{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,17]],"date-time":"2026-03-17T18:11:48Z","timestamp":1773771108800,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":39,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"5","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2014,2,6]],"date-time":"2014-02-06T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1391644800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Eur Radiol"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2014,5]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-014-3102-4","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2014,2,5]],"date-time":"2014-02-05T10:48:19Z","timestamp":1391597299000},"page":"1097-1104","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":9,"title":["Variations in screening outcome among pairs of screening radiologists at non-blinded double reading of screening mammograms: a population-based study"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"24","author":[{"given":"E. G.","family":"Klompenhouwer","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"L. E. M.","family":"Duijm","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"A. C.","family":"Voogd","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"G. J.","family":"den Heeten","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"J.","family":"Nederend","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"F. H","family":"Jansen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"M. J. M.","family":"Broeders","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2014,2,6]]},"reference":[{"key":"3102_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"735","DOI":"10.1093\/ije\/27.5.735","volume":"27","author":"S Shapiro","year":"1998","unstructured":"Shapiro S, Coleman EA, Broeders M et al (1998) Breast cancer screening programmes in 22 countries: current policies, administration and guidelines. International Breast Cancer Screening Network (IBSN) and the European Network of Pilot Projects for Breast Cancer Screening. Int J Epidemiol 27:735\u2013742","journal-title":"Int J Epidemiol"},{"key":"3102_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1675","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa0803545","volume":"359","author":"FJ Gilbert","year":"2008","unstructured":"Gilbert FJ, Astley SM, Gillan MG et al (2008) Single reading with computer-aided detection for screening mammography. N Engl J Med 359:1675\u20131684","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"3102_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1399","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa066099","volume":"356","author":"JJ Fenton","year":"2007","unstructured":"Fenton JJ, Taplin SH, Carney PA et al (2007) Influence of computer-aided detection on performance of screening mammography. N Engl J Med 356:1399\u20131409","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"3102_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1152","DOI":"10.1093\/jnci\/djr206","volume":"103","author":"JJ Fenton","year":"2011","unstructured":"Fenton JJ, Abraham L, Taplin SH et al (2011) Effectiveness of computer-aided detection in community mammography practice. J Natl Cancer Inst 103:1152\u20131161","journal-title":"J Natl Cancer Inst"},{"key":"3102_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"809","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.312.7034.809","volume":"312","author":"J Brown","year":"1996","unstructured":"Brown J, Bryan S, Warren R (1996) Mammography screening: an incremental cost effectiveness analysis of double versus single reading of mammograms. BMJ 312:809\u2013812","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"3102_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1461","DOI":"10.2214\/ajr.180.5.1801461","volume":"180","author":"SC Harvey","year":"2003","unstructured":"Harvey SC, Geller B, Oppenheimer RG, Pinet M, Riddell L, Garra B (2003) Increase in cancer detection and recall rates with independent double interpretation of screening mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 180:1461\u20131467","journal-title":"AJR Am J Roentgenol"},{"key":"3102_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"774","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejca.2008.10.020","volume":"45","author":"LE Duijm","year":"2009","unstructured":"Duijm LE, Groenewoud JH, de Koning HJ et al (2009) Delayed diagnosis of breast cancer in women recalled for suspicious screening mammography. Eur J Cancer 45:774\u2013781","journal-title":"Eur J Cancer"},{"key":"3102_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"241","DOI":"10.1148\/radiology.191.1.8134580","volume":"191","author":"EL Thurfjell","year":"1994","unstructured":"Thurfjell EL, Lernevall KA, Taube AA (1994) Benefit of independent double reading in a population-based mammography screening program. Radiology 191:241\u2013244","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"3102_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"798","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejca.2008.02.016","volume":"44","author":"P Taylor","year":"2008","unstructured":"Taylor P, Potts HW (2008) Computer aids and human second reading as interventions in screening mammography: two systematic reviews to compare effects on cancer detection and recall rate. Eur J Cancer 44:798\u2013807","journal-title":"Eur J Cancer"},{"key":"3102_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"113","DOI":"10.1007\/s10549-006-9468-5","volume":"106","author":"LE Duijm","year":"2007","unstructured":"Duijm LE, Groenewoud JH, Roumen RM, de Koning HJ, Plaisier ML, Fracheboud J (2007) A decade of breast cancer screening in The Netherlands: trends in the preoperative diagnosis of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 106:113\u2013119","journal-title":"Breast Cancer Res Treat"},{"key":"3102_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"529","DOI":"10.1148\/radiology.211.2.r99ma32529","volume":"211","author":"JM Tonita","year":"1999","unstructured":"Tonita JM, Hillis JP, Lim