{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,10]],"date-time":"2026-01-10T04:50:54Z","timestamp":1768020654414,"version":"3.49.0"},"reference-count":33,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,14]],"date-time":"2025-11-14T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1763078400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,14]],"date-time":"2025-11-14T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1763078400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["World J Urol"],"DOI":"10.1007\/s00345-025-06069-3","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,14]],"date-time":"2025-11-14T14:56:53Z","timestamp":1763132213000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Comparing outcomes of ureteric stent versus nephrostomy tube in urosepsis: a population-based study in Ontario, Canada"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"43","author":[{"given":"Hazem","family":"Elmansy","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Mohamad Baker","family":"Berjaoui","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"David W.","family":"Savage","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Joshua O.","family":"Cerasuolo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Tasneem","family":"Lalva","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Rachel","family":"Mckay","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Ahmed S.","family":"Zakaria","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,14]]},"reference":[{"issue":"8","key":"6069_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"801","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2016.0287","volume":"315","author":"M Singer","year":"2016","unstructured":"Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, Shankar-Hari M, Annane D, Bauer M et al (2016) The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA 315(8):801\u2013810. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jama.2016.0287","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"6069_CR2","unstructured":"Navaneelan T, Alam S, Peters PA, Phillips O (2016) Deaths involving sepsis in Canada. Stat Canada: Health Glance. ;82\u2013624"},{"key":"6069_CR3","volume-title":"Symptom to diagnosis: an Evidence-Based guide","author":"A Pincavage","year":"2019","unstructured":"Pincavage A (2019) Urosepsis. In: Stern SDC, Cifu AS, Altkorn D (eds) Symptom to diagnosis: an Evidence-Based guide, 4th edn. McGraw-Hill Education, New York, NY","edition":"4"},{"key":"6069_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Wagenlehner FME, Pilatz A, Weidner W, Naber KG, Urosepsis (2015) Overview of the diagnostic and treatment challenges. Microbiol Spectr 3(5). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1128\/microbiolspec.UTI-0003-2012","DOI":"10.1128\/microbiolspec.UTI-0003-2012"},{"issue":"2","key":"6069_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"127","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2022.0200","volume":"37","author":"JJ Lee","year":"2023","unstructured":"Lee JJ, Kottooran C, Hinojosa-Gonzalez DE, Yaghoubian AJ, Uppaluri NR, Hanson KA et al (2023) Predicting septic shock after emergent ureteral stenting in Stone-Related obstruction and presumed infections. J Endourol 37(2):127\u2013132. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1089\/end.2022.0200","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"issue":"4","key":"6069_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1161","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2016.05.091","volume":"196","author":"D Assimos","year":"2016","unstructured":"Assimos D, Krambeck A, Miller NL, Monga M, Murad MH, Nelson CP et al (2016) Surgical management of stones: American urological Association\/Endourological society Guideline, PART II. J Urol 196(4):1161\u20131169. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.juro.2016.05.091","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"issue":"12","key":"6069_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E676","DOI":"10.5489\/cuaj.7581","volume":"15","author":"JY Lee","year":"2021","unstructured":"Lee JY, Andonian S, Bhojani N, Bjazevic J, Chew BH, De S et al (2021) Canadian urological association guideline: management of ureteral calculi - Full-text. Can Urol Assoc J 15(12):E676\u2013E90. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5489\/cuaj.7581","journal-title":"Can Urol Assoc J"},{"key":"6069_CR8","unstructured":"European Association of Urology (2024) EAU Guidelines. Edn. Presented at the EAU annual Congress Paris 2024. European Association of Urology"},{"issue":"3","key":"6069_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"725","DOI":"10.12669\/pjms.293.3563","volume":"29","author":"I Ahmad","year":"2013","unstructured":"Ahmad I, Saeed Pansota M, Tariq M, Shahzad Saleem M, Ali Tabassum S, Hussain A (2013) Comparison between double J (DJ) ureteral stenting and percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN) in obstructive uropathy. Pak J Med Sci 29(3):725\u2013729. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.12669\/pjms.293.3563","journal-title":"Pak J Med Sci"},{"key":"6069_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"175628722412418","DOI":"10.1177\/17562872241241854","volume":"16","author":"X Wang","year":"2024","unstructured":"Wang X, Wu G, Wang T, Liu S, Ding G, Mao Q et al (2024) Meta-analysis of perioperative outcomes and safety of percutaneous nephrostomy versus retrograde ureteral stenting in the treatment of acute obstructive upper urinary tract infection. Ther Adv Urol 16:17562872241241854. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/17562872241241854","journal-title":"Ther Adv Urol"},{"issue":"2","key":"6069_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"323","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jiac.2020.11.022","volume":"27","author":"ZH Xu","year":"2021","unstructured":"Xu ZH, Yang YH, Zhou S, Lv JL (2021) Percutaneous nephrostomy versus retrograde ureteral stent for acute upper urinary tract obstruction with Urosepsis. J Infect Chemother 27(2):323\u2013328. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jiac.2020.11.022","journal-title":"J Infect Chemother"},{"issue":"2","key":"6069_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E122","DOI":"10.1111\/bju.12161","volume":"112","author":"ZG Goldsmith","year":"2013","unstructured":"Goldsmith ZG, Oredein-McCoy O, Gerber L, Banez LL, Sopko DR, Miller MJ et al (2013) Emergent ureteric stent vs percutaneous nephrostomy for obstructive urolithiasis with sepsis: patterns of use and outcomes from a 15-year experience. BJU Int 112(2):E122\u2013E128. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/bju.12161","journal-title":"BJU Int"},{"issue":"6","key":"6069_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"371","DOI":"10.4111\/icu.2018.59.6.371","volume":"59","author":"S Pandey","year":"2018","unstructured":"Pandey S, Sharma D, Sankhwar S, Singh M, Garg G, Aggarwal A et al (2018) Are there any predictive risk factors for failure of ureteric stent in patients with obstructive urolithiasis with sepsis? Investig Clin Urol 59(6):371\u2013375. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4111\/icu.2018.59.6.371","journal-title":"Investig Clin Urol"},{"issue":"1","key":"6069_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"6613","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-021-86136-y","volume":"11","author":"I Zul Khairul Azwadi","year":"2021","unstructured":"Zul Khairul Azwadi I, Norhayati MN, Abdullah MS (2021) Percutaneous nephrostomy versus retrograde ureteral stenting for acute upper obstructive uropathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep 11(1):6613. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41598-021-86136-y","journal-title":"Sci Rep"},{"issue":"5","key":"6069_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"415","DOI":"10.1007\/s00240-015-0852-7","volume":"44","author":"CJ Wang","year":"2016","unstructured":"Wang CJ, Hsu CS, Chen HW, Chang CH, Tsai PC (2016) Percutaneous nephrostomy versus ureteroscopic management of sepsis associated with ureteral stone impaction: a randomized controlled trial. Urolithiasis 44(5):415\u2013419. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00240-015-0852-7","journal-title":"Urolithiasis"},{"issue":"45","key":"6069_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e31194","DOI":"10.1097\/MD.0000000000031194","volume":"101","author":"KP Zhang","year":"2022","unstructured":"Zhang KP, Zhang Y, Chao M (2022) Which is the best way for patients with ureteral obstruction? Percutaneous nephrostomy versus double J stenting. Med (Baltim) 101(45):e31194. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/MD.0000000000031194","journal-title":"Med (Baltim)"},{"issue":"2","key":"6069_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"73","DOI":"10.3138\/jammi-2023-0030","volume":"9","author":"R Wong","year":"2024","unstructured":"Wong R, Ziegler J, Bal DS, Lother SA, Patel P, Rush B (2024) Nephrostomy tube versus ureteral stent for obstructing septic calculi: A nationwide propensity score\u2013matched analysis. J Association Med Microbiol Infect Disease Can 9(2):73\u201381. