{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,21]],"date-time":"2025-02-21T03:09:44Z","timestamp":1740107384954,"version":"3.37.3"},"reference-count":10,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"10","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,5,3]],"date-time":"2024-05-03T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1714694400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,5,3]],"date-time":"2024-05-03T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1714694400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Eur Radiol"],"DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-024-10773-w","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,5,3]],"date-time":"2024-05-03T10:02:15Z","timestamp":1714730535000},"page":"6332-6333","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Why don\u2019t all women with extremely dense breasts want MRI screening?"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"34","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-8792-6185","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Wendie A.","family":"Berg","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,5,3]]},"reference":[{"key":"10773_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"278","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2021203633","volume":"299","author":"SGA Veenhuizen","year":"2021","unstructured":"Veenhuizen SGA, de Lange SV, Bakker MF et al (2021) Supplemental breast MRI for women with extremely dense breasts: results of the second screening round of the DENSE trial. Radiology 299:278\u2013286","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"10773_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2091","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1903986","volume":"381","author":"MF Bakker","year":"2019","unstructured":"Bakker MF, de Lange SV, Pijnappel RM et al (2019) Supplemental MRI screening for women with extremely dense breast tissue. N Engl J Med 381:2091\u20132102","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"10773_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"79","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2541090953","volume":"254","author":"WA Berg","year":"2010","unstructured":"Berg WA, Blume JD, Adams AM et al (2010) Reasons women at elevated risk of breast cancer refuse breast MR imaging screening: ACRIN 6666. Radiology 254:79\u201387","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"10773_CR4","unstructured":"Veenhuizen SGA, van Grinsven SEL, Laseur IL et al (2024) Re-attendance in supplemental breast MRI screening rounds of the DENSE trial among women with extremely dense breasts. Eur Radiol 381:2091\u20132102"},{"key":"10773_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S229","DOI":"10.1016\/j.acra.2021.03.003","volume":"29","author":"D Son","year":"2022","unstructured":"Son D, Phillips J, Mehta TS, Mehta R, Brook A, Dialani VM (2022) Patient preferences regarding use of contrast-enhanced imaging for breast cancer screening. Acad Radiol 29:S229\u2013S238","journal-title":"Acad Radiol"},{"key":"10773_CR6","unstructured":"DenseBreast-info.org (2024) https:\/\/densebreast-info.org\/for-patients\/. Accessed March 30, 2024"},{"key":"10773_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"902","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2023.04.002","volume":"20","author":"DL Monticciolo","year":"2023","unstructured":"Monticciolo DL, Newell MS, Moy L, Lee CS, Destounis SV (2023) Breast cancer screening for women at higher-than-average risk: updated recommendations from the ACR. J Am Coll Radiol 20:902\u2013914","journal-title":"J Am Coll Radiol"},{"key":"10773_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kuhl CK, Gatsonis C, Newstead G et al (2023) Incidence round screening performance among women with dense breasts undergoing abbreviated breast MRI and digital breast tomosynthesis (ECOG-ACRIN EA1141). J Clin Oncol 41","DOI":"10.1200\/JCO.2023.41.16_suppl.10502"},{"key":"10773_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"758","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2023.05.014","volume":"20","author":"WA Berg","year":"2023","unstructured":"Berg WA, Bandos AI, Sava MG (2023) Analytic hierarchy process analysis of patient preferences for contrast-enhanced mammography versus MRI as supplemental screening options for breast cancer. J Am Coll Radiol 20:758\u2013768","journal-title":"J Am Coll Radiol"},{"key":"10773_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"527","DOI":"10.1093\/jbi\/wbab060","volume":"3","author":"WA Berg","year":"2021","unstructured":"Berg WA (2021) BI-RADS 3 on screening breast ultrasound: what is it and what is the appropriate management? J Breast Imaging 3:527\u2013538","journal-title":"J Breast Imaging"}],"container-title":["European Radiology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00330-024-10773-w.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00330-024-10773-w\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00330-024-10773-w.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,9,13]],"date-time":"2024-09-13T17:19:13Z","timestamp":1726247953000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00330-024-10773-w"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,5,3]]},"references-count":10,"journal-issue":{"issue":"10","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,10]]}},"alternative-id":["10773"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00330-024-10773-w","relation":{},"ISSN":["1432-1084"],"issn-type":[{"type":"electronic","value":"1432-1084"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,5,3]]},"assertion":[{"value":"3 April 2024","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"3 April 2024","order":2,"name":"revised","label":"Revised","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"10 April 2024","order":3,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"3 May 2024","order":4,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Compliance with ethical standards"}},{"value":"The scientific guarantor of this publication is Wendie A. Berg.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Guarantor"}},{"value":"WAB discloses consulting with Exai Bio, Inc., and research grant support to her institution from Koios Medical, Inc. She is a voluntary Chief Scientific Advisor to DenseBreast-info.org and a voluntary Associate Editor to the Journal of Breast Imaging.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}},{"value":"No complex statistical methods were necessary for this paper.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Statistics and biometry"}},{"value":"Written informed consent was not required.","order":5,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Informed consent"}},{"value":"Institutional Review Board approval was not required.","order":6,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethical approval"}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":7,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Study subjects or cohorts overlap"}},{"order":8,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Methodology"}}]}}