{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,2]],"date-time":"2025-10-02T05:35:00Z","timestamp":1759383300532},"reference-count":25,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"8","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2009,8,1]],"date-time":"2009-08-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1249084800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Ophthalmologe"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2009,8]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s00347-009-1957-6","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2009,8,3]],"date-time":"2009-08-03T10:56:27Z","timestamp":1249296987000},"page":"709-713","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":4,"title":["Frequenzverdopplungsperimetrie"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"106","author":[{"given":"J.","family":"Lamparter","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"A.","family":"Schulze","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"E.M.","family":"Hoffmann","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2009,8,5]]},"reference":[{"key":"1957_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"4147","DOI":"10.1167\/iovs.02-1076","volume":"44","author":"Anderson","year":"2003","unstructured":"Anderson AJ, Johnson CA (2003) Frequency-doubling technology perimetry and optical defocus. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 44:4147\u20134152","journal-title":"Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci"},{"key":"1957_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2451","DOI":"10.1167\/iovs.05-0135","volume":"46","author":"Artes","year":"2005","unstructured":"Artes PH, Hutchison DM, Nicolela MT et al (2005) Threshold and variability properties of matrix frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 46:2451\u20132457","journal-title":"Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci"},{"key":"1957_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"646","DOI":"10.1167\/iovs.02-0532","volume":"44","author":"Artes","year":"2003","unstructured":"Artes PH, Nicolela MT, McCormick TA et al (2003) Effects of blur and repeated testing on sensitivity estimates with frequency doubling perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 44:646\u2013652","journal-title":"Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci"},{"key":"1957_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"184","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0420.1997.tb00121.x","volume":"75","author":"Bengtsson","year":"1997","unstructured":"Bengtsson B, Lindgren A, Heijl A et al (1997) Perimetric probability maps to separate change caused by glaucoma from that caused by cataract. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 75:184\u2013188","journal-title":"Acta Ophthalmol Scand"},{"key":"1957_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"203","DOI":"10.1097\/IJG.0b013e31815a3493","volume":"17","author":"Bozkurt","year":"2008","unstructured":"Bozkurt B, Yilmaz PT, Irkec M (2008) Relationship between humphrey 30-2 SITA standard test, matrix 30-2 threshold test and Heidelberg retina tomograph in ocular hypertensive and glaucoma patients. J Glaucoma 17:203\u2013210","journal-title":"J Glaucoma"},{"key":"1957_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"351","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0420.2006.00637.x","volume":"84","author":"Brusini","year":"2006","unstructured":"Brusini P, Salvetat ML, Zeppieri M et al (2006) Visual field testing with the new humphrey matrix: a comparison between the FDT N-30 and matrix N-30-F tests. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 84:351\u2013356","journal-title":"Acta Ophthalmol Scand"},{"key":"1957_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"314","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9394(99)00414-6","volume":"129","author":"Cello","year":"2000","unstructured":"Cello KE, Nelson-Quigg JM, Johnson CA (2000) Frequency doubling technology perimetry for detection of glaucomatous visual field loss. Am J Ophthalmol 129:314\u2013322","journal-title":"Am J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"1957_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Clement CI, Goldberg I, Graham S et al (2008) Humphrey matrix frequency doubling perimetry for detection of visual field defects in open-angle glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol (epub ahead of print)","DOI":"10.1136\/bjo.2007.119909"},{"key":"1957_CR9","first-page":"2242","volume":"40","author":"Harwerth","year":"1999","unstructured":"Harwerth RS, Carter-Dawson L, Shen F et al (1999) Ganglion cell losses underlying visual field defects from experimental glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 40:2242\u20132250","journal-title":"Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci"},{"key":"1957_CR10","unstructured":"Hodapp E, Parrish RK, Andersson DR (1993) Clinical decisions in glaucoma. CV Mosby Company, St Louis"},{"key":"1957_CR11","unstructured":"Hoffmann EM, Lamparter J, Aliyeva S et al (2009) Standard automated perimetry versus matrix frequency doubling technology in patients with ocular hypertension and healthy subjects. Poster Presentation ARVO"},{"key":"1957_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"359","DOI":"10.1097\/00006324-199506000-00003","volume":"72","author":"Johnson","year":"1995","unstructured":"Johnson CA (1995) The Glenn A. Fry Award Lecture. Early losses of visual function in glaucoma. Optom Vis Sci 72:359\u2013370","journal-title":"Optom Vis Sci"},{"key":"1957_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"571","DOI":"10.1097\/00006324-199908000-00026","volume":"76","author":"Johnson","year":"1999","unstructured":"Johnson CA, Cioffi GA, Van Buskirk EM (1999) Frequency doubling technology perimetry using a 24-2 stimulus presentation pattern. Optom Vis Sci 76:571\u2013581","journal-title":"Optom Vis