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3138\/jammi-2023-0030","journal-title":"J Association Med Microbiol Infect Disease Can"},{"issue":"3","key":"6069_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"946","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2012.09.088","volume":"189","author":"MS Borofsky","year":"2013","unstructured":"Borofsky MS, Walter D, Shah O, Goldfarb DS, Mues AC, Makarov DV (2013) Surgical decompression is associated with decreased mortality in patients with sepsis and ureteral calculi. J Urol 189(3):946\u2013951. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.juro.2012.09.088","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"issue":"1","key":"6069_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"77","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2020.0626","volume":"35","author":"CR Haas","year":"2021","unstructured":"Haas CR, Smigelski M, Sebesta EM, Mobley D, Shah O (2021) Implementation of a Hospital-Wide protocol reduces time to decompression and length of stay in patients with Stone-Related obstructive pyelonephritis with sepsis. J Endourol 35(1):77\u201383. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1089\/end.2020.0626","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"issue":"5","key":"6069_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"587","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2022.0557","volume":"37","author":"N Bhojani","year":"2023","unstructured":"Bhojani N, Paranjpe R, Cutone B, Eisner BH (2023) Delays in ureteroscopy and shockwave lithotripsy after ureteral stent placement: impact on infectious Complications, resource Use, and medical costs. J Endourol 37(5):587\u2013594. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1089\/end.2022.0557","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"issue":"6","key":"6069_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"579","DOI":"10.1007\/s00240-017-0964-3","volume":"45","author":"YF Shi","year":"2017","unstructured":"Shi YF, Ju WL, Zhu YP, Xia SJ, Sun XW (2017) The impact of ureteral stent indwelling time on the treatment of acute infection caused by ureteral calculi. Urolithiasis 45(6):579\u2013583. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00240-017-0964-3","journal-title":"Urolithiasis"},{"issue":"12","key":"6069_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e009487","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2015-009487","volume":"5","author":"RJ Jolley","year":"2015","unstructured":"Jolley RJ, Quan H, Jette N, Sawka KJ, Diep L, Goliath J et al (2015) Validation and optimisation of an ICD-10-coded case definition for sepsis using administrative health data. BMJ Open 5(12):e009487. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmjopen-2015-009487","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"issue":"4","key":"6069_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"745","DOI":"10.1016\/j.euf.2019.08.011","volume":"6","author":"GW Hosier","year":"2020","unstructured":"Hosier GW, McGregor T, Beiko D, Jaeger M, Booth C, Whitehead M et al (2020) Persistent opioid use among patients with urolithiasis: A population based study. Eur Urol Focus 6(4):745\u2013751. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.euf.2019.08.011","journal-title":"Eur Urol Focus"},{"issue":"12","key":"6069_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E437","DOI":"10.1503\/cmaj.220926","volume":"195","author":"JE Amuah","year":"2023","unstructured":"Amuah JE, Molodianovitsh K, Carbone S, Diestelkamp N, Guo Y, Hogan DB et al (2023) Development and validation of a hospital frailty risk measure using Canadian clinical administrative data. CMAJ 195(12):E437\u2013E48. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1503\/cmaj.220926","journal-title":"CMAJ"},{"issue":"7497","key":"6069_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"960","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.330.7497.960","volume":"330","author":"M Mamdani","year":"2005","unstructured":"Mamdani M, Sykora K, Li P, Normand SL, Streiner DL, Austin PC et al (2005) Reader\u2019s guide to critical appraisal of cohort studies: 2. Assessing potential for confounding. BMJ 330(7497):960\u2013962. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmj.330.7497.960","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"17","key":"6069_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1818","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2016.16435","volume":"316","author":"DN Kyriacou","year":"2016","unstructured":"Kyriacou DN, Lewis RJ (2016) Confounding by indication in clinical research. JAMA 316(17):1818\u20131819. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jama.2016.16435","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"issue":"28","key":"6069_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3661","DOI":"10.1002\/sim.6607","volume":"34","author":"PC Austin","year":"2015","unstructured":"Austin PC, Stuart EA (2015) Moving towards best practice when using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) using the propensity score to estimate causal treatment effects in observational studies. Stat Med 34(28):3661\u20133679. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/sim.6607","journal-title":"Stat Med"},{"issue":"12","key":"6069_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1149","DOI":"10.1093\/aje\/kwj149","volume":"163","author":"MA Brookhart","year":"2006","unstructured":"Brookhart MA, Schneeweiss S, Rothman KJ, Glynn RJ, Avorn J, Sturmer T (2006) Variable selection for propensity score models. Am J Epidemiol 163(12):1149\u20131156. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/aje\/kwj149","journal-title":"Am J Epidemiol"},{"issue":"4","key":"6069_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"268","DOI":"10.7326\/M16-2607","volume":"167","author":"TJ VanderWeele","year":"2017","unstructured":"VanderWeele TJ, Ding P (2017) Sensitivity analysis in observational research: introducing the E-Value. Ann Intern Med 167(4):268\u2013274. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7326\/M16-2607","journal-title":"Ann Intern Med"},{"issue":"5","key":"6069_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"663","DOI":"10.25122\/jml-2022-0334","volume":"16","author":"C Cozma","year":"2023","unstructured":"Cozma C, Georgescu D, Popescu R, Geavlete B, Geavlete P (2023) Double-J stent versus percutaneous nephrostomy for emergency upper urinary tract decompression. J Med Life 16(5):663\u2013667. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.25122\/jml-2022-0334","journal-title":"J Med Life"},{"issue":"6","key":"6069_CR31","first-page":"E346","volume":"110","author":"O Aboumarzouk","year":"2012","unstructured":"Aboumarzouk O, Hughes O, Narahari K, Coulthard R, Kynaston H, Chlosta P et al (2012) Percutaneous nephrostomy versus ureteric stent for relief of obstruction in urolithiasis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BJU Int 110(6):E346\u2013E54","journal-title":"BJU Int"},{"issue":"4","key":"6069_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1088","DOI":"10.1016\/S0022-5347(05)66434-8","volume":"165","author":"H Mokhmalji","year":"2001","unstructured":"Mokhmalji H, Braun PM, Martinez Portillo FJ, Siegsmund M, Alken P, Kohrmann KU (2001) Percutaneous nephrostomy versus ureteral stents for diversion of hydronephrosis caused by stones: a prospective, randomized clinical trial. J Urol 165(4):1088\u20131092","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"key":"6069_CR33","unstructured":"Leavitt D, Pareek G (2022) Timing of definitive management in septic patients with obstructing ureteral calculi: A systematic review. 32(1):67\u201372"}],"container-title":["World Journal of Urology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00345-025-06069-3.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00345-025-06069-3","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00345-025-06069-3.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,9]],"date-time":"2026-01-09T23:03:51Z","timestamp":1767999831000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00345-025-06069-3"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,14]]},"references-count":33,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,12]]}},"alternative-id":["6069"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00345-025-06069-3","relation":{},"ISSN":["1433-8726"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1433-8726","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,14]]},"assertion":[{"value":"20 May 2025","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"31 October 2025","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"14 November 2025","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"H. Elmansy is an Investigator for Urotronic Inc. (Laborie) and Zenflow Inc. He previously received honoraria and was the recipient of a research grant from Boston Scientific. He also serves as an Editorial Board Member of the World Journal of Urology. The other co-authors do not have a conflict of interest to disclose.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}},{"value":"All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and\/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The use of the data in this project is authorized under Sect.\u00a045 of Ontario\u2019s Personal Health Information Protection Act (PHIPA) and does not require review by a Research Ethics Board.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethical approval"}}],"article-number":"692"}}