{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,19]],"date-time":"2026-01-19T13:39:15Z","timestamp":1768829955902,"version":"3.49.0"},"reference-count":41,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"8","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2018,2,19]],"date-time":"2018-02-19T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1518998400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100003252","name":"Lund University","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100003252","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"crossref"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Eur Radiol"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,8]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-017-5297-7","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2018,2,19]],"date-time":"2018-02-19T10:39:36Z","timestamp":1519036776000},"page":"3194-3203","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":9,"title":["The role of breast tomosynthesis in a predominantly dense breast population at a tertiary breast centre: breast density assessment and diagnostic performance in comparison with MRI"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"28","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-5083-7624","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Daniel","family":"F\u00f6rnvik","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Masako","family":"Kataoka","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Mami","family":"Iima","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Akane","family":"Ohashi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Shotaro","family":"Kanao","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Masakazu","family":"Toi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Kaori","family":"Togashi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2018,2,19]]},"reference":[{"key":"5297_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"616","DOI":"10.2214\/AJR.07.2231","volume":"189","author":"SP Poplack","year":"2007","unstructured":"Poplack SP, Tosteson TD, Kogel CA et al (2007) Digital breast tomosynthesis: initial experience in 98 women with abnormal digital screening mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189:616\u2013623","journal-title":"AJR Am J Roentgenol"},{"key":"5297_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2817","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-008-1076-9","volume":"18","author":"I Andersson","year":"2008","unstructured":"Andersson I, Ikeda DM, Zackrisson S et al (2008) Breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography: a comparison of breast cancer visibility and BIRADS classification in a population of cancers with subtle mammographic findings. Eur Radiol 18:2817\u20132825","journal-title":"Eur Radiol"},{"key":"5297_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"586","DOI":"10.2214\/AJR.08.2031","volume":"193","author":"D Gur","year":"2009","unstructured":"Gur D, Abrams GS, Chough DM et al (2009) Digital breast tomosynthesis: observer performance study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193:586\u2013591","journal-title":"AJR Am J Roentgenol"},{"key":"5297_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"104","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.12120674","volume":"266","author":"EA Rafferty","year":"2013","unstructured":"Rafferty EA, Park JM, Philpotts LE et al(2013) Assessing radiologist performance using combined digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis compared with digital mammography alone: results of a multicenter, multireader trial. Radiology 266:104\u2013113","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"5297_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2499","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2014.6095","volume":"311","author":"SM Friedewald","year":"2014","unstructured":"Friedewald SM, Rafferty EA, Rose SL et al (2014) Breast cancer screening using tomosynthesis in combination with digital mammography. JAMA 311:2499\u20132507","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"5297_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"697","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2015142566","volume":"277","author":"FJ Gilbert","year":"2015","unstructured":"Gilbert FJ, Tucker L, Gillan MG et al (2015) Accuracy of digital breast tomosynthesis for depicting breast cancer subgroups in a UK retrospective reading study (TOMMY Trial). Radiology 277:697\u2013706","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"5297_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"47","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.12121373","volume":"267","author":"P Skaane","year":"2013","unstructured":"Skaane P, Bandos AI, Gullien R et al (2013) Comparison of digital mammography alone and digital mammography plus tomosynthesis in a population-based screening program. Radiology 267:47\u201356","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"issue":"7","key":"5297_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"583","DOI":"10.1016\/S1470-2045(13)70134-7","volume":"14","author":"S