{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,14]],"date-time":"2026-10-14T21:48:51Z","timestamp":1792014531144,"version":"4.4.0"},"reference-count":153,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,11,15]],"date-time":"2024-11-15T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1731628800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,11,15]],"date-time":"2024-11-15T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1731628800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["World J Urol"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Purpose<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>The goal of this systematic review is to assess the temporal changes in outcomes and complications of transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) from 2000 to 2022.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of 103 randomized clinical trials from PubMed on TURP, involving 8521 patients. Studies were grouped by years: 2000\u20132004, 2005\u20132009, 2010\u20132014, and 2015\u20132022. We assessed International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), Peak Flow (Qmax), Post-void residue of urine (PVR), and post-operative complications. Heterogeneity was ranked as low (I<jats:sup>2<\/jats:sup>\u2009&lt;\u200925%), moderate (I<jats:sup>2<\/jats:sup>\u2009=\u200925\u201375%), or high (I<jats:sup>2<\/jats:sup>\u2009&gt;\u200975%).<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>TURP significantly improved IPSS, Qmax, and PVR, with the most recent studies showing superior results in IPSS and Qmax after 3\u00a0years compared to 2000\u20132004 studies. Heterogeneity in PVR was high (I<jats:sup>2<\/jats:sup>\u2009=\u2009100%). No negative impact on erectile function was observed. Complication rates included TURP syndrome (2%), bleeding (8%), and blood transfusion (6%), but elevated heterogeneity with difference between the groups was seen in clot evacuation (I<jats:sup>2<\/jats:sup>\u2009=\u200983%) and urinary tract infections (I<jats:sup>2<\/jats:sup>\u2009=\u200982%). Other complications were urinary retention (4%), incontinence (8%), urethral stricture (3%), bladder neck stenosis (2%).<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>In the last 20\u00a0years there has not been a clear trend in the results of TURP. The found heterogeneity may indicate a lack of standardization in TURP procedures. However, symptomatic improvement among patients is uniform, which supports this procedure as a historical benchmark surgical treatment for BPH.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1007\/s00345-024-05332-3","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,11,15]],"date-time":"2024-11-15T20:33:05Z","timestamp":1731702785000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":39,"title":["Evaluating transurethral resection of the prostate over twenty years: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"42","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-6495-1054","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Joao G.","family":"Porto","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-6131-4837","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Ansh M.","family":"Bhatia","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Abhishek","family":"Bhat","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-0086-9174","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Maria Camila","family":"Suarez Arbelaez","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-9700-0805","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Ruben","family":"Blachman-Braun","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-2879-3607","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Khushi","family":"Shah","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-1498-7443","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Ankur","family":"Malpani","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-8620-9512","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Diana","family":"Lopategui","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-4493-1301","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Thomas R. W.","family":"Herrmann","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Robert","family":"Marcovich","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-4273-5502","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Hemendra N.","family":"Shah","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,11,15]]},"reference":[{"issue":"7","key":"5332_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2255","DOI":"10.1007\/s00345-021-03607-7","volume":"39","author":"RT Strebel","year":"2021","unstructured":"Strebel RT, Kaplan SA (2021) The state of TURP through a historical lens. World J Urol 39(7):2255\u20132262","journal-title":"World J Urol"},{"issue":"7","key":"5332_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2655","DOI":"10.1007\/s00345-020-03445-z","volume":"39","author":"S Merheb","year":"2021","unstructured":"Merheb S, Wang N, Weinberg J, Wang DS, Wason SEL (2021) Online interest in surgical treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia using Google trends. World J Urol 39(7):2655\u20132659","journal-title":"World J Urol"},{"issue":"2","key":"5332_CR3","first-page":"149","volume":"72","author":"J Nettleton","year":"2019","unstructured":"Nettleton J, Jones P, Pietropaolo A, Geraghty R, Rai B, Drake M, Dragos L, Veneziano D, Somani BK (2019) The industrial revolution for the management of benign prostate obstruction: worldwide publication trends for surgical and medical therapies over the past two decades. Central Eur J Urol 72(2):149","journal-title":"Central Eur J Urol"},{"issue":"11","key":"5332_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"4207","DOI":"10.1007\/s00345-021-03760-z","volume":"39","author":"MS Lee","year":"2021","unstructured":"Lee MS, Assmus M, Agarwal D, Large T, Krambeck A (2021) Contemporary practice patterns of transurethral therapies for benign prostate hypertrophy: results of a worldwide survey. World J Urol 39(11):4207\u20134213","journal-title":"World J Urol"},{"issue":"12","key":"5332_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3471","DOI":"10.1007\/s00345-023-04666-8","volume":"41","author":"A Morozov","year":"2023","unstructured":"Morozov A, Taratkin M, Shpikina A, Ehrlich Y, McFarland J, Dymov A et al (2023) Comparison of EEP and TURP long-term outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Urol 41(12):3471\u20133483","journal-title":"World J Urol"},{"issue":"6","key":"5332_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"775","DOI":"10.47102\/annals-acadmedsg.LimKB","volume":"33","author":"KB Lim","year":"2004","unstructured":"Lim KB, Wong MY, Foo KT (2004) Transurethral resection of prostate (TURP) through the decades\u2013a comparison of results over the last thirty years in a single institution in Asia. Ann Acad Med Singapore 33(6):775\u2013779","journal-title":"Ann Acad Med Singapore"},{"issue":"5","key":"5332_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1151","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2011.04.072","volume":"78","author":"AI Tasc\u0131","year":"2011","unstructured":"Tasc\u0131 AI, Ilbey YO, Tugcu V, Cicekler O, Cevik C, Zoroglu F (2011) Transurethral resection of the prostate with monopolar resectoscope: single-surgeon experience and long-term results of after 3589 procedures. Urology 78(5):1151\u20131155","journal-title":"Urology"},{"issue":"6","key":"5332_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"428","DOI":"10.1308\/147870804731","volume":"86","author":"J Wilson","year":"2004","unstructured":"Wilson J, Urwin G, Stower M (2004) The changing practice of transurethral prostatectomy: a comparison of cases performed in 1990 and 2000. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 86(6):428\u2013431","journal-title":"Ann R Coll Surg Engl"},{"issue":"12","key":"5332_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2143","DOI":"10.1007\/s11255-019-02280-5","volume":"51","author":"O Abdelwahab","year":"2019","unstructured":"Abdelwahab O, Habous M, Aziz M, Sultan M, Farag M, Santucci R et al (2019) Bipolar vaporization of the prostate may cause higher complication rates compared to bipolar loop resection: a randomized prospective trial. Int Urol Nephrol 51(12):2143\u20132148","journal-title":"Int Urol Nephrol"},{"key":"5332_CR10","volume":"361","author":"D Abt","year":"2018","unstructured":"Abt D, Hechelhammer L, M\u00fcllhaupt G, Markart S, G\u00fcsewell S, Kessler TM et al (2018) Comparison of prostatic artery embolisation (PAE) versus transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) for benign prostatic hyperplasia: randomised, open label, non-inferiority trial. BMJ 361:k2338","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"4","key":"5332_CR11","first-page":"758","volume":"28","author":"M Ahmad","year":"2016","unstructured":"Ahmad M, Khan H, Masood I, Masood W, Malik A (2016) Comparison of bipolar and monopolar cautry use in turp for treatment of enlarged prostate. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad JAMC. 28(4):758\u201361","journal-title":"J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad JAMC."