{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,21]],"date-time":"2025-02-21T03:09:02Z","timestamp":1740107342259,"version":"3.37.3"},"reference-count":46,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"12","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,5,22]],"date-time":"2019-05-22T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1558483200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,5,22]],"date-time":"2019-05-22T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1558483200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Eur Radiol"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,12]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-019-06253-1","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2019,5,23]],"date-time":"2019-05-23T03:40:59Z","timestamp":1558582859000},"page":"6900-6910","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Integrated versus separate reading of F-18 FDG-PET\/CT and MRI for abdominal malignancies \u2013 effect on staging outcomes and diagnostic confidence"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"29","author":[{"given":"Lisa A.","family":"Min","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Wouter V.","family":"Vogel","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Max J.","family":"Lahaye","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Monique","family":"Maas","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Maarten L.","family":"Donswijk","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Erik","family":"Vegt","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Miranda","family":"Kusters","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Henry J.","family":"Zijlmans","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Katarzyna","family":"J\u00f3\u017awiak","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Sander","family":"Roberti","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Regina G. H.","family":"Beets-Tan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-2990-0099","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Doenja M. J.","family":"Lambregts","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2019,5,22]]},"reference":[{"key":"6253_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"832","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-010-1977-2","volume":"21","author":"D L\u00f6wenthal","year":"2011","unstructured":"L\u00f6wenthal D, Zeile M, Lim WY et al (2011) Detection and characterisation of focal liver lesions in colorectal carcinoma patients: comparison of diffusion-weighted and Gd-EOB-DTPA enhanced MR imaging. Eur Radiol 21:832\u2013840","journal-title":"Eur Radiol"},{"key":"6253_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"224","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejrad.2010.06.004","volume":"80","author":"M Bozkurt","year":"2011","unstructured":"Bozkurt M, Doganay S, Kantarci M et al (2011) Comparison of peritoneal tumor imaging using conventional MR imaging and diffusion-weighted MR imaging with different b values. Eur J Radiol 80:224\u2013228","journal-title":"Eur J Radiol"},{"key":"6253_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"88","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejca.2017.06.010","volume":"83","author":"K Michielsen","year":"2017","unstructured":"Michielsen K, Dresen R, Vanslembrouck R et al (2017) Diagnostic value of whole body diffusion-weighted MRI compared to computed tomography for pre-operative assessment of patients suspected for ovarian cancer. Eur J Cancer 83:88\u201398","journal-title":"Eur J Cancer"},{"key":"6253_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1169","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejrad.2014.03.024","volume":"83","author":"M Micc\u00f2","year":"2014","unstructured":"Micc\u00f2 M, Vargas HA, Burger IA et al (2014) Combined pre-treatment MRI and 18F-FDG PET\/CT parameters as prognostic biomarkers in patients with cervical cancer. Eur J Radiol 83:1169\u20131176","journal-title":"Eur J Radiol"},{"key":"6253_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"104","DOI":"10.1016\/j.radonc.2017.06.013","volume":"124","author":"I Joye","year":"2017","unstructured":"Joye I, Debucquoy A, Deroose CM et al (2017) Quantitative imaging outperforms molecular markers when predicting response to chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. Radiother Oncol 124:104\u2013109","journal-title":"Radiother Oncol"},{"key":"6253_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1186\/s13550-017-0352-6","volume":"8","author":"JE Mongula","year":"2018","unstructured":"Mongula JE, Bakers FCH, V\u00f6\u00f6 S et al (2018) Positron emission tomography-magnetic resonance imaging (PET-MRI) for response assessment after radiation therapy of cervical carcinoma: a pilot study. EJNMMI Res 8:1","journal-title":"EJNMMI