{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,30]],"date-time":"2026-10-30T02:00:37Z","timestamp":1793325637719,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":31,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2018,8,29]],"date-time":"2018-08-29T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1535500800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Eur Radiol"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,3]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-018-5690-x","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2018,8,29]],"date-time":"2018-08-29T20:13:05Z","timestamp":1535573585000},"page":"1175-1186","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":45,"title":["A randomized controlled trial of digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography in population-based screening in Bergen: interim analysis of performance indicators from the To-Be trial"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"29","author":[{"given":"Hildegunn S.","family":"Aase","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"\u00c5sne S","family":"Holen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Kristin","family":"Pedersen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Nehmat","family":"Houssami","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ingfrid S.","family":"Haldorsen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Sofie","family":"Sebu\u00f8deg\u00e5rd","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Berit","family":"Hanestad","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-0178-8939","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Solveig","family":"Hofvind","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2018,8,29]]},"reference":[{"key":"5690_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"583","DOI":"10.1016\/S1470-2045(13)70134-7","volume":"14","author":"S Ciatto","year":"2013","unstructured":"Ciatto S, Houssami N, Bernardi D et al (2013) Integration of 3D digital mammography with tomosynthesis for population breast-cancer screening (STORM): a prospective comparison study. Lancet Oncol 14:583\u2013589","journal-title":"Lancet Oncol"},{"key":"5690_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"47","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.12121373","volume":"267","author":"P Skaane","year":"2013","unstructured":"Skaane P, Bandos AI, Gullien R et al (2013) Comparison of digital mammography alone and digital mammography plus tomosynthesis in a population-based screening program. Radiology 267:47\u201356","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"5690_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1105","DOI":"10.1016\/S1470-2045(16)30101-2","volume":"17","author":"D Bernardi","year":"2016","unstructured":"Bernardi D, Macaskill P, Pellegrini M et al (2016) Breast cancer screening with tomosynthesis (3D mammography) with acquired or synthetic 2D mammography compared with 2D mammography alone (STORM-2): a population-based prospective study. Lancet Oncol 17:1105\u20131113","journal-title":"Lancet Oncol"},{"key":"5690_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"184","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-015-3803-3","volume":"26","author":"K L\u00e5ng","year":"2016","unstructured":"L\u00e5ng K, Andersson I, Rosso A, Tingberg A, Timberg P, Zackrisson S (2016) Performance of one-view breast tomosynthesis as a stand-alone breast cancer screening modality: results from the Malmo Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial, a population-based study. Eur Radiol 26:184\u2013190","journal-title":"Eur Radiol"},{"key":"5690_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"489","DOI":"10.1007\/s10549-018-4705-2","volume":"169","author":"P Skaane","year":"2018","unstructured":"Skaane P, Sebu\u00f8deg\u00e5rd S, Bandos AI et al (2018) Performance of breast cancer screening using digital breast tomosynthesis: Results from the prospective population-based Oslo Tomosynthesis Screening Trial. Breast Cancer Res Treat 169:489\u2013496","journal-title":"Breast Cancer Res Treat"},{"key":"5690_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"150","DOI":"10.1016\/j.breast.2018.01.002","volume":"38","author":"N Houssami","year":"2018","unstructured":"Houssami N, Bernardi D, Caumo F et al (2018) Interval breast cancers in the 'screening with tomosynthesis or standard mammography' (STORM) population-based trial. Breast 38:150\u2013153","journal-title":"Breast"},{"key":"5690_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"49","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2017171148","volume":"287","author":"M Bahl","year":"2018","unstructured":"Bahl M, Gaffney S, McCarthy AM, Lowry KP, Dang PA, Lehman CD (2018) Breast cancer characteristics associated with 2D digital mammography versus digital breast tomosynthesis for screening-detected and interval cancers. Radiology 287:49\u201357","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"5690_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"787","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2018171361","volume":"287","author":"S Hofvind","year":"2018","unstructured":"Hofvind S, Hovda T, Holen \u00c5S et al (2018) Digital breast tomosynthesis and synthetic 2D mammography versus digital mammography: evaluation in a population-based screening program. Radiology 287:787\u2013794","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"5690_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"37","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2017170745","volume":"287","author":"F Caumo","year":"2018","unstructured":"Caumo F, Zorzi M, Brunelli S et al (2018) Digital breast tomosynthesis with synthesized two-dimensional images versus full-field digital mammography for population screening: outcomes from