},{"issue":"5","key":"5332_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1456","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2007.04.053","volume":"52","author":"SA Ahyai","year":"2007","unstructured":"Ahyai SA, Lehrich K, Kuntz RM (2007) Holmium laser enucleation versus transurethral resection of the prostate: 3-year follow-up results of a randomized clinical trial. Eur Urol 52(5):1456\u20131463","journal-title":"Eur Urol"},{"issue":"1","key":"5332_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"129","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1464-410X.2012.11266.x","volume":"111","author":"T Akman","year":"2013","unstructured":"Akman T, Binbay M, Tekinarslan E, Tepeler A, Akcay M, Ozgor F et al (2013) Effects of bipolar and monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate on urinary and erectile function: a prospective randomized comparative study. BJU Int 111(1):129\u2013136","journal-title":"BJU Int"},{"issue":"3","key":"5332_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"349","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2010.05.026","volume":"58","author":"A Al-Ansari","year":"2010","unstructured":"Al-Ansari A, Younes N, Sampige VP, Al-Rumaihi K, Ghafouri A, Gul T et al (2010) GreenLight HPS 120-W laser vaporization versus transurethral resection of the prostate for treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a randomized clinical trial with midterm follow-up. Eur Urol 58(3):349\u2013355","journal-title":"Eur Urol"},{"issue":"10","key":"5332_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1595","DOI":"10.1007\/s00345-017-2023-7","volume":"35","author":"SF Al-Rawashdah","year":"2017","unstructured":"Al-Rawashdah SF, Pastore AL, Salhi YA, Fuschi A, Petrozza V, Maurizi A et al (2017) Prospective randomized study comparing monopolar with bipolar transurethral resection of prostate in benign prostatic obstruction: 36-month outcomes. World J Urol 35(10):1595\u20131601","journal-title":"World J Urol"},{"issue":"4","key":"5332_CR16","first-page":"220","volume":"84","author":"G Albino","year":"2012","unstructured":"Albino G, Marucco EC (2012) TURP and PVP treatments are really similar? From subjective feeling to objective data. Pilot study (proof of concept) prospective randomized trial. Arch Ital Urol Androl Organo Uff Soc Ital Ecogr Urol E Nefrol. 84(4):220\u20133","journal-title":"Arch Ital Urol Androl Organo Uff Soc Ital Ecogr Urol E Nefrol."},{"issue":"5","key":"5332_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"931","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2013.10.040","volume":"65","author":"A Bachmann","year":"2014","unstructured":"Bachmann A, Tubaro A, Barber N, d\u2019Ancona F, Muir G, Witzsch U et al (2014) 180-W XPS GreenLight laser vaporisation versus transurethral resection of the prostate for the treatment of benign prostatic obstruction: 6-month safety and efficacy results of a European Multicentre Randomised Trial\u2013the GOLIATH study. Eur Urol 65(5):931\u2013942","journal-title":"Eur Urol"},{"issue":"2","key":"5332_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"570","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2014.09.001","volume":"193","author":"A Bachmann","year":"2015","unstructured":"Bachmann A, Tubaro A, Barber N, d\u2019Ancona F, Muir G, Witzsch U et al (2015) A European multicenter randomized noninferiority trial comparing 180 w greenlight xps laser vaporization and transurethral resection of the prostate for the treatment of benign prostatic obstruction: 12-month results of the GOLIATH Study. J Urol 193(2):570\u2013578","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"issue":"15","key":"5332_CR19","volume":"98","author":"F Bai","year":"2019","unstructured":"Bai F, Feng S, Xu C, Xu Z, Chen J, Zheng Y (2019) Transurethral resection versus holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: a prospective randomized trial comparing perioperative thrombin generation and fibrinolysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 98(15):e15223","journal-title":"Medicine (Baltimore)"},{"issue":"1","key":"5332_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"15","DOI":"10.2298\/ACI1301015B","volume":"60","author":"D Basi\u0107","year":"2013","unstructured":"Basi\u0107 D, Stankovi\u0107 J, Poti\u0107 M, Ignjatovi\u0107 I, Stojkovi\u0107 I (2013) Holmium laser enucleation versus transurethral resection of the prostate: a comparison of clinical results. Acta Chir Iugosl 60(1):15\u201320","journal-title":"Acta Chir Iugosl"},{"issue":"7","key":"5332_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"964","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1464-410X.2009.08961.x","volume":"105","author":"DM Bouchier-Hayes","year":"2010","unstructured":"Bouchier-Hayes DM, Van Appledorn S, Bugeja P, Crowe H, Challacombe B, Costello AJ (2010) A randomized trial of photoselective vaporization of the prostate using the 80-W potassium-titanyl-phosphate laser vs transurethral prostatectomy, with a 1-year follow-up. BJU Int 105(7):964\u2013969","journal-title":"BJU Int"},{"issue":"11","key":"5332_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1771","DOI":"10.1007\/s00270-021-02920-3","volume":"44","author":"F Capdevila","year":"2021","unstructured":"Capdevila F, Insausti I, Galbete A, Sanchez-Iriso E, Montesino M (2021) Prostatic artery embolization versus transurethral resection of the prostate: a post hoc cost analysis of a randomized controlled clinical trial. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 44(11):1771\u20131777","journal-title":"Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol"},{"issue":"4","key":"5332_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"734","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2011.05.043","volume":"60","author":"C Capit\u00e1n","year":"2011","unstructured":"Capit\u00e1n C, Bl\u00e1zquez C, Martin MD, Hern\u00e1ndez V, de la Pe\u00f1a E, Llorente C (2011) GreenLight HPS 120-W laser vaporization versus transurethral resection of the prostate for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia: a randomized clinical trial with 2-year follow-up. Eur Urol 60(4):734\u2013739","journal-title":"Eur Urol"},{"issue":"1","key":"5332_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"44","DOI":"10.1007\/s00270-015-1202-4","volume":"39","author":"FC Carnevale","year":"2016","unstructured":"Carnevale FC, Iscaife A, Yoshinaga EM, Moreira AM, Antunes AA, Srougi M (2016) Transurethral Resection of the Prostate (TURP) Versus Original and PErFecTED Prostate Artery Embolization (PAE) Due to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH): Preliminary Results of a Single Center, Prospective. Urodynam Controll Anal Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 39(1):44\u201352","journal-title":"Urodynam Controll Anal Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol"},{"issue":"5","key":"5332_CR25","first-page":"2355","volume":"12","author":"M Cetinkaya","year":"2015","unstructured":"Cetinkaya M, Onem K, Rifaioglu MM, Yalcin V (2015) 980-Nm diode laser vaporization versus transurethral resection of the prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia: randomized controlled study. Urol J 12(5):2355\u20132361","journal-title":"Urol J"},{"issue":"9","key":"5332_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1339","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1464-410X.2010.09401.x","volume":"106","author":"Q Chen","year":"2010","unstructured":"Chen Q, Zhang L, Fan QL, Zhou J, Peng YB, Wang Z (2010) Bipolar transurethral resection in saline vs traditional monopolar resection of the prostate: results of a randomized trial with a 2-year follow-up. BJU Int 106(9):1339\u20131343","journal-title":"BJU Int"},{"issue":"2","key":"5332_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"103","DOI":"10.1089\/08927790360587432","volume":"17","author":"E Cimentepe","year":"2003","unstructured":"Cimentepe E, Unsal A, Saglam R (2003) Randomized clinical trial comparing transurethral needle ablation with transurethral resection of the prostate for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: results at 18 months. J Endourol 17(2):103\u2013107","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"issue":"3","key":"5332_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"683","DOI":"10.1007\/s00345-013-1103-6","volume":"32","author":"D Cui","year":"2014","unstructured":"Cui D, Sun F, Zhuo J, Sun X, Han B, Zhao F et al (2014) A randomized trial comparing thulium laser resection to standard transurethral resection of the prostate for symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia: four-year follow-up results. World J Urol 32(3):683\u2013689","journal-title":"World J Urol"},{"key":"5332_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"132","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2016.08.008","volume":"98","author":"C Demirdag","year":"2016","unstructured":"Demirdag C, Citgez S, Tunc B, Simsekoglu F, Can G, Onal B (2016) The clinical effect of bipolar and monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate more than 60 milliliters. Urology 98:132\u2013137","journal-title":"Urology"},{"issue":"9","key":"5332_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1569","DOI":"10.1007\/s11255-018-1950-6","volume":"50","author":"A El-Assmy","year":"2018","unstructured":"El-Assmy A, ElShal AM, Mekkawy R, El-Kappany H, Ibrahiem EHI (2018) Erectile and ejaculatory functions changes following bipolar versus monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate: a prospective randomized study. Int Urol Nephrol 50(9):1569\u20131576","journal-title":"Int Urol Nephrol"},{"issue":"6","key":"5332_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"731","DOI":"10.1111\/bju.15161","volume":"126","author":"AM Elshal","year":"2020","unstructured":"Elshal AM, Soltan M, El-Tabey NA, Laymon M, Nabeeh A (2020) Randomised trial of bipolar resection vs holmium laser enucleation vs Greenlight laser vapo-enucleation of the prostate for treatment of large benign prostate obstruction: 3-years outcomes. BJU Int 126(6):731\u2013738","journal-title":"BJU Int"},{"issue":"6","key":"5332_CR32","first-page":"5447","volume":"17","author":"MA Eltabey","year":"2010","unstructured":"Eltabey MA, Sherif H, Hussein AA (2010) Holmium laser enucleation versus transurethral resection of the prostate. Can J Urol 17(6):5447\u20135452","journal-title":"Can J Urol"},{"issue":"12","key":"5332_CR33","first-page":"1138","volume":"26","author":"D Enikeev","year":"2019","unstructured":"Enikeev D, Netsch C, Rapoport L, Gazimiev M, Laukhtina E, Snurnitsyna O et al (2019) Novel thulium fiber laser for endoscopic enucleation of the prostate: a prospective comparison with conventional transurethral resection of the prostate. Int J Urol Off J Jpn Urol Assoc 26(12):1138\u20131143","journal-title":"Int J Urol Off J Jpn Urol Assoc"},{"issue":"1","key":"5332_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"167","DOI":"10.1007\/s00345-019-02757-z","volume":"38","author":"D Enikeev","year":"2020","unstructured":"Enikeev D, Rapoport L, Gazimiev M, Allenov S, Inoyatov J, Taratkin M et al (2020) Monopolar enucleation versus transurethral resection of the prostate for small- and medium-sized (< 80 cc) benign prostate hyperplasia: a prospective analysis. World J Urol 38(1):167\u2013173","journal-title":"World J Urol"},{"issue":"1","key":"5332_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"97","DOI":"10.1038\/sj.pcan.4500907","volume":"10","author":"S Erturhan","year":"2007","unstructured":"Erturhan S, Erbagci A, Seckiner I, Yagci F, Ustun A (2007) Plasmakinetic resection of the prostate versus standard transurethral resection of the prostate: a prospective randomized trial with 1-year follow-up. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 10(1):97\u2013100","journal-title":"Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis"},{"issue":"11","key":"5332_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1560","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1464-410X.2009.09052.x","volume":"105","author":"T Fagerstr\u00f6m","year":"2010","unstructured":"Fagerstr\u00f6m T, Nyman CR, Hahn RG (2010) Bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate causes less bleeding than the monopolar technique: a single-centre randomized trial of 202 patients: bipolar turp causes less bleeding than the monopolar technique. BJU Int 105(11):1560\u20131564","journal-title":"BJU Int"},{"issue":"6","key":"5332_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1043","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2010.0714","volume":"25","author":"T Fagerstr\u00f6m","year":"2011","unstructured":"Fagerstr\u00f6m T, Nyman CR, Hahn RG (2011) Complications and clinical outcome 18 months after bipolar and monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate. J Endourol 25(6):1043\u20131049","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"issue":"5","key":"5332_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1037","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2015.08.004","volume":"86","author":"AS Fayad","year":"2015","unstructured":"Fayad AS, Elsheikh MG, Zakaria T, Elfottoh HA, Alsergany R, Elshenoufy A et al (2015) Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate versus bipolar resection of the prostate: a prospective randomized study. \u201cPros and Cons.\u201d Urology. 86(5):1037\u201341","journal-title":"Urology."},{"issue":"8","key":"5332_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1347","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2011.0059","volume":"25","author":"AS Fayad","year":"2011","unstructured":"Fayad AS, Sheikh MGE, Zakaria T, Elfottoh HA, Alsergany R (2011) Holmium laser enucleation versus bipolar resection of the prostate: a prospective randomized study. Which to choose? J Endourol. 25(8):1347\u201352","journal-title":"J Endourol."},{"issue":"1","key":"5332_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"24","DOI":"10.1016\/S1015-9584(09)60253-0","volume":"28","author":"BTC Fung","year":"2005","unstructured":"Fung BTC, Li SK, Yu CF, Lau BE, Hou SSM (2005) Prospective randomized controlled trial comparing plasmakinetic vaporesection and conventional transurethral resection of the prostate. Asian J Surg 28(1):24\u201328","journal-title":"Asian J Surg"},{"issue":"3","key":"5332_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"920","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.13122803","volume":"270","author":"YA Gao","year":"2014","unstructured":"Gao YA, Huang Y, Zhang R, Yang YD, Zhang Q, Hou M, Wang Y (2014) Benign prostatic hyperplasia: prostatic arterial embolization versus transurethral resection of the prostate\u2014a prospective, randomized, and controlled clinical trial. Radiology. 270(3):920\u2013928","journal-title":"Radiology."},{"issue":"3","key":"5332_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"323","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2014.0493","volume":"29","author":"B Geavlete","year":"2015","unstructured":"Geavlete B, Bulai C, Ene C, Checherita I, Geavlete P (2015) Bipolar vaporization, resection, and enucleation versus open prostatectomy: optimal treatment alternatives in large prostate cases? J Endourol 29(3):323\u2013331","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"issue":"4","key":"5332_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"930","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2011.03.072","volume":"78","author":"B Geavlete","year":"2011","unstructured":"Geavlete B, Georgescu D, Multescu R, Stanescu F, Jecu M, Geavlete P (2011) Bipolar plasma vaporization vs monopolar and bipolar TURP\u2013a prospective, randomized, long-term comparison. Urology 78(4):930\u2013935","journal-title":"Urology"},{"issue":"11","key":"5332_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1695","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1464-410X.2010.09433.x","volume":"106","author":"B Geavlete","year":"2010","unstructured":"Geavlete B, Multescu R, Dragutescu M, Jecu M, Georgescu D, Geavlete P (2010) Transurethral resection (TUR) in saline plasma vaporization of the prostate vs standard TUR of the prostate: \u201cthe better choice\u201d in benign prostatic hyperplasia? BJU Int 106(11):1695\u20131699","journal-title":"BJU Int"},{"issue":"2","key":"5332_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"288","DOI":"10.1111\/bju.12290","volume":"113","author":"B Geavlete","year":"2014","unstructured":"Geavlete B, Stanescu F, Moldoveanu C, Geavlete P (2014) Continuous vs conventional bipolar plasma vaporisation of the prostate and standard monopolar resection: a prospective, randomised comparison of a new technological advance. BJU Int 113(2):288\u2013295","journal-title":"BJU Int"},{"key":"5332_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"169","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2018.12.002","volume":"125","author":"PJ Gilling","year":"2019","unstructured":"Gilling PJ, Barber N, Bidair M, Anderson P, Sutton M, Aho T et al (2019) Randomized controlled trial of aquablation versus transurethral resection of the prostate in benign prostatic hyperplasia: one-year outcomes. Urology 125:169\u2013173","journal-title":"Urology"},{"issue":"3","key":"5332_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"408","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1464-410X.2011.10359.x","volume":"109","author":"PJ Gilling","year":"2012","unstructured":"Gilling PJ, Wilson LC, King CJ, Westenberg AM, Frampton CM, Fraundorfer MR (2012) Long-term results of a randomized trial comparing holmium laser enucleation of the prostate and transurethral resection of the prostate: results at 7 years: long-term results of an rct comparing holep and Turp. BJU Int 109(3):408\u2013411","journal-title":"BJU Int"},{"issue":"2","key":"5332_CR48","first-page":"88","volume":"83","author":"R Giulianelli","year":"2011","unstructured":"Giulianelli R, Brunori S, Gentile BC, Vincenti G, Nardoni S, Pisanti F et al (2011) Comparative randomized study on the efficaciousness of treatment of BOO due to BPH in patients with prostate up to 100 gr by endoscopic gyrus prostate resection versus open prostatectomy. Preliminary data. Arch Ital Urol Androl Organo Uff Soc Ital Ecogr Urol E Nefrol. 83(2):88\u201394","journal-title":"Arch Ital Urol Androl Organo Uff Soc Ital Ecogr Urol E Nefrol."},{"issue":"1","key":"5332_CR49","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"59","DOI":"10.1016\/S0022-5347(05)67449-6","volume":"164","author":"S Gujral","year":"2000","unstructured":"Gujral S, Abrams P, Donovan JL, Neal DE, Brookes ST, Chacko KN et al (2000) A prospective randomized trial comparing transurethral resection of the prostate and laser therapy in men with chronic urinary retention: The CLasP study. J Urol 164(1):59\u201364","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"issue":"1","key":"5332_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"85","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1464-410X.2006.05862.x","volume":"97","author":"N Gupta","year":"2006","unstructured":"Gupta N, Sivaramakrishna Kumar R, Dogra PN, Seth A (2006) Comparison of standard transurethral resection, transurethral vapour resection and holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for managing benign prostatic hyperplasia of> 40 g. BJU Int. 97(1):85\u20139","journal-title":"BJU Int."