{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,29]],"date-time":"2026-10-29T16:50:46Z","timestamp":1793292646533,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":31,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,6]],"date-time":"2025-03-06T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1741219200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,6]],"date-time":"2025-03-06T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1741219200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100016981","name":"Necmettin Erbakan University","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100016981","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"crossref"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["World J Urol"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Purpose<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The aim of this systematic review is to assess the environmental impact of urologic procedures and equipment (P), specifically comparing emissions and waste generation between single-use and reusable devices (I and C), while also exploring strategies for emission reduction and providing relevant recommendations for sustainable practices in urology.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The review registered to PROSPERO (ID: CRD42024576865) and adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A systematic search was conducted to identify studies addressing sustainability, carbon footprint, and environmental impact in urology. A total of 7714 records were initially identified, of which ten met the inclusion criteria. Study quality was assessed using the QUADAS scoring system to evaluate risk of bias and applicability concerns.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Ten studies met the inclusion criteria, focusing on the environmental impacts of urologic devices and procedures (O). Single-use cystoscopes demonstrated lower carbon dioxide (CO\n                      <jats:sub>2<\/jats:sub>\n                      ) emissions per procedure (2.41\u00a0kg) compared to their reusable counterparts (4.23\u00a0kg) but produced more waste (622\u00a0g). Reusable cystoscopes, while having a lower cumulative waste per-use, increased emissions due to energy-intensive reprocessing. For ureteroscopes, single-use devices generated less CO\n                      <jats:sub>2<\/jats:sub>\n                      but significantly more solid waste. TURBT procedures had a high carbon footprint (131.8\u00a0kg CO\n                      <jats:sub>2<\/jats:sub>\n                      per procedure), largely from single-use items and sterilization. Robotic prostatectomy produced a lower carbon footprint (47,313\u00a0g CO\n                      <jats:sub>2<\/jats:sub>\n                      ) than laparoscopic methods, emphasizing the potential for energy-efficient techniques to reduce emissions in urology.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>A hybrid approach in urology, focusing on improving sterilization processes and developing eco-friendly single-use alternatives, may provide a balanced approach toward sustainability.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1007\/s00345-025-05522-7","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,6]],"date-time":"2025-03-06T12:19:02Z","timestamp":1741263542000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":19,"title":["Environmental sustainability in urologic practices: a systematic review"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"43","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-9926-6890","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"A.","family":"Tozsin","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-5440-7741","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"A.","family":"Aydin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-5091-9654","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"S.","family":"Silay","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-7401-9455","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"A. E.","family":"Demet","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"T.","family":"Knoll","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-4493-1301","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"T.","family":"Herrmann","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-3047-3637","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"M.","family":"De Bruin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-8690-0445","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"P.","family":"Dasgupta","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-0436-8246","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"J.","family":"Rassweiler","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-5009-8435","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Selcuk","family":"Guven","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-5135-9211","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"K.","family":"Ahmed","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,6]]},"reference":[{"issue":"1","key":"5522_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"7","DOI":"10.1111\/bju.15668","volume":"129","author":"I Eardley","year":"2022","unstructured":"Eardley I (2022) How can we reduce urology\u2019s carbon footprint? BJU Int 129(1):7\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/bju.15668","journal-title":"BJU Int"},{"issue":"3","key":"5522_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"260","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2023.04.035","volume":"84","author":"Z Kornberg","year":"2023","unstructured":"Kornberg Z, Wu J, Wilmot H, Duffina T, Shah JB (2023) A leak in the system: addressing the environmental impact of urologic care. Eur Urol 84(3):260\u2013262. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.eururo.2023.04.035","journal-title":"Eur Urol"},{"issue":"6","key":"5522_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"894","DOI":"10.1016\/j.euf.2023.09.006","volume":"9","author":"K Pandit","year":"2023","unstructured":"Pandit K, Yodkhunnatham N, Bagrodia A, Monga M (2023) Sustainability in urology: ideas for a greener future. Eur Urol Focus 9(6):894\u2013896. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.euf.2023.09.006","journal-title":"Eur Urol Focus"},{"issue":"6","key":"5522_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"897","DOI":"10.1016\/j.euf.2023.11.004","volume":"9","author":"A Herrmann","year":"2023","unstructured":"Herrmann A, van Veen FEE, Blok BFM, Watts KL (2023) A green prescription: integrating environmental sustainability in urology guidelines. Eur Urol Focus 9(6):897\u2013899. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.euf.2023.11.004","journal-title":"Eur Urol Focus"},{"issue":"5","key":"5522_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"617","DOI":"10.1111\/bju.15949","volume":"131","author":"JP Kemble","year":"2023","unstructured":"Kemble JP, Winoker JS, Patel SH, Su ZT, Matlaga BR, Potretzke AM, Koo K (2023) Environmental impact of single-use and reusable flexible cystoscopes. BJU Int 131(5):617\u2013622. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/bju.15949","journal-title":"BJU Int"},{"issue":"6","key":"5522_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"888","DOI":"10.1016\/j.euf.2023.09.012","volume":"9","author":"CS Elliott","year":"2023","unstructured":"Elliott CS (2023) Sustainability in urology: single-use versus reusable catheters for intermittent catheterization. Eur Urol Focus 9(6):888\u2013890. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.euf.2023.09.012","journal-title":"Eur Urol Focus"},{"issue":"11","key":"5522_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1460","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2021.0891","volume":"36","author":"D Hogan","year":"2022","unstructured":"Hogan D, Rauf H, Kinnear N, Hennessey DB (2022) The carbon footprint of single-use flexible cystoscopes compared with reusable cystoscopes. J Endourol 36(11):1460\u20131464. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1089\/end.2021.0891","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"issue":"10","key":"5522_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1317","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2022.0201","volume":"36","author":"T Boucheron","year":"2022","unstructured":"Boucheron T, Lechevallier E, Gondran-Tellier B, Michel F, Bastide C, Martin N, Baboudjian M (2022) Cost and environmental impact of disposable flexible cystoscopes compared to reusable devices. J Endourol 36(10):1317\u20131321. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1089\/end.2022.0201","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"issue":"4","key":"5522_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"681","DOI":"10.1016\/j.euf.2022.12.006","volume":"9","author":"M Baboudjian","year":"2023","unstructured":"Baboudjian M, Pradere B, Martin N, Gondran-Tellier B, Angerri O, Boucheron T, Bastide C, Emiliani E, Misrai V, Breda A, Lechevallier E (2023) Life cycle assessment of reusable and disposable cystoscopes: a path to greener urological procedures. Eur Urol Focus 9(4):681\u2013687. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.euf.2022.12.006","journal-title":"Eur Urol Focus"},{"key":"5522_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"70","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2024.03.023","volume":"188","author":"R Bertolo","year":"2024","unstructured":"Bertolo R, Gilioli V, Veccia A, Malandra S, Dal Corso L, Fenzi D, Mazzetto F, Antonelli A (2024) Institutional micro-cost comparative analysis of reusable vs single-use cystoscopes with assessment of environmental footprint. Urology 188:70\u201376. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.urology.2024.03.023","journal-title":"Urology"},{"issue":"3","key":"5522_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"214","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2018.0001","volume":"32","author":"NF Davis","year":"2018","unstructured":"Davis NF, McGrath S, Quinlan M, Jack G, Lawrentschuk N, Bolton DM (2018) Carbon footprint in flexible ureteroscopy: a comparative study on the environmental impact of reusable and single-use ureteroscopes. J Endourol 32(3):214\u2013217. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1089\/end.2018.0001","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"issue":"1","key":"5522_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"78","DOI":"10.1111\/bju.16477","volume":"135","author":"JB John","year":"2024","unstructured":"John JB, Collins M, Eames S, O\u2019Flynn K, Briggs TWR, Gray WK, McGrath JS (2024) The carbon footprint of the perioperative transurethral resection of bladder tumour pathway. BJU Int 135(1):78\u201387. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/bju.16477","journal-title":"BJU Int"},{"issue":"5","key":"5522_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"463","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2022.12.008","volume":"83","author":"MS Leapman","year":"2023","unstructured":"Leapman MS, Thiel CL, Gordon IO, Nolte AC, Perecman A, Loeb S, Overcash M, Sherman JD (2023) Environmental impact of prostate magnetic resonance imaging and transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy. Eur Urol 83(5):463\u2013471. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.eururo.2022.12.008","journal-title":"Eur Urol"},{"issue":"3","key":"5522_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/as9.0000000000000094","volume":"2","author":"V Misrai","year":"2021","unstructured":"Misrai V, Rijo E, Cottenceau JB, Zorn KC, Enikeev D, Elterman D, Bhojani N, De La Taille A, Herrmann TRW, Robert G, Pradere B (2021) A standardized method for estimating the carbon footprint of disposable minimally invasive surgical devices: application in transurethral prostate surgery. Ann Surg Open 2(3):e094. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/as9.0000000000000094","journal-title":"Ann Surg Open"},{"issue":"2","key":"5522_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"272","DOI":"10.1038\/s41391-023-00672-4","volume":"27","author":"A Fuschi","year":"2024","unstructured":"Fuschi A, Pastore AL, Al Salhi Y et al (2024) The impact of radical prostatectomy on global climate: a prospective multicentre study comparing laparoscopic versus robotic surgery. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 27(2):272\u2013278. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41391-023-00672-4","journal-title":"Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis"},{"issue":"7","key":"5522_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e271","DOI":"10.1016\/s2542-5196(20)30121-2","volume":"4","author":"M Lenzen","year":"2020","unstructured":"Lenzen M, Malik A, Li M, Fry J, Weisz H, Pichler P-P, Chaves LSM, Capon A, Pencheon D (2020) The environmental footprint of health care: a global assessment. Lancet Planet Health 4(7):e271\u2013e279. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/s2542-5196(20)30121-2","journal-title":"Lancet Planet Health"},{"key":"5522_CR17","unstructured":"United Nations (2024) Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. https:\/\/sdgs.un.org\/2030agenda"},{"issue":"9","key":"5522_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e381","DOI":"10.1016\/s2542-5196(17)30162-6","volume":"1","author":"AJ MacNeill","year":"2017","unstructured":"MacNeill AJ, Lillywhite R, Brown CJ (2017) The impact of surgery on global climate: a carbon footprinting study of operating theatres in three health systems. Lancet Planet Health 1(9):e381\u2013e388. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/s2542-5196(17)30162-6","journal-title":"Lancet Planet Health"},{"key":"5522_CR19","unstructured":"The Royal College of Surgeons of England (2022) Sustainability in the operating theatre: a guide to good practice. https:\/\/www.rcseng.ac.uk\/standards-and-research\/standards-and-guidance\/good-practice-guides\/sustainability-in-operating-theatre\/"},{"issue":"2","key":"5522_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"64","DOI":"10.1308\/rcsbull.2023.25","volume":"105","author":"HD Robb","year":"2023","unstructured":"Robb HD, Pegna V (2023) The intercollegiate green theatre checklist. Bull R Coll Surg Engl 105(2):64\u201367. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1308\/rcsbull.2023.25","journal-title":"Bull R Coll Surg Engl"},{"issue":"4","key":"5522_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"331","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2022.01.027","volume":"83","author":"B Pradere","year":"2023","unstructured":"Pradere B, Mallet R, de La Taille A et al (2023) Climate-smart actions in the operating theatre for improving sustainability practices: a systematic review. Eur Urol 83(4):331\u2013342. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.eururo.2022.01.027","journal-title":"Eur Urol"},{"issue":"1","key":"5522_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"94","DOI":"10.1016\/s0001-2092(07)69677-x","volume":"60","author":"HM French","year":"1994","unstructured":"French HM (1994) Blueprint for reducing, reusing, recycling. AORN J 60(1):94\u201398. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/s0001-2092(07)69677-x","journal-title":"AORN J"},{"key":"5522_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"44","DOI":"10.1016\/j.euros.2023.03.007","volume":"52","author":"M Phull","year":"2023","unstructured":"Phull M, Begum H, John JB, van Hove M, McGrath J, O\u2019Flynn K, Briggs TWR, Gray WK (2023) Potential carbon savings with day-case compared to inpatient transurethral resection of bladder tumour surgery in England: a retrospective observational study using administrative data. Eur Urol Open Sci 52:44\u201350. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.euros.2023.03.007","journal-title":"Eur Urol Open Sci"},{"issue":"5","key":"5522_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1606","DOI":"10.1002\/2014GL062785","volume":"42","author":"MK Vollmer","year":"2015","unstructured":"Vollmer MK, Rhee TS, Rigby M, Hofstetter D, Hill M, Schoenenberger F, Reimann S (2015) Modern inhalation anesthetics: potent greenhouse gases in the global atmosphere. Geophys Res Lett 42(5):1606\u20131611. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/2014GL062785","journal-title":"Geophys Res Lett"},{"issue":"S2","key":"5522_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S158","DOI":"10.2105\/ajph.2018.304397","volume":"108","author":"CL Thiel","year":"2018","unstructured":"Thiel CL, Woods NC, Bilec MM (2018) Strategies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from laparoscopic surgery. Am J Public Health 108(S2):S158-164. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2105\/ajph.2018.304397","journal-title":"Am J Public Health"},{"issue":"7","key":"5522_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"977","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2022.0007","volume":"36","author":"A Slade","year":"2022","unstructured":"Slade A, Agarwal D, Large T, Sahm E, Schmidt J, Rivera M (2022) Expanded criteria same day catheter removal following holmium laser enucleation of the prostate. J Endourol 36(7):977\u2013981. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1089\/end.2022.0007","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"issue":"5","key":"5522_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"917","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2015.09.052","volume":"69","author":"C Gratzke","year":"2016","unstructured":"Gratzke C, Dovey Z, Novara G, Geurts N, De Groote R, Schatteman P, de Naeyer G, Gandaglia G, Mottrie A (2016) Early catheter removal after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: surgical technique and outcomes for the Aalst Technique (ECaRemA Study). Eur Urol 69(5):917\u2013923. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.eururo.2015.09.052","journal-title":"Eur Urol"},{"key":"5522_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"435","DOI":"10.1016\/j.aju.2018.04.005","volume":"16","author":"KM Doersch","year":"2018","unstructured":"Doersch KM, Elmekresh A, Machen GL, El Tayeb MM (2018) The use of a string with a stent for self-removal following ureteroscopy: a safe practice to remain. Arab J Urol 16:435\u2013440. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.aju.2018.04.005","journal-title":"Arab J Urol"},{"issue":"2","key":"5522_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"159","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2023.0412","volume":"38","author":"N Harrison","year":"2023","unstructured":"Harrison N, Hughes C, Somani BK (2023) Is stent on a string the new gold standard for post-ureteroscopy ureteric drainage? Evidence from a systematic review. J Endourol 38(2):159\u2013169. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1089\/end.2023.0412","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"issue":"7","key":"5522_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2204","DOI":"10.1002\/nau.23562","volume":"37","author":"AJ Sun","year":"2018","unstructured":"Sun AJ, Comiter CV, Elliott CS (2018) The cost of a catheter: an environmental perspective on single use clean intermittent catheterization. Neurourol Urodyn 37(7):2204\u20132208. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/nau.23562","journal-title":"Neurourol Urodyn"},{"issue":"16","key":"5522_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1133","DOI":"10.1016\/j.purol.2021.08.036","volume":"31","author":"A Filfilan","year":"2021","unstructured":"Filfilan A, Anract J, Chartier-Kastler E, Parra J, Vaessen C, de La Taille A, Roupret M, Pinar U (2021) Positive environmental impact of remote teleconsultation in urology during the COVID-19 pandemic in a highly populated area. Prog Urol 31(16):1133\u20131138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.purol.2021.08.036","journal-title":"Prog Urol"}],"container-title":["World Journal of Urology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00345-025-05522-7.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00345-025-05522-7","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00345-025-05522-7.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,9]],"date-time":"2026-01-09T22:02:21Z","timestamp":1767996141000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00345-025-05522-7"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,6]]},"references-count":31,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,12]]}},"alternative-id":["5522"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00345-025-05522-7","relation":{},"ISSN":["1433-8726"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1433-8726","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,6]]},"assertion":[{"value":"18 December 2024","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"20 February 2025","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"6 March 2025","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}}],"article-number":"152"}}