Ciatto","year":"2013","unstructured":"Ciatto S, Houssami N, Bernardi D et al (2013) Integration of 3D digital mammography with tomosynthesis for population breast-cancer screening (STORM): a prospective comparison study. Lancet Oncol 14(7):583\u2013589","journal-title":"Lancet Oncol"},{"key":"5297_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"184","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-015-3803-3","volume":"26","author":"K L\u00e5ng","year":"2016","unstructured":"L\u00e5ng K, Andersson I, Rosso A et al (2016) Performance of one-view breast tomosynthesis as a stand-alone breast cancer screening modality: results from the Malm\u00f6 Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial, a population-based study. Eur Radiol 26:184\u2013190","journal-title":"Eur Radiol"},{"key":"5297_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"227","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa062790","volume":"356","author":"NF Boyd","year":"2007","unstructured":"Boyd NF, Guo H, Martin LJ et al (2007) Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 356:227\u2013236","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"5297_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"439","DOI":"10.1186\/s13058-014-0439-1","volume":"16","author":"A Eng","year":"2014","unstructured":"Eng A, Gallant Z, Shepherd J et al (2014) Digital mammographic density and breast cancer risk: a case-control study of six alternative density assessment methods. Breast Cancer Res 16:439","journal-title":"Breast Cancer Res"},{"key":"5297_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2102","DOI":"10.1038\/sj.bjc.6602643","volume":"92","author":"C Nagata","year":"2005","unstructured":"Nagata C, Matsubara T, Fujita H et al (2005) Mammographic density and the risk of breast cancer in Japanese women. Br J Cancer 92:2102\u20132106","journal-title":"Br J Cancer"},{"key":"5297_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"367","DOI":"10.3961\/jpmph.16.054","volume":"49","author":"JM Bae","year":"2016","unstructured":"Bae JM, Kim EH (2016) Breast density and risk of breast cancer in Asian women: a meta-analysis of observational studies. J Prev Med Public Health 49:367\u2013375","journal-title":"J Prev Med Public Health"},{"key":"5297_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"47","DOI":"10.1007\/s10549-006-9387-5","volume":"104","author":"G Maskarinec","year":"2007","unstructured":"Maskarinec G, Pagano I, Chen Z et al (2007) Ethnic and geographic differences in mammographic density and their association with breast cancer incidence. Breast Cancer Res Treat 104:47\u201356","journal-title":"Breast Cancer Res Treat"},{"key":"5297_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"884","DOI":"10.1093\/jjco\/hyv088","volume":"45","author":"M Hori","year":"2015","unstructured":"Hori M, Matsuda T, Shibata A et al (2015) Cancer incidence and incidence rates in Japan in 2009: a study of 32 population-based cancer registries for the Monitoring of Cancer Incidence in Japan (MCIJ) project. Jpn J Clin Oncol 45:884\u2013891","journal-title":"Jpn J Clin Oncol"},{"key":"5297_CR16","volume-title":"ACR breast imaging and reporting data system: breast imaging atlas","author":"CJ D\u2019Orsi","year":"2003","unstructured":"D\u2019Orsi CJ, Mendelson EB, Ikeda DM (2003) ACR breast imaging and reporting data system: breast imaging atlas. American College of Radiology, Reston"},{"key":"5297_CR17","volume-title":"ACR BI-RADS\u00ae Atlas, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System","author":"CJ D\u2019Orsi","year":"2013","unstructured":"D\u2019Orsi CJ, Sickles EA, Mendelson EB et al (2013) ACR BI-RADS\u00ae Atlas, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. American College of Radiology, Reston"},{"key":"5297_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"481","DOI":"10.1111\/tbj.12443","volume":"21","author":"CC Gard","year":"2015","unstructured":"Gard CC, Aiello Bowles EJ, Miglioretti DL et al (2015) Misclassification of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) mammographic density and implications for breast density reporting legislation. Breast J 21:481\u2013489","journal-title":"Breast J"},{"key":"5297_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"276217","DOI":"10.1155\/2015\/276217","volume":"2015","author":"W He","year":"2015","unstructured":"He W, Juette A, Denton ER et al (2015) A review on automatic mammographic density and parenchymal segmentation. Int J Breast Cancer 2015:276217","journal-title":"Int J Breast Cancer"},{"key":"5297_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1159","DOI":"10.1158\/1055-9965.EPI-06-0034","volume":"15","author":"VA McCormack","year":"2006","unstructured":"McCormack VA, dos Santos Silva I (2006) Breast density and parenchymal patterns as markers of breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 15:1159\u20131169","journal-title":"Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev"},{"key":"5297_CR21","unstructured":"Are You Dense Advocacy. D.E.N.S.E. state efforts. http:\/\/Areyoudenseadvocacy.org\/dense\/ . Accessed 19 June 2017."