the Verona screening program. Radiology 287:37\u201346","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"5690_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"573","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-017-5024-4","volume":"28","author":"G Gennaro","year":"2018","unstructured":"Gennaro G, Bernardi D, Houssami N (2018) Radiation dose with digital breast tomosynthesis compared to digital mammography: per-view analysis. Eur Radiol 28:573\u2013581","journal-title":"Eur Radiol"},{"key":"5690_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"93","DOI":"10.1016\/j.breast.2014.12.002","volume":"24","author":"TM Svahn","year":"2015","unstructured":"Svahn TM, Houssami N, Sechopoulos I, Mattsson S (2015) Review of radiation dose estimates in digital breast tomosynthesis relative to those in two-view full-field digital mammography. Breast 24:93\u201399","journal-title":"Breast"},{"key":"5690_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"035006","DOI":"10.1088\/1361-6560\/aaa614","volume":"63","author":"BH \u00d8ster\u00e5s","year":"2018","unstructured":"\u00d8ster\u00e5s BH, Skaane P, Gullien R, Martinsen ACT (2018) Average glandular dose in paired digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis acquisitions in a population based screening program: effects of measuring breast density, air kerma and beam quality. Phys Med Biol 63:035006","journal-title":"Phys Med Biol"},{"key":"5690_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"655","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.13131391","volume":"271","author":"P Skaane","year":"2014","unstructured":"Skaane P, Bandos AI, Eben EB et al (2014) Two-view digital breast tomosynthesis screening with synthetically reconstructed projection images: comparison with digital breast tomosynthesis with full-field digital mammographic images. Radiology 271:655\u2013663","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"5690_CR14","first-page":"1784","volume":"15","author":"EA Rafferty","year":"2013","unstructured":"Rafferty EA, Durand MA, Conant EF et al (2013) Breast cancer screening using tomosynthesis and digital mammography in dense and nondense breasts. JAMA 15:1784\u20131786","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"5690_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2499","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2014.6095","volume":"311","author":"SM Friedewald","year":"2014","unstructured":"Friedewald SM, Rafferty EA, Rose SL et al (2014) Breast cancer screening using tomosynthesis in combination with digital mammography. JAMA 311:2499\u20132507","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"5690_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"141","DOI":"10.1016\/j.crad.2015.11.008","volume":"71","author":"FJ Gilbert","year":"2016","unstructured":"Gilbert FJ, Tucker L, Young KC (2016) Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT): a review of the evidence for use as a screening tool. Clin Radiol 71:141\u2013150","journal-title":"Clin Radiol"},{"key":"5690_CR17","unstructured":"Hofvind S, Tsuruda K, Mangerud G et al. The Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program, 1996-2016: celebrating 20 years of organised mammographic screening. In: Cancer in Norway 2016 - cancer incidence, mortality, survival and prevalence in Norway. Oslo: Cancer Registry of Norway, 2017: ISBN 978-82-473-0055-8; 2017. \n                    https:\/\/www.kreftregisteret.no\/globalassets\/cancer-in-Norway\/2016\/mammo_cin2016_special_issue_web.pdf\n                    \n                   Cited 03012018"},{"key":"5690_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"418","DOI":"10.1158\/1055-9965.EPI-09-1059","volume":"19","author":"Z Aitken","year":"2010","unstructured":"Aitken Z, McCormack VA, Highnam RP et al (2010) Screen-film mammographic density and breast cancer risk: a comparison of the volumetric standard mammogram form and the interactive threshold measurement methods. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 19:418\u2013428","journal-title":"Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev"},{"key":"5690_CR19","first-page":"342","volume-title":"Lecture notes in computer science: 10th international workshop on digital mammography","author":"R Highnam","year":"2010","unstructured":"Highnam R, Brady M, Yaffe M, Karssemeijer N, Harvey J (2010) Robust breast composition measurement - Volpara\u2122. In: Mart\u00ed JOA, Freixenet J, Mart\u00ed R (eds) Lecture notes in computer science: 10th international workshop on digital mammography. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 342\u2013349"},{"key":"5690_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"78","DOI":"10.1016\/j.acra.2015.09.012","volume":"23","author":"T Singh","year":"2016","unstructured":"Singh T, Sharma M, Singla V, Khandelwal N (2016) Breast density estimation with fully automated volumetric method: comparison to radiologists' assessment by BI-RADS categories. Acad Radiol 23:78\u201383","journal-title":"Acad Radiol"},{"key":"5690_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"4354","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-016-4309-3","volume":"26","author":"H Sartor","year":"2016","unstructured":"Sartor H, L\u00e5ng K, Rosso A, Borgquist S, Zackrisson S, Timberg P (2016) Measuring mammographic density: comparing a fully automated volumetric assessment versus European radiologists' qualitative classification. Eur Radiol 26:4354\u20134360","journal-title":"Eur Radiol"},{"key":"5690_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e0136667","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0136667","volume":"10","author":"D Waal van der","year":"2015","unstructured":"van der Waal D, den Heeten GJ, Pijnappel RM et al (2015) Comparing visually assessed BI-RADS breast