},"assertion":[{"value":"20 September 2019","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"24 March 2020","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"27 April 2020","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Compliance with Ethical Standards"}},{"value":"The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}},{"value":"All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and\/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Human Participants and Animals"}},{"value":"Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Informed Consent"}},{"value":"Consent for publication was obtained for every individual person\u2019s data included in the study.","order":5,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent for Publication"}}]}}