},{"issue":"6","key":"5332_CR51","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1166","DOI":"10.1016\/S0090-4295(03)00109-2","volume":"61","author":"MY Hammadeh","year":"2003","unstructured":"Hammadeh MY, Madaan S, Hines J, Philp T (2003) 5-year outcome of a prospective randomized trial to compare transurethral electrovaporization of the prostate and standard transurethral resection. Urology 61(6):1166\u20131171","journal-title":"Urology"},{"issue":"6 Pt 1","key":"5332_CR52","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2336","DOI":"10.1097\/01.ju.0000127761.87421.a0","volume":"171","author":"B Hill","year":"2004","unstructured":"Hill B, Belville W, Bruskewitz R, Issa M, Perez-Marrero R, Roehrborn C et al (2004) Transurethral needle ablation versus transurethral resection of the prostate for the treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia: 5-year results of a prospective, randomized, multicenter clinical trial. J Urol 171(6 Pt 1):2336\u20132340","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"issue":"3","key":"5332_CR53","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"217","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1464-410x.2001.02232.x","volume":"88","author":"RG Hindley","year":"2001","unstructured":"Hindley RG, Mostafid AH, Brierly RD, Harrison NW, Thomas PJ, Fletcher MS (2001) The 2-year symptomatic and urodynamic results of a prospective randomized trial of interstitial radiofrequency therapy vs transurethral resection of the prostate. BJU Int 88(3):217\u2013220","journal-title":"BJU Int"},{"issue":"6","key":"5332_CR54","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"822","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1464-410X.2010.09229.x","volume":"106","author":"RJ Hoekstra","year":"2010","unstructured":"Hoekstra RJ, Van Melick HHE, Kok ET, Ruud Bosch JLH (2010) A 10-year follow-up after transurethral resection of the prostate, contact laser prostatectomy and electrovaporization in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia; long-term results of a randomized controlled trial. BJU Int 106(6):822\u2013826","journal-title":"BJU Int"},{"issue":"2","key":"5332_CR55","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"247","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2007.09.017","volume":"71","author":"K Horasanli","year":"2008","unstructured":"Horasanli K, Silay MS, Altay B, Tanriverdi O, Sarica K, Miroglu C (2008) Photoselective Potassium Titanyl Phosphate (KTP) laser vaporization versus transurethral resection of the prostate for prostates larger than 70 mL: a short-term prospective randomized trial. Urology 71(2):247\u2013251","journal-title":"Urology"},{"issue":"6","key":"5332_CR56","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"882","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jvir.2019.12.810","volume":"31","author":"I Insausti","year":"2020","unstructured":"Insausti I, de Oc\u00e1riz AS, Galbete A, Capdevila F, Solchaga S, Giral P, Bilhim T, Isaacson A, Urtasun F, Napal S (2020) Randomized comparison of prostatic artery embolization versus transurethral resection of the prostate for treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Vasc Intervent Radiol 31(6):882\u201390","journal-title":"J Vasc Intervent Radiol"},{"issue":"9","key":"5332_CR57","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"795","DOI":"10.1089\/089277903770802407","volume":"17","author":"ID Kan","year":"2003","unstructured":"Kan ID, Kirillov SA, Tedeev VV (2003) Advantages of transurethral rotoresection versus standard transurethral resection in the management of benign hyperplasia of the prostate. J Endourol 17(9):795\u2013797","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"issue":"3","key":"5332_CR58","first-page":"9317","volume":"25","author":"V Kasivisvanathan","year":"2018","unstructured":"Kasivisvanathan V, Hussain M (2018) Aquablation versus transurethral resection of the prostate: 1 year United States - cohort outcomes. Can J Urol 25(3):9317\u20139322","journal-title":"Can J Urol"},{"issue":"1","key":"5332_CR59","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"74","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1464-410x.2000.00407.x","volume":"85","author":"SR Keoghane","year":"2000","unstructured":"Keoghane SR, Lawrence KC, Gray AM, Doll HA, Hancock AM, Turner K et al (2000) A double-blind randomized controlled trial and economic evaluation of transurethral resection vs contact laser vaporization for benign prostatic enlargement: a 3-year follow-up. BJU Int 85(1):74\u201378","journal-title":"BJU Int"},{"issue":"3","key":"5332_CR60","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"227","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1464-410x.2000.00778.x","volume":"86","author":"SR Keoghane","year":"2000","unstructured":"Keoghane SR, Sullivan ME, Doll HA, Kourambas J, Cranston DW (2000) Five-year data from the Oxford Laser Prostatectomy Trial. BJU Int 86(3):227\u2013228","journal-title":"BJU Int"},{"issue":"4","key":"5332_CR61","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"543","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1464-410X.2003.04689.x","volume":"93","author":"G Kobelt","year":"2004","unstructured":"Kobelt G, Sp\u00e5ngberg A, Mattiasson A (2004) The cost of feedback microwave thermotherapy compared with transurethral resection of the prostate for treating benign prostatic hyperplasia. BJU Int 93(4):543\u2013548","journal-title":"BJU Int"},{"issue":"2","key":"5332_CR62","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"405","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2014.04.025","volume":"84","author":"K Komura","year":"2014","unstructured":"Komura K, Inamoto T, Takai T, Uchimoto T, Saito K, Tanda N et al (2014) Could transurethral resection of the prostate using the TURis system take over conventional monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate? A randomized controlled trial and midterm results. Urology 84(2):405\u2013411","journal-title":"Urology"},{"issue":"4","key":"5332_CR63","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"644","DOI":"10.1111\/bju.12831","volume":"115","author":"K Komura","year":"2015","unstructured":"Komura K, Inamoto T, Takai T, Uchimoto T, Saito K, Tanda N et al (2015) Incidence of urethral stricture after bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate using TURis: results from a randomised trial. BJU Int 115(4):644\u2013652","journal-title":"BJU Int"},{"issue":"6","key":"5332_CR64","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"429","DOI":"10.4103\/0256-4947.57163","volume":"29","author":"CHC Kong","year":"2009","unstructured":"Kong CHC, Ibrahim MF, Zainuddin ZM (2009) A prospective, randomized clinical trial comparing bipolar plasma kinetic resection of the prostate versus conventional monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Ann Saudi Med 29(6):429\u2013432","journal-title":"Ann Saudi Med"},{"issue":"10","key":"5332_CR65","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1245","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2013.0216","volume":"27","author":"A Kumar","year":"2013","unstructured":"Kumar A, Vasudeva P, Kumar N, Nanda B, Jha SK, Mohanty N (2013) A prospective randomized comparative study of monopolar and bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate and photoselective vaporization of the prostate in patients who present with benign prostatic obstruction: a single center experience. J Endourol 27(10):1245\u20131253","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"issue":"1","key":"5332_CR66","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"17","DOI":"10.1111\/luts.12135","volume":"10","author":"N Kumar","year":"2018","unstructured":"Kumar N, Vasudeva P, Kumar A, Singh H (2018) Prospective randomized comparison of monopolar TURP, bipolar TURP and photoselective vaporization of the prostate in patients with benign prostatic obstruction: 36 months outcome. Low Urin Tract Symptoms 10(1):17\u201320","journal-title":"Low Urin Tract Symptoms"},{"issue":"3","key":"5332_CR67","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"573","DOI":"10.1016\/S0090-4295(02)02420-2","volume":"61","author":"ED Kursh","year":"2003","unstructured":"Kursh ED, Concepcion R, Chan S, Hudson P, Ratner M, Eyre R (2003) Interstitial laser coagulation versus transurethral prostate resection for treating benign prostatic obstruction: a randomized trial with 2-year follow-up. Urology 61(3):573\u2013578","journal-title":"Urology"},{"issue":"6","key":"5332_CR68","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"494","DOI":"10.1080\/00365590310001773","volume":"37","author":"F Liedberg","year":"2003","unstructured":"Liedberg F, Adell L, Hagberg G, Palmqvist IB (2003) Interstitial laser coagulation versus transurethral resection of the prostate for benign prostatic enlargement\u2013a prospective randomized study. Scand J Urol Nephrol 37(6):494\u2013497","journal-title":"Scand J Urol Nephrol"},{"issue":"6","key":"5332_CR69","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1165","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2012.01.052","volume":"61","author":"B Lukacs","year":"2012","unstructured":"Lukacs B, Loeffler J, Bruy\u00e8re F, Blanchet P, Gelet A, Coloby P et al (2012) Photoselective vaporization of the prostate with GreenLight 120-W laser compared with monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Eur Urol 61(6):1165\u20131173","journal-title":"Eur Urol"},{"issue":"2","key":"5332_CR70","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"240","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1464-410X.2011.10222.x","volume":"109","author":"C Mamoulakis","year":"2012","unstructured":"Mamoulakis C, Skolarikos A, Schulze M, Scoffone CM, Rassweiler JJ, Alivizatos G et al (2012) Results from an international multicentre double-blind randomized controlled trial on the perioperative efficacy and safety of bipolar vs monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate. BJU Int 109(2):240\u2013248","journal-title":"BJU Int"},{"issue":"1","key":"5332_CR71","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"109","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1464-410X.2012.11662.x","volume":"112","author":"C Mamoulakis","year":"2013","unstructured":"Mamoulakis C, Skolarikos A, Schulze M, Scoffone CM, Rassweiler JJ, Alivizatos G et al (2013) Bipolar vs monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate: evaluation of the impact on overall sexual function in an international randomized controlled trial setting. BJU Int 112(1):109\u2013120","journal-title":"BJU Int"},{"key":"5332_CR72","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Mattiasson A, Wagrell L, Schelin S, Nordling J, Richthoff J, Magnusson B, et al (2007) Five-year follow-up of feedback microwave thermotherapy versus TURP for clinical BPH: a prospective randomized multicenter study. Urology 69(1):91\u20136; discussion 96\u201397.