{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,21]],"date-time":"2026-08-21T03:25:11Z","timestamp":1787282711173,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":63,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,21]],"date-time":"2026-08-21T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1787270400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,21]],"date-time":"2026-08-21T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1787270400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/100019864","name":"Universidade Nove De Julho","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100019864","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"crossref"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["World J Urol"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Purpose<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Partial nephrectomy (PN) is the standard of care for T1 renal tumors, offering oncological outcomes equivalent to radical nephrectomy while preserving renal function. Intraoperative hemostasis remains a critical challenge, as warm ischemia time is independently associated with postoperative renal functional decline. Topical hemostatic agents have been increasingly adopted as adjuncts to renorrhaphy; however, their incremental benefit over suture alone remains unestablished. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of hemostatic agents combined with renorrhaphy versus renorrhaphy alone in patients undergoing PN.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Materials and methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>This systematic review and meta-analysis followed PRISMA guidelines and the Cochrane Handbook, with prospective registration in PROSPERO (CRD420261396802). MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched from inception to March 15, 2026, for RCTs and comparative observational studies comparing hemostatic agents combined with renorrhaphy versus renorrhaphy alone in adult PN patients. The primary outcome was blood transfusion rate (BTR); secondary outcomes included estimated blood loss (EBL), hemorrhagic complications (HC), and urinary leakage (UL). A random-effects model with REML estimation was used. Risk of bias was assessed with RoB 2 and ROBINS-I V2; certainty of evidence was graded using GRADE.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Fifteen studies (2 RCTs, 13 observational) comprising 3,408 patients were included from 2,281 identified (1,265 screened after duplicate removal). No significant difference was observed for BTR (RR 0.96; 95% CI 0.59\u20131.57; I\n                      <jats:sup>2<\/jats:sup>\n                      \u2009=\u200944.7%; 95% prediction interval 0.24\u20133.90), HC (RR 0.73; 95% CI 0.40\u20131.35; I\n                      <jats:sup>2<\/jats:sup>\n                      \u2009=\u200947.6%; PI 0.14\u20133.83), or UL (RR 1.36; 95% CI 0.56\u20133.28; I\n                      <jats:sup>2<\/jats:sup>\n                      \u2009=\u20090.0%; PI 0.45\u20134.09). EBL heterogeneity was considerable (I\n                      <jats:sup>2<\/jats:sup>\n                      \u2009=\u200997.8%) and irreducible on leave-one-out (lowest I\n                      <jats:sup>2<\/jats:sup>\n                      \u2009=\u200984.1%); it is therefore reported narratively, with study-level differences ranging from\u2009\u2212\u2009120 to\u2009+\u200957\u00a0mL. No publication bias was detected (Egger p\u2009=\u20090.598).\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Current evidence does not demonstrate a benefit of adjunctive hemostatic agents over renorrhaphy alone. With wide intervals and low certainty for most outcomes, these data reflect an absence of evidence of benefit rather than evidence of absence, and a clinically relevant effect cannot be excluded. Routine use is not supported; adequately powered trials stratified by tumor complexity and agent class are warranted.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1007\/s00345-026-06679-5","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,21]],"date-time":"2026-08-21T03:05:20Z","timestamp":1787281520000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Adjunctive topical hemostatic agents combined with renorrhaphy versus renorrhaphy alone during partial nephrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"44","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-4203-3196","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Jose Arnaldo","family":"Shiomi da Cruz","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Artur","family":"De Souza Almeida","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Bruno Damico","family":"Terada","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Felipe Giraldo Alvarez","family":"Gon\u00e7alves","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Breno Cordeiro","family":"Porto","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Rodrigo Afonso","family":"Da Silva Sardenberg","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Tiago Aparecido","family":"Silva","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ronaldo","family":"Soares Maia","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Fernando Gon\u00e7alves","family":"de Almeida","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Murilo","family":"de Almeida Luz","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,21]]},"reference":[{"issue":"12","key":"6679_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1001","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2024.12848","volume":"332","author":"TL Rose","year":"2024","unstructured":"Rose TL, Kim WY (2024) Renal cell carcinoma: a review. JAMA 332(12):1001\u20131010. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jama.2024.12848","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"issue":"10451","key":"6679_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"476","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(24)00917-6","volume":"404","author":"M Young","year":"2024","unstructured":"Young M, Jackson-Spence F, Beltran L et al (2024) Renal cell carcinoma. Lancet 404(10451):476\u2013491. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0140-6736(24)00917-6","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"10351","key":"6679_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"523","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(22)01059-5","volume":"400","author":"GD Stewart","year":"2022","unstructured":"Stewart GD, Klatte T, Cosmai L et al (2022) The multispeciality approach to the management of localised kidney cancer. Lancet 400(10351):523\u2013534. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0140-6736(22)01059-5","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"1","key":"6679_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"61","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2015.01.025","volume":"68","author":"A Volpe","year":"2015","unstructured":"Volpe A, Blute ML, Ficarra V et al (2015) Renal ischemia and function after partial nephrectomy: a collaborative review of the literature. Eur Urol 68(1):61\u201374. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.eururo.2015.01.025","journal-title":"Eur Urol"},{"issue":"5","key":"6679_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1337","DOI":"10.1007\/s00345-023-04366-3","volume":"41","author":"AD Antonelli","year":"2023","unstructured":"Antonelli AD, Cindolo L, Sandri M et al (2023) The role of warm ischemia time on functional outcomes after robotic partial nephrectomy: a radionuclide renal scan study from the clock randomized trial. World J Urol 41(5):1337\u20131344. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00345-023-04366-3","journal-title":"World J Urol"},{"issue":"3","key":"6679_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"196.e15","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urolonc.2020.11.007","volume":"39","author":"J Lee","year":"2021","unstructured":"Lee J, Song C, Lee D et al (2021) Differential contribution of the factors determining long-term renal function after partial nephrectomy over time. Urol Oncol 39(3):196.e15-196.e20. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.urolonc.2020.11.007","journal-title":"Urol Oncol"},{"issue":"2","key":"6679_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"202","DOI":"10.1111\/bju.16023","volume":"132","author":"C Munoz-Lopez","year":"2023","unstructured":"Munoz-Lopez C, Lewis K, Attawettayanon W et al (2023) Functional recovery after partial nephrectomy: next generation analysis. BJU Int 132(2):202\u2013209. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/bju.16023","journal-title":"BJU Int"},{"issue":"2","key":"6679_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"300","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2015.04.043","volume":"86","author":"S Ginzburg","year":"2015","unstructured":"Ginzburg S, Uzzo R, Walton J et al (2015) Residual parenchymal volume, not warm ischemia time, predicts ultimate renal functional outcomes in patients undergoing partial nephrectomy. Urology 86(2):300\u2013305. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.urology.2015.04.043","journal-title":"Urology"},{"issue":"1","key":"6679_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"47","DOI":"10.1111\/iju.12603","volume":"22","author":"A Antonelli","year":"2015","unstructured":"Antonelli A, Minervini A, Mari A et al (2015) Trimatch comparison of the efficacy of FloSeal versus TachoSil versus no hemostatic agents for partial nephrectomy: results from a large multicenter dataset. Int J Urol 22(1):47\u201352. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/iju.12603","journal-title":"Int J Urol"},{"key":"6679_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1038\/srep32376","volume":"6","author":"Y Abu-Ghanem","year":"2016","unstructured":"Abu-Ghanem Y, Dotan Z, Kaver I, Zilberman DE, Ramon J (2016) The use of haemostatic agents does not impact the rate of hemorrhagic complications in patients undergoing partial nephrectomy for renal masses. Sci Rep 6:32376. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/srep32376","journal-title":"Sci Rep"},{"issue":"3","key":"6679_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"653","DOI":"10.1002\/jso.27775","volume":"130","author":"G Rac","year":"2024","unstructured":"Rac G, Ellis JL, Lanzotti NJ et al (2024) The evolution of tumor enucleation partial nephrectomy: a comparison of perioperative outcomes for sutureless hemostatic bandage as an alternative to standard renorrhaphy. J Surg Oncol 130(3):653\u2013658. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/jso.27775","journal-title":"J Surg Oncol"},{"issue":"1","key":"6679_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"5260131","DOI":"10.1155\/2022\/5260131","volume":"2022","author":"P Liu","year":"2022","unstructured":"Liu P, Li Y, Shi B, Zhang Q, Guo H (2022) The Outcome of Sutureless in Partial Nephrectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. BioMed Res Int 2022(1):5260131. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1155\/2022\/5260131","journal-title":"BioMed Res Int"},{"key":"6679_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Topical Hemostatic Agents at Time of Obstetric and Gynecologic Surgery: ACOG Committee Opinion, Number 812. Obstet Gynecol. 2020;136(4):e81. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/AOG.0000000000004104","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000004104"},{"issue":"6","key":"6679_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1582","DOI":"10.1002\/jbm.a.34098","volume":"100","author":"M Chalupov\u00e1","year":"2012","unstructured":"Chalupov\u00e1 M, Such\u00fd P, Pra\u017eanov\u00e1 G, Barto\u0161ov\u00e1 L, Sopuch T, Havelka P (2012) Local tissue reaction after the application of topical hemostatic agents in a rat partial nephrectomy model. J Biomed Mater Res A 100(6):1582\u20131590. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/jbm.a.34098","journal-title":"J Biomed Mater Res A"},{"issue":"3","key":"6679_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"403","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2007.9844","volume":"22","author":"LP Msezane","year":"2008","unstructured":"Msezane LP, Katz MH, Gofrit ON, Shalhav AL, Zorn KC (2008) Hemostatic agents and instruments in laparoscopic renal surgery. J Endourol 22(3):403\u2013408. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1089\/end.2007.9844","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"key":"6679_CR16","unstructured":"DailyMed - TACHOSIL- thrombin human and fibrinogen patch. Accessed May 20, 2026. https:\/\/dailymed.nlm.nih.gov\/dailymed\/drugInfo.cfm?setid=0c324332-290f-413f-820c-8c9a971a2766"},{"key":"6679_CR17","unstructured":"Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (current version) | Cochrane. Accessed May 20, 2026. https:\/\/www.cochrane.org\/authors\/handbooks-and-manuals\/handbook\/current"},{"key":"6679_CR18","unstructured":"PRISMA statement. PRISMA statement. Accessed June 6, 2026. https:\/\/www.prisma-statement.org"},{"key":"6679_CR19","unstructured":"EndNote Web. Accessed June 6, 2026. https:\/\/web.endnote.com\/login?returnUrl=%2Flibrary%2Fmy-library%2Fgroups%2Fall-references%2Freferences%2Fall"},{"key":"6679_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.l4898","volume":"366","author":"JAC Sterne","year":"2019","unstructured":"Sterne JAC, Savovi\u0107 J, Page MJ et al (2019) RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 366:l4898. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmj.l4898","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"6679_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.i4919","volume":"355","author":"JA Sterne","year":"2016","unstructured":"Sterne JA, Hern\u00e1n MA, Reeves BC et al (2016) ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ 355:i4919. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmj.i4919","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"7650","key":"6679_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"924","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.39489.470347.AD","volume":"336","author":"GH Guyatt","year":"2008","unstructured":"Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE et al (2008) GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 336(7650):924\u2013926. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmj.39489.470347.AD","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"3","key":"6679_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"844","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2009.05.035","volume":"182","author":"A Kutikov","year":"2009","unstructured":"Kutikov A, Uzzo RG (2009) The R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score: a comprehensive standardized system for quantitating renal tumor size, location and depth. J Urol 182(3):844\u2013853. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.juro.2009.05.035","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"key":"6679_CR24","unstructured":"R: The R Project for Statistical Computing. Accessed May 21, 2026. https:\/\/www.r-project.org\/"},{"key":"6679_CR25","unstructured":"Posit | Data Science Platform for Enterprise Teams. Accessed May 21, 2026. https:\/\/posit.co\/"},{"issue":"11","key":"6679_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1815","DOI":"10.1007\/s00345-015-1537-0","volume":"33","author":"B Peyronnet","year":"2015","unstructured":"Peyronnet B, Oger E, Khene Z et al (2015) The use of hemostatic agents does not prevent hemorrhagic complications of robotic partial nephrectomy. World J Urol 33(11):1815\u20131820. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00345-015-1537-0","journal-title":"World J Urol"},{"issue":"1","key":"6679_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"21","DOI":"10.22037\/uj.v0i0.4090","volume":"15","author":"S Tonyali","year":"2017","unstructured":"Tonyali S, Koni A, Yazici S, Bilen CY (2017) The Safety and Efficacy of Adjuvant Hemostatic Agents During Laparoscopic Nephron-Sparing Surgery: Comparison of Tachosil and Floseal Versus No Hemostatic Agents. Urol J 15(1):21\u201325. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.22037\/uj.v0i0.4090","journal-title":"Urol J"},{"issue":"8","key":"6679_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"877","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2016.0192","volume":"30","author":"MJ Maurice","year":"2016","unstructured":"Maurice MJ, Ramirez D, Kara \u00d6 et al (2016) Omission of Hemostatic Agents During Robotic Partial Nephrectomy Does Not Increase Postoperative Bleeding Risk. J Endourol 30(8):877\u2013883. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1089\/end.2016.0192","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"issue":"3","key":"6679_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"463","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2004.10.030","volume":"65","author":"IS Gill","year":"2005","unstructured":"Gill IS, Ramani AP, Spaliviero M et al (2005) Improved hemostasis during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy using gelatin matrix thrombin sealant. Urology 65(3):463\u2013466. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.urology.2004.10.030","journal-title":"Urology"},{"issue":"5","key":"6679_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"526","DOI":"10.1097\/JU.0000000000004889","volume":"215","author":"A Lazarovich","year":"2026","unstructured":"Lazarovich A, Tremblay S, Nottingham C et al (2026) Randomized, prospective evaluation of hemostatic agents in robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. J Urol 215(5):526\u2013534. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/JU.0000000000004889","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"issue":"4","key":"6679_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1156","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2007.04.027","volume":"52","author":"S Siemer","year":"2007","unstructured":"Siemer S, Lahme S, Altziebler S et al (2007) Efficacy and safety of TachoSil as haemostatic treatment versus standard suturing in kidney tumour resection: a randomised prospective study. Eur Urol 52(4):1156\u20131163. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.eururo.2007.04.027","journal-title":"Eur Urol"},{"issue":"4","key":"6679_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"423","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2006.0265","volume":"21","author":"F Porpiglia","year":"2007","unstructured":"Porpiglia F, Renard J, Billia M, Morra I, Terrone C, Scarpa RM (2007) Biological glues and collagen fleece for hemostasis during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: technique and results of prospective study. J Endourol 21(4):423\u2013428. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1089\/end.2006.0265","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"issue":"5","key":"6679_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"317","DOI":"10.1016\/j.purol.2012.10.012","volume":"23","author":"V Arnoux","year":"2013","unstructured":"Arnoux V, Descotes JL, Fiard G et al (2013) The use of haemostatic agent: impact on perioperative outcomes of partial nephrectomy. Progres En Urol J Assoc Francaise Urol Soc Francaise Urol 23(5):317\u2013322. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.purol.2012.10.012","journal-title":"Progres En Urol J Assoc Francaise Urol Soc Francaise Urol"},{"issue":"4","key":"6679_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"362","DOI":"10.5173\/ceju.2017.1432","volume":"70","author":"DM Carrion","year":"2017","unstructured":"Carrion DM, Y Gregorio SA, Rivas JG, Baz\u00e1n AA, Sebasti\u00e1n JD, Mart\u00ednez-Pi\u00f1eiro L (2017) The role of hemostatic agents in preventing complications in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. Cent Eur J Urol. 70(4):362\u2013367. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5173\/ceju.2017.1432","journal-title":"Cent Eur J Urol."