{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,10]],"date-time":"2026-01-10T00:15:38Z","timestamp":1768004138334,"version":"3.49.0"},"reference-count":30,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,26]],"date-time":"2025-05-26T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1748217600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,26]],"date-time":"2025-05-26T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1748217600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["World J Urol"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Introduction<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Treatment decisions for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) are preference sensitive, because the disease is non-lethal and there are multiple reasonable treatment options. However, little is known about patients\u2019 and physicians\u2019 preferred decision-making styles for SUI. To aid physicians in their counselling and decision-making in consultations for SUI, we studied patients\u2019 and physicians\u2019 preferred and perceived decision-making in medical specialist consultations for SUI.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>This mixed-methods study combined the validated control preference scale (CPS) and the CPS perception version, and semi-structured, in-depth interviews with both patients and physicians. This study took place in Canada, the United Kingdom and the Netherlands. Sixteen physicians from all three countries and seventeen women from the Netherlands and Canada were interviewed.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>All women expressed a preference for being involved in the decision-making process, either by informative or shared decision-making (SDM) in the CPS, because they valued the autonomy to make their own choice regarding treatment for SUI and appreciated receiving information and advice from their doctor. Physicians also preferred an involved patient, but used medical expertise to steer towards their preferred treatment option. Physicians found SDM difficult to understand, expressing different interpretations.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>SDM is not a precise concept either for patients or physicians, with multiple interpretations. All patients with SUI want to be involved in the decision-making process, either by informative or by shared decision-making. Physicians both express the desire to involve patients in their decision making, but conversely to steer patients towards the decision that they feel suits them best.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1007\/s00345-025-05668-4","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,26]],"date-time":"2025-05-26T12:09:31Z","timestamp":1748261371000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["The views of women and their physicians on decision-making for stress urinary incontinence"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"43","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-0666-6538","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Nienke J. E.","family":"Osse","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Karine Gontijo-Santos","family":"Lima","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-9968-2862","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Marian K.","family":"Engberts","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-6118-5676","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Hugo W. F.","family":"van Eijndhoven","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-6116-5496","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Philippe D.","family":"Violette","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-5501-319X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Rufus","family":"Cartwright","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-1086-8730","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Marco H.","family":"Blanker","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-1743-4193","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Paul. L. P.","family":"Brand","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,26]]},"reference":[{"issue":"1","key":"5668_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1002\/ijgo.13934","volume":"158","author":"MP Rada","year":"2022","unstructured":"Rada MP, Jones S, Betschart C, Falconi G, Haddad JM, Doumouchtsis SK (2022) A meta-synthesis of qualitative studies on stress urinary incontinence in women for the development of a core outcome set: a systematic review. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 158(1):3\u201312","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"issue":"7","key":"5668_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"863","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-013-2276-7","volume":"25","author":"NY Siddiqui","year":"2014","unstructured":"Siddiqui NY, Levin PJ, Phadtare A, Pietrobon R, Ammarell N (2014) Perceptions about female urinary incontinence: a systematic review. Int Urogynecol J 25(7):863\u2013871","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"6","key":"5668_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e39","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmwh.2006.06.004","volume":"51","author":"LH Koch","year":"2006","unstructured":"Koch LH (2006) Help-seeking behaviors of women with urinary incontinence: an integrative literature review. J Midwifery Womens Health 51(6):e39-44","journal-title":"J Midwifery Womens Health"},{"issue":"5","key":"5668_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"342","DOI":"10.17772\/gp\/1734","volume":"85","author":"U W\u00f3jtowicz","year":"2014","unstructured":"W\u00f3jtowicz U, P\u0142aszewska-Zywko L, Stangel-W\u00f3jcikiewicz K, Basta A (2014) Barriers in entering treatment among women with urinary incontinence. Ginekol Pol 85(5):342\u2013347","journal-title":"Ginekol