{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,9]],"date-time":"2026-10-09T00:16:35Z","timestamp":1791504995480,"version":"4.3.4"},"reference-count":38,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,17]],"date-time":"2025-03-17T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1742169600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,17]],"date-time":"2025-03-17T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1742169600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Childs Nerv Syst"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,12]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Craniopharyngiomas are rare tumors found in the suprasellar region of the brain. Untreated, they have the potential to cause debilitating complications, including vision loss and cognitive decline. Craniopharyngiomas can be resected through several surgical options including endoscopic endonasal (EEA) and open, transcranial approaches, cystic drainage, and ventricular neuroendoscopic approaches. Here, we seek to review the literature and compare characteristics of lesions resected by the EEA versus open approach.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>A comprehensive database search was performed on PubMed, Google Scholar, and Embase using key terms. Included studies utilized both EEA and open approaches for craniopharyngioma resection.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>No studies reported a significant difference in tumor location, consistency, pathology, or presence of calcification. One study reported an increased preoperative tumor volume with the open approach. The open approach was significantly associated with a longer follow-up period (4\/16) and hospital length of stay (2\/16), as well as a greater rate of recurrence (2\/16) and mortality (1\/16). New-onset diabetes insipidus (3\/16) and vision deterioration (3\/16) following surgery were significantly more common following an open approach.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Inherent in the surgical decision-making regarding approach are the anatomical considerations of the tumor. Through our literature search, we found tumors were not substantially different for the different approaches, consistent with our clinical experience. This may be related to the refinement of endonasal techniques, allowing larger, suprasellar tumors to be amenable to GTR more than in the past.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1007\/s00381-025-06788-3","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,17]],"date-time":"2025-03-17T05:39:44Z","timestamp":1742189984000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":4,"title":["Endoscopic endonasal versus open approach for craniopharyngioma treatment: a systematic review of clinical characteristics"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"41","author":[{"given":"Geena","family":"Jung","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Joshua M.","family":"Cohen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"David","family":"Oriko","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Emery","family":"Buckner-Wolfson","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Timothy","family":"Kim","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Genesis","family":"Liriano","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Andrew J.","family":"Kobets","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,17]]},"reference":[{"issue":"1","key":"6788_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"110","DOI":"10.1227\/NEU.0b013e31822e8ffc","volume":"70","author":"LZ Leng","year":"2012","unstructured":"Leng LZ, Greenfield JP, Souweidane MM, Anand VK, Schwartz TH (2012) Endoscopic, endonasal resection of craniopharyngiomas: analysis of outcome including extent of resection, cerebrospinal fluid leak, return to preoperative productivity, and body mass index. Neurosurgery 70(1):110\u2013124. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1227\/NEU.0b013e31822e8ffc","journal-title":"Neurosurgery"},{"issue":"1","key":"6788_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"799","DOI":"10.1186\/s12885-024-12548-4","volume":"24","author":"Y Xiao","year":"2024","unstructured":"Xiao Y, Wu W, Liu F et al (2024) The clinical significance of inflammatory mediators in predicting obesity and progression-free survival in patients with adult-onset Craniopharyngioma. BMC Cancer 24(1):799. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12885-024-12548-4","journal-title":"BMC Cancer"},{"issue":"1","key":"6788_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"25","DOI":"10.1515\/iss-2019-1004","volume":"6","author":"S Fujio","year":"2021","unstructured":"Fujio S, Hanada T, Yonenaga M et al (2021) Surgical aspects in craniopharyngioma treatment. Innov Surg Sci 6(1):25\u201333. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1515\/iss-2019-1004","journal-title":"Innov Surg Sci"},{"key":"6788_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"174","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2024.03.029","volume":"186","author":"KS Maddy","year":"2024","unstructured":"Maddy KS, Luther E, Ramsay IA et al (2024) Infrasellar nasopharyngeal craniopharyngiomas: an individual participant data meta-analysis and review of the literature. World Neurosurg 186:174-183.e1. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.wneu.2024.03.029","journal-title":"World Neurosurg"},{"key":"6788_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e132","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2023.02.020","volume":"173","author":"M Awad","year":"2023","unstructured":"Awad M, Butterfield JT, Dhawan S, Tyler MA, Venteicher AS (2023) Prognostic factors and treatment impact on overall survival in adult craniopharyngioma. World Neurosurg 173:e132\u2013e139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.wneu.2023.02.020","journal-title":"World Neurosurg"},{"issue":"1","key":"6788_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"18","DOI":"10.1186\/1750-1172-2-18","volume":"2","author":"MR Garnett","year":"2007","unstructured":"Garnett MR, Puget S, Grill J, Sainte-Rose C (2007) Craniopharyngioma. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2(1):18. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/1750-1172-2-18","journal-title":"Orphanet J Rare Dis"},{"issue":"1","key":"6788_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"46","DOI":"10.1007\/s11102-012-0428-2","volume":"16","author":"EM Erfurth","year":"2013","unstructured":"Erfurth EM, Holmer H, Fjalldal SB (2013) Mortality and morbidity in adult craniopharyngioma. Pituitary 16(1):46\u201355. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11102-012-0428-2","journal-title":"Pituitary"},{"issue":"4","key":"6788_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"388","DOI":"10.2478\/raon-2019-0036","volume":"53","author":"M Jensterle","year":"2019","unstructured":"Jensterle M, Jazbinsek S, Bosnjak R et al (2019) Advances in the management of craniopharyngioma in children and adults. Radiol Oncol 53(4):388\u2013396. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2478\/raon-2019-0036","journal-title":"Radiol Oncol"},{"issue":"11","key":"6788_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e32112","DOI":"10.1016\/j.heliyon.2024.e32112","volume":"10","author":"MN Alboqami","year":"2024","unstructured":"Alboqami MN, Khalid S, Albaiahy A, Bukhari BH et al (2024) Craniopharyngioma: a comprehensive review of the clinical presentation, radiological findings, management, and future perspective. Heliyon 10(11):e32112. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.heliyon.2024.e32112","journal-title":"Heliyon"},{"key":"6788_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Flitsch J, M\u00fcller HL, Burkhardt T (2011) Surgical strategies in childhood craniopharyngioma. Front Endocrin 2. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fendo.2011.00096","DOI":"10.3389\/fendo.2011.00096"},{"key":"6788_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Park HJ, Kim JW, Cho BK et al (2024) Comparison of the transcranial approach and transsphenoidal approach based on the anatomical location of origin in pediatric craniopharyngiomas. World Neurosurg S1878875024010659. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.wneu.2024.06.106","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2024.06.106"},{"key":"6788_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1274705","DOI":"10.3389\/fonc.2024.1274705","volume":"14","author":"M Schmutzer-Sondergeld","year":"2024","unstructured":"Schmutzer-Sondergeld M, Quach S, Niedermeyer S et al (2024) Risk-benefit analysis of surgical treatment strategies for cystic craniopharyngioma in children and adolescents. Front Oncol 14:1274705. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fonc.2024.1274705","journal-title":"Front Oncol"},{"key":"6788_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e367","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2017.11.004","volume":"110","author":"L Lauretti","year":"2018","unstructured":"Lauretti L, Legninda Sop FY, Pallini R, Fernandez E, D\u2019Alessandris QG (2018) Neuroendoscopic treatment of cystic craniopharyngiomas: a case series with systematic review of the literature. World Neurosurg 110:e367\u2013e373. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.wneu.2017.11.004","journal-title":"World Neurosurg"},{"key":"6788_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1401761","DOI":"10.3389\/fonc.2024.1401761","volume":"14","author":"C Hedrich","year":"2024","unstructured":"Hedrich C, Patel P, Haider L et al (2024) Feasibility, tolerability, and first experience of intracystic treatment with peginterferon alfa-2a in patients with cystic craniopharyngioma. Front Oncol 14:1401761. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fonc.2024.1401761","journal-title":"Front Oncol"},{"issue":"2","key":"6788_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"251","DOI":"10.1093\/ejendo\/lvae091","volume":"191","author":"D De Alcubierre","year":"2024","unstructured":"De Alcubierre D, Gkasdaris G, Mordrel M et al (2024) BRAF and MEK inhibitor targeted therapy in papillary craniopharyngiomas: a cohort study. Eur J Endocrinol 191(2):251\u2013261. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/ejendo\/lvae091","journal-title":"Eur J Endocrinol"},{"issue":"10","key":"6788_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2613","DOI":"10.1007\/s00381-023-06143-4","volume":"39","author":"L Massimi","year":"2023","unstructured":"Massimi L, Palombi D, Musarra A et al (2023) Adamantinomatous craniopharyngioma: evolution in the management. Childs Nerv Syst 39(10):2613\u20132632. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00381-023-06143-4","journal-title":"Childs Nerv Syst"},{"issue":"6","key":"6788_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"842","DOI":"10.3390\/brainsci13060842","volume":"13","author":"LF Figueredo","year":"2023","unstructured":"Figueredo LF, Mart\u00ednez AL, Suarez-Meade P, Marenco-Hillembrand L, Salazar AF, Pabon D, Guzm\u00e1n J, Murguiondo-Perez R, Hallak H, Godo A et al (2023) Current role of endoscopic endonasal approach for craniopharyngiomas: a 10-year systematic review and meta-analysis comparison with the open transcranial approach. Brain Sci 13(6):842. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/brainsci13060842","journal-title":"Brain Sci"},{"issue":"1","key":"6788_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"25","DOI":"10.1016\/S0090-3019(01)00657-7","volume":"57","author":"KC Wang","year":"2002","unstructured":"Wang KC, Kim SK, Choe G, Chi JG, Cho BK (2002) Growth patterns of craniopharyngioma in children: role of the diaphragm sellae and its surgical implication. Surg Neurol 57(1):25\u201333. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0090-3019(01)00657-7","journal-title":"Surg Neurol"},{"issue":"1","key":"6788_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"73","DOI":"10.3171\/jns.1996.85.1.0073","volume":"85","author":"CJ De Vile","year":"1996","unstructured":"De Vile CJ, Grant DB, Kendall BE et al (1996) Management of childhood craniopharyngioma: can the morbidity of radical surgery be predicted? J Neurosurg 85(1):73\u201381. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3171\/jns.1996.85.1.0073","journal-title":"J Neurosurg"},{"issue":"2","key":"6788_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"373","DOI":"10.3171\/2011.6.JNS081451","volume":"116","author":"BM Hofmann","year":"2012","unstructured":"Hofmann BM, H\u00f6llig A, Strauss C, Buslei R, Buchfelder M, Fahlbusch R (2012) Results after treatment of craniopharyngiomas: further experiences with 73 patients since 1997: clinical article. JNS 116(2):373\u2013384. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3171\/2011.6.JNS081451","journal-title":"JNS"},{"issue":"7","key":"6788_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1036","DOI":"10.1002\/hed.21771","volume":"34","author":"JC Fernandez-Miranda","year":"2012","unstructured":"Fernandez-Miranda JC, Gardner PA, Snyderman CH, Devaney KO, Strojan P, Su\u00e1rez C, Genden EM, Rinaldo A, Ferlito A (2012) Craniopharyngioma: a pathologic, clinical, and surgical review. Head Neck 34(7):1036\u20131044","journal-title":"Head Neck"},{"key":"6788_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e629","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2022.08.068","volume":"167","author":"A Abiri","year":"2022","unstructured":"Abiri A, Roman KM, Latif K et al (2022) Endoscopic versus nonendoscopic surgery for resection of craniopharyngiomas. World Neurosurg 167:e629\u2013e638. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.wneu.2022.08.068","journal-title":"World Neurosurg"},{"issue":"5","key":"6788_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1298","DOI":"10.3171\/2020.7.JNS20257","volume":"135","author":"J Fan","year":"2021","unstructured":"Fan J, Liu Y, Pan J et al (2021) Endoscopic endonasal versus transcranial surgery for primary resection of craniopharyngiomas based on a new QST classification system: a comparative series of 315 patients. J Neurosurg 135(5):1298\u20131309. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3171\/2020.7.JNS20257","journal-title":"J Neurosurg"},{"key":"6788_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e729","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2021.06.066","volume":"152","author":"V Govindarajan","year":"2021","unstructured":"Govindarajan V, Luther EM, Morell AA et al (2021) Perioperative complications in endoscopic endonasal versus transcranial resections of adult craniopharyngiomas. World Neurosurg 152:e729\u2013e737. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.wneu.2021.06.066","journal-title":"World Neurosurg"},{"issue":"3","key":"6788_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"627","DOI":"10.3171\/2015.3.JNS142254","volume":"124","author":"S Jeswani","year":"2016","unstructured":"Jeswani S, Nu\u00f1o M, Wu A et al (2016) Comparative analysis of outcomes following craniotomy and expanded endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal resection of craniopharyngioma and related tumors: a single-institution study. J Neurosurg 124(3):627\u2013638. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3171\/2015.3.JNS142254","journal-title":"J Neurosurg"},{"issue":"5","key":"6788_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1535","DOI":"10.1007\/s00381-021-05094-y","volume":"37","author":"BM Lehrich","year":"2021","unstructured":"Lehrich BM, Goshtasbi K, Hsu FPK, Kuan EC (2021) Characteristics and overall survival in pediatric versus adult craniopharyngioma: a population-based study. Childs Nerv Syst 37(5):1535\u20131545. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00381-021-05094-y","journal-title":"Childs Nerv Syst"},{"key":"6788_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e8","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2018.08.092","volume":"121","author":"X Li","year":"2019","unstructured":"Li X, Wu W, Miao Q et al (2019) Endocrine and metabolic outcomes after transcranial and endoscopic endonasal approaches for primary resection of craniopharyngiomas. World Neurosurg 121:e8\u2013e14. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.wneu.2018.08.092","journal-title":"World Neurosurg"},{"issue":"4","key":"6788_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1578","DOI":"10.3390\/jcm12041578","volume":"12","author":"Y Li","year":"2023","unstructured":"Li Y, Xiao Y, Wu W et al (2023) Effects of craniotomy and endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery on bodyweight in adult-onset craniopharyngioma: a single-center retrospective study. J Clin Med 12(4):1578. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/jcm12041578","journal-title":"J Clin Med"},{"issue":"3","key":"6788_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"236","DOI":"10.3171\/2019.4.PEDS18612","volume":"24","author":"PJ Madsen","year":"2019","unstructured":"Madsen PJ, Buch VP, Douglas JE et al (2019) Endoscopic endonasal resection versus open surgery for pediatric craniopharyngioma: comparison of outcomes and complications. J Neurosurg Pediatr 24(3):236\u2013245. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3171\/2019.4.PEDS18612","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Pediatr"},{"issue":"3","key":"6788_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1569","DOI":"10.1007\/s10143-020-01343-x","volume":"44","author":"S Marx","year":"2021","unstructured":"Marx S, Tsavdaridou I, Paul S et al (2021) Quality of life and olfactory function after suprasellar craniopharyngioma surgery-a single-center experience comparing transcranial and endoscopic endonasal approaches. Neurosurg Rev 44(3):1569\u20131582. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10143-020-01343-x","journal-title":"Neurosurg Rev"},{"issue":"6","key":"6788_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E7","DOI":"10.3171\/2016.9.FOCUS16299","volume":"41","author":"N Moussazadeh","year":"2016","unstructured":"Moussazadeh N, Prabhu V, Bander ED et al (2016) Endoscopic endonasal versus open transcranial resection of craniopharyngiomas: a case-matched single-institution analysis. Neurosurg Focus 41(6):E7. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3171\/2016.9.FOCUS16299","journal-title":"Neurosurg Focus"},{"key":"6788_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"755342","DOI":"10.3389\/fonc.2022.755342","volume":"12","author":"C Nie","year":"2022","unstructured":"Nie C, Ye Y, Wu J, Zhao H, Jiang X, Wang H (2022) Clinical outcomes of transcranial and endoscopic endonasal surgery for craniopharyngiomas: a single-institution experience. Front Oncol 12:755342. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fonc.2022.755342","journal-title":"Front Oncol"},{"issue":"6","key":"6788_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e572","DOI":"10.1097\/SCS.0000000000004592","volume":"29","author":"O Ozgural","year":"2018","unstructured":"Ozgural O, Kahilogullari G, Dogan I et al (2018) Single-center surgical experience of the treatment of craniopharyngiomas with emphasis on the operative approach: endoscopic endonasal and open microscopic transcranial approaches. J Craniofac Surg 29(6):e572\u2013e578. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/SCS.0000000000004592","journal-title":"J Craniofac Surg"},{"issue":"2","key":"6788_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"338","DOI":"10.1002\/lary.28063","volume":"130","author":"AK Parasher","year":"2020","unstructured":"Parasher AK, Lerner DK, Glicksman JT et al (2020) The impact of expanded endonasal skull base surgery on midfacial growth in pediatric patients. Laryngoscope 130(2):338\u2013342. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/lary.28063","journal-title":"Laryngoscope"},{"issue":"1","key":"6788_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"83","DOI":"10.1002\/lary.30313","volume":"133","author":"AK Parasher","year":"2023","unstructured":"Parasher AK, Lerner DK, Miranda SP et al (2023) In-hospital costs for open versus endoscopic endonasal approach for craniopharyngioma resection. Laryngoscope 133(1):83\u201387. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/lary.30313","journal-title":"Laryngoscope"},{"issue":"6","key":"6788_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E6","DOI":"10.3171\/2016.9.FOCUS16314","volume":"41","author":"TJ Wannemuehler","year":"2016","unstructured":"Wannemuehler TJ, Rubel KE, Hendricks BK et al (2016) Outcomes in transcranial microsurgery versus extended endoscopic endonasal approach for primary resection of adult craniopharyngiomas. Neurosurg Focus 41(6):E6. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3171\/2016.9.FOCUS16314","journal-title":"Neurosurg Focus"},{"issue":"3","key":"6788_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"325","DOI":"10.3171\/2021.10.PEDS21392","volume":"29","author":"J Wu","year":"2021","unstructured":"Wu J, Pan C, Xie S et al (2021) A propensity-adjusted comparison of endoscopic endonasal surgery versus transcranial microsurgery for pediatric craniopharyngioma: a single-center study. J Neurosurg Pediatr 29(3):325\u2013334. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3171\/2021.10.PEDS21392","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Pediatr"},{"issue":"4","key":"6788_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"371","DOI":"10.1210\/er.2006-0002","volume":"27","author":"N Karavitaki","year":"2006","unstructured":"Karavitaki N, Cudlip S, Adams CB, Wass JA (2006) Craniopharyngiomas. Endocr Rev 27(4):371\u2013397. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1210\/er.2006-0002","journal-title":"Endocr Rev"}],"container-title":["Child's Nervous System"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00381-025-06788-3.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00381-025-06788-3","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00381-025-06788-3.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,11]],"date-time":"2026-02-11T13:16:33Z","timestamp":1770815793000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00381-025-06788-3"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,17]]},"references-count":38,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,12]]}},"alternative-id":["6788"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00381-025-06788-3","relation":{},"ISSN":["0256-7040","1433-0350"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0256-7040","type":"print"},{"value":"1433-0350","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,17]]},"assertion":[{"value":"24 December 2024","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"28 February 2025","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"17 March 2025","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}}],"article-number":"131"}}