},{"issue":"10","key":"6679_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1236","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2013.0136","volume":"27","author":"J Cohen","year":"2013","unstructured":"Cohen J, Jayram G, Mullins JK, Ball MW, Allaf ME (2013) Do fibrin sealants impact negative outcomes after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy? J Endourol 27(10):1236\u20131239. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1089\/end.2013.0136","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"issue":"6","key":"6679_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"668","DOI":"10.1016\/j.asjsur.2019.09.002","volume":"43","author":"K Shigeta","year":"2020","unstructured":"Shigeta K, Matsumoto K, Abe T et al (2020) The efficacy of the TachoSil binding suturing technique in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy to prevent the development of pseudoaneurysm. Asian J Surg 43(6):668\u2013675. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.asjsur.2019.09.002","journal-title":"Asian J Surg"},{"issue":"1","key":"6679_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"127","DOI":"10.1007\/s00345-021-03827-x","volume":"40","author":"M Staehler","year":"2022","unstructured":"Staehler M, Rodler S, Schott M et al (2022) Polyethylene glycol-coated collagen patch (hemopatch(\u00ae)) in open partial nephrectomy. World J Urol 40(1):127\u2013132. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00345-021-03827-x","journal-title":"World J Urol"},{"issue":"3","key":"6679_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"228","DOI":"10.4081\/aiua.2016.3.228","volume":"88","author":"F Ozgor","year":"2016","unstructured":"Ozgor F, Simsek A, Aydogdu O et al (2016) Bleeding during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: can a hemostatic matrix help to improve hemostasis? Arch Ital Urol Androl 88(3):228\u2013232. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4081\/aiua.2016.3.228","journal-title":"Arch Ital Urol Androl"},{"issue":"2","key":"6679_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"372","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2013.06.044","volume":"65","author":"E Scosyrev","year":"2014","unstructured":"Scosyrev E, Messing EM, Sylvester R, Campbell S, Van Poppel H (2014) Renal function after nephron-sparing surgery versus radical nephrectomy: results from EORTC randomized trial 30904. Eur Urol 65(2):372\u2013377. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.eururo.2013.06.044","journal-title":"Eur Urol"},{"issue":"3","key":"6679_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"283","DOI":"10.1111\/bju.16009","volume":"132","author":"D Cignoli","year":"2023","unstructured":"Cignoli D, Basile G, Fallara G et al (2023) Risks and benefits of partial nephrectomy performed with limited or with zero ischaemia time. BJU Int 132(3):283\u2013290. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/bju.16009","journal-title":"BJU Int"},{"issue":"7","key":"6679_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3390\/jcm15072792","volume":"15","author":"P D\u0119bi\u0144ski","year":"2026","unstructured":"D\u0119bi\u0144ski P, Karwacki J, Nowak \u0141 et al (2026) Off-clamp versus on-clamp partial nephrectomy: an updated systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression. J Clin Med 15(7):2792. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/jcm15072792","journal-title":"J Clin Med"},{"issue":"4","key":"6679_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"632","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2015.04.020","volume":"68","author":"G Simone","year":"2015","unstructured":"Simone G, Gill IS, Mottrie A et al (2015) Indications, techniques, outcomes, and limitations for minimally ischemic and off-clamp partial nephrectomy: a systematic review of the literature. Eur Urol 68(4):632\u2013640. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.eururo.2015.04.020","journal-title":"Eur Urol"},{"key":"6679_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/1756-0500-6-399","volume":"6","author":"DA Palacios","year":"2013","unstructured":"Palacios DA, McDonald M, Miyake M, Rosser CJ (2013) Pilot study comparing the two hemostatic agents in patients undergoing partial nephrectomy. BMC Res Notes 6:399. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/1756-0500-6-399","journal-title":"BMC Res Notes"},{"issue":"5b","key":"6679_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E56","DOI":"10.1111\/bju.12397","volume":"113","author":"H Lang","year":"2014","unstructured":"Lang H, Mouracade P, Gimel P et al (2014) National prospective study on the use of local haemostatic agents during partial nephrectomy. BJU Int 113(5b):E56-61. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/bju.12397","journal-title":"BJU Int"},{"issue":"4","key":"6679_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"329","DOI":"10.1111\/iju.15658","volume":"32","author":"D Homewood","year":"2025","unstructured":"Homewood D, Tan N, Fay T et al (2025) An overview of renorrhaphy techniques for partial nephrectomy. Int J Urol 32(4):329\u2013340. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/iju.15658","journal-title":"Int J Urol"},{"issue":"6","key":"6679_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"923","DOI":"10.1111\/bju.14537","volume":"123","author":"R Bertolo","year":"2019","unstructured":"Bertolo R, Campi R, Klatte T et al (2019) Suture techniques during laparoscopic and robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a systematic review and quantitative synthesis of peri-operative outcomes. BJU Int 123(6):923\u2013946. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/bju.14537","journal-title":"BJU Int"},{"issue":"8","key":"6679_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1294","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1464-410X.2012.11721.x","volume":"111","author":"GJ Vricella","year":"2013","unstructured":"Vricella GJ, Finelli A, Alibhai SMH, Ponsky LE, Abouassaly R (2013) The true risk of blood transfusion after nephrectomy for renal masses: a population-based study. BJU Int 111(8):1294\u20131300. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1464-410X.2012.11721.x","journal-title":"BJU Int"},{"issue":"5","key":"6679_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"496","DOI":"10.1002\/jso.24029","volume":"112","author":"Y Abu-Ghanem","year":"2015","unstructured":"Abu-Ghanem Y, Dotan Z, Kaver I, Ramon J (2015) Predictive factors for perioperative blood transfusions in partial nephrectomy for renal masses. J Surg Oncol 112(5):496\u2013502. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/jso.24029","journal-title":"J Surg Oncol"},{"issue":"4","key":"6679_CR49","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1160","DOI":"10.1016\/S0022-5347(05)67132-7","volume":"164","author":"O Shvarts","year":"2000","unstructured":"Shvarts O, Tsui KH, Smith RB, Kernion JB, Belldegrun A (2000) Blood loss and the need for transfusion in patients who undergo partial or radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 164(4):1160\u20131163","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"issue":"10","key":"6679_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0240808","volume":"15","author":"F Piekarski","year":"2020","unstructured":"Piekarski F, Gerdessen L, Schmitt E et al (2020) Do we visually estimate intra-operative blood loss better with white or green sponges and is the deviation from the real blood loss clinically acceptable? Results from a simulated scenario study. PLoS ONE 15(10):e0240808. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0240808","journal-title":"PLoS ONE"},{"issue":"6","key":"6679_CR51","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"759","DOI":"10.1097\/SHK.0000000000001615","volume":"55","author":"F Piekarski","year":"2021","unstructured":"Piekarski F, Gerdessen L, Schmitt E et al (2021) Quantification of intraoperative blood loss in a simulated scenario using a novel device. Shock 55(6):759\u2013765. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/SHK.0000000000001615","journal-title":"Shock"},{"issue":"2","key":"6679_CR52","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"245","DOI":"10.1007\/s12630-020-01857-4","volume":"68","author":"A Tran","year":"2021","unstructured":"Tran A, Heuser J, Ramsay T, McIsaac DI, Martel G (2021) Techniques for blood loss estimation in major non-cardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Can J Anaesth 68(2):245\u2013255. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s12630-020-01857-4","journal-title":"Can J Anaesth"},{"issue":"6","key":"6679_CR53","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000003564","volume":"134","author":"Quantitative Blood Loss in Obstetric Hemorrhage","year":"2019","unstructured":"Quantitative Blood Loss in Obstetric Hemorrhage (2019) ACOG COMMITTEE OPINION, Number 794. Obstet Gynecol 134(6):e150. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/AOG.0000000000003564","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"6679_CR54","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"664","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2016.03.176","volume":"196","author":"H Borgmann","year":"2016","unstructured":"Borgmann H, Reiss AK, Kurosch M et al (2016) R.E.N.A.L. score outperforms PADUA score, C-index and DAP score for outcome prediction of nephron sparing surgery in a selected cohort. J Urol 196(3):664\u2013671. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.juro.2016.03.176","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"issue":"1","key":"6679_CR55","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"36","DOI":"10.1111\/bju.15262","volume":"128","author":"MG Crockett","year":"2021","unstructured":"Crockett MG, Giona S, Whiting D et al (2021) Nephrometry scores: a validation of three systems for peri-operative outcomes in retroperitoneal robot-assisted partial nephrectomy. BJU Int 128(1):36\u201345. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/bju.15262","journal-title":"BJU Int"},{"issue":"15","key":"6679_CR56","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"5062","DOI":"10.1002\/cam4.4047","volume":"10","author":"C Hu","year":"2021","unstructured":"Hu C, Sun J, Zhang Z et al (2021) Parallel comparison of R.E.N.A.L., PADUA, and C-index scoring systems in predicting outcomes after partial nephrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Med 10(15):5062\u20135077. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/cam4.4047","journal-title":"Cancer Med"},{"issue":"3","key":"6679_CR57","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"456","DOI":"10.1111\/bju.13628","volume":"119","author":"R Schiavina","year":"2017","unstructured":"Schiavina R, Novara G, Borghesi M et al (2017) PADUA and R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry scores correlate with perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: analysis of the Vattikuti Global Quality Initiative in Robotic Urologic Surgery (GQI-RUS) database. BJU Int 119(3):456\u2013463. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/bju.13628","journal-title":"BJU Int"},{"issue":"4","key":"6679_CR58","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"724","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2011.05.030","volume":"60","author":"J Simhan","year":"2011","unstructured":"Simhan J, Smaldone MC, Tsai KJ et al (2011) Objective measures of renal mass anatomic complexity predict rates of major complications following partial nephrectomy. Eur Urol 60(4):724\u2013730. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.eururo.2011.05.030","journal-title":"Eur Urol"},{"issue":"3","key":"6679_CR59","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/MD.0000000000023581","volume":"100","author":"C Qin","year":"2021","unstructured":"Qin C, Zhi X, Wang F et al (2021) Imaging and surgical predictive factors for postoperative hemorrhage after partial nephrectomy and clinical results of trans-arterial embolization. Medicine (Baltimore) 100(3):e23581. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/MD.0000000000023581","journal-title":"Medicine (Baltimore)"},{"issue":"1","key":"6679_CR60","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1155\/2015\/981251","volume":"2015","author":"MC Kriegmair","year":"2015","unstructured":"Kriegmair MC, Mandel P, Rathmann N, Diehl SJ, Pfalzgraf D, Ritter M (2015) Open Partial Nephrectomy for High-Risk Renal Masses Is Associated with Renal Pseudoaneurysms: Assessment of a Severe Procedure-Related Complication. BioMed Res Int 2015(1):981251. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1155\/2015\/981251","journal-title":"BioMed Res Int"},{"issue":"7","key":"6679_CR61","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1042","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1464-410X.2010.09230.x","volume":"106","author":"SD Kundu","year":"2010","unstructured":"Kundu SD, Thompson RH, Kallingal GJ, Cambareri G, Russo P (2010) Urinary fistulae after partial nephrectomy. BJU Int 106(7):1042\u20131044. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1464-410X.2010.09230.x","journal-title":"BJU Int"},{"issue":"6","key":"6679_CR62","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2375","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2008.08.018","volume":"180","author":"JJ Meeks","year":"2008","unstructured":"Meeks JJ, Zhao LC, Navai N, Perry KT, Nadler RB, Smith ND (2008) Risk factors and management of urine leaks after partial nephrectomy. J Urol 180(6):2375\u20132378. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.juro.2008.08.018","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"issue":"4","key":"6679_CR63","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"352","DOI":"10.1159\/000518125","volume":"106","author":"Q Guo","year":"2021","unstructured":"Guo Q, Lin Y, Zhang C et al (2021) Hemostatic agent may improve perioperative outcomes in partial nephrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Urol Int 106(4):352\u2013359. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1159\/000518125","journal-title":"Urol Int"}],"container-title":["World Journal of Urology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00345-026-06679-5.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00345-026-06679-5","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00345-026-06679-5.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,21]],"date-time":"2026-08-21T03:05:27Z","timestamp":1787281527000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00345-026-06679-5"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,21]]},"references-count":63,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,12]]}},"alternative-id":["6679"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00345-026-06679-5","relation":{},"ISSN":["1433-8726"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1433-8726","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,21]]},"assertion":[{"value":"16 June 2026","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"7 August 2026","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"21 August 2026","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"Nothing to declare.","order":1,"name":"Ethics","label":"Conflict of interest","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}}],"article-number":"592"}}