Pol"},{"issue":"11","key":"5668_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1679","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-015-2760-3","volume":"26","author":"S Srikrishna","year":"2015","unstructured":"Srikrishna S, Robinson D, Cardozo L, Thiagamoorthy G (2015) Patient and surgeon goal achievement 10 years following surgery for pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J 26(11):1679\u20131686","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"16","key":"5668_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2221","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.1992.03480160079038","volume":"267","author":"EJ Emanuel","year":"1992","unstructured":"Emanuel EJ, Emanuel LL (1992) Four models of the physician-patient relationship. JAMA 267(16):2221\u20132226","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"issue":"10","key":"5668_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1172","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pec.2015.06.022","volume":"98","author":"AM Stiggelbout","year":"2015","unstructured":"Stiggelbout AM, Pieterse AH, De Haes JC (2015) Shared decision making: concepts, evidence, and practice. Patient Educ Couns 98(10):1172\u20131179","journal-title":"Patient Educ Couns"},{"issue":"1","key":"5668_CR8","first-page":"358","volume":"4","author":"MBE Gerritse","year":"2023","unstructured":"Gerritse MBE, de Swart E, de Vries M, Kluivers KB (2023) Identifying womens\u2019 needs in making a treatment decision for stress urinary incontinence: a qualitative study. Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle) 4(1):358\u2013366","journal-title":"Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle)"},{"issue":"6","key":"5668_CR9","first-page":"1145","volume":"29","author":"M Basu","year":"2010","unstructured":"Basu M, Wise B, Duckett J (2010) A quantitative and qualitative study of women\u2019s preferences for treatments of pelvic floor disorders. Neurourol Urodyn 29(6):1145","journal-title":"Neurourol Urodyn"},{"issue":"1","key":"5668_CR10","first-page":"S110","volume":"30","author":"L Dwyer","year":"2019","unstructured":"Dwyer L, Weaver E, Rajai A, Cox S, Reid FM (2019) \u201cvoice your choice\u201d: a multi-centre study of factors determining women\u2019s choice of surgery for primary stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J 30(1):S110\u2013S111","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"1","key":"5668_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"45","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-017-3376-6","volume":"29","author":"DG Tincello","year":"2018","unstructured":"Tincello DG, Armstrong N, Hilton P, Buckley B, Mayne C (2018) Surgery for recurrent stress urinary incontinence: the views of surgeons and women. Int Urogynecol J 29(1):45\u201354","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"9","key":"5668_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1046","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pec.2015.05.004","volume":"98","author":"S Pollard","year":"2015","unstructured":"Pollard S, Bansback N, Bryan S (2015) Physician attitudes toward shared decision making: a systematic review. Patient Educ Couns 98(9):1046\u20131057","journal-title":"Patient Educ Couns"},{"issue":"1","key":"5668_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"77","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pec.2019.08.004","volume":"103","author":"EM Driever","year":"2020","unstructured":"Driever EM, Stiggelbout AM, Brand PLP (2020) Shared decision making: physicians\u2019 preferred role, usual role and their perception of its key components. Patient Educ Couns 103(1):77\u201382","journal-title":"Patient Educ Couns"},{"issue":"1","key":"5668_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2021-056471","volume":"12","author":"EM Driever","year":"2022","unstructured":"Driever EM, Stiggelbout AM, Brand PLP (2022) Do consultants do what they say they do? Observational study of the extent to which clinicians involve their patients in the decision-making process. BMJ Open 12(1):e056471","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"issue":"5","key":"5668_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"520","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-005-0060-z","volume":"17","author":"H Sandvik","year":"2006","unstructured":"Sandvik H, Espuna M, Hunskaar S (2006) Validity of the incontinence severity index: comparison with pad-weighing tests. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 17(5):520\u2013524","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct"},{"issue":"1","key":"5668_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"98","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2003.379","volume":"189","author":"I Yalcin","year":"2003","unstructured":"Yalcin I, Bump RC (2003) Validation of two global impression questionnaires for incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 189(1):98\u2013101","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"5668_CR17","first-page":"21","volume":"29","author":"LF Degner","year":"1997","unstructured":"Degner LF, Sloan JA, Venkatesh P (1997) The control preferences scale. Can J Nurs Res 29(3):21\u201343","journal-title":"Can J Nurs Res"},{"issue":"8","key":"5668_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2702","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pec.2022.03.025","volume":"105","author":"EM Driever","year":"2022","unstructured":"Driever EM, Stiggelbout AM, Brand PLP (2022) Patients\u2019 preferred and perceived decision-making roles, and observed patient involvement in videotaped encounters with medical specialists. Patient Educ Couns 105(8):2702\u20132707","journal-title":"Patient Educ Couns"},{"issue":"8","key":"5668_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"846","DOI":"10.1080\/0142159X.2020.1755030","volume":"42","author":"ME Kiger","year":"2020","unstructured":"Kiger ME, Varpio L (2020) Thematic analysis of qualitative data: AMEE