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2006.08.1115"},{"issue":"2","key":"5332_CR73","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"130","DOI":"10.1159\/000200786","volume":"82","author":"RM Mavuduru","year":"2009","unstructured":"Mavuduru RM, Mandal AK, Singh SK, Acharya N, Agarwal M, Garg S et al (2009) Comparison of HoLEP and TURP in terms of efficacy in the early postoperative period and perioperative morbidity. Urol Int 82(2):130\u2013135","journal-title":"Urol Int"},{"issue":"4","key":"5332_CR74","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"437","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1464-410x.2000.00439.x","volume":"85","author":"WJ McAllister","year":"2000","unstructured":"McAllister WJ, Absalom MJ, Mir K, Shivde S, Anson K, Kirby RS et al (2000) Does endoscopic laser ablation of the prostate stand the test of time? Five-year results from a multicentre randomized controlled trial of endoscopic laser ablation against transurethral resection of the prostate. BJU Int 85(4):437\u2013439","journal-title":"BJU Int"},{"issue":"5 Pt 1","key":"5332_CR75","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1926","DOI":"10.1097\/01.ju.0000140501.68841.a1","volume":"172","author":"F Montorsi","year":"2004","unstructured":"Montorsi F, Naspro R, Salonia A, Suardi N, Briganti A, Zanoni M et al (2004) Holmium laser enucleation versus transurethral resection of the prostate: results from a 2-center, prospective, randomized trial in patients with obstructive benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol 172(5 Pt 1):1926\u20131929","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"key":"5332_CR76","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"144","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2018.01.037","volume":"116","author":"L Mordasini","year":"2018","unstructured":"Mordasini L, Di Bona C, Klein J, Mattei A, Wirth GJ, Iselin CE (2018) 80-W greenlight laser vaporization versus transurethral resection of the prostate for treatment of benign prostatic obstruction: 5-year outcomes of a single-center prospective randomized trial. Urology 116:144\u2013149","journal-title":"Urology"},{"key":"5332_CR77","unstructured":"Ng CF, Yee CH, Chan CK, Wong HM, Chiu PK, Tsu JH, et al (2017) Bipolar transurethral vapourisation versus monopolar transurethral resection of prostate: a randomised controlled trial. Hong Kong Med J Xianggang Yi Xue Za Zhi 23 Suppl 2(3):32\u201334"},{"issue":"1","key":"5332_CR78","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"79","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2005.19.79","volume":"19","author":"B Nuho\u011flu","year":"2005","unstructured":"Nuho\u011flu B, Ayyildiz A, Fidan V, Ersoy E, Huri E, Germiyano\u011fu C (2005) Transurethral electrovaporization of the prostate: is it any better than standard transurethral prostatectomy? 5-year follow-up. J Endourol 19(1):79\u201382","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"issue":"1","key":"5332_CR79","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"131","DOI":"10.1590\/s1677-5538.ibju.2019.0766","volume":"47","author":"H Otaola-Arca","year":"2021","unstructured":"Otaola-Arca H, \u00c1lvarez-Ardura M, Molina-Escudero R, Fern\u00e1ndez MI, P\u00e1ez-Borda \u00c1 (2021) A prospective randomized study comparing bipolar plasmakinetic transurethral resection of the prostate and monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate for the treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: efficacy, sexual function, Quality of Life, and complications. Int Braz J Urol Off J Braz Soc Urol 47(1):131\u2013144","journal-title":"Int Braz J Urol Off J Braz Soc Urol"},{"issue":"11","key":"5332_CR80","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2181","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jsxm.2020.06.001","volume":"17","author":"C Pan","year":"2020","unstructured":"Pan C, Zhan Y, Zhao Y, Wu B, Bai S (2020) Comparison of Hiraoka\u2019s transurethral detachment prostatectomy and transurethral resection of the prostate effects on postoperative erectile function in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia: a prospective randomized controlled study. J Sex Med 17(11):2181\u20132190","journal-title":"J Sex Med"},{"issue":"3","key":"5332_CR81","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"215","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2006.20.215","volume":"20","author":"S Patankar","year":"2006","unstructured":"Patankar S, Jamkar A, Dobhada S, Gorde V (2006) PlasmaKinetic superpulse transurethral resection versus conventional transurethral resection of prostate. J Endourol 20(3):215\u2013219","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"issue":"8","key":"5332_CR82","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1184","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1464-410X.2011.10878.x","volume":"110","author":"JA Pereira-Correia","year":"2012","unstructured":"Pereira-Correia JA, de Moraes Sousa KD, Santos JBP, de Morais PD, Lopes-da-Silva LF, Krambeck RL et al (2012) GreenLight HPS\u2122 120-W laser vaporization vs transurethral resection of the prostate (<60 mL): a 2-year randomized double-blind prospective urodynamic investigation. BJU Int 110(8):1184\u20131189","journal-title":"BJU Int"},{"issue":"1","key":"5332_CR83","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"26","DOI":"10.1159\/000071089","volume":"71","author":"B Planz","year":"2003","unstructured":"Planz B, Kalem T, Sprenger C, Deix T, Djavan B, Hanke P (2003) A prospective randomized study of combined visual laser ablation and transurethral resection of the prostate versus transurethral prostatectomy alone. Urol Int 71(1):26\u201330","journal-title":"Urol Int"},{"issue":"3","key":"5332_CR84","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"526","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2014.05.027","volume":"84","author":"MR Razzaghi","year":"2014","unstructured":"Razzaghi MR, Mazloomfard MM, Mokhtarpour H, Moeini A (2014) Diode laser (980 nm) vaporization in comparison with transurethral resection of the prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia: randomized clinical trial with 2-year follow-up. Urology 84(3):526\u2013532","journal-title":"Urology"},{"issue":"1","key":"5332_CR85","first-page":"68","volume":"28","author":"MR Razzaghi","year":"2007","unstructured":"Razzaghi MR, Habibi G, Djavid GE, Gholamrezaee H (2007) Laser prostatectomy versus transurethral resection of prostate in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Saudi Med J 28(1):68\u201372","journal-title":"Saudi Med J"},{"issue":"6","key":"5332_CR86","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1193","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2005.12.036","volume":"67","author":"L Rigatti","year":"2006","unstructured":"Rigatti L, Naspro R, Salonia A, Centemero A, Ghezzi M, Guazzoni G et al (2006) Urodynamics after TURP and HoLEP in urodynamically obstructed patients: are there any differences at 1 year of follow-up? Urology 67(6):1193\u20131198","journal-title":"Urology"},{"key":"5332_CR87","first-page":"192","volume":"133","author":"M Samir","year":"2019","unstructured":"Samir M, Tawfick A, Mahmoud MA, Elawady H, Abuelnaga M, Shabayek M et al (2019) Two-year follow-up in bipolar transurethral enucleation and resection of the prostate in comparison with bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate in treatment of large prostates. Randomiz Controll Trial Urol 133:192\u2013198","journal-title":"Randomiz Controll Trial Urol"},{"issue":"2","key":"5332_CR88","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"139","DOI":"10.1159\/000090877","volume":"76","author":"I Seckiner","year":"2006","unstructured":"Seckiner I, Yesilli C, Akduman B, Altan K, Mungan NA (2006) A prospective randomized study for comparing bipolar plasmakinetic resection of the prostate with standard TURP. Urol Int 76(2):139\u2013143","journal-title":"Urol Int"},{"issue":"4","key":"5332_CR89","first-page":"262","volume":"7","author":"N Simforoosh","year":"2010","unstructured":"Simforoosh N, Abdi H, Kashi AH, Zare S, Tabibi A, Danesh A et al (2010) Open prostatectomy versus transurethral resection of the prostate, where are we standing in the new era? A randomized controlled trial. Urol J 7(4):262\u2013269","journal-title":"Urol J"},{"issue":"2","key":"5332_CR90","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"183","DOI":"10.1590\/S1677-55382010000200008","volume":"36","author":"P Singhania","year":"2010","unstructured":"Singhania P, Nandini D, Sarita F, Hemant P, Hemalata I (2010) Transurethral resection of prostate: a comparison of standard monopolar versus bipolar saline resection. Int Braz J Urol Off J Braz Soc Urol 36(2):183\u2013189","journal-title":"Int Braz J Urol Off J Braz Soc Urol"},{"issue":"3","key":"5332_CR91","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"677","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2015.08.083","volume":"195","author":"A Skolarikos","year":"2016","unstructured":"Skolarikos A, Rassweiler J, de la Rosette JJ, Alivizatos G, Scoffone C, Scarpa RM et al (2016) Safety and efficacy of bipolar versus monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate in patients with large prostates or severe lower urinary tract symptoms: post hoc analysis of a european multicenter randomized controlled trial. J Urol 195(3):677\u2013684","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"issue":"3","key":"5332_CR92","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1036","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2007.01.040","volume":"177","author":"SA Soliman","year":"2007","unstructured":"Soliman SA, Wadie BS, Ibrahim EHE, Shehab El-Dein AB (2007) Rotoresection versus transurethral resection of the prostate: short-term evaluation of a prospective randomized study. J Urol 