},{"key":"5297_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"268","DOI":"10.7326\/M15-1789","volume":"164","author":"J Melnikow","year":"2016","unstructured":"Melnikow J, Fenton JJ, Whitlock EP et al (2016) Supplemental screening for breast cancer in women with dense breasts: a systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 164:268\u2013278","journal-title":"Ann Intern Med"},{"issue":"Suppl 2","key":"5297_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S77","DOI":"10.1016\/j.breast.2013.07.014","volume":"22","author":"SH Heywang-K\u00f6brunner","year":"2013","unstructured":"Heywang-K\u00f6brunner SH, Hacker A, Sedlacek S (2013) Magnetic resonance imaging: the evolution of breast imaging. Breast 22(Suppl 2):S77\u2013S82","journal-title":"Breast"},{"key":"5297_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"13","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2015150244","volume":"278","author":"M Iima","year":"2016","unstructured":"Iima M, Le Bihan D (2016) Clinical intravoxel incoherent motion and diffusion MR imaging: past, present, and future. Radiology 278:13\u201332","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"5297_CR25","unstructured":"ACR practice parameter for the performance of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the breast. The American College of Radiology, Revised 2013 (Resolution 12). https:\/\/www.acr.org\/~\/media\/2a0eb28eb59041e2825179afb72ef624.pdf"},{"key":"5297_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1296","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejca.2010.02.015","volume":"46","author":"F Sardanelli","year":"2010","unstructured":"Sardanelli F, Boetes C, Borisch B et al (2010) Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: recommendations from the EUSOMA working group. Eur J Cancer 46:1296\u20131316","journal-title":"Eur J Cancer"},{"key":"5297_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"4903","DOI":"10.1118\/1.4736530","volume":"39","author":"BM Keller","year":"2012","unstructured":"Keller BM, Nathan DL, Wang Y et al (2012) Estimation of breast percent density in raw and processed full field digital mammography images via adaptive fuzzy c-means clustering and support vector machine segmentation. Med Phys 39:4903\u20134917","journal-title":"Med Phys"},{"key":"5297_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"117","DOI":"10.1186\/s13058-015-0626-8","volume":"17","author":"BM Keller","year":"2015","unstructured":"Keller BM, Chen J, Daye D et al (2015) Preliminary evaluation of the publicly available Laboratory for Breast Radiodensity Assessment (LIBRA) software tool: comparison of fully automated area and volumetric density measures in a case-control study with digital mammography. Breast Cancer Res 17:117","journal-title":"Breast Cancer Res"},{"key":"5297_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"240","DOI":"10.3109\/02841850903524447","volume":"51","author":"D F\u00f6rnvik","year":"2010","unstructured":"F\u00f6rnvik D, Zackrisson S, Ljungberg O et al (2010) Breast tomosynthesis: accuracy of tumor measurement compared with digital mammography and ultrasonography. Acta Radiol 51:240\u2013247","journal-title":"Acta Radiol"},{"key":"5297_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1119","DOI":"10.1007\/s11547-013-0941-z","volume":"118","author":"A Luparia","year":"2013","unstructured":"Luparia A, Mariscotti G, Durando M et al (2013) Accuracy of tumour size assessment in the preoperative staging of breast cancer: comparison of digital mammography, tomosynthesis, ultrasound and MRI. Radiol Med 118:1119\u20131136","journal-title":"Radiol Med"},{"key":"5297_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1093\/jicru_ndn018","volume":"8","author":"The International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements","year":"2008","unstructured":"The International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements (2008) ICRU Report 79: receiver operating characteristic analysis in medical imaging. J ICRU 8:1\u201362","journal-title":"J ICRU"},{"key":"5297_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"27","DOI":"10.1016\/j.diii.2014.06.010","volume":"96","author":"J Mercier","year":"2015","unstructured":"Mercier J, Kwiatkowski F, Abrial C et al (2015) The role of tomosynthesis in breast cancer staging in 75 patients. Diagn Interv Imaging 96:27\u201335","journal-title":"Diagn Interv Imaging"},{"key":"5297_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2830","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-015-3720-5","volume":"25","author":"P Clauser","year":"2015","unstructured":"Clauser P, Carbonaro LA, Pancot M et al (2015) Additional findings at preoperative breast MRI: the value of second-look digital breast tomosynthesis. Eur Radiol 25:2830\u20132839","journal-title":"Eur Radiol"},{"key":"5297_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2673","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-015-3669-4","volume":"25","author":"G Mariscotti","year":"2015","unstructured":"Mariscotti G, Houssami N, Durando M et al(2015) Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) to characterize MRI-detected