{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,9]],"date-time":"2026-09-09T15:16:59Z","timestamp":1788967019118,"version":"build-2803163510"},"reference-count":51,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,9]],"date-time":"2026-09-09T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1788912000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,9]],"date-time":"2026-09-09T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1788912000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["World J Urol"],"DOI":"10.1007\/s00345-026-06759-6","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,9]],"date-time":"2026-09-09T14:31:02Z","timestamp":1788964262000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Suction-assisted ureteroscopy compared with traditional ureteroscopy for renal stones \u2264 2\u00a0cm: a systematic review, Bayesian network meta-analysis and meta-regression"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"44","author":[{"given":"David E.","family":"Hinojosa-Gonzalez","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Andres","family":"Gutierrez-Gamez","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Mauricio","family":"Torres-Martinez","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Alejandro","family":"Calvillo-Ramirez","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Gal","family":"Saffati-Grunhaus","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Aidan","family":"Boyne","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Amelia G.","family":"Oppenheimer","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Payton","family":"Coady","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Beatriz S.","family":"Hernandez","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Richard Edward","family":"Link","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jeremy R.","family":"Slawin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Wesley A.","family":"Mayer","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,9]]},"reference":[{"issue":"4","key":"6759_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"724","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2014.06.036","volume":"66","author":"JA Antonelli","year":"2014","unstructured":"Antonelli JA, Maalouf NM, Pearle MS, Lotan Y (2014) Use of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey to calculate the impact of obesity and diabetes on cost and prevalence of urolithiasis in 2030. Eur Urol 66(4):724\u2013729. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.eururo.2014.06.036","journal-title":"Eur Urol"},{"issue":"1","key":"6759_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"160","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2012.03.052","volume":"62","author":"CD Scales","year":"2012","unstructured":"Scales CD, Smith AC, Hanley JM, Saigal CS (2012) Prevalence of kidney stones in the United States. Eur Urol 62(1):160\u2013165. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.eururo.2012.03.052","journal-title":"Eur Urol"},{"issue":"4","key":"6759_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1153","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2016.05.090","volume":"196","author":"D Assimos","year":"2016","unstructured":"Assimos D, Krambeck A, Miller NL et al (2016) Surgical management of stones: American Urological Association\/Endourological Society guideline, PART I. J Urol 196(4):1153\u20131160. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.juro.2016.05.090","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"issue":"4 Part 1","key":"6759_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"982","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2015.11.009","volume":"195","author":"BH Chew","year":"2016","unstructured":"Chew BH, Brotherhood HL, Sur RL et al (2016) Natural history, complications and re-intervention rates of asymptomatic residual stone fragments after ureteroscopy: a report from the EDGE research consortium. J Urol 195(4 Part 1):982\u2013986. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.juro.2015.11.009","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"issue":"3","key":"6759_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"526","DOI":"10.1097\/JU.0000000000001836","volume":"206","author":"E Brain","year":"2021","unstructured":"Brain E, Geraghty RM, Lovegrove CE, Yang B, Somani BK (2021) Natural history of post-treatment kidney stone fragments: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Urol 206(3):526\u2013538. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/JU.0000000000001836","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"issue":"3","key":"6759_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"564","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2010.06.056","volume":"77","author":"DA Rebuck","year":"2011","unstructured":"Rebuck DA, Macejko A, Bhalani V, Ramos P, Nadler RB (2011) The natural history of renal stone fragments following ureteroscopy. Urology 77(3):564\u2013568. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.urology.2010.06.056","journal-title":"Urology"},{"issue":"2","key":"6759_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"381","DOI":"10.1016\/j.euf.2022.09.008","volume":"9","author":"L Tzelves","year":"2023","unstructured":"Tzelves L, Geraghty R, Lombardo R et al (2023) Reply to Ryan S. Hsi, John M. Hollingsworth, and Tatuki Koyama\u2019s Letter to the Editor re: Lazaros Tzelves, Robert Geraghty, Riccardo Lombardo, et al. Duration of follow-up and timing of discharge from imaging follow-up, in adult patients with urolithiasis after surgical or medical intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis from the european association of urology guideline panel on urolithiasis. Eur Urol Focus 9(2):381\u2013382. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.euf.2022.09.008. ((Eur Urol Focus. In press. 10.1016\/j.euf.2022.06.016))","journal-title":"Eur Urol Focus"},{"issue":"10","key":"6759_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1257","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2012.0217","volume":"26","author":"OM Aboumarzouk","year":"2012","unstructured":"Aboumarzouk OM, Monga M, Kata SG, Traxer O, Somani BK (2012) Flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for stones > 2 cm: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endourol 26(10):1257\u20131263. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1089\/end.2012.0217","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"issue":"1","key":"6759_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2017.0641","volume":"32","author":"BR Matlaga","year":"2018","unstructured":"Matlaga BR, Chew B, Eisner B et al (2018) Ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy: a review of dusting vs fragmentation with extraction. J Endourol 32(1):1\u20136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1089\/end.2017.0641","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"key":"6759_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1089\/lap.2024.0076","author":"M Erkoc","year":"2024","unstructured":"Erkoc M, Bozkurt M, Sezgin MA et al (2024) Efficacy of aspiration-assisted ureteral access sheath (ClearPETRA) in retrograde intrarenal surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1089\/lap.2024.0076","journal-title":"J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech"},{"issue":"10","key":"6759_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1009","DOI":"10.1002\/bco2.408","volume":"5","author":"L Tzelves","year":"2024","unstructured":"Tzelves L, Geraghty R, Julieb\u00f8\u2010Jones P et al (2024) Suction use in ureterorenoscopy: a systematic review and meta\u2010analysis of comparative studies. BJUI Compass 5(10):1009\u20131026. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/bco2.408","journal-title":"BJUI Compass"},{"issue":"23","key":"6759_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3390\/jcm13237191","volume":"13","author":"P Geavlete","year":"2024","unstructured":"Geavlete P, Mare\u0219 C, Mul\u021bescu R et al (2024) Small diameter (7.5 Fr) single-use flexible ureteroscopy with direct in-scope suction (DISSTM) in conjunction with aspiration-assisted flexible access sheath: a new hype for real stone-free? J Clin Med 13(23):7191. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/jcm13237191","journal-title":"J Clin Med"},{"key":"6759_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/17562872251320807","volume":"17","author":"V Gauhar","year":"2025","unstructured":"Gauhar V, Traxer O, Kandarthanda NM et al (2025) Introducing a new device for direct in-scope suction technique during flexible ureteroscopy for kidney stone disease: an EAU section of endourology prospective multicenter audit using the GLITZ system. Ther Adv Urol 17:17562872251320807. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/17562872251320807","journal-title":"Ther Adv Urol"},{"issue":"1","key":"6759_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00345-025-05768-1","volume":"43","author":"Z Okhunov","year":"2025","unstructured":"Okhunov Z, Baldwin EA, Jhang D et al (2025) Which sucks more? Comparison of two novel direct-in-scope suction ureteroscopes to a conventional ureteroscope. World J Urol 43(1):495. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00345-025-05768-1","journal-title":"World J Urol"},{"issue":"1","key":"6759_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00345-024-05203-x","volume":"42","author":"A Madden","year":"2024","unstructured":"Madden A, Altez C, Lueza JP et al (2024) Direct in-scope suction: an in vitro evaluation of a single use flexible ureteroscope with integrated suction capability. World J Urol 42(1):500. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00345-024-05203-x","journal-title":"World J Urol"},{"key":"6759_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.n71","author":"MJ Page","year":"2020","unstructured":"Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM et al (2020) The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmj.n71","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"6759_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/08927790251387343","author":"JJS Cabo","year":"2025","unstructured":"Cabo JJS, Ballantyne CC, Edmonds VS, Humphreys MR, Stern KL (2025) Prospective, real-world evaluation of CVAC 2.0 in-scope aspiration system compared with flexible and navigable ureteral access sheath for high-volume stone disease. J Endourol. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/08927790251387343","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"issue":"1","key":"6759_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00345-025-05520-9","volume":"43","author":"L Cacciatore","year":"2025","unstructured":"Cacciatore L, Minore A, Bonanno L et al (2025) Is flexible navigable suction ureteral access sheath (FANS) safer and more efficient than conventional sheaths? Italian multicentric experience. World J Urol 43(1):153. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00345-025-05520-9","journal-title":"World J Urol"},{"issue":"11","key":"6759_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1184","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2023.0358","volume":"37","author":"J Ding","year":"2023","unstructured":"Ding J, Su T, Zhang X et al (2023) Omnidirectional (flexible) ureteral access sheath: safety, efficacy, and initial experience report. J Endourol 37(11):1184\u20131190. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1089\/end.2023.0358","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"issue":"3","key":"6759_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"817","DOI":"10.1007\/s11255-024-04269-1","volume":"57","author":"H Hu","year":"2024","unstructured":"Hu H, Qin M, Yang L et al (2024) Analysis of the effectiveness and safety of 7.5 Fr ultra-thin flexible ureteroscope combined with a tip-flexible suctioning ureteral access sheath for the treatment of kidney stones. Int Urol Nephrol 57(3):817\u2013823. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11255-024-04269-1","journal-title":"Int Urol Nephrol"},{"issue":"11","key":"6759_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3097","DOI":"10.1007\/s00345-023-04595-6","volume":"41","author":"J Huang","year":"2023","unstructured":"Huang J, Yang Y, Xie H et al (2023) Vacuum-assisted dedusting lithotripsy in the treatment of kidney and proximal ureteral stones less than 3 cm in size. World J Urol 41(11):3097\u20133103. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00345-023-04595-6","journal-title":"World J Urol"},{"issue":"1","key":"6759_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1155\/2022\/9354714","volume":"2022","author":"X Qian","year":"2022","unstructured":"Qian X, Liu C, Hong S et al (2022) Application of suctioning ureteral access sheath during flexible ureteroscopy for renal stones decreases the risk of postoperative systemic inflammatory response syndrome. Int J Clin Pract 2022(1):9354714. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1155\/2022\/9354714","journal-title":"Int J Clin Pract"},{"issue":"1","key":"6759_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00345-025-05610-8","volume":"43","author":"L Rico","year":"2025","unstructured":"Rico L, Diaz-Zorita V, Blas L, Ramos LB, Sabeh P, Contreras P (2025) Is the ablation stone efficacy and efficiency better with a flexible and navigable suction ureteric access sheath? World J Urol 43(1):219. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00345-025-05610-8","journal-title":"World J Urol"},{"issue":"1","key":"6759_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00345-024-05325-2","volume":"42","author":"Z Ying","year":"2024","unstructured":"Ying Z, Dong H, Li C et al (2024) Efficacy analysis of tip-flexible suction access sheath during flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy for unilateral upper urinary tract calculi. World J Urol 42(1):626. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00345-024-05325-2","journal-title":"World J Urol"},{"issue":"1","key":"6759_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00345-023-04697-1","volume":"42","author":"Y Yu","year":"2024","unstructured":"Yu Y, Chen Y, Zhou X et al (2024) Comparison of novel flexible and traditional ureteral access sheath in retrograde intrarenal surgery. World J Urol 42(1):7. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00345-023-04697-1","journal-title":"World J Urol"},{"issue":"12","key":"6759_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3619","DOI":"10.1007\/s00345-023-04648-w","volume":"41","author":"Z Zhang","year":"2023","unstructured":"Zhang Z, Xie T, Li F et al (2023) Comparison of traditional and novel tip-flexible suctioning ureteral access sheath combined with flexible ureteroscope to treat unilateral renal calculi. World J Urol 41(12):3619\u20133627. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00345-023-04648-w","journal-title":"World J Urol"},{"key":"6759_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eclinm.2024.102724","volume":"74","author":"W Zhu","year":"2024","unstructured":"Zhu W, Liu S, Cao J et al (2024) Tip bendable suction ureteral access sheath versus traditional sheath in retrograde intrarenal stone surgery: an international multicentre, randomized, parallel group, superiority study. eClinicalMedicine 74:102724. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.eclinm.2024.102724","journal-title":"eClinicalMedicine"},{"issue":"1","key":"6759_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"10","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2024.0602","volume":"39","author":"BR Matlaga","year":"2025","unstructured":"Matlaga BR, Mueller TJ, Johnson B et al (2025) A prospective, randomized, noninferiority study to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of steerable ureteroscopic renal evacuation compared with standard ureteroscopy: 30-day results of the ASPIRE study. J Endourol 39(1):10\u201318. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1089\/end.2024.0602","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"issue":"11","key":"6759_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1539","DOI":"10.1002\/sim.1186","volume":"21","author":"JPT Higgins","year":"2002","unstructured":"Higgins JPT, Thompson SG (2002) Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta\u2010analysis. Stat Med 21(11):1539\u20131558. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/sim.1186","journal-title":"Stat Med"},{"key":"6759_CR30","unstructured":"Higgins J, Thomas J, Chandler J et al (2022) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 6.3 (updated February 2022). www.training.cochrane.org\/handbook"},{"key":"6759_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-21416-0","volume-title":"Meta-analysis with R","author":"G Schwarzer","year":"2015","unstructured":"Schwarzer G, Carpenter JR, R\u00fccker G (2015) Meta-analysis with R. Springer International Publishing. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-21416-0"},{"key":"6759_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.l4898","author":"JAC Sterne","year":"2019","unstructured":"Sterne JAC, Savovi\u0107 J, Page MJ et al (2019) RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmj.l4898","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"6759_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.i4919","author":"JA Sterne","year":"2016","unstructured":"Sterne JA, Hern\u00e1n MA, Reeves BC et al (2016) ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmj.i4919","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"2","key":"6759_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"139","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajur.2024.01.008","volume":"11","author":"PJS Osther","year":"2024","unstructured":"Osther PJS, Osther SS, Hesselholt MP et al (2024) Understanding intrarenal backflow: intrarenal pressure during ureteroscopy and beyond. Asian J Urol 11(2):139\u2013142. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajur.2024.01.008","journal-title":"Asian J Urol"},{"issue":"5","key":"6759_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"512","DOI":"10.1111\/bju.16095","volume":"132","author":"A Hong","year":"2023","unstructured":"Hong A, Du Plessis J, Browne C, Jack G, Bolton D (2023) Mechanism of urosepsis: relationship between intrarenal pressures and pyelovenous backflow. BJU Int 132(5):512\u2013519. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/bju.16095","journal-title":"BJU Int"},{"issue":"2","key":"6759_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"279","DOI":"10.1111\/bju.16539","volume":"135","author":"D Hinojosa\u2010Gonzalez","year":"2025","unstructured":"Hinojosa\u2010Gonzalez D, Kottooran C, Saunders J, Chaussee EL, Budrewicz J, Eisner BH (2025) Relationship between renal pelvis pressure and post\u2010ureteroscopy infection in a live swine model. BJU Int 135(2):279\u2013285. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/bju.16539","journal-title":"BJU Int"},{"key":"6759_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/bju.16871","author":"PU Patel","year":"2025","unstructured":"Patel PU, Uy M, Dauw C et al (2025) Direct in\u2010scope suction (DISS) ureteroscopy: techniques, outcomes and future directions. BJU Int. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/bju.16871","journal-title":"BJU Int"},{"issue":"1","key":"6759_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"198","DOI":"10.1007\/s00345-025-05579-4","volume":"43","author":"MC Chan","year":"2025","unstructured":"Chan MC, Gauhar V, Koh SH et al (2025) Direct-in-scope suction with a 5.1Fr large working channel ureteroscope: what stone dust size for effective evacuation during laser lithotripsy? An in vitro analysis by PEARLS and section of EAU endourology. World J Urol 43(1):198. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00345-025-05579-4","journal-title":"World J Urol"},{"issue":"5S","key":"6759_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/01.JU.0001191404.60845.a4.10","volume":"215","author":"BA Johnson","year":"2026","unstructured":"Johnson BA, Gonzalez A, Corsi N (2026) IP24-10\u2003Significant outcome difference between renal stone suction evacuation techniques: controlled in vitro comparison of SURE vs DISS. J Urol 215(5S):E485. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/01.JU.0001191404.60845.a4.10","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"issue":"1","key":"6759_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00240-025-01748-7","volume":"53","author":"\u00dc Yildirim","year":"2025","unstructured":"Yildirim \u00dc, Uslu M, Ezer M, Erdo\u011fdu \u00c7, Kocaaslan R, Sarica K (2025) Comparison of flexible ureteroscopic suction techniques: efficacy and safety of flexible and navigable access sheath (FANS) vs. direct in-scope suction (DISS) in the management of 2\u20133 cm lower pole renal stones. Urolithiasis 53(1):75. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00240-025-01748-7","journal-title":"Urolithiasis"},{"issue":"1","key":"6759_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00345-025-05809-9","volume":"43","author":"YQ Tan","year":"2025","unstructured":"Tan YQ, Law YXT, So WZ et al (2025) In-vitro deflection comparison of 3 flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheaths (FANS) of 2 sizes across 7.5Fr single-use flexible ureteroscopes: an AUSET-EAU endourology collaboration. World J Urol 43(1):450. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00345-025-05809-9","journal-title":"World J Urol"},{"issue":"4","key":"6759_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"267","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2017.0523","volume":"32","author":"K Taguchi","year":"2018","unstructured":"Taguchi K, Usawachintachit M, Tzou DT et al (2018) Micro-costing analysis demonstrates comparable costs for LithoVue compared to reusable flexible fiberoptic ureteroscopes. J Endourol 32(4):267\u2013273. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1089\/end.2017.0523","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"issue":"3 Part 1","key":"6759_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"730","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2016.09.085","volume":"197","author":"CJ Martin","year":"2017","unstructured":"Martin CJ, McAdams SB, Abdul-Muhsin H et al (2017) The economic implications of a reusable flexible digital ureteroscope: a cost-benefit analysis. J Urol 197(3 Part 1):730\u2013735. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.juro.2016.09.085","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"issue":"4","key":"6759_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"652","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2017.05.047","volume":"72","author":"K Sarica","year":"2017","unstructured":"Sarica K, Yuruk E (2017) Re: the economic implications of a reusable flexible digital ureteroscope: a cost-benefit analysis. Eur Urol 72(4):652\u2013653. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.eururo.2017.05.047","journal-title":"Eur Urol"},{"issue":"Supp1","key":"6759_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S40","DOI":"10.5152\/tud.2020.20223","volume":"46","author":"E Ventimiglia","year":"2020","unstructured":"Ventimiglia E, God\u00ednez AJ et al (2020) Cost comparison of single-use versus reusable flexible ureteroscope: a systematic review. Urol Res Pract 46(Supp1):S40\u2013S45. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5152\/tud.2020.20223","journal-title":"Urol Res Pract"},{"key":"6759_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"64","DOI":"10.1016\/j.euros.2021.12.013","volume":"37","author":"DK Rindorf","year":"2022","unstructured":"Rindorf DK, Tailly T, Kamphuis GM et al (2022) Repair rate and associated costs of reusable flexible ureteroscopes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol Open Sci 37:64\u201372. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.euros.2021.12.013","journal-title":"Eur Urol Open Sci"},{"issue":"1","key":"6759_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-025-00515-3","volume":"15","author":"PA Geavlete","year":"2025","unstructured":"Geavlete PA, Bulai CA, Multescu RD et al (2025) Early clinical outcomes using a 6.3 Fr single use ureteroscope compared to a 7.5 Fr device. Sci Rep 15(1):15362. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41598-025-00515-3","journal-title":"Sci Rep"},{"issue":"S4","key":"6759_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S418","DOI":"10.21037\/tau.2019.06.13","volume":"8","author":"M Talso","year":"2019","unstructured":"Talso M, Goumas IK, Kamphuis GM et al (2019) Reusable flexible ureterorenoscopes are more cost-effective than single-use scopes: results of a systematic review from PETRA Uro-group. Transl Androl Urol 8(S4):S418\u2013S425. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.21037\/tau.2019.06.13","journal-title":"Transl Androl Urol"},{"issue":"1","key":"6759_CR49","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00345-025-05572-x","volume":"43","author":"OF \u00c7avdar","year":"2025","unstructured":"\u00c7avdar OF, Aydin A, Tokas T et al (2025) Residual stone fragments: systematic review of definitions, diagnostic standards. World J Urol 43(1):194. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00345-025-05572-x","journal-title":"World J Urol"},{"issue":"5","key":"6759_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"930","DOI":"10.1093\/aje\/kwab278","volume":"191","author":"G Salanti","year":"2022","unstructured":"Salanti G, Nikolakopoulou A, Efthimiou O, Mavridis D, Egger M, White IR (2022) Introducing the treatment hierarchy question in network meta-analysis. Am J Epidemiol 191(5):930\u2013938. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/aje\/kwab278","journal-title":"Am J Epidemiol"},{"issue":"S1","key":"6759_CR51","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S8","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2024.0669","volume":"39","author":"MA Awad","year":"2025","unstructured":"Awad MA, Johnson BA, Pearle MS (2025) New techniques and technologies in flexible ureteroscopy. J Endourol 39(S1):S8\u2013S17. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1089\/end.2024.0669","journal-title":"J Endourol"}],"container-title":["World Journal of Urology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00345-026-06759-6.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00345-026-06759-6","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00345-026-06759-6.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,9]],"date-time":"2026-09-09T14:31:05Z","timestamp":1788964265000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00345-026-06759-6"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,9]]},"references-count":51,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,12]]}},"alternative-id":["6759"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00345-026-06759-6","relation":{},"ISSN":["1433-8726"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1433-8726","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,9]]},"assertion":[{"value":"20 April 2026","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"31 August 2026","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"9 September 2026","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"The authors declare no conflicts of interests.","order":1,"name":"Ethics","label":"Conflict of interest","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}}],"article-number":"651"}}