CH (1999) Medical radiologic technologist review: effects on a population-based breast cancer screening program. Radiology 211:529\u2013533","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"3102_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1223","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejca.2008.03.003","volume":"44","author":"LE Duijm","year":"2008","unstructured":"Duijm LE, Groenewoud JH, Fracheboud J, van Ineveld BM, Roumen RM, de Koning HJ (2008) Introduction of additional double reading of mammograms by radiographers: effects on a biennial screening programme outcome. Eur J Cancer 44:1223\u20131228","journal-title":"Eur J Cancer"},{"key":"3102_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"353","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2532090225","volume":"253","author":"N Karssemeijer","year":"2009","unstructured":"Karssemeijer N, Bluekens AM, Beijerinck D et al (2009) Breast cancer screening results 5\u00a0years after introduction of digital mammography in a population-based screening program. Radiology 253:353\u2013358","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"3102_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"564","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2312030665","volume":"231","author":"LE Duijm","year":"2004","unstructured":"Duijm LE, Groenewoud JH, Hendriks JH, de Koning HJ (2004) Independent double reading of screening mammograms in The Netherlands: effect of arbitration following reader disagreements. Radiology 231:564\u2013570","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"3102_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"6","DOI":"10.1054\/brst.2000.0212","volume":"10","author":"J Fracheboud","year":"2001","unstructured":"Fracheboud J, de Koning HJ, Boer R et al (2001) Nationwide breast cancer screening programme fully implemented in The Netherlands. Breast 10:6\u201311","journal-title":"Breast"},{"key":"3102_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"34","DOI":"10.1259\/bjr.70.829.9059292","volume":"70","author":"RM Maes","year":"1997","unstructured":"Maes RM, Dronkers DJ, Hendriks JH, Thijssen MA, Nab HW (1997) Do non-specific minimal signs in a biennial mammographic breast cancer screening programme need further diagnostic assessment? Br J Radiol 70:34\u201338","journal-title":"Br J Radiol"},{"key":"3102_CR17","volume-title":"TNM classification of malignant tumours","author":"LH Sobin","year":"2002","unstructured":"Sobin LH, Wittekind C (2002) TNM classification of malignant tumours. Wiley-Liss, New York"},{"key":"3102_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1795","DOI":"10.1038\/sj.bjc.6602158","volume":"91","author":"LE Duijm","year":"2004","unstructured":"Duijm LE, Groenewoud JH, Jansen FH, Fracheboud J, van Beek M, de Koning HJ (2004) Mammography screening in the Netherlands: delay in the diagnosis of breast cancer after breast cancer screening. Br J Cancer 91:1795\u20131799","journal-title":"Br J Cancer"},{"key":"3102_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"9","DOI":"10.1007\/BF02967182","volume":"7","author":"R Warren","year":"2000","unstructured":"Warren R, Duffy S (2000) Interval cancers as an indicator of performance in breast screening. Breast Cancer 7:9\u201318","journal-title":"Breast Cancer"},{"key":"3102_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"409","DOI":"10.1016\/S0033-8389(01)00017-3","volume":"40","author":"L Liberman","year":"2002","unstructured":"Liberman L, Menell JH (2002) Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS). Radiol Clin North Am 40:409\u2013430","journal-title":"Radiol Clin North Am"},{"key":"3102_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"463","DOI":"10.1148\/radiology.179.2.2014293","volume":"179","author":"EA Sickles","year":"1991","unstructured":"Sickles EA (1991) Periodic mammographic follow-up of probably benign lesions: results in 3,184 consecutive cases. Radiology 179:463\u2013468","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"3102_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"691","DOI":"10.2214\/ajr.179.3.1790691","volume":"179","author":"X Varas","year":"2002","unstructured":"Varas X, Leborgne JH, Leborgne F, Mezzera J, Jaumandreu S, Leborgne F (2002) Revisiting the mammographic follow-up of BI-RADS category 3 lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 179:691\u2013695","journal-title":"AJR Am J Roentgenol"},{"key":"3102_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"282","DOI":"10.1093\/jnci\/95.4.282","volume":"95","author":"CA Beam","year":"2003","unstructured":"Beam CA, Conant EF, Sickles EA (2003) Association of volume and volume-independent factors with accuracy in screening mammogram interpretation. J Natl Cancer Inst 95:282\u2013290","journal-title":"J Natl Cancer Inst"},{"key":"3102_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"901","DOI":"10.1038\/sj.bjc.6604954","volume":"100","author":"LE Duijm","year":"2009","unstructured":"Duijm LE, Louwman MW, Groenewoud JH, van de Poll-Franse LV, Fracheboud J, Coebergh JW (2009) Inter-observer variability in mammography screening and effect of type and number of readers on screening outcome. Br J Cancer 100:901\u2013907","journal-title":"Br J Cancer"},{"key":"3102_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1373","DOI":"10.1093\/jnci\/94.18.1373","volume":"94","author":"JG Elmore","year":"2002","unstructured":"Elmore JG, Miglioretti DL, Reisch LM et al (2002) Screening mammograms by community radiologists: variability in false-positive rates. J Natl Cancer Inst 94:1373\u20131380","journal-title":"J Natl Cancer Inst"},{"key":"3102_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"72","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.10101698","volume":"259","author":"DS Buist","year":"2011","unstructured":"Buist DS, Anderson ML, Haneuse SJ et al (2011) Influence of annual interpretive volume on screening mammography performance in the United States. Radiology 