additional lesions unidentified at targeted ultrasound in newly diagnosed breast cancer patients. Eur Radiol 25:2673\u20132681","journal-title":"Eur Radiol"},{"key":"5297_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1556","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-015-3998-3","volume":"26","author":"WH Kim","year":"2016","unstructured":"Kim WH, Chang JM, Moon HG et al (2016) Comparison of the diagnostic performance of digital breast tomosynthesis and magnetic resonance imaging added to digital mammography in women with known breast cancers. Eur Radiol 26:1556\u20131564","journal-title":"Eur Radiol"},{"key":"5297_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1784","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2016.1708","volume":"315","author":"EA Rafferty","year":"2016","unstructured":"Rafferty EA, Durand MA, Conant EF et al (2016) Breast cancer screening using tomosynthesis and digital mammography in dense and nondense breasts. JAMA 315:1784\u20131786","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"5297_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Sprague BL, Gangnon RE, Burt V et al (2015) Prevalence of mammographically dense breasts in the United States. J Natl Cancer Inst 106(10). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/jnci\/dju255","DOI":"10.1093\/jnci\/dju255"},{"key":"5297_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"McCarthy AM, Keller BM, Pantalone LM et al (2016) Racial differences in quantitative measures of area and volumetric breast density. J Natl Cancer Inst 108(10). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/jnci\/djw104","DOI":"10.1093\/jnci\/djw104"},{"key":"5297_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"483","DOI":"10.1002\/jmri.24495","volume":"40","author":"NL Hansen","year":"2014","unstructured":"Hansen NL, Kuhl CK, Barabasch A et al (2014) Does MRI breast \u201cdensity\u201d (degree of background enhancement) correlate with mammographic breast density? J Magn Reson Imaging 40:483\u2013489","journal-title":"J Magn Reson Imaging"},{"key":"5297_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"50","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.11102156","volume":"260","author":"V King","year":"2011","unstructured":"King V, Brooks JD, Bernstein JL et al (2011) Background parenchymal enhancement at breast MR imaging and breast cancer risk. Radiology 260:50\u201360","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"5297_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"573","DOI":"10.1016\/j.crad.2017.02.013","volume":"72","author":"AV Chudgar","year":"2017","unstructured":"Chudgar AV, Conant EF, Weinstein SP et al (2017) Assessment of disease extent on contrast-enhanced MRI in breast cancer detected at digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography alone. Clin Radiol 72:573\u2013579","journal-title":"Clin Radiol"}],"container-title":["European Radiology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00330-017-5297-7\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00330-017-5297-7.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00330-017-5297-7.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,8,14]],"date-time":"2022-08-14T14:26:40Z","timestamp":1660487200000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00330-017-5297-7"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2018,2,19]]},"references-count":41,"journal-issue":{"issue":"8","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,8]]}},"alternative-id":["5297"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00330-017-5297-7","relation":{},"ISSN":["0938-7994","1432-1084"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0938-7994","type":"print"},{"value":"1432-1084","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2018,2,19]]},"assertion":[{"value":"23 August 2017","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"25 December 2017","order":2,"name":"revised","label":"Revised","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"28 December 2017","order":3,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"19 February 2018","order":4,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Compliance with ethical standards"}},{"value":"The scientific guarantor of this publication is Kaori Togashi, Kyoto University.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Guarantor"}},{"value":"The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies, whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}},{"value":"One of the authors has significant statistical expertise.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Statistics and biometry"}},{"value":"Written informed consent was waived by the Institutional Review Board.","order":5,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Informed consent"}},{"value":"Institutional Review Board approval was obtained.","order":6,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethical approval"}},{"value":"\u2022 prospective\u2022 diagnostic or prognostic study\u2022 performed at one institution","order":7,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Methodology"}}]}}