density and automated volumetric breast density software: a cross-sectional study in a breast cancer screening setting. PLoS One 10:e0136667","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"5690_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"70","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2017162674","volume":"283","author":"MP Aujero","year":"2017","unstructured":"Aujero MP, Gavenonis SC, Benjamin R, Zhang Z, Holt JS (2017) Clinical performance of synthesized two-dimensional mammography combined with tomosynthesis in a large screening population. Radiology 283:70\u201376","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"5690_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"501","DOI":"10.1007\/s10549-017-4431-1","volume":"166","author":"PE Freer","year":"2017","unstructured":"Freer PE, Riegert J, Eisenmenger L et al (2017) Clinical implementation of synthesized mammography with digital breast tomosynthesis in a routine clinical practice. Breast Cancer Res Treat 166:501\u2013509","journal-title":"Breast Cancer Res Treat"},{"key":"5690_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"175","DOI":"10.1007\/s12254-017-0341-5","volume":"10","author":"PAT Baltzer","year":"2017","unstructured":"Baltzer PAT, Kapetas P, Marino MA, Clauser P (2017) New diagnostic tools for breast cancer. Memo 10:175\u2013180","journal-title":"Memo"},{"key":"5690_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Houssami N, Hunter K, Zackrisson S (2017) Overview of tomosynthesis (3D mammography) for breast cancer screening. Breast Cancer Manag 6:179\u2013186","DOI":"10.2217\/bmt-2016-0024"},{"key":"5690_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2710","DOI":"10.1002\/cncr.20683","volume":"101","author":"BC Yankaskas","year":"2004","unstructured":"Yankaskas BC, Schell MJ, Miglioretti DL (2004) Recall and detection rates in screening mammography. Cancer 101:2710\u20132711 author reply 1-2","journal-title":"Cancer"},{"key":"5690_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"681","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2433060372","volume":"243","author":"MJ Schell","year":"2007","unstructured":"Schell MJ, Yankaskas BC, Ballard-Barbash R et al (2007) Evidence-based target recall rates for screening mammography. Radiology 243:681\u2013689","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"5690_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"49","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.13130765","volume":"270","author":"PA Dang","year":"2014","unstructured":"Dang PA, Freer PE, Humphrey KL, Halpern EF, Rafferty EA (2014) Addition of tomosynthesis to conventional digital mammography: effect on image interpretation time of screening examinations. Radiology 270:49\u201356","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"5690_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"371","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2017151936","volume":"283","author":"L Tucker","year":"2017","unstructured":"Tucker L, Gilbert FJ, Astley SM et al (2017) Does reader performance with digital breast tomosynthesis vary according to experience with two-dimensional mammography? Radiology 283:371\u2013380","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"5690_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"728","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2015.02.025","volume":"12","author":"J Zhang","year":"2015","unstructured":"Zhang J, Grimm LJ, Lo JY et al (2015) Does breast imaging experience during residency translate into improved initial performance in digital breast tomosynthesis? J Am Coll Radiol 12:728\u2013732","journal-title":"J Am Coll Radiol"}],"container-title":["European Radiology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00330-018-5690-x\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00330-018-5690-x.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00330-018-5690-x.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,8,28]],"date-time":"2019-08-28T19:06:13Z","timestamp":1567019173000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00330-018-5690-x"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2018,8,29]]},"references-count":31,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,3]]}},"alternative-id":["5690"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00330-018-5690-x","relation":{},"ISSN":["0938-7994","1432-1084"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0938-7994","type":"print"},{"value":"1432-1084","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2018,8,29]]},"assertion":[{"value":"1 May 2018","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"19 July 2018","order":2,"name":"revised","label":"Revised","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"31 July 2018","order":3,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"29 August 2018","order":4,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Compliance with ethical standards"}},{"value":"The scientific guarantor of this publication is Solveig Hofvind.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Guarantor"}},{"value":"The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}},{"value":"No complex statistical methods were necessary for this paper.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Statistics and biometry"}},{"value":"Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects (patients) in this study.","order":5,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Informed consent"}},{"value":"Institutional review board approval was obtained.","order":6,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethical approval"}},{"value":"\u2022 prospective\u2022 randomized controlled trial\u2022 performed at one institution","order":7,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Methodology"}}]}}