177(3):1036\u20131039","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"issue":"4","key":"5332_CR93","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"643","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2015.04.024","volume":"68","author":"J S\u00f8nksen","year":"2015","unstructured":"S\u00f8nksen J, Barber NJ, Speakman MJ, Berges R, Wetterauer U, Greene D et al (2015) Prospective, randomized, multinational study of prostatic urethral lift versus transurethral resection of the prostate: 12-month results from the BPH6 study. Eur Urol 68(4):643\u2013652","journal-title":"Eur Urol"},{"issue":"4","key":"5332_CR94","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1371","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2014.08.137","volume":"193","author":"P Stucki","year":"2015","unstructured":"Stucki P, Marini L, Mattei A, Xafis K, Boldini M, Danuser H (2015) Bipolar versus monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate: a prospective randomized trial focusing on bleeding complications. J Urol 193(4):1371\u20131376","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"issue":"7","key":"5332_CR95","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1277","DOI":"10.1007\/s11255-014-0646-9","volume":"46","author":"N Sun","year":"2014","unstructured":"Sun N, Fu Y, Tian T, Gao J, Wang Y, Wang S et al (2014) Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate versus transurethral resection of the prostate: a randomized clinical trial. Int Urol Nephrol 46(7):1277\u20131282","journal-title":"Int Urol Nephrol"},{"issue":"1","key":"5332_CR96","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"94","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2015.07.054","volume":"69","author":"JA Thomas","year":"2016","unstructured":"Thomas JA, Tubaro A, Barber N, d\u2019Ancona F, Muir G, Witzsch U et al (2016) A multicenter randomized noninferiority trial comparing greenlight-xps laser vaporization of the prostate and transurethral resection of the prostate for the treatment of benign prostatic obstruction: two-yr outcomes of the GOLIATH study. Eur Urol 69(1):94\u2013102","journal-title":"Eur Urol"},{"issue":"6","key":"5332_CR97","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"487","DOI":"10.1080\/00365590310015769","volume":"37","author":"K Tuhkanen","year":"2003","unstructured":"Tuhkanen K, Heino A, Aaltomaa S, Ala-Opas M (2003) Long-term results of contact laser versus transurethral resection of the prostate in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia with small or moderately enlarged prostates. Scand J Urol Nephrol 37(6):487\u2013493","journal-title":"Scand J Urol Nephrol"},{"issue":"6","key":"5332_CR98","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1029","DOI":"10.1016\/S0090-4295(03)00769-6","volume":"62","author":"HHE van Melick","year":"2003","unstructured":"van Melick HHE, van Venrooij GEPM, Boon TA (2003) Long-term follow-up after transurethral resection of the prostate, contact laser prostatectomy, and electrovaporization. Urology 62(6):1029\u20131034","journal-title":"Urology"},{"issue":"4","key":"5332_CR99","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"698","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2004.05.030","volume":"64","author":"L Wagrell","year":"2004","unstructured":"Wagrell L, Schelin S, Nordling J, Richthoff J, Magnusson B, Schain M et al (2004) Three-year follow-up of feedback microwave thermotherapy versus TURP for clinical BPH: a prospective randomized multicenter study. Urology 64(4):698\u2013702","journal-title":"Urology"},{"issue":"2","key":"5332_CR100","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"616","DOI":"10.1097\/01.ju.0000132739.57555.d8","volume":"172","author":"A Westenberg","year":"2004","unstructured":"Westenberg A, Gilling P, Kennett K, Frampton C, Fraundorfer M (2004) Holmium laser resection of the prostate versus transurethral resection of the prostate: results of a randomized trial with 4-year minimum long-term followup. J Urol 172(2):616\u2013619","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"issue":"3","key":"5332_CR101","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"569","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2006.04.002","volume":"50","author":"LC Wilson","year":"2006","unstructured":"Wilson LC, Gilling PJ, Williams A, Kennett KM, Frampton CM, Westenberg AM et al (2006) A randomised trial comparing holmium laser enucleation versus transurethral resection in the treatment of prostates larger than 40 grams: results at 2 years. Eur Urol 50(3):569\u2013573","journal-title":"Eur Urol"},{"issue":"41","key":"5332_CR102","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.3310\/hta24410","volume":"24","author":"J Worthington","year":"2020","unstructured":"Worthington J, Lane JA, Taylor H, Young G, Noble SM, Abrams P et al (2020) Thulium laser transurethral vaporesection versus transurethral resection of the prostate for benign prostatic obstruction: the UNBLOCS RCT. Health Technol Assess Winch Engl 24(41):1\u201396","journal-title":"Health Technol Assess Winch Engl"},{"issue":"2","key":"5332_CR103","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"382","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2007.05.019","volume":"53","author":"SJ Xia","year":"2008","unstructured":"Xia SJ, Zhuo J, Sun XW, Han BM, Shao Y, Zhang YN (2008) Thulium laser versus standard transurethral resection of the prostate: a randomized prospective trial. Eur Urol 53(2):382\u2013389","journal-title":"Eur Urol"},{"issue":"4","key":"5332_CR104","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"734","DOI":"10.3349\/ymj.2012.53.4.734","volume":"53","author":"CY Xie","year":"2012","unstructured":"Xie CY, Zhu GB, Wang XH, Liu XB (2012) Five-year follow-up results of a randomized controlled trial comparing bipolar plasmakinetic and monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate. Yonsei Med J 53(4):734","journal-title":"Yonsei Med J"},{"issue":"3","key":"5332_CR105","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"353","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2013.0374","volume":"28","author":"JB Xie","year":"2014","unstructured":"Xie JB, Tan YA, Wang FL, Xuan Q, Sun YW, Xiao J et al (2014) Extraperitoneal laparoscopic adenomectomy (Madigan) versus bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia greater than 80 ml: complications and functional outcomes after 3-year follow-up. J Endourol. 28(3):353\u20139","journal-title":"J Endourol."},{"issue":"1","key":"5332_CR106","first-page":"125","volume":"21","author":"B Xue","year":"2013","unstructured":"Xue B, Zang Y, Zhang Y, Yang D, Gao J, Sun C et al (2013) GreenLight HPS 120-W laser vaporization versus transurethral resection of the prostate for treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a prospective randomized trial. J X-Ray Sci Technol 21(1):125\u2013132","journal-title":"J X-Ray Sci Technol"},{"issue":"3","key":"5332_CR107","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"316","DOI":"10.1111\/ases.12197","volume":"8","author":"CH Yee","year":"2015","unstructured":"Yee CH, Wong JH, Chiu PK, Chan CK, Lee WM, Tsu JH et al (2015) Short-stay transurethral prostate surgery: A randomized controlled trial comparing transurethral resection in saline bipolar transurethral vaporization of the prostate with monopolar transurethral resection. Asian J Endosc Surg 8(3):316\u2013322","journal-title":"Asian J Endosc Surg"},{"issue":"12","key":"5332_CR108","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1889","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2011.0269","volume":"25","author":"SK Yip","year":"2011","unstructured":"Yip SK, Chan NH, Chiu P, Lee KW, Ng CF (2011) A randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy of hybrid bipolar transurethral vaporization and resection of the prostate with bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate. J Endourol 25(12):1889\u20131894","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"issue":"21","key":"5332_CR109","first-page":"3811","volume":"125","author":"SY Zhang","year":"2012","unstructured":"Zhang SY, Hu H, Zhang XP, Wang D, Xu KX, Na YQ et al (2012) Efficacy and safety of bipolar plasma vaporization of the prostate with \u201cbutton-type\u201d electrode compared with transurethral resection of prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Chin Med J (Engl) 125(21):3811\u20133814","journal-title":"Chin Med J (Engl)"},{"issue":"5","key":"5332_CR110","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"752","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2010.08.026","volume":"58","author":"Z Zhao","year":"2010","unstructured":"Zhao Z, Zeng G, Zhong W, Mai Z, Zeng S, Tao X (2010) A prospective, randomised trial comparing plasmakinetic enucleation to standard transurethral resection of the prostate for symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia: three-year follow-up results. Eur Urol 58(5):752\u2013758","journal-title":"Eur Urol"},{"issue":"4","key":"5332_CR111","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1427","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2012.10.117","volume":"189","author":"L Zhu","year":"2013","unstructured":"Zhu L, Chen S, Yang S, Wu M, Ge R, Wu W et al (2013) Electrosurgical enucleation versus bipolar transurethral resection for prostates larger than 70 ml: a prospective, randomized trial with 5-year followup. J Urol 189(4):1427\u20131431","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"issue":"1","key":"5332_CR112","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"24","DOI":"10.1111\/bju.12281","volume":"113","author":"MI Omar","year":"2014","unstructured":"Omar MI, Lam TB, Alexander CE, Graham J, Mamoulakis C, Imamura M et al (2014) Systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinical effectiveness of bipolar compared with monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP): Clinical effectiveness of bipolar vs monopolar