guide no. 131. Med Teach 42(8):846\u2013854","journal-title":"Med Teach"},{"issue":"6","key":"5668_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1248","DOI":"10.1111\/hex.12564","volume":"20","author":"NP Tamirisa","year":"2017","unstructured":"Tamirisa NP, Goodwin JS, Kandalam A, Linder SK, Weller S, Turrubiate S et al (2017) Patient and physician views of shared decision making in cancer. Health Expect 20(6):1248\u20131253","journal-title":"Health Expect"},{"issue":"3","key":"5668_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"295","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pec.2014.07.017","volume":"96","author":"LA Shay","year":"2014","unstructured":"Shay LA, Lafata JE (2014) Understanding patient perceptions of shared decision making. Patient Educ Couns 96(3):295\u2013301","journal-title":"Patient Educ Couns"},{"issue":"1","key":"5668_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"139","DOI":"10.1002\/pon.4923","volume":"28","author":"H Bomhof-Roordink","year":"2019","unstructured":"Bomhof-Roordink H, Fischer MJ, van Duijn-Bakker N, Baas-Thijssen MC, van der Weijden T, Stiggelbout AM et al (2019) Shared decision making in oncology: a model based on patients\u2019, health care professionals\u2019, and researchers\u2019 views. Psychooncology 28(1):139\u2013146","journal-title":"Psychooncology"},{"issue":"11","key":"5668_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"4484","DOI":"10.1111\/jocn.17217","volume":"33","author":"M Chehade","year":"2024","unstructured":"Chehade M, McCarthy MM, Squires A (2024) Patient-related decisional regret: an evolutionary concept analysis. J Clin Nurs 33(11):4484\u20134503","journal-title":"J Clin Nurs"},{"issue":"3","key":"5668_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"291","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pec.2013.10.031","volume":"94","author":"N Joseph-Williams","year":"2014","unstructured":"Joseph-Williams N, Elwyn G, Edwards A (2014) Knowledge is not power for patients: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of patient-reported barriers and facilitators to shared decision making. Patient Educ Couns 94(3):291\u2013309","journal-title":"Patient Educ Couns"},{"key":"5668_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s12909-022-03203-2","author":"EM Driever","year":"2022","unstructured":"Driever EM, Tolhuizen IM, Duvivier RJ, Stiggelbout AM, Brand PLP (2022) Why do medical residents prefer paternalistic decision making? An interview study. BMC Med Educ. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12909-022-03203-2","journal-title":"BMC Med Educ"},{"key":"5668_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.j1744","volume":"357","author":"N Joseph-Williams","year":"2017","unstructured":"Joseph-Williams N, Lloyd A, Edwards A, Stobbart L, Tomson D, Macphail S et al (2017) Implementing shared decision making in the NHS: lessons from the MAGIC programme. BMJ 357:j1744","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"5668_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"92","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejon.2018.12.004","volume":"38","author":"W Savelberg","year":"2019","unstructured":"Savelberg W, Boersma LJ, Smidt M, Goossens MFJ, Hermanns R, van der Weijden T (2019) Does lack of deeper understanding of shared decision making explains the suboptimal performance on crucial parts of it? An example from breast cancer care. Eur J Oncol Nurs 38:92\u201397","journal-title":"Eur J Oncol Nurs"},{"issue":"3","key":"5668_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"526","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pec.2008.07.018","volume":"73","author":"F Legare","year":"2008","unstructured":"Legare F, Ratte S, Gravel K, Graham ID (2008) Barriers and facilitators to implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice: update of a systematic review of health professionals\u2019 perceptions. Patient Educ Couns 73(3):526\u2013535","journal-title":"Patient Educ Couns"},{"key":"5668_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"17","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pec.2022.10.350","volume":"106","author":"NQP Tan","year":"2023","unstructured":"Tan NQP, Maki KG, Lopez-Olivo MA, Geng Y, Volk RJ (2023) Cultural influences on shared decision-making among Asian Americans: a systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies. Patient Educ Couns 106:17\u201330","journal-title":"Patient Educ Couns"},{"issue":"12","key":"5668_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2023.107109","volume":"49","author":"A Murray","year":"2023","unstructured":"Murray A, Francks L, Hassanein ZM, Lee R, Wilson E (2023) Breast cancer surgical decision-making: experiences of non-Caucasian women globally\u2014a qualitative systematic review. Eur J Surg Oncol 49(12):107109","journal-title":"Eur J Surg Oncol"}],"container-title":["World Journal of Urology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00345-025-05668-4.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00345-025-05668-4","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00345-025-05668-4.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,9]],"date-time":"2026-01-09T13:50:40Z","timestamp":1767966640000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00345-025-05668-4"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,26]]},"references-count":30,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,12]]}},"alternative-id":["5668"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00345-025-05668-4","relation":{},"ISSN":["1433-8726"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1433-8726","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,26]]},"assertion":[{"value":"11 February 2025","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"24 April 2025","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"26 May 2025","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}}],"article-number":"329"}}