Res"},{"key":"6253_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"857","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.13131306","volume":"269","author":"OA Catalano","year":"2013","unstructured":"Catalano OA, Rosen BR, Sahani DV et al (2013) Clinical impact of PET\/MR imaging in patients with cancer undergoing same-day PET\/CT: initial experience in 134 patients--a hypothesis-generating exploratory study. Radiology 269:857\u2013869","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"issue":"2","key":"6253_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"265","DOI":"10.1002\/jmri.25161","volume":"44","author":"Houman Sotoudeh","year":"2016","unstructured":"Sotoudeh H, Sharma A, Fowler KJ, McConathy J, Dehdashti F (2016) Clinical application of PET\/MRI in oncology. J Magn Reson Imaging 44:265\u2013276","journal-title":"Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging"},{"key":"6253_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"366","DOI":"10.1007\/s12149-017-1164-5","volume":"31","author":"A Singnurkar","year":"2017","unstructured":"Singnurkar A, Poon R, Metser U (2017) Comparison of 18F-FDG-PET\/CT and 18F-FDG-PET\/MR imaging in oncology: a systematic review. Ann Nucl Med 31:366\u2013378","journal-title":"Ann Nucl Med"},{"key":"6253_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"123","DOI":"10.1007\/s00259-015-3137-z","volume":"43","author":"C Brendle","year":"2016","unstructured":"Brendle C, Schwenzer NF, Rempp H et al (2016) Assessment of metastatic colorectal cancer with hybrid imaging: comparison of reading performance using different combinations of anatomical and functional imaging techniques in PET\/MRI and PET\/CT in a short case series. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 43:123\u2013132","journal-title":"Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging"},{"key":"6253_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"56","DOI":"10.1007\/s00259-014-2902-8","volume":"42","author":"K Beiderwellen","year":"2015","unstructured":"Beiderwellen K, Grueneisen J, Ruhlmann V et al (2015) [(18)F]FDG PET\/MRI vs. PET\/CT for whole-body staging in patients with recurrent malignancies of the female pelvis: initial results. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 42:56\u201365","journal-title":"Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging"},{"key":"6253_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"808","DOI":"10.1097\/RLI.0000000000000086","volume":"49","author":"J Grueneisen","year":"2014","unstructured":"Grueneisen J, Beiderwellen K, Heusch P et al (2014) Simultaneous positron emission tomography\/magnetic resonance imaging for whole-body staging in patients with recurrent gynecological malignancies of the pelvis. Invest Radiol 49:808\u2013815","journal-title":"Invest Radiol"},{"key":"6253_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1941","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejrad.2016.08.020","volume":"85","author":"V Ruhlmann","year":"2016","unstructured":"Ruhlmann V, Ruhlmann M, Bellendorf A et al (2016) Hybrid imaging for detection of carcinoma of unknown primary: a preliminary comparison trial of whole-body PET\/MRI versus PET\/CT. Eur J Radiol 85:1941\u20131947","journal-title":"Eur J Radiol"},{"key":"6253_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"845","DOI":"10.2967\/jnumed.111.098608","volume":"53","author":"A Drzezga","year":"2012","unstructured":"Drzezga A, Souvatzoglou M, Eiber M et al (2012) First clinical experience with integrated whole-body PET\/MR: comparison to PET\/CT in patients with oncologic diagnoses. J Nucl Med 53:845\u2013855","journal-title":"J Nucl Med"},{"key":"6253_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1930","DOI":"10.2967\/jnumed.114.146886","volume":"55","author":"J Grueneisen","year":"2014","unstructured":"Grueneisen J, Schaarschmidt BM, Beiderwellen K et al (2014) Diagnostic value of diffusion-weighted imaging in simultaneous 18F-FDG PET\/MR imaging for whole-body staging of women with pelvic malignancies. J Nucl Med 55:1930\u20131935","journal-title":"J Nucl Med"},{"key":"6253_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2097","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejrad.2015.08.010","volume":"84","author":"J Grueneisen","year":"2015","unstructured":"Grueneisen J, Schaarschmidt BM, Heubner M et al (2015) Implementation of FAST-PET\/MRI for whole-body staging of female patients with recurrent pelvic malignancies: a comparison to PET\/CT. Eur J Radiol 84:2097\u20132102","journal-title":"Eur J Radiol"},{"key":"6253_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1814","DOI":"10.1007\/s00259-015-3131-5","volume":"42","author":"J Grueneisen","year":"2015","unstructured":"Grueneisen J, Schaarschmidt BM, Heubner M et al (2015) Integrated PET\/MRI for whole-body staging of patients with primary cervical cancer: preliminary results. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 42:1814\u20131824","journal-title":"Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging"},{"key":"6253_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"597","DOI":"10.1002\/jmri.25384","volume":"45","author":"MS Lee","year":"2017","unstructured":"Lee MS, Cho JY, Kim SY et al (2017) Diagnostic value of integrated PET\/MRI for detection and localization of prostate cancer: comparative study of multiparametric MRI and PET\/CT. J Magn Reson Imaging 45:597\u2013609","journal-title":"J Magn Reson Imaging"},{"key":"6253_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"67","DOI":"10.1007\/s00259-017-3809-y","volume":"45","author":"T Sarabhai","year":"2018","unstructured":"Sarabhai T, Schaarschmidt BM, Wetter A et al (2018) Comparison of 18F-FDG PET\/MRI and MRI for pre-therapeutic tumor staging of patients with primary cancer of the uterine cervix. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 45:67\u201376","journal-title":"Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging"},{"key":"6253_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"459","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejrad.2015.12.010","volume":"85","author":"LM Sawicki","year":"2016","unstructured":"Sawicki LM, Grueneisen J, Schaarschmidt BM et al (2016) Evaluation of 18 F-FDG PET\/MRI, 18 F-FDG PET\/CT, MRI, and CT in whole-body staging of recurrent breast cancer. Eur J Radiol 85:459\u2013465","journal-title":"Eur J Radiol"},{"key":"6253_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"14","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejrad.2016.12.019","volume":"89","author":"J Grueneisen","year":"2017","unstructured":"Grueneisen J, Sawicki LM, Wetter A et al (2017) Evaluation of PET and MR datasets in integrated 18F-FDG PET\/MRI: a comparison of different MR sequences for whole-body restaging of breast cancer patients. Eur J Radiol 89:14\u201319","journal-title":"Eur J Radiol"},{"key":"6253_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"289","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejrad.2013.11.002","volume":"83","author":"L Pace","year":"2014","unstructured":"Pace L, Nicolai E, Luongo A et al (2014) Comparison of whole-body PET\/CT and PET\/MRI in breast cancer patients: lesion detection and quantitation of 18F-deoxyglucose uptake in lesions and in normal organ tissues. Eur J Radiol 83:289\u2013296","journal-title":"Eur J Radiol"},{"key":"6253_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"281","DOI":"10.3892\/ijo.2017.4012","volume":"51","author":"OA Catalano","year":"2017","unstructured":"Catalano OA, Daye D, Signore A et al (2017) Staging performance of whole-body DWI, PET\/CT and PET\/MRI in invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast. Int J Oncol 51:281\u2013288","journal-title":"Int J Oncol"},{"key":"6253_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"191","DOI":"10.2967\/jnumed.113.123646","volume":"55","author":"M Eiber","year":"2014","unstructured":"Eiber M, Takei T, Souvatzoglou M et al (2014) Performance of whole-body integrated 18F-FDG PET\/MR in comparison to PET\/CT for evaluation of malignant bone lesions. J Nucl Med 55:191\u2013197","journal-title":"J Nucl Med"},{"key":"6253_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"681","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-016-4397-0","volume":"27","author":"BM Schaarschmidt","year":"2017","unstructured":"Schaarschmidt BM, Grueneisen J, Metzenmacher M et al (2017) Thoracic staging with 18F-FDG PET\/MR in non-small cell lung cancer - does it change therapeutic decisions in comparison to 18F-FDG PET\/CT? Eur Radiol 27:681\u2013688","journal-title":"Eur Radiol"},{"key":"6253_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"582","DOI":"10.2967\/jnumed.115.167486","volume":"57","author":"LM Sawicki","year":"2016","unstructured":"Sawicki LM, Grueneisen J, Buchbender C et al (2016) Comparative performance of 18F-FDG PET\/MRI and 18F-FDG PET\/CT in detection and characterization of pulmonary lesions in 121 oncologic patients. J Nucl Med 57:582\u2013586","journal-title":"J Nucl Med"},{"key":"6253_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"A3","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejrad.2017.04.004","volume":"94","author":"Ivo Rausch","year":"2017","unstructured":"Rausch I, Quick HH, Cal-Gonzalez J, Sattler B, Boellaard R, Beyer T (2017) Technical and instrumentational foundations of PET\/MRI. Eur J Radiol 94:A3\u2013A13","journal-title":"European Journal of Radiology"},{"issue":"1","key":"6253_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"190","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.13121838","volume":"268","author":"Cornelia B. Brendle","year":"2013","unstructured":"Brendle CB, Schmidt H, Fleischer S, Braeuning UH, Pfannenberg CA, Schwenzer NF (2013) Simultaneously acquired MR\/PET images compared with sequential MR\/PET and PET\/CT: alignment quality. Radiology 