{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,18]],"date-time":"2026-06-18T12:24:40Z","timestamp":1781785480898,"version":"3.54.5"},"reference-count":17,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"10","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,9,5]],"date-time":"2022-09-05T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1662336000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,9,5]],"date-time":"2022-09-05T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1662336000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["World J Urol"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Purpose<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>To evaluate the role of low intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) in improving postoperative recovery in Robotic-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) and intracorporeal ileal\u00a0conduit urinary diversion (ICUD).<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>A retrospective case\u2013control study of 49 bladder cancer patients offered RARC\/ICUD with standard (12\u00a0mmHg, <jats:italic>n<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u200924) or low IAP (8\u00a0mmHg, <jats:italic>n<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u200925). Outcomes of interest included length of procedure (LoP), estimated blood loss (EBL), blood transfusion, margin positivity rates, time to first flatus (TtFF), time to first bowel movement (TtFBM), ileus and small bowel obstruction (SBO) rates, time to safe discharge (TtSD), postoperative hospital stay (PHS) and pain levels on a postoperative day (POD) 1 and 3. Perioperative complications were recorded using the Clavien-Dindo system.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>Demographic and baseline clinical characteristics, LoP, EBL and margin positivity rates were similar between groups. No transfusions were recorded. Median (IQR) TtFF, TtFBM and TtSD were significantly longer in Group 1 vs Group 2 (4 (1) vs 2 (1), 7 (3) vs 6 (2) and 8.5 (5.75) vs 5.0 (1), respectively). PHS and rates of postoperative ileus and SBO were lower in Group 2, however not statistically significant. Severe pain was uncommon in both groups but moderate\/severe pain was significantly higher in Group 1 (95.8% vs 48% on POD1 and 62.5% vs 16% on POD3). No significant intraoperative complications were recorded and\u2009\u2265\u2009Grade 3 postoperative complications at 30 and 90\u00a0days were similar.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>With limitations, Low-IAP RARC can be safely offered to RARC\/ICUD patients and leads to faster bowel recovery, and shorter time to safe discharge compared to standard pneumoperitoneum.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1007\/s00345-022-04117-w","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,9,5]],"date-time":"2022-09-05T17:02:33Z","timestamp":1662397353000},"page":"2467-2472","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":4,"title":["The impact of low-pressure pneumoperitoneum on robotic-assisted radical cystectomy and intracorporeal ileal conduit urinary diversion: a case\u2013control study"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"40","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-1972-0206","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Nikolaos","family":"Kostakopoulos","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Grigorios","family":"Athanasiadis","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Muhammad Imran","family":"Omar","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jacalyn","family":"Abraham","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Konstantinos","family":"Dimitropoulos","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,9,5]]},"reference":[{"key":"4117_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"91","DOI":"10.4103\/0972-9941.72593","volume":"6","author":"A Srivastava","year":"2010","unstructured":"Srivastava A, Niranjan A (2010) Secrets of safe laparoscopic surgery: anaesthetic and surgical considerations. J Minim Access Surg 6:91\u201394. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4103\/0972-9941.72593","journal-title":"J Minim Access Surg"},{"key":"4117_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1121","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-001-9166-7","volume":"16","author":"J Neudecker","year":"2002","unstructured":"Neudecker J, Sauerland S, Neugebauer E et al (2002) The European association for endoscopic surgery clinical practice guideline on the pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 16:1121\u20131143. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00464-001-9166-7","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"4117_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2049","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-015-4454-9","volume":"30","author":"DMD \u00d6zdemir-van Brunschot","year":"2016","unstructured":"\u00d6zdemir-van Brunschot DMD, van Laarhoven KCJHM, Scheffer G-J et al (2016) What is the evidence for the use of low-pressure pneumoperitoneum? A systematic review. Surg Endosc 30:2049\u20132065. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00464-015-4454-9","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"4117_CR4","first-page":"178","volume":"15","author":"RL Hsu","year":"2013","unstructured":"Hsu RL, Kaye AD, Urman RD (2013) Anesthetic challenges in robotic-assisted urologic surgery. Rev Urol 15:178\u2013184","journal-title":"Rev Urol"},{"key":"4117_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"562","DOI":"10.7150\/ijms.15875","volume":"13","author":"JB Choi","year":"2016","unstructured":"Choi JB, Kang K, Song MK et al (2016) Pain characteristics after total laparoscopic hysterectomy. Int J Med Sci 13:562\u2013568. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7150\/ijms.15875","journal-title":"Int J Med Sci"},{"key":"4117_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2469","DOI":"10.1007\/s00345-020-03486-4","volume":"39","author":"M Rohloff","year":"2021","unstructured":"Rohloff M, Peifer G, Shakuri-Rad J, Maatman TJ (2021) The impact of low pressure pneumoperitoneum in robotic assisted radical prostatectomy: a prospective, randomized, double blinded trial. World J Urol 39:2469\u20132474. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00345-020-03486-4","journal-title":"World J Urol"},{"key":"4117_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s11701-021-01349-7","author":"A West","year":"2022","unstructured":"West A, Hayes J, Bernstein DE et al (2022) Clinical outcomes of low-pressure pneumoperitoneum in minimally invasive urological surgery. J Robot Surg. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11701-021-01349-7","journal-title":"J Robot Surg"},{"key":"4117_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1500","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijsu.2014.07.014","volume":"12","author":"JP Vandenbroucke","year":"2014","unstructured":"Vandenbroucke JP, von Elm E, Altman DG et al (2014) Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration. Int J Surg 12:1500\u20131524. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ijsu.2014.07.014","journal-title":"Int J Surg"},{"key":"4117_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"50","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2014.01.097","volume":"192","author":"S Daneshmand","year":"2014","unstructured":"Daneshmand S, Ahmadi H, Schuckman AK et al (2014) Enhanced recovery protocol after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. J Urol 192:50\u201355. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.juro.2014.01.097","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"key":"4117_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"186","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0033-1351137","volume":"26","author":"D Keller","year":"2013","unstructured":"Keller D, Stein SL (2013) Facilitating return of bowel function after colorectal surgery: alvimopan and gum chewing. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 26:186\u2013190. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1055\/s-0033-1351137","journal-title":"Clin Colon Rectal Surg"},{"key":"4117_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"93","DOI":"10.3322\/caac.21388","volume":"67","author":"MB Amin","year":"2017","unstructured":"Amin MB, Greene FL, Edge SB et al (2017) The eighth edition AJCC cancer staging manual: continuing to build a bridge from a population-based to a more \u201cpersonalized\u201d approach to cancer staging. CA Cancer J Clin 67:93\u201399. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3322\/caac.21388","journal-title":"CA Cancer J Clin"},{"key":"4117_CR12","unstructured":"ASA Physical Status Classification System. https:\/\/www.asahq.org\/standards-and-guidelines\/asa-physical-status-classification-system. Accessed 18 Apr 2022"},{"key":"4117_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"205","DOI":"10.1097\/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae","volume":"240","author":"D Dindo","year":"2004","unstructured":"Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P-A (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205\u2013213. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"key":"4117_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD006930.pub3","author":"KS Gurusamy","year":"2014","unstructured":"Gurusamy KS, Vaughan J, Davidson BR (2014) Low pressure versus standard pressure pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/14651858.CD006930.pub3","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"4117_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"982","DOI":"10.1097\/JU.0000000000002422","volume":"207","author":"R Mastroianni","year":"2022","unstructured":"Mastroianni R, Ferriero M, Tuderti G et al (2022) Open radical cystectomy versus robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion: early outcomes of a single-center randomized controlled trial. J Urol 207:982\u2013992. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/JU.0000000000002422","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"key":"4117_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"308","DOI":"10.1111\/bju.14682","volume":"124","author":"MC Ferroni","year":"2019","unstructured":"Ferroni MC, Abaza R (2019) Feasibility of robot-assisted prostatectomy performed at ultra-low pneumoperitoneum pressure of 6 mmHg and comparison of clinical outcomes vs standard pressure of 15 mmHg. BJU Int 124:308\u2013313. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/bju.14682","journal-title":"BJU Int"},{"key":"4117_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E478","DOI":"10.1111\/ctr.12143","volume":"27","author":"MC Warl\u00e9","year":"2013","unstructured":"Warl\u00e9 MC, Berkers AW, Langenhuijsen JF et al (2013) Low-pressure pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopic donor nephrectomy to optimize live donors\u2019 comfort. Clin Transplant 27:E478\u2013E483. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/ctr.12143","journal-title":"Clin Transplant"}],"container-title":["World Journal of Urology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00345-022-04117-w.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00345-022-04117-w\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00345-022-04117-w.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,9,26]],"date-time":"2022-09-26T16:10:55Z","timestamp":1664208655000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00345-022-04117-w"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,9,5]]},"references-count":17,"journal-issue":{"issue":"10","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,10]]}},"alternative-id":["4117"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00345-022-04117-w","relation":{},"ISSN":["1433-8726"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1433-8726","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,9,5]]},"assertion":[{"value":"5 May 2022","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"20 July 2022","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"5 September 2022","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}}]}}