TURP. BJU Int 113(1):24\u201335","journal-title":"BJU Int"},{"issue":"9","key":"5332_CR113","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1107","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2014.0188","volume":"28","author":"Y Tang","year":"2014","unstructured":"Tang Y, Li J, Pu C, Bai Y, Yuan H, Wei Q et al (2014) Bipolar transurethral resection versus monopolar transurethral resection for benign prostatic hypertrophy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endourol 28(9):1107\u20131114","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"key":"5332_CR114","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Mamoulakis C, Ubbink DT, De La Rosette JJMCH (2009) Bipolar versus monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur Urol 56(5):798\u2013809","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2009.06.037"},{"issue":"5","key":"5332_CR115","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1015","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2009.08.015","volume":"75","author":"N Burke","year":"2010","unstructured":"Burke N, Whelan JP, Goeree L, Hopkins RB, Campbell K, Goeree R et al (2010) Systematic review and meta-analysis of transurethral resection of the prostate versus minimally invasive procedures for the treatment of benign prostatic obstruction. Urology 75(5):1015\u20131022","journal-title":"Urology"},{"issue":"6","key":"5332_CR116","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1066","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2014.06.017","volume":"67","author":"JN Cornu","year":"2015","unstructured":"Cornu JN, Ahyai S, Bachmann A, De La Rosette J, Gilling P, Gratzke C et al (2015) A systematic review and meta-analysis of functional outcomes and complications following transurethral procedures for lower urinary tract symptoms resulting from benign prostatic obstruction: an update. Eur Urol 67(6):1066\u20131096","journal-title":"Eur Urol"},{"key":"5332_CR117","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lerner LB, McVary KT, Barry MJ, Kumar A, Gandhi MC, Kaplan SA, et al (2021) Management of lower urinary tract symptoms attributed to benign prostatic hyperplasia: AUA GUIDELINE. 65.","DOI":"10.1097\/JU.0000000000002183"},{"issue":"1","key":"5332_CR118","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"7","DOI":"10.1007\/s002400050015","volume":"26","author":"P Kunelius","year":"1998","unstructured":"Kunelius P, Hakkinen J, Lukkarinen O (1998) Sexual functions in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia before and after transurethral resection of the prostate. Urol Res. 26(1):7\u20139","journal-title":"Urol Res."},{"issue":"4","key":"5332_CR119","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1206","DOI":"10.1016\/S0022-5347(05)67142-X","volume":"164","author":"Y Arai","year":"2000","unstructured":"Arai Y, Aoki Y, Okubo K, Maeda H, Terada N, Matsuta Y et al (2000) Impact of interventional therapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia on quality of life and sexual function: a prospective study. J Urol 164(4):1206\u20131211","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"issue":"2","key":"5332_CR120","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"146","DOI":"10.1038\/ijir.2009.56","volume":"22","author":"M Jaidane","year":"2010","unstructured":"Jaidane M, Arfa NB, Hmida W, Hidoussi A, Slama A, Sorba NB et al (2010) Effect of transurethral resection of the prostate on erectile function: a prospective comparative study. Int J Impot Res 22(2):146\u2013151","journal-title":"Int J Impot Res"},{"issue":"5","key":"5332_CR121","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"745","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1464-410X.2011.10396.x","volume":"109","author":"SF Mishriki","year":"2012","unstructured":"Mishriki SF, Grimsley SJS, Lam T, Nabi G, Cohen NP (2012) TURP and sex: patient and partner prospective 12 years follow-up study: TURP AND SEX. BJU Int 109(5):745\u2013750","journal-title":"BJU Int"},{"issue":"2","key":"5332_CR122","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"510","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2007.01.088","volume":"52","author":"M Muntener","year":"2007","unstructured":"Muntener M, Aellig S, Kuettel R, Gehrlach C, Sulser T, Strebel RT (2007) Sexual Function after Transurethral Resection of the Prostate (TURP): Results of an Independent Prospective Multicentre Assessment of Outcome. Eur Urol 52(2):510\u2013516","journal-title":"Eur Urol"},{"issue":"2\u20133","key":"5332_CR123","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"125","DOI":"10.1080\/00224499.2011.603168","volume":"49","author":"J DeLamater","year":"2012","unstructured":"DeLamater J (2012) Sexual expression in later life: a review and synthesis. J Sex Res 49(2\u20133):125\u2013141","journal-title":"J Sex Res"},{"issue":"2","key":"5332_CR124","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"299","DOI":"10.1007\/s00345-018-2368-6","volume":"37","author":"S Lebdai","year":"2019","unstructured":"Lebdai S, Chevrot A, Doizi S, Pradere B, Delongchamps NB et al (2019) Do patients have to choose between ejaculation and miction? A systematic review about ejaculation preservation technics for benign prostatic obstruction surgical treatment. World J Urol. 37(2):299\u2013308","journal-title":"World J Urol."},{"key":"5332_CR125","unstructured":"Manasa T, Reddy N, Puvvada S, Mylarappa P (2022) Evaluating outcomes of combined bladder neck and supramontanal sparing ejaculatory preserving transurethral resection of the prostate: Results from a prospective, randomised study. Cent Eur J Urol. 75(3):292\u2013298"},{"issue":"12","key":"5332_CR126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2013","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2009.0129","volume":"23","author":"A Hawary","year":"2009","unstructured":"Hawary A, Mukhtar K, Sinclair A, Pearce I (2009) Transurethral resection of the prostate syndrome: almost gone but not forgotten. J Endourol 23(12):2013\u20132020","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"issue":"5","key":"5332_CR127","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"969","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2005.12.042","volume":"50","author":"J Rassweiler","year":"2006","unstructured":"Rassweiler J, Teber D, Kuntz R, Hofmann R (2006) Complications of Transurethral Resection of the Prostate (TURP)\u2014Incidence, Management, and Prevention. Eur Urol 50(5):969\u2013980","journal-title":"Eur Urol"},{"issue":"1","key":"5332_CR128","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"246","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2008.03.058","volume":"180","author":"O Reich","year":"2008","unstructured":"Reich O, Gratzke C, Bachmann A, Seitz M, Schlenker B, Hermanek P et al (2008) Morbidity, mortality and early outcome of transurethral resection of the prostate: a prospective multicenter evaluation of 10,654 patients. J Urol 180(1):246\u2013249","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"issue":"1","key":"5332_CR129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"6575","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-018-25069-5","volume":"8","author":"F Palmisano","year":"2018","unstructured":"Palmisano F, Boeri L, Fontana M, Gallioli A, De Lorenzis E, Zanetti SP et al (2018) Incidence and predictors of readmission within 30 days of transurethral resection of the prostate: a single center European experience. Sci Rep 8(1):6575","journal-title":"Sci Rep"},{"issue":"4","key":"5332_CR130","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"465","DOI":"10.1002\/nau.21231","volume":"31","author":"BS Buckley","year":"2012","unstructured":"Buckley BS, Lapitan MCM, Glazener CM, for the MAPS Trial Group (2012) The effect of urinary incontinence on health utility and health-related quality of life in men following prostate surgery: Urinary Incontinence and QoL After Prostate Surgery. Neurourol Urodyn. 31(4):465\u2013469","journal-title":"Neurourol Urodyn."},{"issue":"3","key":"5332_CR131","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"380","DOI":"10.1590\/S1677-55382011000300012","volume":"37","author":"H Bruschini","year":"2011","unstructured":"Bruschini H, Simonetti R, Antunes AA, Srougi M (2011) Urinary incontinence following surgery for BPH: the role of aging on the incidence of bladder dysfunction. Int Braz J Urol 37(3):380\u2013387","journal-title":"Int Braz J Urol"},{"issue":"10","key":"5332_CR132","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1331","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2022.0222","volume":"36","author":"D Castellani","year":"2022","unstructured":"Castellani D, Rubilotta E, Fabiani A, Maggi M, Wroclawski ML, Teoh JYC et al (2022) Correlation between transurethral interventions and their influence on type and duration of postoperative urinary incontinence: results from a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. J Endourol 36(10):1331\u20131347","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"issue":"6","key":"5332_CR133","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1391","DOI":"10.1007\/s00345-022-03946-z","volume":"40","author":"GM Pirola","year":"2022","unstructured":"Pirola GM, Castellani D, Lim EJ, Wroclawski ML, Le Quy ND, Gubbiotti M et al (2022) Urethral stricture following endoscopic prostate surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective, randomized trials. World J Urol 40(6):1391\u20131411","journal-title":"World J Urol"},{"issue":"9","key":"5332_CR134","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1400","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2020.0847","volume":"35","author":"ME Garza-Mont\u00fafar","year":"2021","unstructured":"Garza-Mont\u00fafar ME, Cobos-Aguilar H, Trevi\u00f1o-Baez JD, P\u00e9rez-Cort\u00e9z P (2021) Factors associated with urethral and bladder neck stricture after