268:190\u2013199","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"6253_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1672","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejrad.2013.05.005","volume":"82","author":"K Kitajima","year":"2013","unstructured":"Kitajima K, Suenaga Y, Ueno Y et al (2013) Value of fusion of PET and MRI for staging of endometrial cancer: comparison with 18F-FDG contrast-enhanced PET\/CT and dynamic contrast-enhanced pelvic MRI. Eur J Radiol 82:1672\u20131676","journal-title":"Eur J Radiol"},{"key":"6253_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"464","DOI":"10.1016\/j.clinimag.2014.02.006","volume":"38","author":"K Kitajima","year":"2014","unstructured":"Kitajima K, Suenaga Y, Ueno Y et al (2014) Fusion of PET and MRI for staging of uterine cervical cancer: comparison with contrast-enhanced 18F-FDG PET\/CT and pelvic MRI. Clin Imaging 38:464\u2013469","journal-title":"Clin Imaging"},{"key":"6253_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"537","DOI":"10.1007\/s11547-016-0626-5","volume":"121","author":"A Stecco","year":"2016","unstructured":"Stecco A, Buemi F, Cassar\u00e0 A et al (2016) Comparison of retrospective PET and MRI-DWI (PET\/MRI-DWI) image fusion with PET\/CT and MRI-DWI in detection of cervical and endometrial cancer lymph node metastases. Radiol Med 121:537\u2013545","journal-title":"Radiol Med"},{"key":"6253_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2103","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejca.2009.04.006","volume":"45","author":"SK Kim","year":"2009","unstructured":"Kim SK, Choi HJ, Park SY et al (2009) Additional value of MR\/PET fusion compared with PET\/CT in the detection of lymph node metastases in cervical cancer patients. Eur J Cancer 45:2103\u20132109","journal-title":"Eur J Cancer"},{"key":"6253_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"95","DOI":"10.1007\/s11604-009-0387-3","volume":"28","author":"K Nakajo","year":"2010","unstructured":"Nakajo K, Tatsumi M, Inoue A et al (2010) Diagnostic performance of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography\/magnetic resonance imaging fusion images of gynecological malignant tumors: comparison with positron emission tomography\/computed tomography. Jpn J Radiol 28:95\u2013100","journal-title":"Jpn J Radiol"},{"key":"6253_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2005","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejrad.2013.06.025","volume":"82","author":"T Kanda","year":"2013","unstructured":"Kanda T, Kitajima K, Suenaga Y et al (2013) Value of retrospective image fusion of 18 F-FDG PET and MRI for preoperative staging of head and neck cancer: comparison with PET\/CT and contrast-enhanced neck MRI. Eur J Radiol 82:2005\u20132010","journal-title":"Eur J Radiol"},{"key":"6253_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"37","DOI":"10.1186\/s40644-016-0096-y","volume":"16","author":"JM Hempel","year":"2016","unstructured":"Hempel JM, Kloeckner R, Krick S et al (2016) Impact of combined FDG-PET\/CT and MRI on the detection of local recurrence and nodal metastases in thyroid cancer. Cancer Imaging 16:37","journal-title":"Cancer Imaging"},{"key":"6253_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"259","DOI":"10.1053\/j.sult.2005.04.005","volume":"26","author":"MJ Lahaye","year":"2005","unstructured":"Lahaye MJ, Engelen SM, Nelemans PJ et al (2005) Imaging for predicting the risk factors --the circumferential resection margin and nodal disease-- of local recurrence in rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 26:259\u2013268","journal-title":"Semin Ultrasound CT MR"},{"key":"6253_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"90","DOI":"10.1006\/gyno.2002.6769","volume":"87","author":"T Belhocine","year":"2002","unstructured":"Belhocine T, Thille A, Fridman V et al (2002) Contribution of whole-body 18FDG PET imaging in the management of cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 87:90\u201397","journal-title":"Gynecol Oncol"},{"issue":"4","key":"6253_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"263","DOI":"10.1136\/ijgc-00009577-200107000-00002","volume":"11","author":"K. Narayan","year":"2001","unstructured":"Narayan K, Hicks RJ, Jobling T, Bernshaw D, McKenzie AF (2001) A comparison of MRI and PET scanning in surgically staged loco-regionally advanced cervical cancer: potential impact on treatment. Int J Gynecol Cancer 11:263\u2013271","journal-title":"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer"},{"key":"6253_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"20170370","DOI":"10.1259\/bjr.20170370","volume":"90","author":"A Mahmud","year":"2017","unstructured":"Mahmud A, Poon R, Jonker D (2017) PET imaging in anal canal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Radiol 90:20170370","journal-title":"Br J Radiol"},{"key":"6253_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2224","DOI":"10.1245\/s10434-011-1607-5","volume":"18","author":"DM