{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,23]],"date-time":"2026-03-23T16:09:41Z","timestamp":1774282181393,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":34,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,23]],"date-time":"2026-03-23T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1774224000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,23]],"date-time":"2026-03-23T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1774224000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["World J Urol"],"DOI":"10.1007\/s00345-026-06339-8","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,23]],"date-time":"2026-03-23T15:42:26Z","timestamp":1774280546000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Challenging recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstructions: endoscopic procedures versus redo-pyeloplasty\u2014a systematic review and meta-analysis"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"44","author":[{"given":"Michael E.","family":"Chua","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Marilyn M.","family":"Wong","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Mikael","family":"Gouwtama","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Jessica M.","family":"Ming","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Jin Kyu","family":"Kim","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Mandy","family":"Rickard","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Rodrigo","family":"Romao","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Pippi","family":"Salle","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Jessie","family":"Cunningham","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Joana","family":"Dos Santos","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Armando J.","family":"Lorenzo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,23]]},"reference":[{"issue":"11","key":"6339_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1112","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2019.0737","volume":"34","author":"AK Chow","year":"2020","unstructured":"Chow AK, Rosenberg BJ, Capoccia EM, Cherullo EE (2020) Risk factors and management options for the adult failed ureteropelvic junction obstruction repair in the era of minimally invasive and robotic approaches: a comprehensive literature review. J Endourol 34(11):1112\u20131119. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1089\/end.2019.0737","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"issue":"5","key":"6339_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s11934-016-0593-3","volume":"17","author":"MC Strother","year":"2016","unstructured":"Strother MC, Mucksavage P (2016) Minimally invasive techniques for the management of adult UPJ obstruction. Curr Urol Rep 17(5):39. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11934-016-0593-3","journal-title":"Curr Urol Rep"},{"issue":"5","key":"6339_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1145","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2013.06.049","volume":"82","author":"RLP Rom\u00e3o","year":"2013","unstructured":"Rom\u00e3o RLP, Koyle MA, Pippi Salle JL, Alotay A, Figueroa VH, Lorenzo AJ et al (2013) Failed pyeloplasty in children: revisiting the unknown. Urology 82(5):1145\u20131149. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.urology.2013.06.049","journal-title":"Urology"},{"issue":"Suppl 1","key":"6339_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S23","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2015.0837","volume":"30","author":"R Swearingen","year":"2016","unstructured":"Swearingen R, Ambani S, Faerber GJ, Bloom DA, Wolf JS Jr. (2016) Definitive management of failure after pyeloplasty. J Endourol 30(Suppl 1):S23\u2013S27. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1089\/end.2015.0837","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"issue":"2","key":"6339_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"291","DOI":"10.1016\/S0090-4295(02)02160-X","volume":"61","author":"CS Ng","year":"2003","unstructured":"Ng CS, Yost AJ, Streem SB (2003) Management of failed primary intervention for ureteropelvic junction obstruction: 12-year, single-center experience. Urology 61(2):291\u2013296. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0090-4295(02)02160-X","journal-title":"Urology"},{"key":"6339_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"108","DOI":"10.1111\/bju.12454","volume":"113","author":"M Vannahme","year":"2014","unstructured":"Vannahme M, Mathur S, Davenport K, Timoney AG, Keeley FX Jr. (2014) The management of secondary pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction: a comparison of pyeloplasty and endopyelotomy. BJU Int 113:108\u2013112. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/bju.12454","journal-title":"BJU Int"},{"key":"6339_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"58","DOI":"10.1186\/s12894-025-01746-2","volume":"25","author":"D Diamantidis","year":"2025","unstructured":"Diamantidis D, Lailisidis S, Panagiotopoulos N, Giannopoulos S, Georgellis C, Tsakaldimis G et al (2025) Redo laparoscopic pyeloplasty for recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a single center experience and review of the literature. BMC Urol 25:58","journal-title":"BMC Urol"},{"issue":"12","key":"6339_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1750","DOI":"10.1111\/iju.70233","volume":"32","author":"D Ishii","year":"2025","unstructured":"Ishii D, Mori K, Shiba I, Shiono Y, Matsumoto K (2025) Current status and future perspectives of robotic assisted redo pyeloplasty for recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Int J Urol 32(12):1750\u201361","journal-title":"Int J Urol"},{"issue":"6","key":"6339_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"584","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2023.0577","volume":"38","author":"Q Xie","year":"2024","unstructured":"Xie Q, Wang C, Su C, Shi B, Li Y, Huang J et al (2024) Feasibility and effectiveness of repeat laparoscopic pyeloplasty for recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction in pediatric patients. J Endourol 38(6):584\u2013589. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1089\/end.2023.0577","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"issue":"11","key":"6339_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2250","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jpedsurg.2018.06.002","volume":"53","author":"AM Abdrabuh","year":"2018","unstructured":"Abdrabuh AM, Salih EM, Aboelnasr M, Galal H, El-Emam A, El-Zayat T (2018) Endopyelotomy versus redo pyeloplasty for management of failed pyeloplasty in children: a single center experience. J Pediatr Surg 53(11):2250\u20132255. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jpedsurg.2018.06.002","journal-title":"J Pediatr Surg"},{"issue":"6","key":"6339_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2571","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2007.08.050","volume":"178","author":"LHP Braga","year":"2007","unstructured":"Braga LHP, Lorenzo AJ, Skeldon S, Dave S, Bagli DJ, Khoury AE et al (2007) Failed pyeloplasty in children: comparative analysis of retrograde endopyelotomy versus redo pyeloplasty. J Urol 178(6):2571\u20132575. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.juro.2007.08.050","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"key":"6339_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"971","DOI":"10.1007\/s00383-020-04699-9","volume":"36","author":"E Ceyhan","year":"2020","unstructured":"Ceyhan E, Dogan HS, Tekgul S (2020) Our experience on management of failed pediatric pyeloplasty. Pediatr Surg Int 36:971\u2013976. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00383-020-04699-9","journal-title":"Pediatr Surg Int"},{"key":"6339_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.n71","volume":"372","author":"MJ Page","year":"2021","unstructured":"Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD et al (2021) The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 372:n71. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmj.n71","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"6339_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.i4919","volume":"355","author":"JAC Sterne","year":"2016","unstructured":"Sterne JAC, Hern\u00e1n MA, Reeves BC, Savovi\u0107 J, Berkman ND, Viswanathan M et al (2016) ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ 355:i4919. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmj.i4919","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"6339_CR15","unstructured":"Chua M, Ming J, Cunningham J (2025) Systematic review and meta-analysis for management of recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction (PROSPERO registration no. CRD420251046758). In: PROSPERO"},{"issue":"2","key":"6339_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"108","DOI":"10.4103\/ua.ua_94_24","volume":"17","author":"N Alqarni","year":"2025","unstructured":"Alqarni N, Alyami F, Alrumaih A, Joueidi F, Alshayie M, Alrefaei MA et al (2025) Balloon dilatation for failed pyeloplasty: is it a valid alternate option in pediatric age group? A comparative retrospective study. Urol Ann 17(2):108\u2013111. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4103\/ua.ua_94_24","journal-title":"Urol Ann"},{"issue":"6","key":"6339_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1209","DOI":"10.1590\/S1677-5538.IBJU.2021.0303","volume":"47","author":"JJ Crivelli","year":"2021","unstructured":"Crivelli JJ, Johnson BA, Steinberg RL, Gahan JC, Antonelli JA, Morey AF et al (2021) Clinical and radiographic outcomes following salvage intervention for ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Int Braz J Urol 47(6):1209\u20131218. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1590\/S1677-5538.IBJU.2021.0303","journal-title":"Int Braz J Urol"},{"key":"6339_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1493","DOI":"10.1007\/s11255-022-03439-3","volume":"55","author":"W Gao","year":"2023","unstructured":"Gao W, Zhang L, He Y, Tian T, Li Z, Bai L et al (2023) Analysis of the efficacy and risk factors of surgical treatment of recurrent UPJO in adults. Int Urol Nephrol 55:1493\u20131499. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11255-022-03439-3","journal-title":"Int Urol Nephrol"},{"issue":"4","key":"6339_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"318","DOI":"10.1089\/lap.2015.0095","volume":"26","author":"L Leung","year":"2016","unstructured":"Leung L, Chan IHY, Chung PHY, Lan LCL, Wong KKY, Tam PKH (2016) Outcomes of re-intervention for laparoscopic transperitoneal pyeloplasty in children. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 26(4):318\u2013323. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1089\/lap.2015.0095","journal-title":"J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech"},{"issue":"Suppl 5A","key":"6339_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"48","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2005.06.115","volume":"66","author":"MC Ost","year":"2005","unstructured":"Ost MC, Kaye JD, Guttman MJ, Lee BR, Smith AD (2005) Laparoscopic pyeloplasty versus antegrade endopyelotomy: comparison in 100 patients and a new algorithm for the minimally invasive treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Urology 66(Suppl 5A):48\u201351. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.urology.2005.06.115","journal-title":"Urology"},{"issue":"5 Suppl","key":"6339_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/01.JU.0001008800.83683.92.03","volume":"211","author":"S Xiong","year":"2024","unstructured":"Xiong S, Zhu H, Zhang P, Wang B, Zhou L, Li X (2024) Comparative effectiveness of surgical treatments for recurrent obstruction following pyeloplasty: a multicenter, prospective study [abstract]. J Urol 211(5 Suppl):e905. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/01.JU.0001008800.83683.92.03","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"key":"6339_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/JS9.0000000000004448","author":"S Xiong","year":"2025","unstructured":"Xiong S, Fan S, Huang Y, Li Z, Li X, Wang X et al (2025) Clinical efficacy and risk factors of minimally invasive surgery for failed pyeloplasty: a prospective multicenter cohort study. Int J Surg (Lond Engl). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/JS9.0000000000004448","journal-title":"Int J Surg (Lond Engl)"},{"issue":"1","key":"6339_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"180","DOI":"10.1097\/01.ju.0000132142.25717.08","volume":"172","author":"IM Varkarakis","year":"2004","unstructured":"Varkarakis IM, Bhayani SB, Allaf ME, Inagaki T, Ong AM, Kavoussi LR et al (2004) Management of secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction after failed primary laparoscopic pyeloplasty. J Urol 172(1):180\u2013182. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/01.ju.0000132142.25717.08","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"issue":"1","key":"6339_CR24","first-page":"1470","volume":"79","author":"HA Gad","year":"2020","unstructured":"Gad HA, Eldahshoury MZ, Hussein MM, Hammady A (2020) Laparoscopic treatment for secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Egypt J Hosp Med 79(1):1470\u20131478","journal-title":"Egypt J Hosp Med"},{"issue":"6","key":"6339_CR25","first-page":"147","volume":"99","author":"A Rogers","year":"2007","unstructured":"Rogers A, Hasan T (2007) Management of secondary pelviureteric junction obstruction. BJU Int 99(6):147\u2013154","journal-title":"BJU Int"},{"issue":"5","key":"6339_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"642","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jpurol.2022.08.025","volume":"18","author":"VVS Chandrasekharam","year":"2022","unstructured":"Chandrasekharam VVS, Babu R (2022) A systematic review and meta-analysis of open, conventional laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic techniques for redo pyeloplasty for recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children. J Pediatr Urol 18(5):642\u2013649","journal-title":"J Pediatr Urol"},{"key":"6339_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3389\/fped.2022.997196","volume":"10","author":"J Li","year":"2022","unstructured":"Li J, Yang Y, Li Z, Fan S, Wang X, Yang Z et al (2022) Redo laparoscopic pyeloplasty for recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction: propensity score matched analyses of a high-volume center. Front Pediatr 10:997196","journal-title":"Front Pediatr"},{"issue":"6","key":"6339_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2363","DOI":"10.1097\/01.ju.0000180420.11915.31","volume":"174","author":"JC Thomas","year":"2005","unstructured":"Thomas JC, DeMarco RT, Donohoe JM, Adams MC, Pope JC IV, Brock JW III (2005) Management of the failed pyeloplasty: a contemporary review. J Urol 174(6):2363\u20132366. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/01.ju.0000180420.11915.31","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"issue":"3","key":"6339_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"397.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jpurol.2021.01.035","volume":"17","author":"H Sen","year":"2021","unstructured":"Sen H, Bayrak O, Yilmaz AE, Turgut O, Ozturk M, Erturhan S et al (2021) Evaluation of the results of laser endopyelotomy with two different technique in ureteropelvic junction obstruction. J Pediatr Urol 17(3):397.e1-397.e6. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jpurol.2021.01.035","journal-title":"J Pediatr Urol"},{"issue":"5","key":"6339_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"227","DOI":"10.1177\/1756287210362070","volume":"1","author":"SA Elabd","year":"2009","unstructured":"Elabd SA, Elbahnasy AM, Farahat YA, Soliman MG, Taha MR, Elgarabawy MA, Figenshau R (2009) Minimally-invasive correction of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: do retrograde endo-incision techniques still have a role in the era of laparoscopic pyeloplasty? Ther Adv Urol 1(5):227\u2013234. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1756287210362070","journal-title":"Ther Adv Urol"},{"issue":"1","key":"6339_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"260","DOI":"10.1007\/s00345-025-05618-0","volume":"43","author":"M Kolvatzis","year":"2025","unstructured":"Kolvatzis M, Corrales M, Moretto S, Quar\u00e0 A, Traxer O (2025) Long-term results of retrograde endopyelotomy: a narrative review. World J Urol 43(1):260. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00345-025-05618-0","journal-title":"World J Urol"},{"issue":"10","key":"6339_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2503","DOI":"10.1007\/s11255-022-03305-2","volume":"54","author":"C Esposito","year":"2022","unstructured":"Esposito C, Blanc T, Patkowski D, Lopez PJ, Masieri L, Spinoit AF, Escolino M (2022) Laparoscopic and robot-assisted ureterocalicostomy for treatment of primary and recurrent pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction in children: a multicenter comparative study with laparoscopic and robot-assisted Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty. Int Urol Nephrol 54(10):2503\u20132509","journal-title":"Int Urol Nephrol"},{"issue":"Suppl 1","key":"6339_CR33","first-page":"A458","volume":"26","author":"SM Al Qahtani","year":"2012","unstructured":"Al Qahtani SM, Drouin S, Sebe P, Tligui M, de Medina SGD, Traxer O (2012) Retrograde laser endopyelotomy in patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJ) with previously failed open surgical repair [abstract]. J Endourol 26(Suppl 1):A458","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"issue":"Suppl 1","key":"6339_CR34","first-page":"A53","volume":"24","author":"H Tan","year":"2010","unstructured":"Tan H, Wolf JS Jr. (2010) Management of failed laparoscopic pyeloplasty. J Endourol 24(Suppl 1):A53\u2013A54","journal-title":"J Endourol"}],"container-title":["World Journal of Urology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00345-026-06339-8.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00345-026-06339-8","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00345-026-06339-8.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,23]],"date-time":"2026-03-23T15:42:28Z","timestamp":1774280548000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00345-026-06339-8"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,23]]},"references-count":34,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,12]]}},"alternative-id":["6339"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00345-026-06339-8","relation":{},"ISSN":["1433-8726"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1433-8726","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,23]]},"assertion":[{"value":"10 January 2026","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"4 March 2026","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"23 March 2026","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}}],"article-number":"256"}}