Sci"},{"key":"1957_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1053","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2006.09.015","volume":"114","author":"Kim","year":"2007","unstructured":"Kim TW, Zangwill LM, Bowd C et al (2007) Retinal nerve fiber layer damage as assessed by optical coherence tomography in eyes with a visual field defect detected by frequency doubling technology perimetry but not by standard automated perimetry. Ophthalmology 114:1053\u20131057","journal-title":"Ophthalmology"},{"key":"1957_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"217","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9394(01)00969-2","volume":"132","author":"Kim","year":"2001","unstructured":"Kim YY, Kim JS, Shin DH et al (2001) Effect of cataract extraction on blue-on-yellow visual field. Am J Ophthalmol 132:217\u2013220","journal-title":"Am J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"1957_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1066","DOI":"10.1016\/S0161-6420(91)32175-4","volume":"98","author":"Lam","year":"1991","unstructured":"Lam BL, Alward WL, Kolder HE (1991) Effect of cataract on automated perimetry. Ophthalmology 98:1066\u20131070","journal-title":"Ophthalmology"},{"key":"1957_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"263","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajo.2006.10.033","volume":"143","author":"Leeprechanon","year":"2007","unstructured":"Leeprechanon N, Giangiacomo A, Fontana H et al (2007) Frequency-doubling perimetry: comparison with standard automated perimetry to detect glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 143:263\u2013271","journal-title":"Am J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"1957_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"863","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajo.2003.12.009","volume":"137","author":"Medeiros","year":"2004","unstructured":"Medeiros FA, Sample PA, Weinreb RN (2004) Frequency doubling technology perimetry abnormalities as predictors of glaucomatous visual field loss. Am J Ophthalmol 137:863\u2013871","journal-title":"Am J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"1957_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"819","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9394(98)00046-4","volume":"125","author":"Quigley","year":"1998","unstructured":"Quigley HA (1998) Identification of glaucoma-related visual field abnormality with the screening protocol of frequency doubling technology. Am J Ophthalmol 125:819\u2013829","journal-title":"Am J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"1957_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S319","DOI":"10.1016\/S0039-6257(01)00196-5","volume":"45","author":"Sample","year":"2001","unstructured":"Sample PA (2001) What does functional testing tell us about optic nerve damage? Surv Ophthalmol 45(Suppl 3):S319\u2013S324 (discussion S332\u2013314)","journal-title":"Surv Ophthalmol"},{"key":"1957_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1515","DOI":"10.1001\/archopht.1997.01100160685004","volume":"115","author":"Smith","year":"1997","unstructured":"Smith SD, Katz J, Quigley HA (1997) Effect of cataract extraction on the results of automated perimetry in glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 115:1515\u20131519","journal-title":"Arch Ophthalmol"},{"key":"1957_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1031","DOI":"10.1136\/bjo.2004.057778","volume":"89","author":"Spry","year":"2005","unstructured":"Spry PG, Hussin HM, Sparrow JM (2005) Clinical evaluation of frequency doubling technology perimetry using the Humphrey Matrix 24-2 threshold strategy. Br J Ophthalmol 89:1031\u20131035","journal-title":"Br J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"1957_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"315","DOI":"10.1097\/00061198-200208000-00007","volume":"11","author":"Spry","year":"2002","unstructured":"Spry PG, Johnson CA (2002) Within-test variability of frequency-doubling perimetry using a 24-2 test pattern. J Glaucoma 11:315\u2013320","journal-title":"J Glaucoma"},{"key":"1957_CR24","first-page":"1404","volume":"42","author":"Spry","year":"2001","unstructured":"Spry PG, Johnson CA, McKendrick AM et al (2001) Variability components of standard automated perimetry and frequency-doubling technology perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 42:1404\u20131410","journal-title":"Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci"},{"key":"1957_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"808","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1442-9071.2007.01629.x","volume":"35","author":"Zarkovic","year":"2007","unstructured":"Zarkovic A, Mora J, McKelvie J et al (2007) Relationship between second-generation frequency doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in patients with glaucoma. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 35:808\u2013811","journal-title":"Clin Experiment Ophthalmol"}],"container-title":["Der Ophthalmologe"],"original-title":[],"language":"de","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00347-009-1957-6.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00347-009-1957-6\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00347-009-1957-6","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,5,28]],"date-time":"2019-05-28T13:50:56Z","timestamp":1559051456000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00347-009-1957-6"}},"subtitle":["Neue Methode zur Untersuchung glaukomat\u00f6ser Gesichtsfeldausf\u00e4lle"],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2009,8]]},"references-count":25,"journal-issue":{"issue":"8","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2009,8]]}},"alternative-id":["1957"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00347-009-1957-6","relation":{},"ISSN":["0941-293X","1433-0423"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0941-293X","type":"print"},{"value":"1433-0423","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2009,8]]}}}