Lambregts","year":"2011","unstructured":"Lambregts DM, Vandecaveye V, Barbaro B et al (2011) Diffusion-weighted MRI for selection of complete responders after chemoradiation for locally advanced rectal cancer: a multicenter study. Ann Surg Oncol 18:2224\u20132231","journal-title":"Ann Surg Oncol"},{"key":"6253_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2805","DOI":"10.1245\/s10434-012-2300-z","volume":"19","author":"CS Van Kessel","year":"2012","unstructured":"Van Kessel CS, Buckens CF, van den Bosch MA et al (2012) Preoperative imaging of colorectal liver metastases after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 19:2805\u20132813","journal-title":"Ann Surg Oncol"},{"key":"6253_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1165","DOI":"10.1097\/MNM.0000000000000387","volume":"36","author":"A Samarin","year":"2015","unstructured":"Samarin A, H\u00fcllner M, Queiroz MA et al (2015) 18F-FDG-PET\/MR increases diagnostic confidence in detection of bone metastases compared with 18F-FDG-PET\/CT. Nucl Med Commun 36:1165\u20131173","journal-title":"Nucl Med Commun"},{"key":"6253_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"859","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.14140090","volume":"273","author":"MW Huellner","year":"2014","unstructured":"Huellner MW, Appenzeller P, Kuhn FP et al (2014) Whole-body nonenhanced PET\/MR versus PET\/CT in the staging and restaging of cancers: preliminary observations. Radiology 273:859\u2013869","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"6253_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"551","DOI":"10.2967\/jnumed.113.125443","volume":"55","author":"FP Kuhn","year":"2014","unstructured":"Kuhn FP, H\u00fcllner M, Mader CE et al (2014) Contrast-enhanced PET\/MR imaging versus contrast-enhanced PET\/CT in head and neck cancer: how much MR information is needed? J Nucl Med 55:551\u2013558","journal-title":"J Nucl Med"},{"key":"6253_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"521","DOI":"10.1002\/jmri.25196","volume":"44","author":"B Taouli","year":"2016","unstructured":"Taouli B, Beer AJ, Chenevert T et al (2016) Diffusion-weighted imaging outside the brain: consensus statement from an ISMRM-sponsored workshop. J Magn Reson Imaging 44:521\u2013540","journal-title":"J Magn Reson Imaging"},{"key":"6253_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"135","DOI":"10.1102\/1470-7330.2006.0021","volume":"6","author":"EM Charles-Edwards","year":"2006","unstructured":"Charles-Edwards EM, deSouza NM (2006) Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and its application to cancer. Cancer Imaging 6:135\u2013143","journal-title":"Cancer Imaging"}],"container-title":["European Radiology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00330-019-06253-1.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00330-019-06253-1\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00330-019-06253-1.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2020,5,20]],"date-time":"2020-05-20T23:14:08Z","timestamp":1590016448000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00330-019-06253-1"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2019,5,22]]},"references-count":46,"journal-issue":{"issue":"12","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,12]]}},"alternative-id":["6253"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00330-019-06253-1","relation":{},"ISSN":["0938-7994","1432-1084"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0938-7994"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1432-1084"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2019,5,22]]},"assertion":[{"value":"11 January 2019","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"4 April 2019","order":2,"name":"revised","label":"Revised","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"25 April 2019","order":3,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"22 May 2019","order":4,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Compliance with ethical standards"}},{"value":"The scientific guarantor of this publication is Dr. Doenja Lambregts.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Guarantor"}},{"value":"The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}},{"value":"Two of the authors have significant statistical expertise (KJ and SR).","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Statistics and biometry"}},{"value":"Written informed consent was waived by the Institutional Review Board.","order":5,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Informed consent"}},{"value":"Institutional Review Board approval was obtained.","order":6,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethical approval"}},{"value":"\u2022 Retrospective\u2022 Diagnostic or prognostic study\u2022 Performed at one institution","order":7,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Methodology"}}]}}