transurethral resection of the prostate. J Endourol 35(9):1400\u20131404","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"issue":"3","key":"5332_CR135","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"186","DOI":"10.4111\/icu.2017.58.3.186","volume":"58","author":"GH Tan","year":"2017","unstructured":"Tan GH, Shah SA, Ali NM, Goh EH, Singam P, Ho CCK et al (2017) Urethral strictures after bipolar transurethral resection of prostate may be linked to slow resection rate. Investig Clin Urol 58(3):186","journal-title":"Investig Clin Urol"},{"issue":"1","key":"5332_CR136","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"125","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2008.12.057","volume":"74","author":"JK Park","year":"2009","unstructured":"Park JK, Lee SK, Han SH, Kim SD, Choi KS, Kim MK (2009) Is warm temperature necessary to prevent urethral stricture in combined transurethral resection and vaporization of prostate? Urology 74(1):125\u2013129","journal-title":"Urology"},{"key":"5332_CR137","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"G\u00fcr A, S\u00f6nmez G, Demirta\u015f T, Tombul \u015eT, Halitgil K, Demirta\u015f A (2021) Risk factors for early urethral stricture after mono-polar transurethral prostate resection: a single-center experience. Cureus 17;13(11):e19663","DOI":"10.7759\/cureus.19663"},{"issue":"4","key":"5332_CR138","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"329","DOI":"10.4103\/UA.UA_165_19","volume":"13","author":"H Sekar","year":"2021","unstructured":"Sekar H, Palaniyandi V, Krishnamoorthy S, Kumaresan N (2021) Post-transurethral resection of prostate urethral strictures: are they often underreported? A single-center retrospective observational cohort study. Urol Ann 13(4):329","journal-title":"Urol Ann"},{"issue":"3","key":"5332_CR139","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"262","DOI":"10.1159\/000080839","volume":"73","author":"W Al-Singary","year":"2004","unstructured":"Al-Singary W, Arya M, Patel HRH (2004) Bladder neck stenosis after transurethral resection of prostate: does size matter? Urol Int 73(3):262\u2013265","journal-title":"Urol Int"},{"issue":"3","key":"5332_CR140","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"855","DOI":"10.1097\/JU.0000000000001463","volume":"205","author":"C Gilfrich","year":"2021","unstructured":"Gilfrich C, May M, Fahlenbrach C, G\u00fcnster C, Jeschke E, Popken G et al (2021) Surgical reintervention rates after invasive treatment for lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic syndrome: a comparative study of more than 43,000 patients with long-term followup. J Urol 205(3):855\u2013863","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"issue":"11","key":"5332_CR141","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"4073","DOI":"10.1007\/s00345-021-03718-1","volume":"39","author":"D Castellani","year":"2021","unstructured":"Castellani D, Wroclawski ML, Pirola GM, Gauhar V, Rubilotta E, Chan VWS et al (2021) Bladder neck stenosis after transurethral prostate surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Urol 39(11):4073\u20134083","journal-title":"World J Urol"},{"issue":"13","key":"5332_CR142","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2884","DOI":"10.3390\/jcm10132884","volume":"10","author":"C Rosenbaum","year":"2021","unstructured":"Rosenbaum C, Vetterlein M, Fisch M, Reiss P, Worst T, Kranz J et al (2021) Contemporary outcomes after transurethral procedures for bladder neck contracture following endoscopic treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Clin Med 10(13):2884","journal-title":"J Clin Med"},{"issue":"12","key":"5332_CR143","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2035","DOI":"10.1007\/s00345-018-2353-0","volume":"36","author":"B Rosenhammer","year":"2018","unstructured":"Rosenhammer B, Lausenmeyer EM, Mayr R, Burger M, Eichelberg C (2018) HoLEP provides a higher prostate cancer detection rate compared to bipolar TURP: a matched-pair analysis. World J Urol 36(12):2035\u20132041","journal-title":"World J Urol"},{"issue":"6","key":"5332_CR144","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"683","DOI":"10.1590\/S1677-55382009000600007","volume":"35","author":"AA Antunes","year":"2009","unstructured":"Antunes AA, Srougi M, Coelho RF, Leite KR, Freire GDC (2009) Transurethral resection of the prostate for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms related to benign prostatic hyperplasia: how much should be resected? Int Braz J Urol 35(6):683\u2013691","journal-title":"Int Braz J Urol"},{"issue":"4","key":"5332_CR145","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"889","DOI":"10.1007\/s00345-021-03771-w","volume":"40","author":"A Bhat","year":"2022","unstructured":"Bhat A, Blachman-Braun R, Herrmann TRW, Shah HN (2022) Are all procedures for benign prostatic hyperplasia created equal? A systematic review on post-procedural PSA dynamics and its correlation with relief of bladder outlet obstruction. World J Urol 40(4):889\u2013905","journal-title":"World J Urol"},{"key":"5332_CR146","first-page":"175","volume":"12","author":"GWK Duarsa","year":"2020","unstructured":"Duarsa GWK, Dau DO, Pramana IBP, Tirtayasa PMW, Yudiana IW, Santosa KB et al (2020) Risk factors for prostate volume progression after prostate-transurethral resection. Res Rep Urol 12:175\u2013178","journal-title":"Res Rep Urol"},{"issue":"4","key":"5332_CR147","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"943","DOI":"10.1007\/s11255-013-0474-3","volume":"45","author":"M Pahwa","year":"2013","unstructured":"Pahwa M, Pahwa M, Pahwa AR, Girotra M, Chawla A, Sharma A (2013) Changes in S-PSA after transurethral resection of prostate and its correlation to postoperative outcome. Int Urol Nephrol 45(4):943\u2013949","journal-title":"Int Urol Nephrol"},{"issue":"1","key":"5332_CR148","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"41","DOI":"10.1590\/S1677-55382008000100007","volume":"34","author":"RC Fonseca","year":"2008","unstructured":"Fonseca RC, Gomes CM, Meireles EB, Freire GC, Srougi M (2008) Prostate specific antigen levels following transurethral resection of the prostate. Int Braz J Urol 34(1):41\u201348","journal-title":"Int Braz J Urol"},{"issue":"1","key":"5332_CR149","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"177","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2008.10.062","volume":"74","author":"BT Helfand","year":"2009","unstructured":"Helfand BT, Anderson CB, Fought A, Kim DY, Vyas A, McVary KT (2009) Postoperative PSA and PSA velocity identify presence of prostate cancer after various surgical interventions for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Urology 74(1):177\u2013183","journal-title":"Urology"},{"issue":"15","key":"5332_CR150","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"909","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM198710083171501","volume":"317","author":"TA Stamey","year":"1987","unstructured":"Stamey TA, Yang N, Hay AR, McNeal JE, Freiha FS, Redwine E (1987) Prostate-specific antigen as a serum marker for adenocarcinoma of the prostate. N Engl J Med 317(15):909\u2013916","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"issue":"2","key":"5332_CR151","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"532","DOI":"10.1097\/JU.0000000000001390","volume":"205","author":"DM Frendl","year":"2021","unstructured":"Frendl DM, Chen Y, Chang DC, Kim MM (2021) A claims based assessment of reoperation and acute urinary retention after ambulatory transurethral surgery for benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol. 205(2):532\u2013538","journal-title":"J Urol."},{"key":"5332_CR152","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"152","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2018.04.032","volume":"118","author":"K Eredics","year":"2018","unstructured":"Eredics K, Wachabauer D, R\u00f6thlin F, Madersbacher S, Schauer I (2018) Reoperation rates and mortality after transurethral and open prostatectomy in a long-term nationwide analysis: have we improved over a decade? Urology 118:152\u2013157","journal-title":"Urology"},{"key":"5332_CR153","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Tram M, Zipkin J, Srivastava S, Welliver C (2023) Outcome measures and inclusion\/exclusion criteria in benign prostatic hyperplasia trials on ClinicalTrials.gov. Urol Pract 10(3):254\u2013260","DOI":"10.1097\/UPJ.0000000000000397"}],"container-title":["World Journal of Urology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00345-024-05332-3.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00345-024-05332-3\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00345-024-05332-3.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,1,2]],"date-time":"2025-01-02T21:27:04Z","timestamp":1735853224000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00345-024-05332-3"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,11,15]]},"references-count":153,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,12]]}},"alternative-id":["5332"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00345-024-05332-3","relation":{},"ISSN":["1433-8726"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1433-8726","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,11,15]]},"assertion":[{"value":"5 June 2024","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"20 October 2024","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"15 November 2024","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interests"}},{"value":"This is a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis with public data. The University of Miami Institutional Review Board has confirmed that no ethical approval is required.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethics approval"}},{"value":"Not required.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent to publish"}}],"article-number":"639"}}