259:72\u201384","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"3102_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"369","DOI":"10.1093\/jnci\/94.5.369","volume":"94","author":"L Esserman","year":"2002","unstructured":"Esserman L, Cowley H, Eberle C et al (2002) Improving the accuracy of mammography: volume and outcome relationships. J Natl Cancer Inst 94:369\u2013375","journal-title":"J Natl Cancer Inst"},{"key":"3102_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1590","DOI":"10.1002\/cncr.20053","volume":"100","author":"D Gur","year":"2004","unstructured":"Gur D, Sumkin JH, Hardesty LA et al (2004) Recall and detection rates in screening mammography. Cancer 100:1590\u20131594","journal-title":"Cancer"},{"key":"3102_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"641","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2533082308","volume":"253","author":"JG Elmore","year":"2009","unstructured":"Elmore JG, Jackson SL, Abraham L et al (2009) Variability in interpretive performance at screening mammography and radiologists' characteristics associated with accuracy. Radiology 253:641\u2013651","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"3102_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"354","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.10091636","volume":"255","author":"PA Carney","year":"2010","unstructured":"Carney PA, Sickles EA, Monsees BS et al (2010) Identifying minimally acceptable interpretive performance criteria for screening mammography. Radiology 255:354\u2013361","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"3102_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"960","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.101735","volume":"258","author":"GP Doyle","year":"2011","unstructured":"Doyle GP, Onysko J, Pogany L et al (2011) Limitations of minimally acceptable interpretive performance criteria for screening mammography. Radiology 258:960\u2013961","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"3102_CR32","unstructured":"National Evaluation Team for Breast Cancer Screening (NETB) (2009) National evaluation of breast National cancer in the Netherlands 1990\u20132007, twelth evaluation report. Erasmus MC, Rotterdam"},{"key":"3102_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2129","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.290.16.2129","volume":"290","author":"R Smith-Bindman","year":"2003","unstructured":"Smith-Bindman R, Chu PW, Miglioretti DL et al (2003) Comparison of screening mammography in the United States and the United Kingdom. JAMA 290:2129\u20132137","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"3102_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"493","DOI":"10.7326\/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00005","volume":"155","author":"K Kerlikowske","year":"2011","unstructured":"Kerlikowske K, Hubbard RA, Miglioretti DL et al (2011) Comparative effectiveness of digital versus film-screen mammography in community practice in the United States: a cohort study. Ann Intern Med 155:493\u2013502","journal-title":"Ann Intern Med"},{"key":"3102_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1773","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa052911","volume":"353","author":"ED Pisano","year":"2005","unstructured":"Pisano ED, Gatsonis C, Hendrick E et al (2005) Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening. N Engl J Med 353:1773\u20131783","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"3102_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"694","DOI":"10.1002\/(SICI)1097-0215(19980302)75:5<694::AID-IJC6>3.0.CO;2-U","volume":"75","author":"J Fracheboud","year":"1998","unstructured":"Fracheboud J, de Koning HJ, Beemsterboer PM et al (1998) Nation-wide breast cancer screening in The Netherlands: results of initial and subsequent screening 1990-1995. National Evaluation Team for Breast Cancer Screening. Int J Cancer 75:694\u2013698","journal-title":"Int J Cancer"},{"key":"3102_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"748","DOI":"10.1093\/jnci\/dji131","volume":"97","author":"JD Otten","year":"2005","unstructured":"Otten JD, Karssemeijer N, Hendriks JH et al (2005) Effect of recall rate on earlier screen detection of breast cancers based on the Dutch performance indicators. J Natl Cancer Inst 97:748\u2013754","journal-title":"J Natl Cancer Inst"},{"key":"3102_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3098","DOI":"10.1093\/annonc\/mds146","volume":"23","author":"J Nederend","year":"2012","unstructured":"Nederend J, Duijm LE, Louwman MW, Groenewoud JH, Donkers-van Rossum AB, Voogd AC (2012) Impact of transition from analog screening mammography to digital screening mammography on screening outcome in The Netherlands: a population-based study. Ann Oncol 23:3098\u20133103","journal-title":"Ann Oncol"},{"key":"3102_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"632","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2533090070","volume":"253","author":"DL Miglioretti","year":"2009","unstructured":"Miglioretti DL, Gard CC, Carney PA et al (2009) When radiologists perform best: the learning curve in screening mammogram interpretation. Radiology 253:632\u2013640","journal-title":"Radiology"}],"container-title":["European Radiology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00330-014-3102-4.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00330-014-3102-4\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00330-014-3102-4","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,5,28]],"date-time":"2019-05-28T12:02:05Z","timestamp":1559044925000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00330-014-3102-4"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2014,2,6]]},"references-count":39,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2014,5]]}},"alternative-id":["3102"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00330-014-3102-4","relation":{},"ISSN":["0938-7994","1432-1084"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0938-7994","type":"print"},{"value":"1432-1084","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2014,2,6]]}}}